Britain’s Sun Features Photo Essay on Primitive Monkey-Eating African Baka Tribe

AFRICA’S BAKA TRIBE.

Never forget, goyim, that we are all equal in every way except skin color. More photos:

The Sun offers 14 total pictures and the story to its readers. Interestingly, a neighboring tribe viewed these creatures as subhuman. If Obama were still president, I’m certain it would be a priority for bring them to the States, put them on welfare, and urge them to vote Democrat.

this-is-racist-even-a-monkey-should-be-allowed-to-own-a-nigger_o_5440001

New “Equality has no Boundaries” Nike Commericial Uses Negroid Sports Stars to Promote Myth of Black Equality

Watch the new Nike EQUALITY commercial, released Sunday, which has almost 2 million views already. Or read the story from the Daily Mail, if you prefer not to encourage Nike by giving it a click on youtube.

Large corporations are increasingly a propaganda arm of the (((Deep State))), promoting the equality myth that is the foundation of an increasingly sick American society.

Daily Mail

Nike has launched its new ‘equality’ campaign by unveiling a powerful ad featuring some of the biggest US sporting stars.

The commercial, which lasts one-minute and 30 seconds and is shot entirely in black and white, features LeBron James, Serena Williams, Kevin Durant, Victor Cruz, Gabby Douglas, soccer star and LGBT activist Megan Rapinoe, and Olympic hurdler Dalilah Muhammad.
It is narrated by actor Michael B. Jordan, and includes Alicia Keys singing Sam Cooke’s ‘A Change Is Gonna Come.’

SERENA WILLIAMS.

‘Is this the land history promised?’ Jordan says at the start of the short film, before it pans down from above a basketball court to show James on the other side of a wire fence.

‘Here, within these lines, on this concrete court, this patch of turf, here, you are defined by your actions.
‘Not your looks or beliefs.’

Durant, as well as others in the video, are then seen painting a white line on the ground, as Jordan continues: ‘Equality should have no boundaries.

‘The bonds we find here should run passed these lines.

‘Opportunity should not discriminate. The ball should bounce the same for everyone. Worth should outshine color.

‘If we can be equals here, we can be equals everywhere.’

That sentence I bolded is false. If Negros are superior in certain types of sports (not heavy lifting, shotput, etc.), then it does not follow that they would be superior in brain power. In fact, it seems that muscles and brains go in the opposite direction in many instances. That’s human evolution.

I suppose this commercial was produced to make blacks feel good. In that way, they’ll stupidly go out and pay $300 for a shoe that cost $5 to make, just because it’s endorsed by a black athelete.

The majority of responses to the add was positive, despite it being able to potentially be seen as political.

‘This one actually gave me goosebumps. Well done @Nike,’ Abby Milloy tweeted.

‘This isn’t a response to @UnderArmour – @Nike has been pushing equality and social justice for a minute. Bravo,’ another fan said.

‘Definitely applauding the new #Equality video by @Nike,’ one person wrote.

‘How long before white conservatives attempt to boycott @Nike for their #Equality campaign? Love this campaign,’ Anthony Nicodemo added.

But, as with all things – especially those that are perceived to be political, others took shots at Nike over the commercial.

‘No Asians. No Europeans. No Africans. No Australians. Yes, we can be equals in sport. Just not in a @Nike ad that claims so,’ Jonathan Rego tweeted about the North American campaign.

‘This is a STUPID commercial..we have Title 9. Also @Nike how equal do you pay the folks that make your products???’ another person said.

Nike said in a statement that campaign is a continuation of the organization’s desire to create a fair and respectful world – both on and off the field.

‘Nike believes in respect and equality – and that these values are worth standing up for and supporting,’ the statement read.

‘EQUALITY follows Nike’s recent announcement of its partnerships with MENTOR and PeacePlayers International, to drive change within communities.

‘Building on these partnerships, Nike will donate $5 million in 2017 to numerous organizations that advance equality in communities across the US, including MENTOR and PeacePlayers.’

MENTOR is a program that encourages people to work with their local community and to help young people, while PeacePlayers is a foundation: ‘bridging divides, developing leaders and changing perceptions’.

