Trump to Announce LEGAL IMMIGRATION Bill Cutting Immigration in Half and Favoring White WORKERS

The media, Democrats, and other liberals are going to be spinning Donald Trump as the world’s biggest racist, maybe even bigger than Hitler.

His new immigration bill, opposed by Republicans McCain (die you traitor), phony conservative from Arizona Jeff Flake, and good old Lindsay Graham, will freeze out parasites and their families that come join them in the former USA, now Amurkistan.

Wealthy, hard working Hindus and Asians won’t be kept out since they often are skilled and willing to work.

But the bill clearly favors white immigrants.

Daily Caller

President Donald Trump will join two leading Republican senators at the White House on Wednesday to formally introduce a bill that would slash legal immigration levels in half and implement a merit-based system for potential migrants, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.

GOP Sens. David Perdue of Georgia and Tom Cotton of Arkansas will reintroduce an updated version of the Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy (RAISE) Act, a bill they originally proposed in February that failed to gain traction in the Senate.

The legislation seeks to curtail the current practice of family chain migration and move to a points system that would “tailor the immigration system to meet the needs of our economy,” a spokeperson for Perdue’s office told TheDCNF.

The updated RAISE Act, which has also been reported by the Washington Examiner, moves the focus of Trump’s immigration agenda from cracking down on illegal immigration to reducing the number and types of people allowed to immigrate. Trump has previously couched support for the bill in terms of protecting American workers, who he says are hurt by the current immigration system.

“Instead of today’s low-skilled system — which is a terrible system where anyone comes in, people who have never worked, people that are criminals, anyone comes in — we want a merit-based system,” he said at an Ohio rally last week. “One that protects our workers, protects our taxpayers, and one that protects our economy.”

The RAISE Act establishes a points-based merit system that gives priority to high-skilled immigrants and potential job-creating entrepreneurs. The changes are modeled on the Canadian and Australian systems, according to Perdue’s office.

In what will likely prove to be the most controversial provision, the bill would dramatically reduce overall immigration levels by doing away with chain migration. Current immigration law allows U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents to sponsor their parents, siblings and married adult children for immigrant visas. Under the RAISE Act, only spouses and minor children could apply for admission based on family ties.

The bill also caps annual refugee admissions at 50,000 and completely eliminates the diversity visa lottery, a Department of State program that awards immigrant visas to people from countries with historically low levels of immigration to the U.S.

While Perdue’s office says the bill does not include a “hard and fast cap” on the number of family-based visas that would be issued, it does seek to bring overall immigration levels to “historic norms.” Previous reports have indicated that number could fall to 500,000 legal permanent residents per year over the next decade.

By contrast, the U.S. took in an average of about 1.1 million legal immigrants annually from 2000 to 2015, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

Perdue and Cotton have criticized those historically high levels of immigration, saying they flood the U.S. labor market with low-skill workers who drive down wages for poor and working-class Americans. As Cotton noted when the original RAISE Act was introduced in February, just one in 15 green cards are granted for employment purposes. (RELATED: Immigration Skeptics Make The Economic Case For Less Legal Migration)

Even with Trump’s support, the bill faces an uphill climb in the GOP-controlled Senate. On top of expected Democratic opposition, some Republican senators have expressed skepticism abut cutting legal immigration levels.

GOP Sens. John McCain and Jeff Flake of Arizona and Lindsay Graham of South Carolina all dismissed the RAISE Act in February, exposing deep divisions within the GOP over the issue of legal immigration.

“Over the next 20 years, one thing I can say for certain is America is getting older and the number of workers coming up in the system is not where it has been in the past,” Graham said at the time. “We’re going to need to replenish our workforce.”

‘Sick:’ Trump slams report of ‘second meeting’ with Putin at G-20

If the choice is between accepting the word of CNN, The New York Times, and the Washington Post or accepting the word of Donald Trump, I’ll take Trump.

