Excerpt from TAKE YOUR CHOICE Separation or Mongrelization By Theodore G. Bilbo

This excerpt is from Chapter 1 of the book. I’ve made no effort to clean up the formatting issues. There are 1,400 words in the excerpt. The book was published in 1947.

archive.org

Although the race problem may seem to lie dormant at times, it continually exists, lives on and
on and som etim es rages w ith all the fury of a jungle beast. It gnaw s at the very vitals of our
existence, in time it w ill sap our strength and destroy the greatness of our American way of life
unless solved properly and permanently. The time has now come when we mustdevote all the
necessary efforts to set our household in order and to find a perm anent solution to this
heretofore unsolved problem .

From the time of slavery through the bloody years of the W ar Between the States and the days
when the S o u th drank from the bitter cup of Reconstruction down to the present tim e, the N egro
problem has been before the American people. It has been, and is today, our greatest domestic
problem. No other issue has been such a source ofconstant friction, has demanded so much
thought and attention, nor has lasted so long. V olum es have been w ritten, great speeches have
been made, sermons have been preached, but the Negro problem has been passed on from
generation to generation. The difficulties have increased with the passing years, the obstacles
have become so great that some students of the question have cried out in weariness and despair
that there is no solution.

W e refuse to accept a defeatist attitude. An answercan and must be found. In the past four or
five years overtwo hundred books have been written by Negroes and white Quis lings pleading
for Negro equality, while only five or six books have been w ritten in behalf of the preservation
of the w hite race and w hite suprem acy. Let those who now plead that this is not the tim e for
discussing the race question obtain any of these two hundred books or any current N egro

DETROIT RACE RIOT, 1943.

Continue reading

Explaining the Spread of White Anger

Regular Unz.com contributor Robert Weissberg offers a thoughtful analysis of why whites are fed up with diversity.

I’ve pulled 500 words out of a 1,600 word essay. Furthermore, there are numerous excellent comments at Unz. Before going to the article excerpt, consider this short, spot on comment #17:

Affirmative action is just a tiny part of the explanation. It’s just one of the tools in the programme of White Genocide. As a European, I will not allow my homeland to be overrun – and ultimately conquered through bloodshed – by low IQ hostiles. This is basic survival and no amount of job opportunities can “fix” my “anger”.

The Unz site is not the Daily Stormer and I don’t believe it allows commenters to name the Jew, so it’s all the more interesting that the the phrase “white genocide” made it to the comments.

Unz.com

The phrase “angry white males” has been around awhile, but Donald Trump’s election has pushed it to the forefront. Indeed, at least for some, it is central to Trump’s election. As Steven M. Gillon put it in The Washington Post, “Donald Trump has tapped into this anger and manipulated it to his political advantage. The bond between President Trump and his white followers is not based on policy but on grievance. They both reject the cultural changes over the past half-century, and Trump’s Make America Great Again slogan signals his intent to unravel them.”

Whether this anger is somehow justified is, of course, a question of immense complexity but let me offer three observations that explain its scope regardless of its justification. My point is that affirmative action and other egalitarian social engineering nostrums inescapably spreads antagonisms beyond those immediately affected by the policies. And the anger will only grow as government keeps pushing the egalitarian fantasy.

First, violating the merit principle, whether in college admissions or hiring police officers guarantees disgruntled white males far in excess of its true victims. Consider hiring five firefighters strictly according to civil service exam scores. Let’s assume that a hundred men apply for the position and can be ranked by test scores. The top four are white and are hired. Now, thanks to a Department of Justice consent decree, the fire department must hire at least one African American from the list and if the highest ranking black scores at 20 in the array he will be hired despite his middling score.

How many white males have actually lost their job to a black? The correct answer is exactly one, the fifth ranking applicant. But how many whites will mistakenly believe that they lost out to an affirmative action candidate? The answer is 14 since this is the number of rejected white candidates between 6 and 19 and, to be honest, all can make a legitimate claim of being passed over to satisfy the diversity bean counters. Further fueling this anger is that each of those fourteen “unfairly” rejected applicants may complain to family and friends and thus tales of the alleged injustice multiply though, in fact, only a single white applicant lost out to a less qualified black.