A wide range of thoughts crossed my mind about the commercial, all of them critical. Athlete worship, which is fairly equivalent to thug worship in America, should not be encouraged. Neither should any interest in professional sports.

Nike should be selling its shoes as the shoe for fleet of foot Negro thugs fleeing the police. That commercial would have some truthful validity to it. “In dem Nikeez I canz outwun dem po-lice.”

I wondered how the Daily Mail comments would go. They are encouraging. As I put this piece together, here are the comments displayed, preserved in case the DM deletes them.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Lordburger, columbus, United States, 7 minutes ago
What a load of horse pockey, being equal would require a certain bit of assimilation, are you willing to do that?
ReplyNew03Rated

Lordburger, columbus, United States, 10 minutes ago
Well its one thing to want to be equal, you have to act and actually be equal also.
ReplyNew03Rated

Stamford Bridge Guy, London, United Kingdom, about an hour ago
Aren’t 80 or 90% of the NBA players b l a c k?
ReplyNew015Rated

American Chrome, Duluth, United States, about 2 hours ago
Michael Jordan inconspicuously missing. For him. Money over principles.
ReplyNew09Rated

Buccaneer10, Wales, United Kingdom, about 2 hours ago
You have to laugh at Nike championing equality whilst stashing billions in profits abroad to avoid tax on products made in sweatshops in Asia by people paid a couple of dollars a day.
ReplyNew021Rated

ShockedndAwed, Singapore, Singapore, about 2 hours ago
Perfect!
03Rated

Conductor Spaulding, Currently in Orbit, United States, about 3 hours ago
So we’ll be ending “affirmative action”?
ReplyNew229Rated

dasdonkey, Riverside, United States, about 4 hours ago
Pandering.
ReplyNew229Rated

Johnny_Vella, Los Angeles, United States, about 5 hours ago
I agree that we should all be treated equally. Looking forward to to abolishing of Af’fir’mat’ive Act’ion.
ReplyNew241Rated

Johnny_Vella, Los Angeles, United States, about 5 hours ago
I agree. We should all be considered Americans. The Democrats need to stop trying to divide and categorize us every way possible.
ReplyNew035Rated

Sunnyinfla, usa, about 6 hours ago
HOW is this equal? HOW is this diverse? This only causes more diversion and animosity. NIKE, stop playing your customers, this is GREED riding on the coattails of other’s suffering. #pathetic #appalling #notfoolinganyone

Outrageous! California Teacher Fired for Using Confederate Flag in History Lesson

Technically, Woody Hart retired, but for all practical purposes he was fired.

Because he “retired,” he has no legitimate grounds for a lawsuit. Always make them fire you.

After you read this story, contrast the outcome to the story of the nonwhite Texas teacher who shot a picture of Donald Trump with a squirt gun, while saying something really bad.

FOLSOM, Calif. (KCRA) —
A Folsom teacher accused of “racially insensitive behavior” has retired, the Folsom Cordova Unified School District said at a board meeting Thursday night.

“(Thursday) in closed session, the Board of Education accepted this Sutter Middle School teacher’s retirement … and he will not be returning to school this year,” Superintendent Deborah Bettencourt said in a statement Thursday.

Sutter Middle School teacher Woody Hart, who has been with the district since 1999, has come under fire twice since November.

After a Confederate flag was found hanging in his classroom Tuesday night, Hart was placed on paid administrative leave Wednesday.

“We recognize that regardless of context, to many of our students, families, and staff, the Confederate flag is a racist symbol of hate,” the school district said in a statement Wednesday.

The flag was hanging in a classroom across from a Civil War Union flag, “potentially in preparation of a history activity,” the district said. It was taken down before class began Wednesday.

“We just came in and we saw the Union flag on one side of the room and the Confederate flag on the other side of the room,” Hart’s student Ana Kneisley said.

Kneisley pointed out the Confederate flag is in her text book and said the hanging flags were part of a lesson, where students were members of the two armies.

“I actually very much appreciated the way he taught history,” Kneisley said. “I felt that we were getting more involved than what our other classes did.”

In November, a family filed a complaint against the same teacher for “making an inappropriate lynching analogy” during a lesson, the school district said.

According to the family, when the teacher was asked to give an example of equality, he said, “When you hang one black person, you’d have to hang them all. That is equality.”

