They are not like us. They belong in Africa.
They are not like us. They belong in Africa.
This excerpt is from Chapter 1 of the book. I’ve made no effort to clean up the formatting issues. There are 1,400 words in the excerpt. The book was published in 1947.
Although the race problem may seem to lie dormant at times, it continually exists, lives on and
on and som etim es rages w ith all the fury of a jungle beast. It gnaw s at the very vitals of our
existence, in time it w ill sap our strength and destroy the greatness of our American way of life
unless solved properly and permanently. The time has now come when we mustdevote all the
necessary efforts to set our household in order and to find a perm anent solution to this
heretofore unsolved problem .
From the time of slavery through the bloody years of the W ar Between the States and the days
when the S o u th drank from the bitter cup of Reconstruction down to the present tim e, the N egro
problem has been before the American people. It has been, and is today, our greatest domestic
problem. No other issue has been such a source ofconstant friction, has demanded so much
thought and attention, nor has lasted so long. V olum es have been w ritten, great speeches have
been made, sermons have been preached, but the Negro problem has been passed on from
generation to generation. The difficulties have increased with the passing years, the obstacles
have become so great that some students of the question have cried out in weariness and despair
that there is no solution.
W e refuse to accept a defeatist attitude. An answercan and must be found. In the past four or
five years overtwo hundred books have been written by Negroes and white Quis lings pleading
for Negro equality, while only five or six books have been w ritten in behalf of the preservation
of the w hite race and w hite suprem acy. Let those who now plead that this is not the tim e for
discussing the race question obtain any of these two hundred books or any current N egro
I’ve taken a long excerpt out of an even longer article and bolded a few key points.
If the (((System’s))) purpose of a college education today is to promote egalitarianism, it’s failing. The keyword is empathy. Whites are running out of it. Sadly, even for other whites. That has to change.
New study: White people lack empathy across the socioeconomic spectrum
Apparent empathy gap among white Americans shows up on questions of both race and economics, study finds
Since the election of Donald Trump, the hunt to figure out what’s the matter with White America has pitted racism against economic anxiety as if those things existed in separate and competing silos, forcing a narrow debate about the future of identity politics that seemingly goes nowhere. Instead of a post-racial America, two terms of America’s first black president left many voters — and a large majority of political pundits — ill-equipped to discuss what it means to be white in America at precisely the time when whites have reasserted their collective identity in this nation.
So while Trump’s rise is often explained as the blowback for a society more focused on Black Lives Matter or trans bathroom bans instead of jobs for coal miners and a growing opioid epidemic, the curious case of a growing racial empathy gap in this country has been unfairly shouldered by Trump’s white voters. An eye-opening new survey, however, reveals that white Americans across the socioeconomic spectrum, including Democrats, are considerably less concerned about both economic and racial inequality — it just all depends on where on the socioeconomic spectrum they stand.
While working-class white folks made up Trump’s signature demographic, it was a surge of whites with college degrees that helped him flip notably blue states like Pennsylvania. These college-educated white people, a new survey from the nonpartisan PRRI found, lack empathy on issues of poverty that place them in stark contrast with the blue-collar voters who have been identified as Trump’s base.
White college-educated Americans are far less likely to say poverty is a critical issue — only 37 percent, compared to 47 percent of white non-college-educated Americans and a majority of Hispanic and black Americans (at 52 and 69 percent, respectively). According to PRRI, white college-educated Americans are also less likely than non-college whites to say that children living in poverty is a critical issue to them (49 percent compared to 60 percent). Only 36 percent of college-educated whites say lack of well-paying jobs is a major problem facing communities.
The empathy gap of college-educated whites only widens in regions where Trump excelled electorally, like the Southwest and the Southeast. White college-educated residents of those regions are far less concerned than those without a college degree about the lack of equal opportunity in education. Nearly half of white college-educated respondents (46 percent) told PRRI that it is not a major problem if not everyone has an equal chance in life — a view shared by only 36 percent of those without a college education.
And it’s not just on matters of economic opportunity that white college-educated respondents exhibit a deep lack of compassion for the plight of others. Only 33 percent of white college-educated respondents said that domestic violence was a critically important issue, compared to 47 percent of whites with no college degree, and 63 percent of black respondents.
