California Bans Travel to 8 States it says Discriminate Against LBGT Degenerates

The lunatic leftists are at it again.

It’s really pretty crazy when a state decides to punish another state for passing laws that the first state doesn’t like.

Obviously, if people living in say Alabama don’t like that state’s laws, then they are free to move to any other state whose laws they like better. It’s called “voting with your feet.”

The busybody leftists in charge of California have decided to punish eight states that the left says are hostile to faggots, trannies, and other degenerates. This is SJW virtue signaling carried to ridiculous extremes. California should invite the fags and trannies to come live there, treating them as refugees and giving them free housing, free medical care, free food–everything free.

Excerpt from CNN

California has issued a ban on state-funded and state-sponsored travel to four more states that it says have laws discriminating against LGBTQ people.

The travel ban was first put into effect January 1 when state measure AB 1887 became law. The law says California is “a leader in protecting civil rights and preventing discrimination” and should not support or finance “discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people.”

The travel ban list also includes states that California believes don’t protect religious freedoms and states that it says use religious freedom as a basis of discrimination.

“Our country has made great strides in dismantling prejudicial laws that have deprived too many of our fellow Americans of their precious rights. Sadly, that is not the case in all parts of our nation, even in the 21st century,” California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement Thursday.

Why the ban?

Kansas, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Tennessee were the original states banned by AB 1887, but Becerra added Alabama, Kentucky, South Dakota and Texas on Thursday, citing what he called new discriminatory legislation enacted against the LGBTQ community in those states.

Alabama, South Dakota, and Texas all recently passed legislation that could prevent LGBT parents from adopting or fostering children and Kentucky passed a religious freedom bill that would allow students to exclude LGBTQ classmates from campus groups.

The eight states on California’s travel ban list can reciprocate and ban travel to California. They should do so.

It’s too bad that those states can’t also ban the typical California libtard from moving to their states. There’s a real divide in America and frankly, the people I know would not welcome the typical Demcrat Californian into his community.

Man charged with hate crime in phone threat to Muslim-American advocate: ‘We will kill you’

MARVIN MEYER.

Is alleged hate crime terrorist Marvin Meyer a Jew?

I don’t know, but it seems reasonable that Jews would feel threatened by Muslims.

In any case, the reaction against Meyer seems ridiculously overblown to me. But I could be wrong. What do you think of the charges Meyer is facing for making a brief phone call to a Muslim terrorist organization that poses as a “civil rights” institution?

Chicago Tribune

A 45-year-old south suburban man was charged with a hate crime after he called a Muslim-American civil rights advocate, said, “We will kill you,” and left his own phone number in the voicemail, prosecutors said Saturday.

Marvin Meyer, of Oak Forest, admitted calling the deputy director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Chicago office on May 16, according to prosecutors. Meyer was charged with a felony count of a hate crime and a misdemeanor count of a telephone threat, Chicago police said.

“Hey. Guess what? This is America calling,” Meyer’s call to Sufyan Sohel’s office voicemail began, according to prosecutors. “You are not welcome here. Take your (double expletive) back to Syria. We will kill you.”

Sohel, an American-born attorney whose parents came to this country from India, oversees CAIR Chicago’s legal strategy. Prosecutors said he does not know Meyer.

The phone message insulted Allah and Democrats, according to prosecutors, who said Meyer not only gave out his phone number but also asked, “Do I seem afraid of you?”

After Sohel reported the incident, Chicago police obtained phone records showing Meyer as the only subscriber on the telephone account, authorities said.

At the Leighton Criminal Court Building, Judge James Brown ordered Meyer held on $75,000 bail and required him to wear an electronic monitoring device once released.

Sohel told the Tribune he was relieved about the charges. “I’m very happy with the seriousness the Chicago Police Department and Cook County state’s attorney’s office took in the matter,” he said.

Sohel said the incident highlights why many Muslim-Americans are increasingly concerned about anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant rhetoric.

Groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League have reported spikes in Anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic hate crimes in recent years. So far this year, CAIR Chicago has received about 400 calls reporting discrimination against Muslim-Americans, which is the group’s usual total for the entire year, Sohel said.

“His comments were very violent in nature,” said Sohel, “and he threatened to kill people, and that raised flags and that kind of shook me because when people use that sort of language, it made me both fearful for me and my team, but I also got a sense of being unwelcome in the only country that I’ve ever called home.”