The lying (((leftist))) media has been caught with their pants down in a $2 whorehouse AGAIN. These people have no shame.

Fox News

President Trump lashed out at a report that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin had a second, previously undisclosed talk during the G-20 summit in Germany earlier this month.

The president said the dinner at which the encounter took place was known to members of the media who were covering the event.

In a follow-up tweet, Trump decried the media for, as he put it, “becoming more and more dishonest!”

“Even a dinner arranged for top 20 leaders in Germany is made to look sinister,” the president wrote.

A White House spokesman confirmed the conversation between the American and Russian leaders to Fox News earlier Tuesday.

An administration official said Trump and Putin “briefly” spoke during a dinner the night of the G-20 summit.

First lady Melania Trump was seated next to Putin, and the president approached Putin at the end of the night, the official said. They spoke through a Russian translator.

The administration official pushed back against the interaction being characterized as a “meeting.”

“There was no ‘second meeting’ between President Trump and President Putin, just a brief conversation at the end of a dinner,” the official said. “The insinuation that the White House has tried to ‘hide’ a second meeting is false, malicious and absurd.”

The official added: “It is not merely perfectly normal, it is part of a president’s duties, to interact with world leaders.”

Details about what transpired during the conversation were unclear.

Their first G-20 encounter, on July 7, lasted more than two hours. Trump later said he pressed the Russian president during that meeting about whether his government attempted to meddle in the 2016 presidential election.

Meanwhile, the White House on Tuesday night officially announced the president’s appointment of former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman to serve as ambassador to Russia. Huntsman is a former ambassador to China and Singapore who unsuccessfully ran for president as a Republican in 2012.

First Article of Impeachment Filed Against President Trump

REPS. AL GREEN AND BRAD SHERMAN. IMPEACHMENT NOW!

Unhinged by the fake news pedaled by the press and by their own desire for fame, two Democrats have filed an Article of Impeachment against President Donald Trump. The Negro looks like a monster, the white man like a wimpy cuck. Both are nobodies who want to be somebody.

This action by two fools will fire up Trump’s base. No matter how much Trump fails to deliver, I doubt that any of his supporters, current and former, want to see a soft coup that shreds the Constitution.

Fox News

Two Democratic lawmakers officially filed an article of impeachment for President Donald Trump Wednesday – becoming the first to do so after Trump’s first six months in office was riddled with calls for it.

Reps. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., and Al Green, D-Texas, formally introduced an article of impeachment against Trump for obstruction of justice, citing Trump’s firing for former FBI director James Comey.

The filing comes just one day after Donald Trump Jr., the president’s son, publicly released emails regarding his meeting with a Russian lawyer during the 2016 campaign. He said he met with the lawyer to get information about his father’s opponent, Hillary Clinton.

“It now seems likely that the President had something to hide when he tried to curtail the investigation of [former] National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and the wider Russian probe,” Sherman said in a statement.

“We now begin the effort to force the House Judiciary Committee to hold hearings on Obstruction of Justice and Russian interference in our election,” he said.

Read on for a look at how the impeachment process works – and just what that means for the president.

What does impeachment mean?

Congress has the ability to remove a sitting president from office before his term is finished – an authority granted by the Constitution.

Along with the president and vice president, all civil officers in the U.S. can be removed from office if they are impeached and convicted of bribery, treason or other high crimes and misdemeanors, according to the Constitution.

How does impeachment work?

Article One of the Constitution grants the House of Representatives the sole power of impeachment; the Senate has the sole authority to try all impeachments. If the president is being tried, the Chief Justice should preside over the trial.

The House must vote, requiring a simple majority vote to adopt the articles of impeachment. Before a vote, the House Judiciary Committee – or another special committee – may investigate the articles.

The House is able to vote to impeach even if the committee does not recommend doing so.

Should that vote be reached, then the House will appoint members – called managers – to act as “prosecutors” as the proceedings will then go to trial in the Senate. The president is able to have defense attorneys.