Meanwhile, white respondents without a college degree were more likely to affirm the importance of equal opportunity and to support economic policies that address those issues, but they simultaneously denied that social factors such as racism play a significant role in structuring inequality. So while 64 percent of white Americans with a college degree reported moderate to high affinity for people of color, 64 percent of whites without a college degree in the Southeast and Southwest — including 31 percent of Democrats — said discrimination against white people has become as big a problem as discrimination against blacks and other minorities. Strikingly, more than 40 percent of young white people (under age 30) in these regions agreed that discrimination against whites is as big a problem as discrimination against nonwhites.
“A central takeaway of the survey is that support for issues affecting disadvantaged kids is limited among whites at both ends of the educational spectrum,” Robert P. Jones, CEO of PRRI, explained. “But this manifests in different ways: By negative racial attitudes among the white working class and by a striking lack of concern about equal opportunity among college-educated whites.”
America’s exceptionalism has been rooted in the country’s relative lack of tribalism. That’s falling apart, and it’s not simply the fault of identity politics. Political identity and partisanship have in recent decades increasingly fused with racial, ethnic and religious identity. As PRRI noted when releasing its survey on Monday, the Republican Party is increasingly becoming a party of white evangelical Protestants, while the Democratic Party is increasingly the home of ethnic minorities and the religiously unaffiliated. College-educated whites who did not vote for Trump, with their lack of religious affiliation and apparent lack of economic empathy, are a big reason why the post-election autopsy still hasn’t concluded in the Democratic Party.
Our job here is to preach the reestablishment of empathy among whites, but only for other whites. It really won’t do that whites are not standing up for each other the way the Jews, blacks, and Mexicans do.
I found this piece of propaganda while researching this post. How obvious the bullshit!
Attention whores have always found the San Francisco area to be appealing. “San Francisco values” even has its own Wikipedia page. In the 60s the area was hippie heaven. Today, the old freaks are dying out to be replaced by a new generation of freaks. The whole area seems to enveloped in narcissism, with everyone screaming, “Look at me.”
BERKELEY, Calif. — Berkeley’s city council is looking at amending its nudity laws to allow women to go topless in public.
The issue is seen as a matter of giving women equal rights to men, who are free to go around in public without a shirt on.
Prior to 1994, it was legal for anyone to roam the streets of Berkeley naked.
It took a Cal student showing up to class naked for the city to change the law.
The naked guy subsequently killed himself. He was stone cold mentally disturbed. And yet he was allowed to attend his classes totally naked. Where were the demands for safe spaces back then? I think I would refuse to teach a class with a naked guy sitting there in front of me. Furthermore, I’d keep a spray can of Lysol handy to disinfect the area where he sat.
To this day, men can go shirtless in Berkeley while women cannot. And that’s what the council could soon change.
Several women raised the question about equalizing gender nudity laws, and Councilmember Kriss Worthington listened.
“I just don’t think Berkeley should be defining (that) women are not allowed and men are allowed,” he said.
Since Worthington proposed it, he’s been hearing from people who want him to go further by letting anybody wear their birthday suit in public.
Yuck! I hope this isn’t the start of a nationwide movement.
The proposed change applies only to public streets.
Private businesses could still refuse service to people not wearing shirts or shoes.
The city council is scheduled to take up the topless issue on Sept. 12.
I wonder what will happen to the number of rapes in the area after toplessness is legalized. Some things are better not seen in public, but only in the privacy of one’s home.
Men don’t have “titties.” Women do. There’s nothing for men to cover up. Women who don’t want to cover up are power tripping, seeking male attention just so they can complain about what ***holes men are for looking. Never trust a feminist!
Never forget, goyim, that we are all equal in every way except skin color. More photos:
The Sun offers 14 total pictures and the story to its readers. Interestingly, a neighboring tribe viewed these creatures as subhuman. If Obama were still president, I’m certain it would be a priority for bring them to the States, put them on welfare, and urge them to vote Democrat.
Watch the new Nike EQUALITY commercial, released Sunday, which has almost 2 million views already. Or read the story from the Daily Mail, if you prefer not to encourage Nike by giving it a click on youtube.