Just yesterday, I trashed a comment possibly written by a Negro that threatened to kill me. That comment came in response to the Philandro Castile-Jeronimo Yanez post, which drew a good bit of outside attention.

Why don’t I report death threats to law enforcement? Because they would be ignored. I’m white. It’s legal to threaten to kill whites.

But for God’s sake, never threaten to kill Niggers, sand niggers, or Mexicans. You’ll end up like Marvin Meyer, needing to raise some bail money.

Test Results Show that 75 Percent of California Negros Can’t Read

LIBERAL PROPAGANDA.

Read the story to see how the fake news media tries to move the story away from race and toward gender. We can’t publish the honest truth about blacks, which is that they, on AVERAGE (there are some smart blacks), are unable to absorb any education beyond a fifth grade level.

Try to imagine the waste of society’s resources expended on trying to do what is impossible. Blacks were brought into the Western Hemisphere as slaves, not to contribute to Western intellectual life, but as farm equipment.

Our ancestors never gave blacks an education because they didn’t have the resources to waste.

Now, with the (((Federal Reserve))) printing money, the government just creates those resources out of thin air, which is in the long run impoverishing the white working and middle class.

Mercury News

Three of four African-American boys in California classrooms failed to meet reading and writing standards on the most recent round of testing, according to data obtained from the state Department of Education and analyzed by CALmatters.

More than half of black boys scored in the lowest category on the English portion of the test, trailing their female counterparts. The disparity reflects a stubbornly persistent gender gap in reading and writing scores that stretches across ethnic groups.

The data provide a unique glimpse of how gender interacts with race and class in mastery of basic reading, writing and listening skills tested on state exams. While California publishes separate figures on the performance of various ethnic and economic groups, it does not make public a more detailed breakdown of how boys and girls are performing within those groups. State officials say they do not sort the data that way because of complexity, cost and time constraints.

Unlike in math, where girls have caught up to boys in California and elsewhere, female students in general maintain a sizable lead over their male classmates in the language arts. While initiatives to encourage girls to learn math and science have received considerable publicity, the gender reading gap is viewed less as a problem warranting action.

“I wouldn’t put this in the same category of severity or concern as other achievement gaps,” said Tom Loveless, an education researcher for the Brookings Institution, a public policy think tank in Washington, D.C. “But there needs to be greater awareness of this.”

The gap spans all grade levels. Boys in high school score better than those in grade school, but girls outperform them by consistent margins at every age. And a higher family income does not appear to even things out.

The gap is not unique to California. In states that administer the same standardized exam as California, girls outscore boys by similar margins. In international reading comprehension exams, girls best boys in nearly every country and at nearly every age.

The article does get a little better as it goes along, but nowhere is the notion that black brainpower is deficient mentioned.

Certainly scores aren’t the only educational area in which black boys trail their peers. African-American boys are more likely to be suspended and drop out of school than other demographic groups, in California and elsewhere.

But the reading data is sobering. As early as fourth grade, for example, nearly 80 percent of black boys failed to meet state reading standards. Of all ethnic groups for which the state collects data, black boys trailed black girls by the widest margin.

“Part of this may be structural, in having texts that aren’t relevant to the experiences and legacy of African-American boys,” said Chris Chatmon, founding executive director of the African-American Male Achievement program at the Oakland Unified School District. “When a lot of the curriculum you have access to isn’t familiar, or doesn’t acknowledge your past or your present, you have a tendency not to be engaged with it or want to read it.”

The same old excuses are offered. Whitey doesn’t understand blackie’s needs.

I can’t blame the reporter too much. The article just repeats what the education “experts” are saying, which is a big nothingburger.

Students Condemn LSU’s Tiger Mascot as Waycisssss

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY’S MIKE THE TIGER.

Whether you’re interested in football or not, the campaign by libturds to change the names of sports teams and mascots ought to concern you. Only uncivilized vandals destroy historical buildings. Obliterating names is a more sophisticated form of vandalism.

The University of Mississippi (Ole Miss) lost its mascot, Colonel Reb, to political correctness in 2003. Can’t you look at him and tell that he’s a racist slave owner?

If all of us don’t unite, show some guts, and stand up to the modern Black Lives Matter vandals, the LSU tiger will soon be gone because he too is a racist symbol to them.

This lunacy says more about their obsession with controlling the white man than it does about racism.

