White College Girls Get Earring Orders from Nonwhites

If you allow a group of thuggish Marxist wetbacks to tell you what you can and can’t wear, you just might be a cuck.

As you read the story, note the term “Latinx.” It’s gender neutral to these a**holes, incorporating Latina and Latino into one.

You may think that earrings are not important but the symbolism of the Mexican takeover of California is striking.

Daily Mail

White women accused of cultural appropriation have been told to scrap their ‘hoop earrings’ after a group of Latino college students complained that ‘black and brown folks’ were being exploited by it.

A group of students, identifying themselves as women of color, wrote, ‘White Girl, take off your hoops’ on a ‘free wall’ used for unmoderated free speech at Pitzer College in Los Angeles, California.

After one student was confused by the message, Alegria Martinez, Jacquelyn Aguilera, and Stefania Gallo-Gonzalez addressed the school in emails explaining the ‘artwork’.

Martinez wrote: ‘The black and brown bodies who typically wear hooped earrings, (and other accessories like winged eyeliner, gold name plate necklaces, etc) are typically viewed as ghetto, and are not taken seriously by others in their daily lives.

ALGERIA MARTINEZ. STUDENT BULLSHITTER. WHORE.

‘White people have actually exploited the culture and made it into fashion,’ she added.

While hoop earrings date back to ancient times, they have also been staples among Cholas and hip hop artists who popularized large hoops and doorknocker earrings before they were featured in fashion shows like the Marc Jacobs Fall 2017 collection.

Martinez, an active member of the Latinx Student Union, wrote an email to the entire student body explaining that hoop earrings are just one accessory appropriated by white people, the Claremont Independent reported.

She said: ‘The art was created by myself and a few other WOC [women of color] after being tired and annoyed with the reoccurring theme of white women appropriating styles…that belong to the black and brown folks who created the culture.

‘The culture actually comes from a historical background of oppression and exclusion.

‘The black and brown bodies who typically wear hooped earrings, (and other accessories like winged eyeliner, gold name plate necklaces, etc) are typically viewed as ghetto, and are not taken seriously by others in their daily lives.

‘Because of this, I see our winged eyeliner, lined lips, and big hoop earrings serving as symbols as an everyday act of resistance, especially here at the Claremont Colleges.

‘Meanwhile we wonder, why should white girls be able to take part in this culture (wearing hoop earrings just being one case of it) and be seen as cute/aesthetic/ethnic.

‘White people have actually exploited the culture and made it into fashion,’ she said.

After the incident received national media attention, Martinez, Aguilera, and Gallo-Gonzalez say they have been harassed by ‘right-wing groups and individuals’. One received a death threat through Facebook messenger, they said.

College President Melvin L. Oliver issued a statement condemning the ‘cycle of violent hate speech’ directed at students as a result.

The university’s president is a Negro. This dumb ass should have condemned the effort by his wetbacks to terrorize white girls, but instead he sided with the browns and blacks.

PRESIDENT MELVIN L. OLIVER.

Latinx propaganda:

Not only must whites separate from blacks, but actually it seems that Mestizos have taken control of wide swaths of territory, giving marching orders to whites.

Unacceptable!

Globalist Jew David Rockefeller Dead at 101

The Rockefellers deny being Jews, but check out this article by Henry Makow that names the Rockefellers, Sonia Sotomayor, and Hugh Hefner as Jews.

Excerpt from Infowars

David Rockefeller, a globalist central banker who advocated a “New World Order” and mass population control while wielding vast influence over world leaders, died Monday at the age of 101.

A family spokesman, Fraser P. Seitel, confirmed his passing.
Rockefeller was well-known for openly bragging about the transnational elite’s plans to centralize control over the world’s populations, wealth and resources.

“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it,” he wrote in his book Memoirs.

Rockefeller also revealed the extent of corporate media collusion with this gameplan.

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years … It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years,” he said at the 1991 Bilderberg meeting. “But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.”

“The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”

I haven’t watched all of the following video, but it’s looking good as it plays out in the background.

