Alt-Right and Alt-Light in Conflict Over JEWS

LAURA LOOMER, ALT-LIGHT JEW PROVOCATEUR.

RICHARD SPENCER. THE ALT-RIGHT LEADER HAS ISSUES WITH THE ALT-LIGHT.

When Laura Loomer disrupted the Central Park Trump assassination play last week, it hit all the major news outlets. The message was that Trump supporters were no longer going to sit idly by while the left advocated murder.

White identitarian Richard Spencer, a former Trump supporter, objected to Loomer’s stunt, claiming that it was an antifa tactic that the alt-right should disavow.

As reported by WTOP, Washington, D.C. will witness two rallies by the right on Sunday. One will be hosted by Spencer. The other will be hosted by alt-light conservative and Infowars contributor Mike Cernovich and will feature Loomer.

Thus, the right in America has already been split by Jewish Loomer.

The question that should be on the minds of white nationalists, race realists, Trump supporters, conservatives, and libertarians is how to unite a movement that is fragmenting while the left sits back and gloats at our infighting.

The following piece details how the split developed, focusing on Loomer’s high profile guerrilla theater tactics and her relationship with the alt-light.

Haaretz

The Jewish Provocateur Caught in the Turf War as the ‘Alt-right’ Battles the ‘Alt-light’

A video of Laura Loomer went viral, showing her stopping a production of Julius Caesar to ‘protect Trump.’ Trump supporters cheered, but then the alt-right attacked

NEW YORK — Days after Republicans criticized a Shakespeare in The Park production of “Julius Caesar” for making its Caesar look like Donald Trump — and of course Caesar gets assassinated — one Trump supporter decided to take her indignation to the next level. On Friday, Laura Loomer rushed the stage in Central Park during a performance, live-streaming as she protested.

“Stop the normalization of political violence against the right!” she shouted on stage. “This is unacceptable! You cannot promote violence against Donald Trump!” One actress responded, “We’re not promoting it,” and Loomer shouted, “Yes you are, this is violence against Donald Trump.” The play was stopped and the crowd booed. “Shame on the New York Public Theater for doing this!” Loomer shouted. “You guys are ISIS!”

Loomer, a self-described “proud Jew,” was escorted from the stage by security, arrested and later released. She has been charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct. Many Trump supporters are celebrating her on social media with the trending Twitter hashtag #FreeLaura.

Conservative commentator Sean Hannity invited Loomer to his show on Fox News, where she called the production “assassination porn” and said she was protecting the president’s life. Hannity praised her for being courageous.

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter has also cheered Loomer on, supporting the Arizona native’s campaign to raise money to cover her legal fees. The Infowars website’s Alex Jones and other right-wing pundits like Mike Cernovich, Laura Ingraham and Cassandra Fairbanks also supported her action. The following day, Loomer’s protest was imitated by two members of the right-wing group Proud Boys, who also rushed the stage during a performance of “Julius Caesar.”

Continue reading

Jones vs. Kelly: Finally Over?

The embedded video above shows Alex Jones, Mike Cernovich, and Steve Pieczenik talking about the lies and distortions that Megyn Kelly brought to the table with her segment on Jones Sunday night.

NBC is blocking the publication of Megyn Kelly’s “interview” with Alex Jones on youtube. You can watch it on the Megyn Kelly webpage.

Kelly’s interview is a hatchet job. Until I heard the biased language coming from Kelly and her guests I never knew that anyone considered the Fat Man to be offensive because of his presentation of alternate views of some of the major news events of this century–9/11, the Sandy Hook shootings, Obama’s birth certificate, and more. The thing that bothered most of the conspiracy realists I follow was his failure to address the Jewish Question.

You have to believe that the sudden mainstream media interest in Jones is related to his relationship with President Donald Trump. By smearing Jones, some of the mud splatters upon Trump too.

When you consider that the press smears Trump a dozen times a day, seven days a week with their fake news narratives, why would anyone trust the press to tell the truth about Jones or any other “deplorable”?