Breitbart

A group of students at Louisiana State University is now demanding that the school eliminate its 122-year-old tiger mascot, because the animal represents “white privilege” and “racism.”

A change.org petition, entitled “Change the Racist Mascot of LSU!,” demands that the school take action to dump the tiger mascot because it was named “during the height of Jim Crow South.”

LSU named the tiger as its mascot back in 1895, taking the symbol from one of the state’s hardest fighting civil war battalions known as the “Louisiana Tigers.”

Wheat’s Louisiana Tigers, or the First Louisiana Infantry, became one of the Confederate Army’s most celebrated infantry units and fought in the Eastern Theater from the first days of the war and also under Robert E. Lee until the surrender at Appomattox Court House. It was often employed as the Confederacy’s shock troops, meant to strike fear in its opponents, especially early in the war when Northern forces were so poorly led.

But, students now want the more than century-old mascot eliminated due to its origin, despite that it has not been associated directly with the Confederacy for many decades.

ONE OF MANY ARTISTIC RENDERINGS OF THE TIGER.

“Louisiana State University named their mascot the Tigers, and they named it during the height of Jim Crow South. This was a time when black men feared for their lives, and were treated as sub human,” the petition reads. “This symbol is the most prevalent Confederate symbol in the United States.”

“These powerful white males choose the Tiger as a symbol to honor a Confederate regiment called Louisiana’s Tigers,” the petition continues. “They were known for their propensity for violence on and off the battlefield. They were just as violent to the black slaves they owned, and later even more violent once those slaves were set free.”

“It is incredibly insulting for any African American to have to attend a school that honors Confederate militantism. It is already hard enough to be black at LSU, and these symbols must be changed,” the petition adds.

The petition also goes on to criticize the university for keeping a live tiger on campus in a $3 million habitat.

THE LIVE LSU TIGER.

“It’s also cruel to cage a wild animal for the amusement of privileged white people. They’ve never been in a cage,” the petition reads.

If we don’t resist, the other side, the tyrants, will win. Our ancestors were willing to fight and die for their rights. Shall we dishonor them now by giving in or should we fight?

Breaking: Trump Appeals Travel Ban to Supreme Court

COUNTRIES AFFECTED BY THE TRAVEL BAN.

It’s been a busy day at the White House on Thursday. Globalists were left crying in their beer over Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Accord and now late Thursday night comes the administration’s appeal to the United States Supreme Court.

The public safety ought to come before political correctness, but with impulsive judges making up the law as they go along, it’s just not possible to foresee how the president’s ability to control hostile invaders will be decided.

ABC News

The Trump administration on Thursday petitioned the Supreme Court to review its contentious travel ban, a move that could set up a high-stakes final verdict on a policy to restrict immigration from several Muslim-majority nations that has so far been stymied in several lower court decisions.

“We have asked the Supreme Court to hear this important case and are confident that President Trump’s executive order is well within his lawful authority to keep the Nation safe and protect our communities from terrorism,” Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores said in a statement released Thursday night. “The President is not required to admit people from countries that sponsor or shelter terrorism, until he determines that they can be properly vetted and do not pose a security risk to the United States.”

The petition comes after the latest setback for Trump’s controversial executive order to cut visas for individuals from Somalia, Libya, Iran, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit declined to lift an existing lower court ban on the administration’s revised travel ban, which had originally also included Iraq.

The 4th Circuit’s Chief Judge Roger L. Gregory wrote that the government’s “asserted national security interest … appears to be a post hoc, secondary justification for an executive action rooted in religious animus and intended to bar Muslims from this country.”

After that court’s decision, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the Justice Department would lodge an appeal with the high court.

Buzzfeed News further reports that the administration is asking the Court to issue an order NOW allowing the ban to take effect while the nine justices mull over the legality of the ban and issue a final ruling.

Additionally, and potentially having a more immediate effect, the department asked for the Supreme Court to allow the federal government to begin enforcing the second version of the travel and refugee executive order that Trump signed in March with two other filings to the justices.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions had said the request for the justices to hear — and ultimately reverse — the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit would be forthcoming.

Additionally, the department asked the justices to issue a stay of the injunction entered in that case — International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) v. Trump — until the justices resolve the case. In that case, the Fourth Circuit upheld a district court injunction against the specific portion of the executive order banning travel for a limited time from six Muslim-majority countries.

