Official Trailer: Get Me Roger Stone

Opinions about Roger Stone are flying fast and furious on youtube. From the youtube information box, we learn:

Published on Mar 29, 2017

The whole world was shocked by the rise Donald Trump, but there was one man who had been plotting it for years: Roger Stone. Diving deep into the mind of the master manipulator, Get Me Roger Stone provides a raw perspective on the transformation of American politics. Coming exclusively to Netflix on May 12, 2017.

President Donald Trump seems to have distanced himself from the controversial Stone, who has used the word “Negro” and thus gotten himself banned from CNN and MSNBC. Stone remains close to Alex Jones.

Wikipedia

n the first grade, Stone claims, he broke into politics to further John F. Kennedy’s presidential campaign: “I remember going through the cafeteria line and telling every kid that Nixon was in favor of school on Saturdays… It was my first political trick”.[17]

When he was a junior and vice president of the student government at a high school in northern Westchester County, New York, he manipulated the ouster of the president and succeeded him. Stone recalled how he ran for election as president for his senior year:

“I built alliances and put all my serious challengers on my ticket. Then I recruited the most unpopular guy in the school to run against me. You think that’s mean? No, it’s smart.”[18]

Given a copy of Barry Goldwater’s Conscience of a Conservative, Stone became a convert to conservatism as a child and a volunteer in Goldwater’s 1964 campaign. In 2007, Stone indicated that he was a staunch conservative but with libertarian leanings.[17]

During the 2016 election cycle, Stone was banned from appearing on CNN and MSNBC after making a series of offensive Twitter posts disparaging other television personalities.[60] Stone specifically referred to a CNN commentator as an “Entitled Diva Bitch” and imagined her “killing herself”, and called another CNN personality a “stupid negro” and a “fat negro”.[61]

Stone’s Tweets tend to be combative:

Huma Can’t Get Enough (((Weiner)))

Weekends are tough. There’s not much to write about, so here I am on a Saturday night forced to push out gossip about two of my least favorite people.

Excerpt from the New York Post

After years of public humiliation by her sext-a-holic husband, Anthony Weiner, 40-year-old Abedin finally separated from the former congressman in August, one day after The Post reported that he had sent yet another explicit photo to a woman — this one showing his toddler son asleep beside him.

But sources tell The Post that Hillary Clinton’s righthand woman is now giving the marriage another try.

“Huma has been working hard on her relationship with Anthony,” said a source close to the Abedin family. “He has been spending 80 to 90 percent of his time at the [Irving Place apartment] they share . . . If there is a disagreement, he goes to his mother’s apartment in Brooklyn.

“Both [his and her] families are hoping they will reconcile.”

Another source, who worked closely with Bill and Hillary Clinton for several years, corroborates this, saying the breakup was “more for optics for the campaign and [under] pressure from Hillary’s camp.”

It’s hard to believe a reconciliation is under consideration given how many times Weiner has betrayed his wife.

In May 2011, he accidentally tweeted out a photo of his erect penis in boxer briefs that he apparently meant to send privately to a college student. Asked about the tweet, he initially denied sending it. Two weeks later, Weiner resigned from Congress as more women with more photos emerged.

While Weiner was running for mayor in 2013, additional sexts and photos came out, posted under the alias “Carlos Danger.” Refusing to withdraw from the race, he came in fifth place with a mere 4.9 percent of the vote.

As his wife led Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, even more sexts were uncovered. Last September, the Daily Mail alleged that Weiner had sent ­X-rated messages to a 15-year-old girl. The next month, Abedin was sucked into the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s e-mails after her then-estranged husband’s laptop was seized.

Despite all of this, the family friend said, the couple is still in love. They blame “the pressures of the campaign and presidential race . . . and him drifting off into obscurity” for Weiner’s most recent relapse, the friend added.

The friend said that since completing outpatient therapy for sex addiction last fall, Weiner has been continuing treatment in New York City.

“A lot of [their] friends believe this is an illness, that he is sick,” said the friend. But “Huma takes it into consideration that there’s been no affair, or physical contact that anybody is aware of. He never met [the women].”

Fake marriage? Fake news? I don’t know and don’t care that much. Someone in the Deep State thinks that the image of a Jew married to a Muslim promotes their cause.

The thing about Weiner is his actions toward a 15 year old girl, which I believe resulted in him having nude pictures of her on his computer. Isn’t that child porn by law?

Shouldn’t Weiner be under indictment? You know that he knows where the skeletons are buried. It wouldn’t surprise anyone if he ends up a suicide with two bullets to the back of the head.

Be careful, Weiner. Huma is probably setting you up.

BOMBSHELL: CIA Whistleblower Leaked Proof Trump Under “Systematic Illegal” Surveillance Over Two Years Ago: FBI Sat On It

Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery allegedly has 47 hard drives and 600 million pages of documents that prove that President Donald Trump was correct about being illegaly wiretapped by President Obama.

The illegal operations against Trump were started in 2004. Trump was not the only target. Dozens of others were also illegally spied on, including members of the Supreme Court.

