FBI: Anti-White Hate Crimes Are The Fastest Growing Racial Hate Crimes In America

The data on anti-white hate crimes may be so flawed as to be useless.

In following the news, there have been quite a few “hate crimes” against white people that were not written up as hate crimes, but rather as robberies gone bad and so forth..

Daily Caller

A new FBI report indicates that hate crimes committed against white Americans are the fastest growing racial hate crimes in the United States.

The FBI report on 2016 Hate Crime Statistics shows that in 2016, there were 876 reported anti-white hate crime offenses in the United States. In 2015, this number was 734, indicating a 19.34 percent increase.

There were more racial hate crime offenses altogether in 2016 compared to 2015.

There were 4,029 single-bias incidents that targeted “Race/Ethnicity/Ancestry” in 2015, compared to 4,229 in 2016.

Anti-Hispanic or Latino hate crimes also increased in 2016. In 2015, the number of offenses targeting Hispanic/Latino Americans was 379. In 2016, that increased to 449, an increase of 18.46 percent. Anti-Black hate crimes actually declined by three offenses.

Within religious hate crimes, there were also increases. Anti-Jewish hate crimes increased by 20 percent and anti-Islamic hate crimes increased by 26.57 percent. Anti-Catholic hate crimes also slightly increased.

Since Donald Trump’s election win, many mainstream media reports have centered on hate crimes being supposedly inspired by Donald Trump and his supporters. A number of these reports have turned out to be false.

New York Police Moving Closer to Harvey Weinstein Rape Arrest

PAZ DE LA LHUERTA. LOOKS LIKE A TRANNY.

We should all be demanding that Harvey be arrested. Maybe there’ll be a change.org petition we can sign.

Ditto Kevin Spacey.

It’s not so much that the victims are in general worthy of sympathy from the alt-right, but that Harvey’s arrogance deserves serious punishment.

Maybe, if offered a plea deal, he’ll implicate more Hollywood trash in illegal behavior.

Mannish looking actress Paz de la Huerta claims Harvey raped her. Maybe he was feeling a little homo that night. Where do these ugly actresses of today come from? Ugh!

The Independent

The New York Police Department (NYPD) have said they are investigating a “credible” rape allegation against disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein.

The force’s chief of detectives, Robert Boyce, said they were working with New York’s attorney general to gather enough evidence before obtaining an arrest warrant.

His comments came after he was asked about a claim made by former Boardwalk Empire star Paz De La Huerta that Weinstein raped her in 2010.

NYPD investigating claims Harvey Weinstein raped actor twice in 2010
Lana Del Rey retires song ‘Cola’ over Harvey Weinstein scandal
UK sex assault inquiry into Harvey Weinstein broadens
Vanity Fair magazine reported that she gave her account to the publication over the phone.

Mr Boyce said the actress came to authorities with allegations that Mr Weinstein raped her last week.

He said she had “a credible and detailed narrative” and investigators “found corroboration” of her claims.

The actress had the “ability to articulate each and every movement of the crime – where she was, where they met, where this happened and what he did”, he added.

“We have an actual case here,” he said. “We’re happy with where the investigation is right now.”

Officers were continuing to gather evidence, he added.

Police officers would need to secure a warrant to arrest Mr Weinstein and Mr Boyce said that the case was complicated by the facts that Mr Weinstein lives in another state and that the alleged crime occurred in 2010.

But he said that if the producer “was still in New York and it was recent, we would go right away and make the arrest – no doubt.”

n an interview with CBS news, Ms de la Huerta alleged that Mr Weinstein raped her twice in 2010. She described one alleged incident as occurring after Mr Weinstein drove her home from a party and said the second alleged rape occurred after he drove to her apartment, and she was too drunk to consent.

Mr Weinstein’s representative Sallie Hofmeister did not immediately respond to questions about Ms de la Paz’s claims and the NYPD’s characterisation of her case.

Mr Weinstein has faced a torrent of sexual harassment accusations in recent months, but this would be the first time he has been charged as a result. The Los Angeles Police Department confirmed last month it was investigating a separate sexual assault allegations against Mr Weinstein.

Dozens of women have accused Mr Weinstein of harassment or rape, allegations that cost the mogul his position with the Weinstein Company. Mr Weinstein has denied that non-consensual sex occurred.

Charge him. We’ll applaud.

Strangers on a Plane: Woman Caught Giving Man Oral Sex on Delta Flight

A flight to Detroit, eh?

Hmmmm.

Fox News

A man and a woman flew into some trouble Sunday night after they were reportedly caught engaging in a sexual act on a Delta flight from Los Angeles to Detroit.

The man, 28, and woman, 48, were not named, but both were issued citations, and the FBI is currently investigating the incident, according to Detoit’s WDIV-TV.