During the investigation, the teacher told administrators that statement was made in the context of how Southerners would respond to people who went to the South to promote equal rights for African-Americans. He said the Southerners would respond, “We treat them all equally. We hang them.”

Bettencourt said in her statement that anytime a teacher or staff member is accused of racially insensitive conduct, the school has to investigate the claims.

“We do not want to limit the free speech of our teachers,” she said.

“Our expectations, however, are that teachers and staff will do this work using culturally appropriate strategies,” she added.

this-ii-pathetic-gif

thats-deplorable

Yes, it is pathetic and deplorable that an elderly white male teacher has been sacrificed to the altar of political correctness. You really have to stretch to placate the Negro gods in this case.

A true ethnic cleansing of whites has been underway in this country for decades, but really ramped up with the election of Barack Insane Obama. It’s unclear whether Donald Trump can change the culture enough to stop this madness.

Roles have been reversed from history. Today, every white person is a slave to the Negro-worshiping enemy occupational government in Washington. As slaves, we pay tribute to our black slave masters in many ways, including by paying about half our incomes in taxes to various governments.

It won’t be long before we’ll be forced to address the sacred Nagger as “Massa.” “Yes, massa, what ever youz sayz.”

Richard Spencer’s Jewish Mentor Paul Gottfried–Godfather of the Alt-Right

PAT BUCHANAN, PAUL GOTTFRIED, AND RICHARD SPENCER.

The full history of Paul Gottfried, conservatism, and the alt-right offered at the link below is significantly longer than the excerpt presented here. It’s well worth the read if you care to understand where Richard Spencer came from and how the alt-right evolved.

This excerpt has 1250 words, which is about twice as long as most posts.

Excerpt from (Jewish) Tablet Magazine

Gottfried doesn’t resolve the alt-right’s contradictions so much as he embodies them. He’s a sniffy traditionalist, a self-described “Robert Taft Republican,” with a classical liberal bent, and a Nietzschean American nationalist who goes out of his way to exaggerate his European affect. He opposes both the Civil Rights Act and white nationalism. He’s a bone-deep elitist and the oracle of what’s billed as a populist revolt. “If someone were to ask me what distinguishes the right from the left,” Gottfried wrote in 2008, “the difference that comes to mind most readily centers on equality. The left favors that principle, while the right regards it as an unhealthy obsession.”

Inequality is the alt-right’s foundational belief. In this view, there are inherent, irreducible differences not only between individuals but between groups of people—races, genders, religions, nations; all of the above. These groups each have their own distinctive characteristics and competitive advantages; accordingly, inequality is natural and good, while equality is unnatural and therefore bad and can only be imposed by force. In practice, it is typically a belief in white supremacy and a rejection of universalism.

To the ancient idea that the world is ordered by natural hierarchies the alt-right adds new wrinkles. It shows a nerdish enthusiasm for data-driven attempts to classify group cognitive abilities, an update on the social Darwinist “race science” popular before WWII that often resolves into a genes-are-destiny outlook. It also embraces concepts from the controversial field of evolutionary psychology, which attempts to explain the behavior of groups in terms of Darwinian natural selection. Because equality is both impossible and a kind of civic religion as Gottfried sees it, government attempts to enforce it are only pretexts for the state to increase its power and reach.

Continue reading

Feminists Are Useful Idiots, And Doomed. Must Watch.

Thirty years ago a Russian defector described the process by which the leftists were subverting the West. In spite of the age of the interview, the ideas are fresh today.

Published on May 22, 2013

Feminists and other leftists are useful idiots who serve only to destabilise the society. When the goal is reached, they will be “lined up against the wall”.
1984 interview with a former KGB agent and Soviet diplomat, Yuri Bezmenov.

Fight or Die: Hillary Says We “Irredeemable” Ones are Not America

trump heroic

In this post I’ve condensed Gregory Hood’s latest piece, called simply “Irredeemable.” He’s the finest writer the alt-right offers today.

Condensed from Radix Journal

Sun Tzu famously advised leaving a line of retreat to your enemies even when you have them surrounded. After all, you don’t want them fighting to the bitter end. You want them to see there is an alternative to death.

