Western Kentucky Students Demand Reparations for Blacks While Declaring Standardized Tests “a tool for white supremacy”

WKY HAS ALMOST 10K FEMALE STUDENTS VS 7.5K MALES.

At many universities students are obsessed with football, keg parties, and Greek activities. The Student Government Association is usually populated with students who have an agenda of some kind, striving to make a name for themselves so they can go into politics for real later in life.

The backstory on how a group of students voted to give free tuition to blacks (meaning they would pay for themselves and the blacks since nothing is free) and to abolish standardized tests as racist would be an interesting story to know. Alas, we don’t know that story.

Apparently, a lifetime of indoctrination into antiwhiteness motivated them to make a crazy resolution and pass it. The school’s president, while mouthing all kinds of affirmative action nonsense, isn’t buying the student’s resolution.

Bowling Green Daily News

Western Kentucky University’s Student Government Association passed a resolution Tuesday supporting reparations for African-American students.

The resolution calls on WKU to create a task force to “assess the feasibility of test-optional admissions and geographically-weighted admissions,” citing research showing that using standardized test scores in the college admissions process “restricts the college opportunities for needy students, helping higher education perpetuate inequality.”

The resolution passed with a margin of 19-10, with one person declining to vote.

SGA senators Andrea Ambam and Brian Anderson wrote the resolution. Anderson said he and Ambam talked a lot about overcoming racial inequality as a society in drafting the resolution. He said they were inspired by a similar resolution endorsed by students at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

LOL. ANDREA AMBAM, AUTHOR OF THE RESOLUTION.

WKU President Gary Ransdell responded to the resolution through a statement issued Thursday afternoon.

“Student success is an important ongoing discussion at Western Kentucky University, and the recruitment, persistence and success of underrepresented minority students is a daily focus across this institution,” Ransdell wrote.

WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY SORORITY MEMBERS.

Continue reading

Fat Negress in Lingerie Overpowers Internet with Tales of “magical” Curves

LINGERIE PICTURES EMPOWER, SAYS MUH NEGRESS.

Here’s another in a series of articles published by the mainstream media that I’ve seen aimed at fat women to make them feel better about their fatness. The more self-deluded they are, the more the press loves them.

metro.co.uk

Thanks to the body positive movement, we see a wider variety of bodies in the public eye nowadays than ever.

But that’s still not many.

Which is why blogger Jasmine Grimes is using the humble underwear selfie to make an important point about size, diversity and representation.

Jasmine of Mysse Match Mag posted the stunning photograph of herself onto Instagram a week ago – in her underwear, looking over one shoulder – and spoke about the ‘importance of an image’ in the caption beneath.

‘So I wanted to talk about the importance of an image,’ she wrote.

So I wanted to talk about the importance of an image. Over the last few weeks, I have seen so many people discount the importance of a good underwear selfie, and I don't think that's right. Many people have touted how important being confident in your own skin in the real world is, and they are right. There's something magical about a fat girl flaunting her curves unapologetically in clothes that others would say only belongs to a certain body type because it inspires others to do the same, just like an underwear selfie. Photos have the ability to change and shape people's perceptions of things, which is why more visibility of fat bodies is so important. If a single image can change people's perceptions, then what do you think a photo of a fat girl in lingerie can do? I used to scour Instagram for photos women who had my body type showing it off because it inspired me to do the same. It allowed me to see someone with stretch marks and cellulite, and rolls and say "I look like that too". It's important for people to see themselves represented so that way we can encourage the next generation to be more unapologetic than the last. #MyBodyMyRules #lanebryant

A post shared by Jasmine Grimes (@myssematch) on

‘There’s something magical about a fat girl flaunting her curves unapologetically in clothes that others would say only belongs to a certain body type because it inspires others to do the same, just like an underwear selfie.

Are you feeling the magic yet, guys. Here’s another to bring out that fairy dust feeling.

Color Me Happy. 🖍

A post shared by Jasmine Grimes (@myssematch) on

Here’s a couple of bonus photos of Jasmine I found while researching her.