Furthermore, when you consider the Neocon’s love of war and hostility to freedom, why would you trust the government to tell the truth?

All of the stories related to Kelly’s 17 minutes of anti-Jones, anti-Trump material stick with the narrative that Jones is evil and dangerous.

Excerpt from Variety

The one strong takeaway from the entire segment was that Jones is newsworthy and dangerous because he has the ear of our volatile president. The segment starts with that sentiment, and then proceeds to enumerate various situations in which Jones is a concerning public figure (including an interview with Neil Heslin, who lost his son in the Sandy Hook tragedy). Then it ends. To be sure, Kelly is right to observe that the connection is worth investigating. But the “Sunday Night” segment doesn’t seem like investigating; it’s instead a wind-up to a punch with no subsequent impact.

At least Variety acknowledges Kelly’s failures. But that’s probably because liberals hate her for her prior association with Fox News.

Excerpt from Deadline

One of Kelly’s fiercest critics, watchdog site Media Matters, called the broadcast “a report that was originally billed as a self-promotional head-to-head showdown with Alex Jones but got turned into “a well-edited investigation of the dangers posed by an unstable megalomaniac with millions of loyal fans, including one in the Oval Office” owing to a “well-deserved firestorm of denunciations.”

Insisting that Kelly deserves little credit for the changes the org warned its damage already had been done, saying “the network’s impotent reaction to Jones’ own grabs for media attention may allow the nation’s biggest producer of conspiracy theory media to come out the winner of tonight’s program.”

Jones seemed to agree. On YouTube, he live-streamed himself breaking open a bottle of champagne and calling the broadcast a big win.

Kellybots will follow her lead and spend Monday at the watercooler at work echoing the nonsense that Jones is dangerous. He may be loud and he may not get everything right and he may even be controlled opposition, but questioning 9/11 and Sandy Hook is patriotic, not dangerous.

The dirtbags at NBC and the liberal media don’t understand the appeal of Alex Jones. I could only find one article that treats him fairly.

Excerpt from American Thinker

Considering the longer term, Jones is in touch with and riding the wave of a powerful new meme that’s gaining currency worldwide. Its adherents believe that the game is stacked against the middle class as powerful and often unseen Deep State actors, globalists, the media, academia, popular culture, government bureaucracies, and other corrupt players conspire to transform for the worse life as we know it. Peaceful opposition to this onslaught is, as Jones has defined it – the Infowar. The Internet and the new media are making more plausible a worldwide wake-up call and a paradigm shift in information, awareness, and action. And they aren’t going away.

Meanwhile, one wonders what the NBC suits are thinking now about their widely reported $15 million-plus investment in their new golden girl, Megyn Kelly. She is decidedly not an Infowarrior or open in the least to the emerging new paradigm. And as her work at NBC is demonstrating, she is not even a good journalist.

Styx, not a fan of Jones or Kelly also gets it.

Twitter reactions:

“Trump is a Nazi Warmonger” Billboard in Phoenix Paid for by Taxpayer Dollars

PAID FOR BY PHOENIX, ARIZONA TAXPAYERS.

Judicial Watch via The Burning Platform

A controversial billboard depicting President Donald Trump as a Nazi was funded with taxpayer dollars and was commissioned by an “arts advocate” paid by a U.S. city to “diminish barriers,” records obtained by Judicial Watch reveal. The massive billboard caused a ruckus when it was unveiled in downtown Phoenix, Arizona in mid-March because it features a menacing portrait of Trump surrounded by mushroom clouds—in the shape of laughing clowns—and swastikas modified as dollar signs. A pin of a Russian flag appears on the president’s lapel.