Large corporations are increasingly a propaganda arm of the (((Deep State))), promoting the equality myth that is the foundation of an increasingly sick American society.
Nike has launched its new ‘equality’ campaign by unveiling a powerful ad featuring some of the biggest US sporting stars.
The commercial, which lasts one-minute and 30 seconds and is shot entirely in black and white, features LeBron James, Serena Williams, Kevin Durant, Victor Cruz, Gabby Douglas, soccer star and LGBT activist Megan Rapinoe, and Olympic hurdler Dalilah Muhammad.
It is narrated by actor Michael B. Jordan, and includes Alicia Keys singing Sam Cooke’s ‘A Change Is Gonna Come.’
‘Is this the land history promised?’ Jordan says at the start of the short film, before it pans down from above a basketball court to show James on the other side of a wire fence.
‘Here, within these lines, on this concrete court, this patch of turf, here, you are defined by your actions.
‘Not your looks or beliefs.’
Durant, as well as others in the video, are then seen painting a white line on the ground, as Jordan continues: ‘Equality should have no boundaries.
‘The bonds we find here should run passed these lines.
‘Opportunity should not discriminate. The ball should bounce the same for everyone. Worth should outshine color.
‘If we can be equals here, we can be equals everywhere.’
That sentence I bolded is false. If Negros are superior in certain types of sports (not heavy lifting, shotput, etc.), then it does not follow that they would be superior in brain power. In fact, it seems that muscles and brains go in the opposite direction in many instances. That’s human evolution.
I suppose this commercial was produced to make blacks feel good. In that way, they’ll stupidly go out and pay $300 for a shoe that cost $5 to make, just because it’s endorsed by a black athelete.
The majority of responses to the add was positive, despite it being able to potentially be seen as political.
‘This one actually gave me goosebumps. Well done @Nike,’ Abby Milloy tweeted.
‘This isn’t a response to @UnderArmour – @Nike has been pushing equality and social justice for a minute. Bravo,’ another fan said.
‘Definitely applauding the new #Equality video by @Nike,’ one person wrote.
‘How long before white conservatives attempt to boycott @Nike for their #Equality campaign? Love this campaign,’ Anthony Nicodemo added.
But, as with all things – especially those that are perceived to be political, others took shots at Nike over the commercial.
‘No Asians. No Europeans. No Africans. No Australians. Yes, we can be equals in sport. Just not in a @Nike ad that claims so,’ Jonathan Rego tweeted about the North American campaign.
‘This is a STUPID commercial..we have Title 9. Also @Nike how equal do you pay the folks that make your products???’ another person said.
Nike said in a statement that campaign is a continuation of the organization’s desire to create a fair and respectful world – both on and off the field.
‘Nike believes in respect and equality – and that these values are worth standing up for and supporting,’ the statement read.
‘EQUALITY follows Nike’s recent announcement of its partnerships with MENTOR and PeacePlayers International, to drive change within communities.
‘Building on these partnerships, Nike will donate $5 million in 2017 to numerous organizations that advance equality in communities across the US, including MENTOR and PeacePlayers.’
MENTOR is a program that encourages people to work with their local community and to help young people, while PeacePlayers is a foundation: ‘bridging divides, developing leaders and changing perceptions’.
A wide range of thoughts crossed my mind about the commercial, all of them critical. Athlete worship, which is fairly equivalent to thug worship in America, should not be encouraged. Neither should any interest in professional sports.
Nike should be selling its shoes as the shoe for fleet of foot Negro thugs fleeing the police. That commercial would have some truthful validity to it. “In dem Nikeez I canz outwun dem po-lice.”
I wondered how the Daily Mail comments would go. They are encouraging. As I put this piece together, here are the comments displayed, preserved in case the DM deletes them.
The comments below have not been moderated.
Lordburger, columbus, United States, 7 minutes ago
What a load of horse pockey, being equal would require a certain bit of assimilation, are you willing to do that?
Lordburger, columbus, United States, 10 minutes ago
Well its one thing to want to be equal, you have to act and actually be equal also.
Stamford Bridge Guy, London, United Kingdom, about an hour ago
Aren’t 80 or 90% of the NBA players b l a c k?