I assume that this nonsense is aimed at black women and that few white women would be taken in by this con artist. She apparently has no time to exercise and no inclination to say no to food.

Racist babies? Infants prefer to learn from adults of their own skin color, study says

Another academic study blows up the “race is a social construct” nonsense theory that liberals love. We’re not “one race, the human race.” Race is real. Even babies know it.

RT.com

Babies who aren’t old enough to walk or talk still manage to exhibit racial bias, according to a new study. The research found that infants prefer to learn from adults who share their skin color.
As part of the study, researchers from the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) and the University of Toronto – along with collaborators from the US, UK, France and China – gave infants a series of videos to watch.

In each video, a female adult looked at one of the four corners of the screen. In some videos, an animal image appeared in the direction she had looked. In other films, an animal image appeared at a non-looked at location.

The results showed that the infants followed the gaze of members of their own race more than they followed the gaze of members of other races.

“This occurred when the faces were slightly unreliable, as they are in the natural environment…” a press release from the University of Toronto states. “This result suggests that, under uncertainty, infants are biased to learn information from own-race adults as opposed to other-race adults.”

Infants under the age of six months were not found to show such bias, according to the study, which was published in the journal Child Development on Monday.

The findings follow a separate study which was conducted by the same researchers and published in the journal Developmental Science in January.

In that study, the researchers played a sequence of videos for three- to 10-month infants. The films depicted female adults with a neutral facial expression.

Before viewing each face, infants heard a music clip. They then participated in one of four music-face combinations: happy music followed by own-race faces; sad music followed by own-race faces; happy music followed by other-race faces; and sad music followed by other-race faces.

The research found that infants aged six- to nine-months looked longer at own-race faces when paired with happy music as opposed to sad music. They looked longer at other-race faces when paired with sad music compared to with happy music.

“Results showed that after six months of age, infants begin to associate own-race faces with happy music and other-race faces with sad music,” the press release states.

As with the first study, infants under the age of six months were not found to have the same bias.

Dr. Kang Lee, a professor at OISE’s Jackman Institute of Child Study and the lead author of both pieces of research, said the findings of both studies are “significant for many reasons.”

“The results show that race-based bias already exists around the second half of a child’s first year. This challenges the popular view that race-based bias first emerges only during the preschool years,” he said.

Meanwhile, Dr. Naiqi (Gabriel) Xiao, first author of the two papers and a postdoctoral fellow at Princeton University, said the findings are notable because they contradict the belief that racial bias is associated with negative experiences a person may have had with other-race individuals. In other words, the children in the study were simply too young to have memories of such experiences.

Pointing to previous studies which indicate that many babies typically experience 90 percent of own-race faces, Lee said that racial interactions during infancy may influence our perceptions about race in adulthood.

“These findings thus point to the possibility that aspects of racial bias later in life may arise from our lack of exposure to other-race individuals in infancy,” he said.

Lee concluded that it is important to identify the starting point of racial bias in order to find ways of preventing it.

Tucker Carlson interview the amiable Dr. Kang Lee in this youtube clip. Tucker gives Dr. Lee a bit of a hard time, but Dr.Lee is NOT one of Tucker’s liberal idiots that he loves to destroy.

Interestingly, dogs are racist too, but only toward blacks. I wish academics would do a study on that.

Entitled Muzzie Making a Stink About Request by Airport Security to Remove Hijab

AGHNIA ADZKIA. IT’S ALL ABOUT HER “RIGHTS.”

Muh discrimination.

A Muslim student is asked by the nice airport security lady to remove her head scarf.

Her response? DISCRIMINATION!

metro.co.uk

A woman was told by airport security that she was not allowed to board when she tried to get on her plane to London – because she was wearing a hijab.

The student refused to remove her headscarf after watching nuns walk through without being asked to remove their habits.

Aghnia Adzkia claims she was discriminated against by Italian airport staff.

The Indonesian citizen filmed her experience at Ciampino Airport in the Italian capital of Rome.