The woman was caught giving the man oral sex while the two were in their seats, the station further reported.

Both the man and woman were traveling to Detroit to catch separate connecting flights: He was going on to Miami, and she to Nashville. The two were reportedly strangers before meeting on the plane, officials told WDIV.

“The act itself is inappropriate in a public space,” one traveler told the station.

“There are children,” said another. “There are families. There are seniors. These things should be respected.”

The FBI said the investigation was underway and the two might be charged with a misdemeanor, or even a felony. The bureau said the charges could be issued as soon as Tuesday.

Delta Airlines has declined to comment on the incident.

Pat Buchanan: The Plot to Bring Down Trump

Pat Buchanan has published a 572 word article about the discredited so-called Russian Dossier that sought to destroy the Trump candidacy.

I’ll summarize the implication that Pat discreetly leaves out: Investigate former FBI Director Comey, the Clinton campaign, and the DNC. The arrest them and put them on trial.

World Net Daily

Well over a year after the FBI began investigating “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Vladimir Putin, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has brought in his first major indictment.

Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort has been charged with a series of crimes dating back years, though none is tied directly to President Donald Trump or 2016.

With a leak to CNN that indictments were coming, Mueller’s office stole the weekend headlines. This blanketed the explosive news on a separate front, as the dots began to be connected on a bipartisan plot to bring down Trump that began two years ago.

And like “Murder of the Orient Express,” it seems almost everyone on the train had a hand in the plot.

The narrative begins in October 2015.

Then it was that the Washington Free Beacon, a neocon website, engaged a firm of researchers called Fusion GPS to do deep dirt-diving into Trump’s personal and professional life – and take him out.

A spinoff of Bill Kristol’s The Weekly Standard, the Beacon is run by his son-in-law. And its Daddy Warbucks is the GOP oligarch and hedge-fund billionaire Paul Singer.

From October 2015 to May 2016, Fusion GPS dug up dirt for the neocons and never-Trumpers. By May, however, Trump had routed all rivals and was the certain Republican nominee.

So the Beacon bailed, and Fusion GPS found two new cash cows to finance its dirt-diving – the DNC and the Clinton campaign.

To keep the sordid business at arm’s length, both engaged the party’s law firm of Perkins Coie. Paid $12.4 million by the DNC and Clinton campaign, Perkins used part of this cash hoard to pay Fusion GPS.

Here is where it begins to get interesting.

In June 2016, Fusion GPS engaged a British spy, Christopher Steele, who had headed up the Russia desk at MI6, to ferret out any connections between Trump and Russia.

Steele began contacting old acquaintances in the FSB, the Russian intelligence service. And the Russians began to feed him astonishing dirt on Trump that could, if substantiated, kill his candidacy.

Among the allegations was that Trump had consorted with prostitutes at a Moscow hotel, that the Kremlin was blackmailing him, that there was provable collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

In memos from June to October 2016, Steele passed this on to Fusion GPS, which passed it on to major U.S. newspapers. But as the press was unable to verify it, they declined to publish it.

Steele’s final product, a 35-page dossier, has been described as full of “unsubstantiated and salacious allegations.”

Steele’s research, however, had also made its way to James Comey’s FBI, which was apparently so taken with it that the bureau considered paying Steele to continue his work.

About this “astonishing” development, columnist Byron York of the Washington Examiner quotes Sen. Chuck Grassley:

“The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for president in the run-up to the election raises … questions about the FBI’s independence from politics, as well as the Obama administration’s use of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political ends.”

The questions begin to pile up.

What was the FBI’s relationship with the British spy who was so wired into Russian intelligence?

Did the FBI use the information Steele dug up to expand its own investigation of Russia-Trump “collusion”? Did the FBI pass what Steele unearthed to the White House and the National Security Council?

The Hill reports that the Clinton camp’s crime was failing to disclose that money was spent on paying for the Russian dossier.

The Clinton campaign and the DNC did not comply with their legal obligation to disclose their payments to Fusion for opposition research. Instead, they concealed the fact that any payments were made to Fusion at all. Rather than disclosing the spending, the campaign and the DNC told the FEC the money had gone to their law firm, and the Clinton campaign said that it had made the payments for “legal services.”

Lock her up.

Manafort Pleads Not Guilty, Placed Under Home Detention Following Mueller’s Grand Jury Indictment

RICK GATES, LEFT, SHOWN WITH PAUL MANAFORT.

There are at least three possibilities when it comes to today’s monster story involving Paul Manafort and business associate Rick Gates turning themselves in to the FBI following an unsealing of a grand jury indictment that could put them in prison for the rest of their lives:

1. Somebody’s guilty of money laundering, a crime normally investigated by the IRS. Since the money laundering allegations in this case took place during the Obama years in the White House, one is forced to ask why there were no prior investigations of the money flows at the center of this case.