Inspirational Quote of the Day: One by Alexander Solzhenitsyn

As in Russia, so in the West today.

Learn more about Alexander Solzhenitsyn at Wikipedia.

Excerpt:

Solzhenitsyn also harshly criticised what he saw as the ugliness and spiritual vapidity of the dominant pop culture of the modern West, including television and much of popular music: “…the human soul longs for things higher, warmer, and purer than those offered by today’s mass living habits… by TV stupor and by intolerable music.” Despite his criticism of the “weakness” of the West, Solzhenitsyn always made clear that he admired the political liberty which was one of the enduring strengths of western democratic societies. In a major speech delivered to the International Academy of Philosophy in Liechtenstein on 14 September 1993, Solzhenitsyn implored the West not to “lose sight of its own values, its historically unique stability of civic life under the rule of law—a hard-won stability which grants independence and space to every private citizen.”[54]
In a series of writings, speeches, and interviews after his return to his native Russia in 1994, Solzhenitsyn spoke about his admiration for the local self-government he had witnessed first hand in Switzerland and New England.[55][56] He “praised ‘the sensible and sure process of grassroots democracy, in which the local population solves most of its problems on its own, not waiting for the decisions of higher authorities.'”[57] Solzhenitsyn’s patriotism was inward-looking. He called for Russia to “renounce all mad fantasies of foreign conquest and begin the peaceful long, long long period of recuperation,” as he put it in a 1979 BBC interview with Janis Sapiets.[58]

During his life Solzhenitsyn faced many accusations of antisemtism for telling the truth about Jews.

The Left’s Violent Endgame

Zerohedge

The Democrat Party, its Media serfs, and Social Justice Incorporated are all outraged because we uppity normals are again presuming to rule ourselves, and their agony is delightful. Less delightful is how, in the process of trying to claw their way back into power, they are incinerating the norms and rules that preserve our political order. That stuff Hillary babbled about honoring the legitimacy of elections? Yeah, no. There’s an invisible asterisk only liberals can see that explains that the norms and rules are void when liberals lose.

So, where does this crisis end?

We know where the leftists want it to end, with us silenced and subservient forever, toiling to pay taxes for them to redistribute to their clients as they pick at, poke at and torment us. You look at the things Trump stands for and all of them are about lifting the yoke off of us – cutting taxes, slashing regulations, guaranteeing the Second Amendment, protecting our religious liberty, and safeguarding us from terrorists and illegals. But everything liberals want, everything Hillary ran on, is about clamping the yoke ever tighter around our necks – raising taxes, issuing more regulations, disarming us, limiting our religious freedom, and putting us at risk from terrorists and alien criminals. The whole leftist platform is about putting us down and keeping us down.

Think what they will do if they take power again.

The author, Kurt Schlichter, fears that Civil War II is headed our way. The dead would number in the millions and the conflict would continue until the left is exterminated, along with their totalitarian belief system.

One commenter at Zerohedge sees the rural population marching into the cities with long guns and rope:

How does this “end”?

The end comes severely, brutally and violently. The armed, rural populace marches, armed and en masse, into the urban, leftist centers of power and overthrows them. Long rope and lamp posts. This is followed by rapid trials, many hardly legal, and executions. Remember, it’s the conservatives in this country who are well-armed. The leftists by their very nature abhor the idea of having to defend themselves.

Please understand, I do not now nor ever will advocate for this. I just don’t see how we avoid it. I’m too old and too infirmed to march anywhere. But there are many who are not in such poor condition. And they are just as resolute.

The article fails to mention Jews as the sh*t stirrers here and now. The conflict just might be a second Holocaust. A real one this time. A Holocaust that offers the opportunity for permanent relief from the theft of our rights under natural law.

California offers an example of how the leftist soft tyranny was installed. It serves as a role model for the left.