The security official can be heard saying: ‘You are not safe.

‘You could hide something in your hair. If you don’t take it off, we do not know if there’s something inside, okay? You are not safe for us.’

She had refused to take off her hijab on principle claiming she was being unfairly targeted.

The Goldsmith university student claims a male security officer then dragged her out of the security area in ‘indecent way’ grabbing her bag and shouting at her to be quiet.

THE NICE ITALIAN SECURITY LADY PUT SAFETY FIRST.

Speaking to MailOnline, Ms Adzkia said: ‘I completely understand about what is going in the world lately. I stand against terrorism and that’s not Islam.

Ms Adzkia can be seen repeatedly demanding to see the law stating that the hijab must be removed at an airport security check.

‘Yet, what I’ve experienced in Rome was shocking, the way they treated me indecently has shown discrimination. I understand if it is for security reason, but why did they not give me a second to read the law?’

Ms Adzkia alerted Facebook friends to the incident in a post that went viral, however it has since been taken down.

She wrote: ‘I wanted to prove to them that I have nothing to hide and that I am not a terrorist.

‘In the meantime, I saw two nuns wearing headscarves, but they weren’t asked to take them off.

‘Is this what you call fair treatment and respect? Where are my human rights?’

Another hijab-wearing woman, Aisyah Allamanda, said Ms Adzkia should have agreed to remove her headscarf.

The official at the Indonesian Embassy said: ‘The numerous times I’ve flown out of Rome’s airport, I also experienced the same kind of security check as I also happen to wear a hijab.

‘The same applies to others who wear the hijab at Rome KBRI, female Muslims believe that they can’t take off their headscarves in public so they are provided a private room for a female officer to carry out the check.

‘If we refuse, I can understand if the security officer acts aggressively towards us.’

DANGEROUS TERRORISTS. TAKE OFF THOSE NUN’S HABITS.

Australian Milk Bar Bans Black Teens Sparking Outrage and Approval

Rather than just report the facts, this news report out of Australia makes a point of condemning what the reporter believes is racism.

Well, guess what Mr. Reporter, racism is your word for simply telling the truth. So take your editorializing and put it where the sun never shines.

By the way, I’m outraged over the sign too–for banning dogs. They don’t steal.

news.com.au

THE racist note displayed at a Melbourne milk bar was bad enough — but then came the online comments from ordinary members of the public.

A notice stuck to a window of a milk bar in the western Melbourne suburb of Melton caused outrage for many when it became public on Friday. The sign said black teenagers aged between 14-18 were not welcome because they “always steal”.

Many were outraged at the racist tone of the note. But others who left comments online were supportive, some making shocking remarks that were even more offensive than the original note. The majority cannot be published here.

“I can’t blame the store owner if being targeted by these A**s,” said one commenter. “Wouldn’t you put a stop to it if a certain group came to your home and stole from you regularly?”

Another added: “Yes we have gone back in time. We have let primitive Africans into the country who rape steal and assault people. What a lovely situation we are in. At least we don’t offend anybody….”

One particularly vile post said: “Its not racist because blacks aren’t humans.”

The milk bar owner initially tried to explain the note by releasing CCTV footage of eight dark skinned youths in the store, some of who menaced him while their mates stole from the shelves. He told 7 News they always came into his shop and stole things which made him “very angry”.

The note was an impulsive reaction to the incident with the eight youths, he said, but claimed there had been at least 20 other similar incidents in the past.

A common theme from many Australians on various forums was that it wasn’t racism if Sudanese people had stolen from him.

Many people made direct links to Melbourne’s youth gang crisis and spiralling crime rate. “The black c**** are on the news rioting and rampaging every night,” wrote one. “Assimilation, and they don’t do it.”

Some used the incident to call for greater controls over who could come to Australia. “The immigration restriction act of 1901 was this countries greatest achievement.”

Another man added: “At least the Aboriginals are getting left alone now ha oh well the Govt opened the doors for everyone to come here to freeload off the Lucky Country & it’s free for all by the looks.”