Judicial Watch claims that the FBI has had this information for two years but has sat on it. If true, that would make FBI Director James Comey a criminal.

When Rep. Devin Nunes dropped his bombshell about Trump being surveilled yesterday (scroll down on the homepage to the next post), this information may be what he was alluding to. The letter reproduced at the bottom of this post shows that Judicial Watch told Nunes two days ago that if he did not go public with the story, that it would.

Zerohedge

The same day House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes gave a press conference disclosing that President Trump had been under “incidental surveillance [4],” Attorney and FreedomWatch Chairman, Larry Klayman, sent a letter to the House Committee on Intelligence imploring them to pursue the claims and evidence presented under oath at a Washington DC FBI Field Office by his client – CIA / NSA Whistleblower Dennis Montgomery – who Klayman claims “holds the keys to disproving the false claims… …that there is no evidence that the president and his men were wiretapped”

When Montgomery attempted to deliver this information through the appropriate channels two years ago, the former CIA and NSA contractor wasn’t given the time of day:

[W]hen Montgomery came forward as a whistleblower to congressional intelligence committees and various other congressmen and senators, including Senator Charles Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who, like Comey, once had a reputation for integrity, he was “blown off;” no one wanted to even hear what he had to say.

WND notes that if the story told by Judicial Watch and Dennis Montgomery are true, then the statements made by FBI Director Comey on Monday before Congress were “false.”

JAMES COMEY MIGHT HAVE A LOT TO BE WORRIED ABOUT.

Continue reading

House Intel chairman: Trump’s personal communications may have been collected

DEVIN NUNES, CHAIR, HOUSE INTEL COMMITTEE.

A bombshell was dropped on Washington politics on Wednesday by House Intelligence Committee chair Devin Nunes.

President Trump’s communications were the subject of “incidental collection” according to Rep. Nunes.

Which translated into reality means that somebody was getting everything they could on Trump in order to smear him or blackmail him into following the New World Order agenda.

CNN

House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes said Wednesday that President Donald Trump’s personal communications may have been picked up by investigators through “incidental collection.”

Nunes said at a news conference he discovered the potential surveillance of Trump himself while reviewing intelligence reports, but said it was not related to Russia.

“This is a normal, incidental collection, based on what I could collect,” Nunes said. “This appears to be all legally collected foreign intelligence under” the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Nunes said he alerted House Speaker Paul Ryan about the collection and is traveling to the White House Wednesday afternoon.

“I’m actually alarmed by it,” Nunes said.

Asked whether he felt vindicated by Nunes’ comments, Trump told reporters in a brief exchange he felt “somewhat” vindicated.

Democrats on the committee appeared blindsided by Nunes’ announcement. Rep. Jim Himes said he spoke with ranking Democratic member Adam Schiff, and that neither of them are familiar with the evidence Nunes is citing.

Nunes is chairing the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Russian meddling into the US election last year. Two weeks ago, Trump asked Congress to investigate whether Trump Tower was wiretapped by his predecessor, then-President Barack Obama.

On Monday, Nunes’ committee held a hearing featuring FBI Director James Comey and National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers. At that hearing, Comey confirmed for the first time that his agency is investigating possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign and whether any crimes may have been committed during last year’s election campaign as part of a wider probe into the hacking of Democratic servers and the Clinton campaign.

Also at that hearing, Comey said he had seen no evidence so far of the specific allegation of wiretapping Trump Tower.

Nunes did not know whether the “incidental collection” happened at Trump Tower, and could not say for certain whether Trump’s communications were directly collected.

Nunes said the collection included Trump transition officials and that it happened after the election. He said he could not say whether it meant that Trump was “spied on”

“I’m not going to get into legal definitions, but clearly I have a concern,” he said.

As all of the confusing stories break out in the media about Trump, the Russians, wiretapping, blah, blah, blah, try to remember at least one thing: (((They))) want us confused.

The simple take away from yesterday’s explosive revelation is that we already knew in our hearts that the Deep State spies on everybody, so why not Donald Trump, the one man who might be able to throw a monkey wrench into their cushy, comfortable old boys club.

The unasked question that the media will avoid like the plague: What did Obama know and when did he know it? Were Obama’s actions legal or illegal?

Obama picked a good time to spend a month in Tahiti.

Richard Spencer’s National Policy Institute Stripped of Tax Exempt Status by IRS

RICHARD SPENCER. THE YOUNG REBEL.

Richard Spencer needs to learn from Jared Taylor how to run a think tank. It’s simply unimaginable to think that Taylor’s Amren would be careless enough to let its tax-exempt status lapse.

MIC

White supremacist organizer Richard Spencer has collided with something that might smart a little more than a punch to the face: The revocation of his organization’s tax-exempt status by the IRS.

The Los Angeles Times reported Monday evening that Spencer’s National Policy Institute, the quasi-academic think tank behind a notorious Washington, D.C., conference in November, has lost its tax-exempt status after the paper inquired whether Spencer had filed proper paperwork to fundraise in Virginia.

