White Policewoman Fined Five Days Pay for Facebook Criticism of NFL Players Who Kneel

KRISTE KIBBEY ETUE. PAID $165,000 A YEAR. APPROX $2,300 FINE.

For once, blacks didn’t get a white person fired.

Daily Mail

A top Michigan police woman will lose five days of pay for sharing a Facebook post in September that called NFL players who kneel during the national anthem ‘anti-American degenerates.’

Col. Kriste Kibbey Etue has been under fire since September 24 when she shared a meme on her personal Facebook page that called NFL players who kneel during the national anthem ‘millionaire ingrates who hate America.’

She has apologized, especially to black lawmakers, but hasn’t publicly explained why she shared it.

Governor Rick Snyder confirmed the penalty Thursday at the end of press release that announced many steps to ‘review the culture of state government.’

Hundreds of athletes have expressed they are taking a knee during the pre-game national anthem as a symbolic protest against racial oppression and incidents of police brutality against blacks.

The controversial message on her personal Facebook page caused outrage, as some have called for her to be fired – which Snyder had already said he would not do.

A patriot has been fined for writing the truth. The fine is a relatively small one. And a coerced apology is no apology.

Kriste expressed the majority view in America. Too bad she doesn’t have the same free speech right to protest that the millionaire players have.

Nonwhite Judge Blocks Trump’s Latest Travel Ban

JUDGE DERRICK WATSON. BLOCKED EARLIER TRAVEL BAN TOO.

Wikipedia tells us that Judge Derrick Watson, who is determined to prevent any travel ban at all from ever taking place for any reason, is an Obama appointee. He is a Native Hawaiian.

He’s also not surprisingly allegedly received threats for his unconcern with public safety.

So, back goes the Attorney General’s office to the Supreme Court, which really needs to excoriate this little Hawaiian worn.

ABC News

A federal judge in Hawaii blocked most of President Donald Trump’s latest travel ban Tuesday, just hours before it was set to take effect, saying the revised order “suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor.”

It was the third set of travel restrictions issued by the president to be thwarted, in whole or in part, by the courts.

U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson issued the ruling after the ban on a set of mostly Muslim countries was challenged by the state of Hawaii, which warned that the restrictions would separate families and undermine the recruiting of diverse college students.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the ruling “dangerously flawed” and said it “undercuts the president’s efforts to keep the American people safe.” The Justice Department said it will quickly appeal.

At issue was a ban, announced in September and set to go into effect early Wednesday, on travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria and Yemen, along with some Venezuelan government officials and their families.

The Trump administration said the ban was based on an assessment of each country’s security situation and willingness to share information with the U.S.

Watson, appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama, said the new restrictions ignore a federal appeals court ruling against Trump’s previous ban.

The latest version “plainly discriminates based on nationality in the manner that the 9th Circuit has found antithetical to … the founding principles of this nation,” Watson wrote.

The judge’s ruling applies only to the six Muslim-majority countries on the list. It does not affect the restrictions against North Korea or Venezuela, because Hawaii did not ask for that.

“This is the third time Hawaii has gone to court to stop President Trump from issuing a travel ban that discriminates against people based on their nation of origin or religion,” Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin said in a statement. “Today is another victory for the rule of law.”

Hawaii argued the updated ban was a continuation of Trump’s campaign call for a ban on Muslims, despite the addition of two countries without a Muslim majority.

Watson noted that Hawaii had argued Trump did not back down from that call, listing in the ruling a series of June tweets “in which (Trump) complained about how the Justice Department had submitted a ‘watered down, politically correct version’ to the Supreme Court.”

Other courts that weighed the travel ban have cited Trump’s comments about banning Muslims, including the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia and a federal judge in Maryland. Watson also referred to a Trump campaign statement in his previous ruling.

His Tuesday ruling said the new ban, like its predecessor, fails to show that nationality alone makes a person a greater security risk to the U.S.

“The categorical restrictions on entire populations of men, women and children, based upon nationality, are a poor fit for the issues regarding the sharing of ‘public-safety and terrorism-related information’ that the president identifies,” Watson wrote.

He said the ban is inconsistent in the way some countries are included or left out. For example, Iraq failed to meet the security benchmark but was omitted from the ban. Somalia met the information-sharing benchmark but was included.

Watson found fault with what sorts of visitors are barred. For instance, all tourists and business travelers from Libya are excluded from the U.S., but student visitors were allowed.