Other offensive posts included, “Shoot the C#### first then the dogs,” and, “Shoot the lot of those African scumbags terrorising Melbourne.”

Some of the messages were not overtly offensive or racist but supported the store owner’s actions and the right to defend his business.

A typical response was: “Should he just fling open his doors and say help yourself? Obviously there’s a hell of a lot more to this story than is here. He’s been driven to this no doubt. The police have probably done little to nothing to help him.”

Even in Australia, where racist words can land you in prison, people are willing to speak the truth. Kudos to the store owner in this story (he’s probably Asian, I think) for refusing to put up with black criminality.

Australian police and the government MUST be held accountable for the fuxation of a once great land, dipping its toe into third world waters.

SUDANESE AUSSIES. THIS IS HOW YOU FUXATE YOUR COUNTRY.

HuffPo: Time to Deny White Men the Right to Vote

I have the feeling that the Jews will suddenly become nonwhite when white males can no longer vote.

This op-ed is out of the pen of a South African Jew feminist, Shelley Garland: “Shelley Garland is an activist and a feminist and is currently completing an MA degree in philosophy. When she’s not gagging at South Africa’s unique brand of rainbow politics, she’s working on ways to smash the patriarchy.”

SHELLEY GARLAND. HAS ISSUES WITH WHITE MEN.

If this one is not a Jew, then she’s one of the worst race traitors one can imagine. Just because she looks sane in the picture doesn’t mean that she’s not a lunatic.

Huffington Post

Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa’s biggest cities.

Continue reading

Lawsuit: Faggots Demand Taxpayers Fund Operation to Chop Off D*cks

If they can force a Christian baker to bake a sodomite wedding cake, the courts can force taxpayers to pay for sex change operations.

There’s generally a long lag between the time a lawsuit is filed and the time a ruling is made–several years. Let’s hope that the liberal judges who find new rights for nonwhites, illegal immigrants, and sex perverts, fumble the ball on this one and deny the trannies their money.

Daily Caller

Two employees of the University of Wisconsin have filed a federal lawsuit to force the state’s taxpayers to fund the removal of their penises and various other costs which go along with gender reassignment surgery.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is assisting with the lawsuit, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

The defendants named in the lawsuit include the University of Wisconsin System and its board of regents, as well as some insurers.

The two plaintiffs are Shannon Andrews, a research assistant at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, and Alina Boyden, a teaching assistant in the anthropology department at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Andrews paid for gender reassignment surgery out of pocket and then sought to be reimbursed through insurance but was denied.

Boyden has decided not to have his sex change because his taxpayer-subsidized insurance plan won’t help foot the bill.

There has been no change in Wisconsin law or policy concerning the funding of sex-change operations by taxpayers. The state has not provided such coverage for a long time.

Last year, state officials contemplated using taxpayer funds to sponsor health insurance plans offering sex changes. Ultimately, however, there was no policy change.

The lawsuit claims that health insurance plans offered by the University of Wisconsin system “single out transgender employees for unequal treatment by categorically depriving them of all medical care for gender dysphoria, a serious medical condition codified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and International Classification of Diseases.”

Andrews described the state’s decision not to pay for sex changes as “clearly discrimination.”

“Many people can relate to paying into an insurance plan only to be told that the treatment they need is not covered,” Andrews said in a statement obtained by the Journal Sentinel.

It’s not clear if Andrews believes these “many people” are similarly subjected to discrimination.

A spokesman for Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker defended the state’s policy on providing sex changes at taxpayer expense. The state’s policy “is a reasonable measure that protects taxpayers from funding sex changes for state employees and complies with both state and federal law,” the spokesman, Tom Evenson, told the Journal Sentinel.

The goal of the lawsuit is to convince a federal court to force the state of Wisconsin and its taxpayers to pay for sex changes, according to the Wisconsin State Journal.

The suit claims that state officials have violated the equal protection rights of Andrews of Boyden as well as their rights under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — more commonly called Obamacare.

The good news is that what has been unattached cannot be reattached.