American Chrome, Duluth, United States, about 2 hours ago
Michael Jordan inconspicuously missing. For him. Money over principles.
Buccaneer10, Wales, United Kingdom, about 2 hours ago
You have to laugh at Nike championing equality whilst stashing billions in profits abroad to avoid tax on products made in sweatshops in Asia by people paid a couple of dollars a day.
ShockedndAwed, Singapore, Singapore, about 2 hours ago
Conductor Spaulding, Currently in Orbit, United States, about 3 hours ago
So we’ll be ending “affirmative action”?
dasdonkey, Riverside, United States, about 4 hours ago
Johnny_Vella, Los Angeles, United States, about 5 hours ago
I agree that we should all be treated equally. Looking forward to to abolishing of Af’fir’mat’ive Act’ion.
Johnny_Vella, Los Angeles, United States, about 5 hours ago
I agree. We should all be considered Americans. The Democrats need to stop trying to divide and categorize us every way possible.
Sunnyinfla, usa, about 6 hours ago
HOW is this equal? HOW is this diverse? This only causes more diversion and animosity. NIKE, stop playing your customers, this is GREED riding on the coattails of other’s suffering. #pathetic #appalling #notfoolinganyone
Technically, Woody Hart retired, but for all practical purposes he was fired.
Because he “retired,” he has no legitimate grounds for a lawsuit. Always make them fire you.
After you read this story, contrast the outcome to the story of the nonwhite Texas teacher who shot a picture of Donald Trump with a squirt gun, while saying something really bad.
FOLSOM, Calif. (KCRA) —
A Folsom teacher accused of “racially insensitive behavior” has retired, the Folsom Cordova Unified School District said at a board meeting Thursday night.
“(Thursday) in closed session, the Board of Education accepted this Sutter Middle School teacher’s retirement … and he will not be returning to school this year,” Superintendent Deborah Bettencourt said in a statement Thursday.
Sutter Middle School teacher Woody Hart, who has been with the district since 1999, has come under fire twice since November.
After a Confederate flag was found hanging in his classroom Tuesday night, Hart was placed on paid administrative leave Wednesday.
“We recognize that regardless of context, to many of our students, families, and staff, the Confederate flag is a racist symbol of hate,” the school district said in a statement Wednesday.
The flag was hanging in a classroom across from a Civil War Union flag, “potentially in preparation of a history activity,” the district said. It was taken down before class began Wednesday.
“We just came in and we saw the Union flag on one side of the room and the Confederate flag on the other side of the room,” Hart’s student Ana Kneisley said.
Kneisley pointed out the Confederate flag is in her text book and said the hanging flags were part of a lesson, where students were members of the two armies.
“I actually very much appreciated the way he taught history,” Kneisley said. “I felt that we were getting more involved than what our other classes did.”
In November, a family filed a complaint against the same teacher for “making an inappropriate lynching analogy” during a lesson, the school district said.
According to the family, when the teacher was asked to give an example of equality, he said, “When you hang one black person, you’d have to hang them all. That is equality.”
During the investigation, the teacher told administrators that statement was made in the context of how Southerners would respond to people who went to the South to promote equal rights for African-Americans. He said the Southerners would respond, “We treat them all equally. We hang them.”
Bettencourt said in her statement that anytime a teacher or staff member is accused of racially insensitive conduct, the school has to investigate the claims.
“We do not want to limit the free speech of our teachers,” she said.
“Our expectations, however, are that teachers and staff will do this work using culturally appropriate strategies,” she added.
Yes, it is pathetic and deplorable that an elderly white male teacher has been sacrificed to the altar of political correctness. You really have to stretch to placate the Negro gods in this case.
A true ethnic cleansing of whites has been underway in this country for decades, but really ramped up with the election of Barack Insane Obama. It’s unclear whether Donald Trump can change the culture enough to stop this madness.
Roles have been reversed from history. Today, every white person is a slave to the Negro-worshiping enemy occupational government in Washington. As slaves, we pay tribute to our black slave masters in many ways, including by paying about half our incomes in taxes to various governments.
It won’t be long before we’ll be forced to address the sacred Nagger as “Massa.” “Yes, massa, what ever youz sayz.”