No wonder Trump received such enthusiastic welcomes by white males—the anger has been silently boiling for decades and this was perhaps the first instance where it could be expressed albeit indirectly. Imagine if a speaker at a Trump a rally was more forthcoming: “We are sick and tired of being pushed aside so that some incompetent minority can take our place in the name of diversity whose only purpose is to make some airhead social justice warrior feel good about herself. How many people in this audience personally know anybody who lost their job to a less-qualified ‘diversity candidate’? Give me a show of hands.”

One can only imagine the panic of every corporate CEO, college president and other Thinkgood Americans upon hearing this speech. They would demand that Trump immediately repudiate it. The White Male Martyrs Brigade has awakened and is on the march.

More “It’s OK to be white” Flyers Posted, This Time at a Maryland High School

SCHOOL PRINCIPAL RENAY JOHNSON SAYS IT’S RACIST TO BE HAPPY TO BE WHITE.

In the south of my youth, Blair school principal Renay Johnson would have been called a “high yaller.” (high yellow in plain English)

This would be a reference to her yellowish skin tone that comes from mixing black and white genes.

Her Twitter shows that she’s a big cheerleader for her school’s sports activities.

That’s nice.

Even if it doesn’t mean much in the grand scheme of things.

I’m sure she’s not happy that her school is in the national spotlight as a consequence of the awakening of white group identity.

WJLA

SILVER SPRING, Md. (ABC7) —
The principal of Montgomery Blair High School believes a flyer posted around her school was meant to incite racial tension.

The piece of paper said, “It’s okay to be white.” The flyers were posted on 10 of the school’s doors before class on Wednesday.

The person behind it was captured on surveillance video, but a hoodie was blocking the person’s face.

“Really? Those type of posters? In a school as diverse as Blair,” asked senior Antoinette Ntomb.

School stats show 15 percent of Blair’s student body is Asian, 24 percent are black, and 33 percent are Hispanic.

“As a parent, yeah, it’s something that troubles me. It troubles us,” said parent Shaun Burke.

Principal Renay Johnson sent parents a letter that said in part “… we will not fall victim to attempts to divide us. We are committed to providing a safe and welcoming environment for every student.”

“I am hoping there is not a repeat, but I guess we will see,” said parent Mayu Mishina.

If the goal is to create racial tension, the students ABC7 News talked to Thursday night were confident the person behind the flyers will not win.

“All of us are equal,” said senior Melissa Oliver.

Wouldn’t it be interesting to pick senior Melissa Oliver’s brain over her claim that we’re all equal.

Her statement, if not prompted by a reporter or school official lurking nearby, is proof enough that schools like Blair are indoctrination centers, preaching the false religion of egalitarianism.

A quick look at the literature on racial differences in intelligence would reveal to Melissa that blacks are ON AVERAGE less intelligent than whites who are ON AVERAGE less intelligent than East Asians. Those differences are measured by IQ scores and can’t be denied.

Someone should ask Melissa to explain why, if we’re all equal, her school’s football team is disproportionately black. For that matter, Melissa might take note of the fact that there are no girls on the football team.

And if we’re all equal, then why do Jews and Hindus make so much more money than whites?

We’re all equal? Please explain, Melissa.

Then Blair’s octoroon principal should be confronted to explain why she thinks “It’s OK to be white” is “divisive.”

That word is dropped by liberals like turds are dropped in a pig sty.

A look at the thesaurus reveals that the opposite of division is union or attachment.

The unity that students may experience in a high school pales in comparison to the unity of blood and soil. A white student at Blair would have more in common with a German student in Germany that he’s never met than he has in common with any black or brown student in his classes at Blair. Likewise, the black student at Blair has more in common with a Negro residing in Africa.

The word diversity itself implies division, not unity.

Madam principal needs to rethink her response.

Having ‘white nuclear family’ promotes white supremacy, says woman sociology professor

JESSIE DANIELS, SOCIOLOGY PROFESSOR. SAYS HAVING A FAMILY IS RACIST.

If blacks don’t form stable family units then let’s all sink to their level. To do anything else would be racist.