The judge said he would set an expedited hearing to determine whether the temporary restraining order blocking the ban should be extended. It comes as other courts weigh challenges to the ban.

In Maryland, the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups are seeking to block the visa and entry restrictions. Washington state, Massachusetts, California, Oregon, New York and Maryland are challenging the order in front of the same federal judge in Seattle who struck down Trump’s initial ban in January.

That ban — aimed mostly at Muslim-majority countries — led to chaos and confusion at airports nationwide and triggered several lawsuits, including one from Hawaii.

When Trump revised the ban, Hawaii challenged that version, too, and Watson agreed it discriminated on the basis of nationality and religion. A subsequent U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowed the administration to partially reinstate restrictions against Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and against all refugees.

Hawaii then successfully challenged the government’s definition of which relatives of people already living in the U.S. would be allowed into the country, and Watson ordered the list expanded.

Nonwhites shouldn’t be judges except for their own peoples. This one wants to create chaos, justifying it with that liberal catchall, “inclusion.”

Fired L’Oreal Negroid Tranny Munroe Bergdorf is Back in New BBC Video Hating on White People Again

To keep your lunch, breakfast, or dinner down and not on your computer keyboard, you might avoid watching either of the videos embedded in this post. The mulatto tranny here isn’t fooling anyone, but is disgusting to see and listen to.

I listened because I do it for you, the people.

Breitbart

The BBC has produced and aired a “take” by trans model Munroe Bergdorf, in which white people are excoriated as inherently racist and “the most violent and oppressive force of nature on earth”.

Bergdorf, who was previously given a platform by the BBC when cosmetics firm L’Oreal sacked them for similar racist comments, was speaking on the October 12th edition of the BBC This Week current affairs programme.

“What kind of country is modern Britain? No doubt it’s a country that likes to think of itself as inclusive, but that depends on where you’re standing,” Bergdorf complained.

“For me, as a transgender mixed race person, we live in a deeply racist society.”

“Why should we expect anything else from a country that’s built its success on the enslavement of non-white people?” Bergdorf alleged.

“It’s that continuous cycle of racism that explains where we are now. Why does the UK acknowledge the sacrifice of people killed in wars, but not the spilt blood of black people?”

In fact, there are many British memorials commemorating the victims of the slave trade and celebrating its abolition. The oldest, according to Historic England, is the Anti-Slavery Arch in Stroud, Gloucestershire, erected in 1834 by Henry Wyatt to celebrate the passing of the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833.

The most recent appears to have been a memorial erected in June this year to commemorate Sir Thomas Fowell Buxton, a parliamentarian who campaigned tirelessly against slavery.

Alt-Right picks up on Bergdorf’s obsession with feelings over facts.

Bergdorf himself has a fascinating passive-aggressive debating style worth mentioning, which I’d like to call “the hair-trigger roundhouse bitch”. In this unique style of communication favored by feminists and SJWs, one treats all questions and offers of discussion as deeply offensive assaults upon one’s feelings. Facts and figures, especially, are insulting, as they are used as weapons to invalidate one’s anecdotal evidence and emotion-based talking points which form 100% of the roundhouse bitch’s intellectual arsenal. Questions and stated facts are never actually responded to, only deflected in these two ways: 1. by whining about one’s imaginary victim status and 2. by complaining about being “misunderstood”. Amid the sympathy-seeking wails, the roundhouse bitch snidely counterattacks with angry, oftentimes unintentionally humorous outbursts and insults that betray the bitch’s true hate-fueled agenda and desire to dominate and crush opposing views. Such a debating style can be clearly observed in the video clip below, from the Victoria Derbyshire program on which Bergdorf made an appearance after L’Oreal fired him in early September.

This unhappy creature isn’t needed anywhere in the West, including in Britain. He should either kill himself or move to some paradise free of white people. I recommend almost any country in Africa.

Twin Daughters of George W. Bush Needed “comfort” After Trump’s Election Night Victory

THE TWINS. 35 NOW. PROBABLY NOT QUITE AS DUMB AS CHELSEA CLINTON.

George W. Bush, the so-called compassionate conservative, was a huge disappointment to me, a Reagan Republican at the time. We thought we had ourselves a new Reagan, but we were wildly off.

George W. Bush’s twins praise their father and grandfather for having a “softer side.” Their father was attacked unmercilessly by Democrats and the media. He failed to respond. His softer side by silence.

Donald Trump’s base loves him because he refuses to be a punching bag for the left. He punches back.