2. Special Counsel Robert Mueller is showing off, giving the public something for the $100 million this investigation is probably going to cost. Manafort and Gates will be found not guilty.

3. The purpose of the Manafort and Gates indictments is to get the two men to turn state’s evidence in order to charge higher ups with crimes. Presumably the target would be Donald Trump, but there’s a least some possibility that Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation are on Mueller’s radar screen, if he’s an honest man.

Here’s a short article that tells you what you need to know about this morning’s drama.

Fox News

Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his associate Rick Gates pleaded not guilty on Monday after being indicted on 12 counts by a federal grand jury as part of the special counsel investigation into Russian meddling and potential collusion with Trump campaign officials in the 2016 presidential election.

Manafort and Gates pleaded not guilty to all charges. A judge set bond at $10 million for Manafort, and $5 million for Gates. Both sides agreed to home detention.

The special counsel’s office told Fox News that the counts include conspiracy against the United States, conspiracy to launder money, unregistered agent of a foreign principal, false and misleading Foreign Agent Registration (FARA) statements, false statements and seven counts of failure to file reports of foreign banks and financial accounts.

Manafort and Gates appeared before Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson on Monday for their initial appearance and arraignment.

Kevin Downing, an attorney for Manafort, said outside a federal courthouse in Washington Monday that there is “no evidence” his client or the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government, claiming Manafort was “seeking to further democracy and to help the Ukraine come closer to the United States and the EU.”

The attorney added the charges related to Manafort’s offshore money transfers are “ridiculous.”

Glenn Selig, Gates’ spokesman, said in a statement Monday that Gates “welcomes the opportunity to confront these charges in court.”

“He is not going to comment further until he has had a chance to review the lengthy indictment with his legal team,” Selig said. “He would appreciate you respecting his and his family’s privacy as they weather this unexpected and hasty proceeding designed to accommodate perhaps political and press considerations rather than his right to have counsel of his choice by his side during the most troubling and challenging day for him and his loved ones.”

Selig added: “This fight is just beginning.”

According to the indictment, reviewed by Fox News, between at least 2006 and 2015, Manafort and Gates acted as unregistered agents of the Government of Ukraine, the Party of Regions, a Ukrainian political party whose leader Victor Yanukovych was president from 2010 to 2014, and the Opposition Bloc. Manafort and Gates generated tens of millions of dollars in income as a result of their work in Ukraine.

The indictment says that Manafort and Gates laundered the money through scores of the United States and foreign corporations, partnerships and bank accounts in order to hide Ukraine payments from U.S. authorities.

More than $75 million flowed through offshore accounts. Manafort, alone, laundered more than $18 million which was used by the former Trump campaign chairman to buy property, goods, and services in the U.S. Manafort concealed that income from the U.S. Treasury and the Department of Justice.

Whatever the guilt or innocence of Manafort, there’s nothing related to the charge of the Special Counsel to investigate Russian influence on the American election.

Mueller should have turned any evidence that he encountered over to the IRS for investigation. But then, Mueller’s face wouldn’t be all over the news today.

SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER.

Suspicious: Couple with Henderson ties die in crash after surviving Las Vegas shooting

This story was at the top of the Las Vegas Review-Journal website Sunday evening. It’s the latest suspicious death involving a survivor of the Las Vegas massacre.

A redditor has put together a short post that identifies at least four suspicious deaths related to the mass shooting.

Las Vegas Review Journal

They couldn’t live without each other.

When Dennis Carver realized the loud cracks weren’t fireworks but instead rapid gunfire, he jumped on top of his wife, Lorraine Carver, to shield her from the bullets.

“That’s just the kind of love they had for each other,” Brooke Carver, the couple’s oldest daughter, told the Las Vegas Review-Journal. “Their love was selfless.”

Minutes earlier, the couple had been line dancing and singing along to country performer Jason Aldean at the Route 91 Harvest music festival on Oct. 1.

It was during the third or fourth lull in gunfire when the two got up, hand in hand, and started running. They ran for their lives and didn’t stop until they got out uninjured, their daughter said.

Two days after the shooting attack, the couple, who lived in Henderson part time and owned a plumbing company, returned to their Riverside County home in California.

They would go on to spend the next two weeks more in love than ever with each other and with life.

“After the shooting, they heard from all of the people they cared about most. They were so happy,” said Brooke, 20. “The last two weeks of their lives were really just spent living in the moment.”