Anything good that you do for your children leaves some poor Niglet somewhere worse off, so don’t do anything good for your children. If you do, the Nutty Professor says you’re a racist.

Sociology is science lite, populated with low IQ women professors not smart enough to go into science, engineering, or economics.

Jessie is one of the dumb ones in the dumbest field of study at the university.

Fox News

A City University of New York sociology professor reportedly said in a tweetstorm last week that “the white-nuclear family” promotes racism, prompting a backlash on social media.

Jessie Daniels, described as an expert on “the Internet manifestations of racism” on her CUNY page, infuriated social media users after reportedly saying that white families promote racism by default.

The professor began her argument saying she learned that “the white-nuclear family is one of the most powerful forces supporting white supremacy,” adding that that families “reproducing white children” are “part of the problem” as they facilitate white supremacy in the country, Campus Reform reported.

She reportedly tweeted: “I mean, if you’re a white person who says they’re engaged in dismantling white supremacy but … you’re forming a white family (and) reproducing white children that ‘you want the best for’ – how is that helping [and] not part of the problem?”

She reportedly ended her arguement suggesting that “white people” should confront their racism and stop perpetuating inequality by leaving their homes for their children.

“Until white people are ready to confront their own family’s racism (and) participation in systemic white supremacy, it’s not getting dismantled,” she wrote. “Beyond just calling out interpersonal racism, white people who want to be engaged in the work need to ask themselves about housing wealth.”

She added: “White people: do you own your home? When you die, where’s wealth in that house going? If it’s to your children, you’re reproducing (inequality).”

The professor locked her account in response to the criticism. Fox News reached out to the professor and the university early Tuesday and did not receive an immediate response.

CUNY describes Jessie as a world renowned expert on racism.

She makes her living seeing racism everywhere. It would be interesting to probe the mind of an anti-racist race traitor like her. Instead of telling blacks to improve (an impossibility) she tells whites to sink into the gutter. Stunning!

However, it would be easier to just send her to a work camp after the revolution so that she could be among the nonwhites she loves so dearly.

That’s Jessie on the left in the picture below. It doesn’t look to me that she’s going to be forming a normal family anytime soon.

Super Dykey Professor: Replace ‘Traditional Science’ With ‘Anti-Science, Antiracist, Feminist Approach’

SARA GIORDANO. SCIENCE IS RACIST AND MUST GO.

Man, oh man.

When that one turned dyke she decided to go all the way.

What a f*cking freak!

It’s almost too much to have to look at her in order to put together this post.

But I soldier on.

Daily Caller

A women’s studies professor at the University of California, Davis has declared that the time has come to replace “traditional science” with “a much needed anti-science, antiracist, feminist approach to knowledge production.”

The professor is Sara Giordano, according to Campus Reform.

Giordano, who has a Ph.D. in neuroscience but has chosen to pursue a career in the field of gender, sexuality and women’s studies, expounds on her thesis in a lengthy essay in Catalyst, a feminist theory journal.

In her 6,611-word treatise (with only three footnotes), Giordano calls on women to “challenge the authority of Science” by “rewriting knowledge” in a way that “explicitly unsticks Science from Truth and therefore opens up possibilities to unstick Being/Power/Truth/Freedom from Coloniality.”

Science is a root cause — perhaps the root cause — of “racial hierarchy,” “genocide,” “slavery” and “exploitation,” the sexuality and women’s studies professor claims.

“Traditional science” depends on “a colonial and racialized form of power,” Giordano says. “These genealogies demonstrate the co-construction of Science with the globalization of racial hierarchy, both of which together naturalize and justify domination through acts of genocide, slavery, and other forms of exploitation. At the root of the justification for social inequality then is Western science (together with philosophy and other modern disciplines).”

Science is also the cause of the evils of capitalism.

“By producing the categories of human/nonhuman as forms of natural (yet flexible) racial difference, capitalism becomes justified as a natural (yet flexible) economic system,” Giordano writes.

What’s more, science is a privileged field because “taking pleasure in observing our ‘natural world’ is class- and race-based, as many people grow up without ‘nature’ around them.”

Science is also “always political,” Giordano asserts. The “goal of science is not the innocent goal of ‘understanding nature’ but rather a political project of producing ‘nature.’”