They are certainly not going to risk us ever being able to repeat November’s rejection. California’s decline lays out their tyrannical road map. When the Democrats took power here, they “reformed” the election laws to lock-in their party, co-opted the “nonpartisan” redistricting process, and changed the ballot initiative system to make sure we will never see another unapproved proposition. They ensured there is no way to stop illegal aliens from voting because they want illegal aliens voting.

Continue reading

Neo-Con (((Bill Kristol))) Prefers Deep State to Trump

Bill-Kristol-ziocon

The Deep State serves the Jewish oligarchs who covertly rule America. Of course, he prefers the Deep State.

Muh Jew is already softening up the public for impeachment:

Excerpt from Breitbart

Foreign-policy hawk Bill Kristol Tweeted out his preference for a political victory by “the deep state” above the nation’s laws and over President Donald Trump’s voters and policies, amid an increasing furor over the forced resignation of Gen. Mike Flynn.

The “deep state” is jargon for the semi-hidden army of bureaucrats, officials, retired officials, legislators, contractors and media people who support and defend established government policies.

Those “deep state” officials include the intelligence, law-enforcement and national security officials who worked in President Barack Obama’s administration but who are still working in permanent or temporary positions in the White House and in surrounding agencies. Many of those officials are believed to be leaking information from within the White House to allies in the anti-Trump media, including Kristol.

Coming after Flynn’s departure, Kristol’s Tweet indicates his support for the semi-hidden — and potentially illegal — actions by government officials who helped push out Flynn by taping and leaking his private calls with the Russian ambassador.

Kristol still has over 100,000 Twitter followers, but the truth is that he’s irrelevant. His inability to say anything good about Donald Trump, plus his smarmy smirky smile makes him garbage.

Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Efforts to Make America Safe Again

At least as far as the ninth circuit appeals court is concerned, the law is trumped by ideology. In this case the ideology of inclusion, diversity, and multiculturalism. As long as at least some Muslims aren’t going to commit mass murder, then we have to admit them all and let it shake out later.

The blood of your families is on the hands of the leftist/anarchist politically correct judges who have stopped the president from using the powers granted him by the Constitution.

Exerpt from The Guardian

Donald Trump’s controversial travel ban suffered a major setback on Thursday after a panel of three judges upheld a temporary ruling which had halted the president’s limit on people arriving from seven Muslim majority countries.

In its unanimous ruling, the three judges on the ninth circuit court of appeals upheld the temporary restraining order, which was issued by Judge James Robart, a federal district court judge in Washington state, and has blocked the enforcement of many key parts of the executive order.

The court found that “the government has not shown a stay is necessary to avoid irreparable injury.” In particular, its ruling noted “the government has pointed to no evidence that any alien from any of the countries named in the order has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the United States. Rather than present evidence to explain the need for the executive order, the government has taken the position that we must not review its decision at all.”

Almost immediately, Trump tweeted his response: “SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!”

Speaking to reporters in the West Wing shortly after that the ruling, he characterized it as “a political decision” and said that “the safety of the nation is at stake”. Trump added that he “looks forward to seeing them in court”.

Thursday’s ruling does not end all litigation over the executive order, which sparked international outcry when it was first issued. Instead, it simply means that its provisions – which include a 90-day travel ban from seven Muslim-majority countries, a 120-day freeze on admission of any refugees into the United States, as well as indefinite halt to admitting any refugees from Syria – cannot be enforced again as the legal battle moves forward. There are roughly 20 lawsuits against the travel ban currently making their way through courts in various states.

On Robart’s injunction, the federal government can now ask the supreme court to review the ninth circuit’s ruling. But the unanimous ruling suggests that the Trump administration will struggle to make a convincing argument.

The supreme court could also sidestep controversy and defer an appeal, leaving the ruling in place as the case works its way through other courts.

The appeals court decision follows a hearing Tuesday night, where lawyers for the state of Washington, which was challenging the ban, argued with attorneys for the justice department.

The selection from the Guardian’s report on this afternoon’s decision offers the basics of the story. I encourage you to click on the link and read all of it because as part of its decision the court has ruled that Trump’s Tweets can be used as evidence that he’s a bigot who hates Muslims. In other words, his mindset can be used against the president’s ability to write laws.