And as shown by his victory over the NFL, he sometimes wins.

The Bush ladies surely know that their father and grandfather are New World Order stooges.

People

The morning after Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton for the presidency, twins Jenna and Barbara Bush, 35, woke up together in Jenna’s bed (her husband, Henry Hager, was away), “filled with gratitude that we had each other for comfort,” they write in their upcoming joint memoir.

The divisiveness that marred the 2016 election—and how their profound connection as sisters was a force to lean on through that and other milestones in their lives—were key inspirations for the former first daughters’ book, Sisters First, out Oct. 24.

n the deeply personal, emotional and often funny book, the sisters, who called the White House home from 2001 to 2009, wax nostalgic about the administrations of America’s 41st president, (“Gampy” George H.W. Bush) and the 43rd (dad George W.), when D.C was a gentler place, while taking care not to fault only Trump for what Barbara calls today’s “belittling and demeaning” political dialogue. “I don’t think it can be blamed only on him,” Barbara tells PEOPLE in an at-home interview for this week’s new issue.

“With our grandfather and our dad, there was a softer side and I do hope it goes back to that,” Jenna, a Today correspondent, says in the interview at Barbara’s lower Manhattan apartment just four blocks away from the home Jenna shares with her husband, Henry Hager and their two daughters, Mila, 4, and Poppy, 2.

A softer side? I think the girls mean a losing side.

Adds Barbara, the ultra-private co-founder and CEO of the nonprofit Global Health Corps, of what she sees as the rampant culture of discrimination against various groups of people: “That, of course, takes dignity away from people — away from populations of people that are distinct people and can’t be categorized as one.”

To their credit, the twins go on to denounce attacks upon children in the White House, including attacks on 11 year old Barron Trump.

If this book of theirs is widely read, I’ll be surprised.

Detroit firefighter fired for bringing watermelon to station

A white firefighter in Detroit (aka Detoilet) raised the hackles of the gentlemen of color who manned the firehouse to which he had been assigned by his supervisors.

Those colored gentlemen raised a ruckus when he, as is traditionally done, brought his new brothers a gift–a watermelon.

They looked a gift horse in the mouth and he’s now looking for another job.

Fox2 Detroit

DETROIT (WJBK) – Fired before he officially started.

Last Monday, 41-year-old Robert Pattison went to introduce himself to his fellow firefighters at Engine 55 at Joy and Southfield in Detroit.

Second Battallion Chief Shawn McCarty calls it a tradition for firefighters.

“It’s not mandatory, it’s voluntary,” he said. “You come in bearing gifts. The usual gift is doughnuts but you are allowed to bring whatever you want to bring in.”

And Pattison, a probationary firefighter, decided to bring a watermelon wrapped in a pink ribbon.

We’re told some African-American firefighters were instantly offended since 90 percent of the people who work at Engine 55 are black.

“When you get your first detail at a firehouse you pretty much know what you are getting yourself into,” said Patrick Trout. “So you would have to say it was probably a bad call.”

FOX 2: “Is it racially insensitive to bring a watermelon into a fire house?”

“To some people,” McCarty said.

FOX 2 spoke to Pattison by phone who claims it was not a joke – and he did not mean to offend his fellow firefighters. But he clearly did.

Fire Commissioner Eric Jones says the Fenton native was officially discharged.

In a statement Jones says: “There is zero tolerance for discriminatory behavior inside the Detroit Fire Department. On Saturday, Sept. 30, 2017, at Engine 55, a trial firefighter (probationary employee) engaged in unsatisfactory work behavior which was deemed offensive and racially insensitive to members of the Detroit Fire Department.

“After a thorough investigation, it was determined that the best course of action was to terminate the employment of this probationary employee.”

In a world where racial tensions run high, some tell me the trial firefighter should have known better. Trout doesn’t know if he meant anything by it – but feels it was a bad choice.

“For sure by far it was,”

The question is did DFD take it too far?

FOX 2: “Should he have lost his job over a watermelon?”

“I don’t think so,” McCarty said. “Between what he did and what was there are a few things that could have been done.”

Getting fired for trying to be nice to the Negroid race is further proof that the mantra remains true: Avoid the groid. Around blacks, never relax.

Ohio fireman suspended for saying he would rescue a dog from a burning building before saving a ‘n*gger’

TYLER ROYSDON. DOG LOVER, NOT A N*GGER LOVER.

I’m with Tyler Roysden. How about you?