The prominence of science is bad for feminism because “science and feminism” are “an unequal pairing, with science occupying a privileged place.” It’s time, Giordano says, to “go back to feminist antiracist politics instead.”

Giordano calls on feminists who are “trained in the sciences” to avoid science. Instead, she says, they should teach something called “critical science literacy skills based on our first-hand knowledge of the sciences.”

The “delegitimizing of science” can “create new definitions of science — ones that are politically grounded in social justice and the politics of location.”

Giordano suggests that feminist professors should engage in “‘pedagogy through politics’ rather than a pedagogy centered solely on the classroom.’”

“In my own teaching and research I have developed a kind of critical science literacy practice,” she writes.

“For example, in one semester students used the skills developed in the course to produce a strategic collective response to anti-immigrant population control environmentalism propaganda that was circulating on campus and in the larger community around Earth Day.”

The University of California, Davis, Giordano’s employer, is infamous in part because the campus newspaper issued a steely edict last year warning students that drinking too much to celebrate Cinco de Mayo is a form of racist cultural appropriation. Also, the student newspaper said, anyone celebrating must spend time learning about the intricacies of “Chicanx/Latinx culture.”

Back in 2011, a campus cop at UC Davis pepper-sprayed a group of protesters who were huddled together on a sidewalk. That incident ultimately resulted in a $1 million settlement divided among several protesters. The officer who pepper-sprayed the protesters, John Pike, also received his own $38,056 settlement for mental anguish for “psychiatric injury.”

This is the second woman professor this week who has attacked traditional scholarship. The first was the Latina who alleged that math was racist. Now this one broadens out the accusation to all rational scientific thought.

I never met a lesbian at the university who wasn’t batsh*t crazy. Even by normal lesbian standards this one is beyond crazy.

It’s nothing that five years in a work camp wouldn’t fix, though.

America is so fuxated, though, that removing the garbage from our universities is out of the question, much less putting it in work camps.

One last thing. Her classes will be populated with crazy lesbians like her. They will give her high teaching marks. She will win teaching awards and be promoted.

But if she taught a class to the general student body, none of those good things would happen for her. That’s the way universities work today.

Latina Professor Says Math is Racist, Promoting White Privilege

PROF. ROCHELLE GUTIERREZ. MATH IS HARD. GET RID OF IT.

Pick a topic. Any topic. Claim that it promotes white supremacy. Throw in the usual jargon. Send to a leftist journnal.

Voila! It’s published.

You get a 4 to 8 percent raise and mucho pats on the back from your fellow pepper bellies.

Campus Reform

A math education professor at the University of Illinois argued in a newly published book that algebraic and geometry skills perpetuate “unearned privilege” among whites.

Hey dumbass lady professor, you fergittin’ them thar gooks?

Huh? Ya fegettin’ them?

Our Asian friends get more of that nonexistent fairy dust you call “unearned privilege” than we whites get.

Rochelle Gutierrez, a professor at the University of Illinois, made the claim in a new anthology for math teachers, arguing that teachers must be aware of the “politics that mathematics brings” in society.

“On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness. Who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as White,” Gutierrez argued.

Are you blind, madam? Haven’t you noticed the Asians walking around with their plastic pocket protectors and slide rules?

The Asians aren’t white, for your information.

Gutierrez also worries that algebra and geometry perpetuate privilege, fretting that “curricula emphasizing terms like Pythagorean theorem and pi perpetuate a perception that mathematics was largely developed by Greeks and other Europeans.”

Uh, it was developed by Europeans, although not with a total monopoly on mathematical reasoning.

Math also helps actively perpetuate white privilege too, since the way our economy places a premium on math skills gives math a form of “unearned privilege” for math professors, who are disproportionately white.

“Are we really that smart just because we do mathematics?” she asks, further wondering why math professors get more research grants than “social studies or English” professors.

Solution: You nonwhites get in there and study math. Then when you’re math professors you too can get more money.

Are you aware, madam, that the IQ level of professors in different fields varies and that higher IQ people tend to earn more. I doubt that you’re one of them with a high IQ. In fact, I strongly suspect you’re one of the affirmative action hires.