The Senate would need a two-thirds majority in order to find the president guilty. Should that happen, he is removed from office and the vice president takes office.

“I served with Mike Pence in Congress for 12 years, and I disagree with him on just about everything,” Sherman said. “I never dreamed I would author a measure that would put him in the White House.”

Have other presidents been impeached?

Only two U.S. presidents have been impeached – and neither were removed from office.

Andrew Johnson was impeached in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998.

While an impeachment proceeding began against former President Richard Nixon, he was not actually impeached. Nixon was the only president to resign from office.

What is the White House’s response?

Deputy press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the impeachment filling “utterly ridiculous” and a “political game at its worst” during a briefing with reporters Wednesday.

Will it work?

With a Republican-led House – and other Democratic congressmen who don’t support impeaching Trump – the lawmaker’s bid to remove Trump from office is a “longshot,” according to the Associated Press.

Democratic leaders have distanced themselves from the efforts to impeach Trump, believing it serves only to energize the president’s supporters.

The thing that Trump should be most afraid of is fabricated evidence, i.e., a frame up. The high level Trump haters have plenty of money and power. They also have no morals. That’s a dangerous combination for the country.

American Liberals Take to Twitter to Condemn Trump for Military’s Use of MOAB

The above map shows the damage radius of the Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bomb that was dropped on ISIS in Afghanistan today.

Recall this campaign promise.

You know that if Obama had dropped MOAB that liberals would be bragging about what a great decision he had made.

But what are liberals saying today in real time?

This next one has the facts wrong. A single bomb costs a mere bag of shells at $16 million.

Mark Dice makes a joke mocking liberals.

Another liberal misstatement. Meals on wheels was not cut.

I doubt this liberal was preaching love when Obama was dropping smaller bombs.

I just looked. So far, there’s no response from Nancy Pelosi or Hillary Clinton to MOAB. I wonder who else besides liberals are going to be added to the list below.

TRUMP: I’m ‘very, very proud’ of the military’s ‘successful job’ dropping the ‘mother of all bombs’ on ISIS

President Donald J. Trump is clearly building support for the big increase in the military budge that he campaigned for during last year’s election.

By making it easier to get his military budget increase, he also makes it easier to get money for the wall and for infrastructure spending.

This is the legendary Trump 8D chess in action.

Business Insider

President Donald Trump on Thursday refused to say whether he personally authorized dropping the “mother of all bombs” on an ISIS target in Afghanistan, but he said he was “very, very proud” of the military’s “successful job.”

The Pentagon announced Thursday that the US had dropped the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast, also known as the “Mother of All Bombs” or “MOAB” because of its acronym, on an ISIS target in a remote part of far northeast Afghanistan. It is the largest nonnuclear bomb in the US military’s inventory.

Trump and the White House dodged questions from reporters on Thursday about whether Trump himself authorized dropping the bomb.

“Everybody knows exactly what happens, so — and what I do is I authorize my military,” Trump said. “We have the greatest military in the world, and they’ve done a job as usual, so we have given them total authorization, and that’s what they’re doing. And, frankly, that’s why they’ve been so successful lately.”

Trump also compared his military successes to those of his predecessor, President Barack Obama.

“If you look at what’s happened over the last eight weeks and compare that, really, to what’s happened over the last eight years, you’ll see there’s a tremendous difference. Tremendous difference,” Trump said. “So we have incredible leaders in the military, and we have an incredible military, and we are very proud of them. And this was another very, very successful mission.”

Trump also deflected a question on whether the use of the bomb sent a message to North Korea, a country Trump has been trying to rein in since he became president. He discussed the issue of North Korea with Chinese President Xi Jinping during Xi’s recent visit to Trump’s resort in Florida.

“I don’t know if this sends a message. It doesn’t make any difference if it does or not,” Trump said. “North Korea is a problem. The problem will be taken care of.