I’m not a legal scholar, but I think I’ve hit on an extremely dangerous new legal precedent.

Also in the opinion, the judges wrote that “it is well established that evidence of purpose” from a case’s context can be used in court – meaning that the states can cite Trump’s claims and tweets, for instance about his preference for Christians and call for a “complete and total shutdown of Muslims”, as admissible evidence.

Trump’s long history of controversial statements, the court suggested, can therefore be used as legal weapons against him.

There is no evidence that Trump hates Muslims. He’s repeatedly said that he seeks the public’s safety. But now the left can argue that he’s a Muslim hater, a woman hater, Mexican hater, etc. and possibly get otherwise lawful orders overturned. In other words, to keep it simple, if Obama does it, it’s legal. If Trump does it, it’s illegal.

This is not the rule of law. It’s a recipe for the assassination of judges and a civil war.

What’s happened is that we’ve had a judicial coup d’etat in the United States. The balance of power is such that a handful of judges, unelected, rule the country now.

Link to Ninth Circuit Site: State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. Trump

“Submit and Obey:” The TYRANNY of WOMEN Over MEN

The analysis of America today by Eric Peters laid out below has three dimensions:

1. We are slaves to an all-powerful evil government.

2. The bureaucrats who control us are petty, tyrannical women.

3. Sports are a tool of the Deep State used to deflect our attention from our slavery and to dissipate our manly rage, which would otherwise explode in violent rebellion.

Given the obsession with yesterday’s Super Bowl, the timing of Peter’s essay is impeccable.

Excerpt from Eric Peters Autos

These games – a new one to keep people busy almost every day, year-round – are not so much “bread and circuses,” as they are often called. They are the vivification of the fictional Two Minutes’ Hate in Orwell’s 1984. A means by which the passions – the frustrations and anger of men in particular – are diverted and dissipated.

In order that they aren’t directed at anything important.

Such as the ever-increasing control exercised over men by the state.

In red giant stage America, the average man has little meaningful control over his life. He does as he’s told – from driving the speed limit to paying “his” taxes. In the land of individuality, collectivism and conformity is the rule.

He must Submit and Obey. He must never raise his voice to question authority.

This stifling of independent action, punishment of deviation from any official orthodoxy and relentless suppression of independent judgment and self-reliance… this systematic thwarting of a normal man’s inclination to be a man. . . well, the pressure builds.

The movie, Falling Down, captured this brilliantly. Unfortunately for Michael Douglas’ character, he wasn’t interested in “the game.”

The demand that men submit and obey is also hammered into today’s boys – usually by women.

Orwell got one thing wrong. It is not Big Brother.

It is Big Sister.

Everywhere, there are short-haired, pants-suited termagants vested with power; the sort who in a better time would have been spinster librarians and generally harmless. Today they infect bureaucracies such as EPA and DOJ and many others besides.

We encounter them at the doctor’s office and DMV.

The beetle-like little men that Orwell described abound, too. But they tyranny of our times is not a masculine tyranny such as Stalin’s. Note that in the Soviet Union, people were still largely free to partake of petty vices such as booze and cigarettes. Soviet power didn’t limit the size of sodas or force people to wear seat belts. It enforced political conformity only.

Maybe that’s why fuhhhhhhttttttball was never a big deal in the Soviet Union.

America’s tyranny is the tyranny of the elementary school marm over grown up men.

These days, a man can’t even paint his own house without first begging permission from the local Gertrud Schlotz-Klink. . . and if he doesn’t cut his grass when ordered or erects a shed unapproved…

As the essay draws to a conclusion, Peters notes that sports dissipates the male anger and outrage at being lorded over by petty female tyrants.

I’d rather stay in touch with my rage, live in reality, and ignore sports. How to deal with petty tyrants is still a difficult question, one that has no easy answers.

My own inclination is to sabotage the System (legally) every time I can.