The department also filed a second stay request, asking the justices to put the injunction on hold that was entered in a challenge to the executive order out of Hawaii — Hawaii v. Trump — that is now on appeal before a different appeals court, the Ninth Circuit, until that case is ultimately resolved. The injunction entered in that case is more broad, covering the entire refugee and travel ban sections of the order.

If both of those stays are granted, as requested, the Trump administration would be allowed to enforce Trump’s travel and refugee executive order while the questions raised in the challenges to the executive order are being heard by the justices.

Texas Wetback Girl’s “most likely to become a terrorist” Award Sparks Outrage

Muh feelz.

A brown tinted Houston seventh grader had her feelings hurt when her teacher bestowed a mock award on her. Imagine how the dainty, sensitive little border jumpers would feel if that old fashioned punishment, the Dunce Cap were administered to her.

I can only speak for myself but at least a third of my teachers made me “feelz bad” when I was in school. That was normal and expected.

Today, powered by poltical correctness, muh tears spark outrage.

By the way, the teacher in trouble over this tempest in a teapot is black.

CNN

No, your eyes are not deceiving you. These are real certificates that were typed up and presented to 7th graders at Lance Cpl. Anthony Aguirre Junior High School in Houston.

“MOST LIKELY TO BECOME A TERRORIST,” one reads, inside a border of cheerful stars. Another, given to a student in the same class, reads “MOST LIKELY TO BLEND IN WITH WHITE PEOPLE.”

Lauren Easton, whose sister received the “white people” award, told CNN there were others, including one that read “Most Likely to be Homeless in Guatemala.”

“My initial reaction was shock,” Easton said. “I couldn’t believe a teacher could be that bold.” She says her sister was initially embarrassed and just wanted everyone to “drop it.”

Lizeth Villanueva, who was bestowed the unwanted “terrorist” honor, told CNN affiliate KPRC the teacher gave out different “mock awards” to students in her advanced learning class. The teacher told them they were supposed to be funny but they “might hurt [students’] feelings.”

“It was not a joke,” Lizeth said. “I do not feel comfortable with this… I do not feel comfortable being in the same classroom with [the teacher].”

The school has not publicly identified the teacher, and CNN was unable to reach her.

The school’s administration released a statement apologizing for the event and promising an investigation.

“Aguirre Administration would like to first of all apologize for the insensitive and offensive fake mock award that were given to students…As principal, I want to assure all students, parents and community members that these ward statement and ideals are NOT representative of the Aguirre Vision, Mission, and educational goals for its students.”

According to a similar statement from the Channelview School District, “the teacher involved in this matter have been disciplined according to district policy. and the incident is still under investigation.”

Easton says this isn’t the first thing the teacher has done that has raised eyebrows. Before this incident, the teacher, who is black, gave Easton’s sister “a ‘black quiz’ to prove how black she was.”

The students who received the “awards” were enrolled in AVID, an advanced learning and college prep program.

“This is a reprehensible action of a single teacher that does not in any way reflect the AVID values, or the values of the thousands of AVID teachers across the US who impact our students daily,” AVID CEO Sandy Husk said in a statement.

Bring back the Dunce Cap.

White New Orleans Principal Fired After Spotted Wearing “Nazi” Rings in Video

NICHOLAS DEAN. PRINCIPAL AT A BLACK SCHOOL.

Nicolas Dean, the principal of a black school, who has been making headlines in New Orleans the last week or two, has nothing bad to say about African-Americans. In fact, he makes it clear that he admires their racial solidarity.

Where he raised the hackles of social justice warriors is being smart enough to know that white genocide is real. He used to be a liberal, which makes him more aware than many.

Anyway, Dean’s efforts to raise awareness of white genocide has gotten him fired.

NOLA

Crescent Leadership Academy Principal Nicholas Dean has been removed from his job. The announcement was made shortly after a video surfaced showing him wearing rings associated with white nationalism and the Nazi movement.

He “will not return as the Principal or be associated with Crescent Leadership Academy,” the charter school’s parent group and board said in a statement Thursday (May 25).

Dean declined to comment.

Photographer Abdul Aziz posted the video to Facebook and YouTube three days after Crescent Leadership management removed Dean from the campus while investigating a photo that showed him at the statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee next to a Confederate flag.

NICHOLAS DEAN HELPING BLACK STUDENTS AT HIS FORMER SCHOOL.

Continue reading