“I will say this: I think China has really been working very hard. I have really gotten to like and respect, as you know, President Xi. He’s a terrific person, we spent a lot of time together in Florida, and he’s a very special man. So we’ll see how it goes. I think he’s going to try very hard.”

Official Trailer: Get Me Roger Stone

Opinions about Roger Stone are flying fast and furious on youtube. From the youtube information box, we learn:

Published on Mar 29, 2017

The whole world was shocked by the rise Donald Trump, but there was one man who had been plotting it for years: Roger Stone. Diving deep into the mind of the master manipulator, Get Me Roger Stone provides a raw perspective on the transformation of American politics. Coming exclusively to Netflix on May 12, 2017.

President Donald Trump seems to have distanced himself from the controversial Stone, who has used the word “Negro” and thus gotten himself banned from CNN and MSNBC. Stone remains close to Alex Jones.

Wikipedia

n the first grade, Stone claims, he broke into politics to further John F. Kennedy’s presidential campaign: “I remember going through the cafeteria line and telling every kid that Nixon was in favor of school on Saturdays… It was my first political trick”.[17]

When he was a junior and vice president of the student government at a high school in northern Westchester County, New York, he manipulated the ouster of the president and succeeded him. Stone recalled how he ran for election as president for his senior year:

“I built alliances and put all my serious challengers on my ticket. Then I recruited the most unpopular guy in the school to run against me. You think that’s mean? No, it’s smart.”[18]

Given a copy of Barry Goldwater’s Conscience of a Conservative, Stone became a convert to conservatism as a child and a volunteer in Goldwater’s 1964 campaign. In 2007, Stone indicated that he was a staunch conservative but with libertarian leanings.[17]

During the 2016 election cycle, Stone was banned from appearing on CNN and MSNBC after making a series of offensive Twitter posts disparaging other television personalities.[60] Stone specifically referred to a CNN commentator as an “Entitled Diva Bitch” and imagined her “killing herself”, and called another CNN personality a “stupid negro” and a “fat negro”.[61]

Stone’s Tweets tend to be combative:

White House Reporter Has Biggest Story in the World Right Now (Video)

I’m posting two videos made within the last day by former Breitbart White House reporter Lee Stranahan. Both are rambling.

Stranahan believes he has the story that can bring an end to the Deep State. It revolves around Deep State criminality related to the DNC refusing to allow the FBI to examine DNC computers, which were allegedly hacked by the Russians.

Stranahan’s videos are hard to follow.

This comment at GLP describes the top video in a nutshell:

The public deservers to know why the FBI did not get access to the DNC servers when such a “serious” crime was supposedly committed by the Russians.

The Russians supposedly hacked the DNC servers, “threatening our democracy” —- yet the FBI was not permitted to look at the servers?

THIS STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN.

And another, slightly longer, summary:

He wrote a 3400 word article on Brietbart about how the FBI was denied access (multiple times) to the DNC servers that were supposedly hacked by Russia…

AND an outside company, Crowdstryke, at the hands of an ex-FBI agent, and a Russian born guy, were the ones who investigated the server, and reported to the FBI.

His boss, gave him the green-light to publish the article, but told him to stay away from the Whitehouse, ie; don’t ask Sean Spicer about the topic.

And he’s pissed

Here’s the link to the Breitbart article by Stranahan that implicitly calls FBI Director Comey a crook.

The second video below was made after Stranahan’s decision to quit Breitbart news. It goes over more of the same territory.

However, Stranhan brings up George Soros’ control of Macedonia. Stranahan says that he intends to travel to Macedonia to try to dig up incriminating information on the role that Soros is playing in bringing down President Trump.

Stranahan was featured at two conspiracy theory sites yesterday. Both of them offer some background to the story that the former White House reporter believes can break the back of the Deep State.

Context at The Gateway Pundit

More context at Zerohedge

A commenter on one of these sites has sent the first video to President Trump, where he hopefully will watch and act.