Further, she also worries that evaluations of math skills can perpetuate discrimination against minorities, especially if they do worse than their white counterparts.

“If one is not viewed as mathematical, there will always be a sense of inferiority that can be summoned,” she says, adding that there are so many minorities who “have experienced microaggressions from participating in math classrooms… [where people are] judged by whether they can reason abstractly.”

Some races are more intelligent than others. I suppose, madam, that in your world a bad grade on a math quiz is a “microaggression.”

Really, madam, you’re making the case that whites really are the superior race. Although you seem not to want to talk about Asians because that wouldn’t be politically correct, would it.

To fight this, Gutierrez encourages aspiring math teachers to develop a sense of “political conocimiento,” a Spanish phrase for “political knowledge for teaching.”

Gutierrez stresses that all knowledge is “relational,” asserting that “Things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.”

How would you like to be a white person taking a class from this ignorant jackass!

Pass the dunce cap on to Professor Gutierrez. I think it will fit her perfectly.

Congolese Woman Raped, Whipped, Beheaded by Rebels Who Drank Her Blood After She Fed Them Forbidden Fish

GRAND CHIEF, REBEL LEADER.

We’re all one race–the human race. God made us all equal.

Said no one ever who’s spent significant time with the savages.

Europe is being told by the globalists that it must accept these creatures by the millions.

Resist.

France24

A video has emerged in the Democratic Republic of Congo that shows a woman being publicly raped as punishment for allegedly serving “forbidden food” to a little-known group of rebels. The video is rare evidence of the atrocities being committed in DRC’s Kasaï region.
WARNING: READERS MAY FIND THE FOLLOWING IMAGES SHOCKING

The video, which lasts 7’40, was filmed on April 8, 2017 in the town of Luebo, in the province of Kasaï-Occidental. The events took place in the main square, referred to by locals as the “parking lot”.

The footage shows a naked woman being pushed out in front of a crowd by members of an armed group claiming allegiance to the Kamuina Nsapu rebel movement. The group seized the town, population 40,000, on March 31 and maintained a reign of terror for several weeks before they were ousted by the Congolese army on April 19.

The rebel movement emerged after the death of a local tribal chief named Kamuina Nsapu, who was killed by the Congolese army in August 2016. Armed groups bearing his name have attacked government targets including police and soldiers across the Kasaï region, as well as symbols of the Catholic Church. In recent months, however, the group has lost power and territory.

At the beginning of the video, Kalamba Kambangoma a rebel leader described as a “grand chief” by the man who is filming holds the victim by her hair and explains in the local Tshiluba language that “she must die” for committing what he calls high treason. He then hands the victim over to another woman, who is wearing a pink t-shirt and the red bandanna that marks members of the Kamuina Nsapu movement.

The woman in pink then brings the victim over to a platform, which was constructed by the rebels when they took over the town. There, the woman and the son of her “rival” [Editor’s note: Her husband’s second wife] are forced to have sex in front of the crowd. The woman in a pink t-shirt whips the pair with branches for several minutes as many people including men, women and children crowd up close to the platform. The onlookers film the scene, applauding and screaming. A group of Luebo residents also attend the public punishment, though they maintain a certain distance from the stage.

One resident of Luebo told FRANCE 24: “She was accused of serving fish to rebels who were fighting on the frontlines in Kabao. They said she gave them beans that contained pieces of a small, local fish. Convinced that she had broken their protection charms, the council of rebels led by a man named Kabata sentenced both the woman and the son of her husband’s second wife [the young man was also working there that day] to commit incest in public.”

The rebels then executed the woman and the young man by hacking them to death with machetes. Some of the rebels consumed their blood, according to several different witnesses interviewed by FRANCE 24.

A resident of Luebo sent the FRANCE 24 Observers team a photograph showing several rebels posing with the severed head of the young man, which was still recognisable. The young man was about 20 years old.

In early September, the video, which shows the forced public rape, started circulating massively on WhatsApp. All of the residents FRANCE 24 spoke to said they condemned the act and were traumatised by it.

Colin Kaepernick and his black followers should take a knee to protest this, real oppression, not the Marxist bullsh*t they mouth off about.