But on the night of Oct. 16, the couple’s younger daughter, 16-year-old Madison Carver, heard a loud bang outside her window. When she ran down the street and rounded the corner, a familiar vehicle engulfed in flames came into view. Dennis, 52, and Lorraine, 53, had died together less than half a mile from their home.

According to the Riverside County Fire Department, their vehicle crashed into a metal gate outside their community at 10:50 p.m. on the 20000 block of Avenida De Arboles. It took firefighters nearly an hour to completely put out the fire, the department said in a statement.

‘Little pieces of them’
Where others see a tragedy, the couple’s daughters see a show of love.

If they had to lose both their parents at the same time, they said they’re thankful it happened so close to the time of the Las Vegas massacre.

“We were so relieved when they got out of the shooting alive,” Brooke said. “But I also think we’ve been given little pieces of them that we would’ve never gotten if the shooting hadn’t happened right before they died.”

Their father was strong and independent and always put the people he loved first. Their mother was humble and generous and appreciated the simple things in life — like a hearty laugh or a colorful flower arrangement.

Three days after the shooting, Brooke said she was on the phone with her father. They asked about each other’s days and their plans for the weekend.

“Hey, you think I should get roses or different flowers for your mom?” her dad asked her.

There was no special occasion — no birthday, no anniversary.

“He just wanted to give my mom a reason to smile after the shooting,” she said. “I swear they were more in love those two weeks than the last 20 years.”

There’s a lot of treacle in this article designed to deflect attention away from the unbelievable circumstances under which this couple died.

The mysteries, contradictions, and suspicious behavior associated with the Las Vegas massacre are just too much to be coincidence.

So, what’s going on?

Bombshell! Oswald and His Assassin Jack Ruby Traveled Together to Cuba to Cut Sugar Cane, Spoke in “Big Bird” Code

Big Bird first appeared on Sesame Street on November 10, 1969. The phrase Big Bird would have been unusual in 1963.

However, LBJ’s wife was nicknamed Lady Bird. It’s entirely possible that LBJ could have privately been referred to as Big Bird.

Excerpt from The Sun

EXPLOSIVE JFK files have revealed that Lee Harvey Oswald and his killer Jack Ruby met in the weeks before Kennedy was assassinated.

The pair were seen together at Florida’s Key West airport in 1963 and were overheard speaking in code about “Big Bird”, according to the documents.

They were part of a group of 30 or 40 “hippie looking” people who were on their way to Cuba to cut sugar cane, airport manager George Faraldo told investigators.

This bombshell will shed new light on the truth behind JFK’s assassination and whether Oswald was to blame for the former president’s murder.

Ruby, whose real name is Jacob Rubenstein, shot dead Oswald, 24, two days after the presidential assassination in November 1963.

But just weeks before, Oswald and nightclub owner Ruby were apparently both part of a large group of “mostly young” people heading to Cuba.

RUBENSTEIN’S NIGHTCLUB WAS A STRIP JOINT.

Mr Faraldo told the FBI that Ruby and Oswald were dressed casually in a sport shirts and trousers.

The airport manager added that Ruby “spent most of the time not mingling with the group but standing against the doorway that led from the waiting area to the rear plane boarding area.”

At one point he saw Oswald approach Ruby and ask: “Have you heard anything from the Big Bird yet?”

Mr Faraldo said he was not sure what this code-word meant.

The group’s plane arrived later that evening and Mr Faraldo saw Oswald board, but he was not sure whether Ruby got on the plane.

Ruby shot dead suspected JFK killer Oswald in the abdomen at point blank range two days after the presidential assassination in Dallas, Texas, in November 1963.

Oswald was being transferred from Dallas Police Headquarters to county prison when Ruby stepped out from a crowd and shot him at close range, as millions of people watched on live TV.

Ruby, a shadowy underworld figure from Chicago, was convicted of murder in 1964.

He claimed he had simply acted out of grief and denied any involvement in a conspiracy.

The strip club owner was later found guilty of murder and sentenced to death.

He appealed but died of an illness in jail before his new trial could take place.

More sensational details around the assassination of JFK have started to emerge after a tranche of documents were released last night.

The FBI was passed information suggesting a US cop was JFK’s real assassin, according to the recently released files.

The internal document dated five months after the US president’s death details intelligence received from an informant.

It claims officer JD Tippit – who was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald around 45 minutes after Kennedy’s assassination – was the real trigger man, not Oswald.

Oswald was fingered for the killing but was himself shot dead by mafia-linked nightclub owner Jack Ruby while in police custody.

But the tip-off in the document suggests Tippit and Oswald were seen together in one of Ruby’s bars just one week before the assassination, linking all three men.

And another file claims sources close to the Soviet KGB told US spies the Russians believed Oswald was not a lone gunman.