Hillary Clinton has provided us no such option. Her recent comments should not be a subject for laughter or mockery. They are a deeply ominous warning to every one of us.

Where Hillary really showed her hand was in characterizing “some of those folks” as “irredeemable.” “Irredeemable” means there is nothing they – we – can do to be regarded as part of American society, to be citizens like everyone else with certain inherent rights. As Clinton put it, we are “not America.” We are simply an enemy to be destroyed.

At some level, we already know this.

We are hated for who we are, for our immutable, unchangeable characteristics. We aren’t just the Alt Right, we are the only alternative to the entire System, the one group which can never be assimilated or accepted by them. Unless you consciously decide to work for your people’s destruction, you are an enemy, a kulak, an unperson. All Whites are racist, all non-white failings can be blamed on racism, and there is no salvation in this new theocracy. That is the essence of what it is to be “irredeemable.”

DEPLORABLE AND IRREDEEMABLE TO HILLARY AND THE MSM.
donald-trump-supporters irredeemable

Continue reading

BLM has Just Delivered Their 10-Point Manifesto and This is What They Want

black against fire

Reading these demands, I’m reminded of a phrase, “Just say no.”

Excerpt from Puckermob

Black Lives Matter (BLM), the activist group that campaigns agasint police brutality and racial injutice, have just come out with their plan to help fix the issues that plague police forces up and down the country.

Their plan – “Campaign Zero” – focuses on 10 points where they would like the law to change. They believe that these changes will help stop racial profiling and lessen the dangers everyday citizens face when dealing with the police.

The danger just mentioned doesn’t come from dealing with the police. The danger to all races comes from interactions with blacks, primarily younger black males.

There’s a much simpler plan to keep the public safe than offered by BLM, but first let’s consider their demands.

To get an idea of what they are asking for we thought we’d provide a breakdown of their plan:

1. End “broken windows” policing, which aggressively polices minor crimes in an attempt to stop larger ones.

“Broken windows” policing is the idea that vigorously enforcing small crimes (like vandalism) will prevent larger crimes from happening. This law has allowed police to increase “stop and frisks”, which BLM claims enables racial stereotyping. They argue that Black men and women are unfairly targeted by police using this law as an excuse, and that this policy ultimately led to the death of Eric Garner (remember the guy that was choked to death after he was caught selling loose cigarettes). This is their first point in their plan, and probably the most controversial.

2. Use community oversight for misconduct rather than having the police department decide what consequences officers should face.

Rather than the police deciding how an officer is punished after they’ve committed a crime (like when an officer who caused a death is ‘punished’ by being put on paid leave for six months), they want an independent group to review all cases and dole out the punishments. Since, you know, the police department might be a tad on biased.

3. Make standards for reporting police use of deadly force.

A lot of reports of police using deadly force aren’t released to the public. This skews the statistics when it comes down to who died by police hands and it leaves the public in the dark about how the police operate. BLM want to standardize the reporting methods and make the whole process more transparent.

4. Independently investigate and prosecute police misconduct.

Much like point two, BLM doesn’t want the police investigating crimes committed by the police since it’s proven to be a recipe for trouble. Instead, they want an independently run government body to investigate whether or not an officer has violated the law. The short version: if a cop shoots someone, someone other than the cops should look into the case to see if that shooting was lawful.

5. Have the racial makeup of police departments reflect the communities they serve.

This one is simple enough to ask for, harder to carry out in practice. BLM want the police force to be racially representative of the areas they protect. If a community is 50% Black, 30% Hispanic, and 20% White, they want to see a police force that reflects those demographics. Hypothetically, for every two White officers they’d hire, they’d also hire five Black officers and three Hispanic officers.

Read points 6 through 10 at the link.

Whatever you think of BLM’s 10 point plan, why should that Marxist terrorist group funded by (((George Soros))) be driving any conversation about how policing is conducted.

BLM wants only black voices to have input into this process, which is racist, is it not?

My own simple plan to improve police-community relations: Lock up all young blacks and throw away the key. Put them to work in chain gangs so that they earn their keep.

Then we’d have public safety par excellence.

black chain gang

History teaches us that if the demands from BLM are met, there will be more demands afterward. They will never stop until a Communist state exists that enslaves everyone in the name of equality.