Keira Knightly took off her shirt for a magazine to promote feminist thinking. Click to enlarge. The wet hair and hooker’s gloves suggest she’s just been having hot, steamy sex.
Yesterday I reblogged a post from Charlotte Allen’s website challenging the “feminist” motivations of British actress Keira Knightly in doing a topless photo shoot for Interview magazine.
There was some disagreement among the commenters on my site about the significance of Miss Knightly’s actions.
This post is my contribution to that discussion, which can be read by scrolling down the home page to the reblog.
First, Charlotte Allen, the blogger, is an accomplished journalist of the conservative, anti-feminist persuasion. Her thoughts are always worth reading, so much so that the Huffington Post calls her a bigot. Anyone HuffPo calls a bigot or racist is OK in my world. She committed the horrific sin of defending men, which brought HuffPo down on her head.
I’ll add that if you search for her name via a search engine, you’ll see that Miss Allen is under constant attack by liberals, egalitarians, cultural Marxists, the left in general. They hate her f*cking guts because they really can’t refute her.
Charlotte Allen–the award winning journalist hated by the anti-white, anti-heterosexual radical left.
From her Stupid Girl blog:
I’m an award-winning journalist who has published prolifically in the Weekly Standard, the Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Washington Times, Insight, City Journal, Washington Monthly, the New Republic, and the Atlantic. I’m the author of “The Human Christ: The Search for the Historical Jesus” (1998). I have a B.A. from Stanford, an M.A. from Harvard, a law degree from U.S.C., and a doctorate in medieval and Byzantine studies from the Catholic University of America.
As I recall the last line of Miss Allen’s post did not reblog to my site:
Because nothing says “My breasts are not public property” so clearly as making your breasts public property by letting everybody look at them.
Miss Allen’s point is that feminism is full of this kind of sh*tty, self-serving nonsense.
Now, on to the comments on this blog about Keira Knightly’s topless photos. First, the issue isn’t whether she has good breasts. However, if you put them out there exposed, it is natural for people to comment on their size, shape, and any other characteristic of an exposed body. Men have every right to say to HER whether they find them or her attractive because she invited it. Men have NO RIGHT to day to a woman on the street anything personal about her body.
Knightly invites criticism by being edgy, hip, with it, and feminist. She invites it by breaking a taboo in place in Western culture for centuries. That taboo against breast exposure is part of our Western civilization for a good reason. Breasts may be milkshake machines for babies but for adolescent and adult men, they are sexual. Historically, the only women exposing their breasts to the public were hookers looking for clients. It’s unreasonable for men to set aside their natural impulses and agree with the feminist position that breasts are not sexual when we know damn well in our d*cks that they are sexual.
Feminism is a movement intended to keep WHITE men’s d*cks as limp as a noodle. It ain’t workin’ with me, babe.
Another thing that needs to be said is that Knightly depends on Jew-controlled Hollywood for her living and her celebrity. Celebrity nudity is just another Talmudic trick the Hollyweird Jews have pulled out of their a**es to stupify the dumb goyim. Defending Miss Knightly is falling into the Talmudic trap. Don’t fall for it. I’m sure her Jewish masters in Tinsel Town are happy as pigs in sh*t that she showed her boobies to the world, for political reasons of course.
Miss Knightly is herself not a Jew, but she is a leftist, coming out of the cultural Marxist Hollywood/academia cabal.
Knightley is the face of an Amnesty International campaign to support human rights, marking the 60th anniversary of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In 2004, she travelled to Ethiopia alongside Richard Curtis, Sanjeev Bhaskar and Julian Metcalfe on behalf of the Comic Relief charity. She posed for photos for WaterAid in 2005 and also for the American Library Association’s “Read” campaign (a promotional poster of Pride & Prejudice). The dress she wore to the 2006 Academy Awards was donated to the charity Oxfam, where it raised £4,300.
If you love Hollyweird values, you gotta love Keira Knightly, who embodies the Talmudic Jewed goyim. If you hate Hollyweird values as much as I do, then you’d best not fall for another cultural Marxist Jew psy op.
Wait … What’s that sound? …
Oh, never mind. It’s just the ooking and eeeking of the Negro in the apartment next to mine fapping away to those pictures of Miss Knightly’s boobs. Hey, you dumb a** neighbor of mine! Didn’t you get the message? Her boobs ain’t public property. Whatsa matter? You don’t get the feminist message yet?