Raw Story

A fireman from Franklin Township in Ohio has been suspended for posting on Facebook that he would rather save a dog than a “n*gger” during an emergency.

According to WHIO, volunteer fireman Tyler Roysdon has been suspended over the racist Facebook post which has since been taken down.

The report notes that Roysdon wrote that if he had to choose between saving a dog and an African American man from a burning building, he’d save the dog’s life because “one dog is more important than a million n*ggers.”

Despite being a volunteer, the Ohio firefighter is paid for when his services are needed — but will not be called while his case is under review.

“Recently, a Franklin Township volunteer firefighter posted unacceptable remarks on social media. Upon gaining knowledge of this information, Fire Chief Steve Bishop immediately contacted the firefighter and directed the comments be removed. The firefighter was suspended without pay until the Board of Township Trustees could meet to determine a course of action. Chief Bishop does not have the authority to terminate employees. Termination of any township employee requires a vote by the Board of Trustees,” a statement from the township read.

Five “Handicapped” New York City (((Nonwhites))) Have Filed 400 Discrimination Lawsuits

ZOLTAN HIRSCH. MAKES A NICE LIVING FILING LAWSUITS.

I think I’ll change my name to Shecky Schlomo Goldensteinbergwitz and start a new career as a scammer.

New York Post

Five New Yorkers in wheelchairs are behind nearly 400 lawsuits brought against small businesses for lacking handicap access.

Such legal claims have been criticized as part of a “cottage industry” of “serial plaintiffs” who target mom-and-pop establishments for quick cash settlements. But others see the suits as helping enforce the American with Disabilities Act.

Wheelchair ramps and bathroom doors are not the only battleground. Two blind New Yorkers have taken the fight online, filing a combined 23 suits against business Web sites that didn’t have screen-reading software for the visually impaired. And a woman cited seven businesses for not allowing her service dog inside.

Zoltan Hirsch, 37, a double amputee from Brooklyn, is hell on wheels for those who fail to make their establishments wheelchair accessible. Since 2010, he has filed suit against 195 businesses ranging from a Soho eyeglass shop to Brooklyn bodegas to a Hell’s Kitchen restaurant.

Four other New Yorkers have filed 200 suits over wheelchair access: Luigi Girotto (70 suits), Pedro Fontanes (55), Jerry Cankat (52) and Nauqone Taylor (23).

Fontanes, 69, of Queens, has filed 13 suits against businesses along Fifth Avenue in Park Slope between Ninth and Bergen streets.

He claims to have suffered “harm” and “injury” at cafes including Le Pain Quotidien, Pizza Town, Uncle Barry’s, SkyIce Sweet & Savory, Dizzy’s Diner and Konditori Swedish Espresso Bar.

At Konditori, he also griped that the bathroom mirror was too high.

Mark Caserta, director of the Park Slope Fifth Avenue Business Improvement District committee, blasted the suits, saying: “This shouldn’t be happening. Small business are already struggling to stay afloat, and these lawsuits could put them over the edge.”

Dennis Kearney, an attorney who defended Uncle Barry’s craft beer bar against Fontanes this year, noted most defendants settle to escape the cost of litigation.

“Why would somebody pay $100,000 in legal fees to go to trial when they can pay a fraction of that and be done with it?” he said.

Plaintiffs typically ask for modest damages but demand payment of their attorneys’ fees, which can top $20,000. Kearney believes the plaintiffs and lawyers split the fees.

Commercial Web sites are the newest lucrative legal target.

Blind Brooklyn resident Marion Kiler, 66, sued eight sites throughout the state during May and June.

Among them was the Museum of Sex’s online store, where she claimed to have made “numerous” attempts to buy products. The site’s wares range from nipple clamps to penis-shaped pasta.

Cheryl Krist, 62, of Manhattan, has brought seven suits against businesses, including an East Village McDonald’s, for not allowing her service dog, Bocci, inside.

DYKEY LOOKING CHERYL KRIST AND BOCCI. WHERE SHE GOES, THE DOG GOES.

But Kenneth Shiotani, an attorney at the National Disability Rights Network, called private litigation the “most effective enforcement mechanism” to make the city disability friendly.

Between the nogs, the Juggalos, the obese, the scammers, and other assorted garbage who inhabit America today, it must be the case that more than half the population produces zilch. Meanwhile, I understand that China has a eugenics program well under way to improve the physical and mental qualities of its human inhabitants.

The parasites are killing the host.

You are witnessing the death rattle of a dying society. Good-bye America, it was nice knowing ya.