After Spencer took helm of the organization in 2011, the National Policy Institute apparently stopped filing its required IRS returns in 2012 and did not do so for the next three years. Any organization that fails file tax returns for three years automatically loses its tax-exempt status under IRS rules. The IRS stripped the National Policy Institute of its tax-exempt status retroactively as of May 15, 2016, the date NPI’s 2015 return would have been due.

Virginia charity regulators have additionally “removed the entry for the National Policy Institute from their public database of nonprofits and began a review, which remained active as of Monday,” the Times reported.

The Times also inquired whether Spencer’s repeated endorsements of President Donald Trump and solicitation of funds to “fight against Hillary Clinton” would have violated 501(c)(3) nonprofit rules prohibiting partisan speech “in official organization publications or at official functions of the organization.” But Louisiana State University law professor and former IRS attorney Philip T. Hackney told Times “as a technical matter, they can’t have violated the provision, because they weren’t a charity anyway.”

However, the political comments may come back into play if Spencer asks the IRS to reinstate its tax-exempt status, which is not automatic and requires IRS review.

Spencer’s defense was not exactly encouraging. “I don’t know what to say,” he said to the Los Angeles Times. “I don’t want to make a comment because I don’t understand this stuff. It’s a bit embarrassing, but it’s not good. We’ll figure it out.”

I am not an attorney although I’ve spent more than enough on them to pay my way through law school. In my opinion, Richard’s likes of Trump are legit and should not disqualify the NPI from tax-exempt status. Jared Taylor has also liked Trump in various statements.

Neither Amren nor NPI has endorsed Trump. Likewise, the folks at the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) said many good things about Obama, although that tax-exempt organization never endorsed him.

Spencer is right. This is a minor embarrassment, but it will be worked out.

JARED TAYLOR. THE OLDER, WISER RESPECTABLE REBEL.

Amazing Little Girl Talks Trump to Reporter (Video)

Haha. What a smart girl.

Jews are Joining the Antifa in order to Violently Attack the Alt-Right

Some Jews have decided that rather than debate alt-right thinkers like Richard Spencer and thousands of others, the answer is to beat them up.

That’s not a smear job. The source is the Jews themselves.

Excerpt from Jewish Forward

How do you punch a Nazi in Yiddish?

Maybe deliver a khsime, or “signature,” as in putting a “signature on someone’s face.” Or give them a shmir, an open-handed smack to the face, like lathering schmear on a bagel. Or maybe it takes der gubernator, “the governor,” jabbing your thumb into a person’s ribcage.

Obscure? To be sure. But you might find yourself becoming more familiar with such terms, if a growing number of Jewish “antifa” activists have their way.

In response to an energized American white nationalism, some Jews are gravitating toward “anti-fascist” activism. They’re embracing the idea that the best way to combat your enemies — in this case, white supremacists — is through direct confrontation, even violence. Organizers say their members number in the thousands. Though on-the-ground organizing on that scale has yet to materialize, one recent protest attended by many Jewish anti-fascists drew hundreds, and organizers say they are planning more actions.

At the same time, they are celebrating their Jewish identity. Those Yiddish fighting words are a good example.

‘Jewish Antifa’

Activists who call themselves “antifa,” short for anti-fascists, are inspired by early 20th-century responses to European fascism. They say they are influenced by militant left-wing and anarchist politics.

A graphic shared by the Jewish Antifa Facebook page presents the German camp of Auschwitz as a justification for why “it’s OK to punch a Nazi in the face.”

A handful of loosely organized groups have cropped up to confront white nationalism online. There is the “Jewish Antifa” Facebook page, which promotes the Jewish history of confrontational protest (this is where the string of Yiddish punch descriptors appeared). Then there is the allied group “MuJew Antifa,” a collaboration between Muslim and Jewish activists. And there are dozens of other individuals who are active from their own social media accounts.

The Jewish Antifa page has fewer than 60 members, but the MuJu Antifa network boasts more than 2,000, one organizer said. Jews who identify as anti-facists could also be involved in groups like Black Lives Matter or other left-wing Jewish groups without belonging to one of these two antifa groups.

One “MuJu” event last month brought a couple hundred people into the street to protest President Trump’s immigration ban. Activists marched down the street in Manhattan, carrying signs against Trump and chanting in Yiddish.

“We’re seeing an increase in far-right activity — the activity of people identifying as white supremacists and even Nazis,” said activist Michael Gould-Wartofsky, who is also the author of the 2015 book “The Occupiers: The Making of the 99 Percent Movement.”

Gould-Wartofsky said there are a range of opinions on tactics among Jews who might call themselves antifa: “With a massive rise in the climate of violence, some people [say] that it takes confrontation to combat far-right activity.”

There is a growing interest in learning physical self-defense among Jewish activists, Gould-Wartofsky said, adding, “People want to have the skills necessary to defend their community and other communities that are also under attack.”

‘Some Groups Are Naive’

This activism marks a sharp break with mainline Jewish organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League. While the ADL has for decades monitored and advocated against anti-Semitism, it does not encourage confronting groups such as white supremacists head-on, nor does it do so itself.

Some antifa activists think that’s exactly what it takes.