The huge display towers over Grand Avenue and Taylor Street in downtown Phoenix and will remain there throughout Trump’s presidency, according to the local art gallery that claims to own it and conveniently omits that public money is involved. A multitude of local and national media outlets covered the controversy surrounding the artist that created it and the contentious image it portrays, but all have failed to uncover the important fact that taxpayer dollars are behind it. Instead, the media has reported that the Trump Nazi billboard was commissioned by the billboard owner, Beatrice Moore, a longtime patron of the arts on Grand Avenue. Moore’s deep ties to the city and the cash she receives for her various public art endeavors have remained secret. The news reports have also focused on the death threats that the artist, Karen Fiorito, has received. A local paper reported that the billboard went up during an annual art event and that the artist aimed to stir up a controversy.

Mainstream national media also failed to report the important fact that taxpayer dollars contributed to the offensive billboard. The Washington Post opted to serve as a mouthpiece for Fiorito’s anti-Trump tirade. In a piece published days after the billboard controversy hit the artist calls Trump supporters “scumbags” and says the country is on a “very dangerous path” toward “total annihilation.” A California news outlet focused on Fiorito’s death threats and her interpretation of the art, which “represents global destruction, warfare and annihilation of the planet.” The dollar swastikas represent “corporate power and greed and how our society has become all about money and corporatism,” the artist says in the story.

ARTIST KAREN FIORITO. OBAMA/HILLARY STARTED 7(?) WARS AND NOT A PEEP OUT OF THE BITCH.

Shortly after the billboard was erected Judicial Watch filed a public records request with the city of Phoenix to obtain details related to public monies connected to organizations and organizers of the sign. This week Judicial Watch received the documents that show the city of Phoenix has awarded Moore, the Trump Nazi billboard owner and a prominent figure in the local art community, thousands of dollars in grants for a program she runs called Grand Avenue Arts & Preservation (GAP), which encompasses the Art Detour event where the Nazi billboard made its debut. The publicly funded annual art celebration is touted as having “a diverse slate of activities created by local artists and art venues to celebrate the growing, vibrant Phoenix arts scene” and is described as “…one of the most important events in Phoenix’s calendar” by Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton. The event is produced by a group called Artlink, which was founded by Moore, in partnership with the city of Phoenix. Former Phoenix Deputy City Manager Rick Naimark, who retired in 2015 with a hefty pension, sits on the board of Artlink.

Moore and her various publicly-funded art enterprises received $3,500 from the city of Phoenix in July 2016, the records obtained by Judicial Watch show, which encompasses the March 2017 Art Detour event that kicked off with the Trump Nazi billboard. In August 2016 Artlink, founded by Moore, was awarded $1,800 for the 2017 Art Detour event, according to the records. Moore, who contracted Fiorito to create the anti-Trump billboard, is recognized by the city as an “artist, community organizer and arts advocate” and the annual festival she puts together with public money aims to “diminish barriers,” the records say. Funds come from “government grant monies,” including the Arizona Commission on the Arts, and the money is used for “artists’ fees.” The objectionable Trump billboard, which involves taxpayer money, doesn’t appear to promote a “growing, vibrant” art scene in the City of Phoenix and seems to fall short of Moore’s stated goal of “diminishing barriers” through art.

And so a liberal loon celebrates her Trump Derangement Syndrome publicly by going straight into the gutter with the “Trump is a Nazi” nonsense. Wait until these loons meet a real Nazi.

Until then, never forget that it was Hillary Clinton and the (((neocons))) making all the noises about starting World War III with Russia.

Now, here’s a Nazi for this gold plated turd of an artist:

Deplorable Mike Cernovich Says Interview Fair in #fakenews Story on 60 Minutes

MIKE CERNOVICH. SELF-DESCRIBED JOURNALIST.

Author (Gorilla Mindset) and blogger Mike Cernovich pushed himself into the middle of election 2016. His pro-Trump positions were embraced by the Deplorables.

Via some clever self-promotion, he takes the credit for the “Hillary has Parkinson’s Disease” theory. Thus, on Sunday night, 60 Minutes interviewd Cernovich about that issue in a story on #fakenews.

Mediaite

Right wing media was abuzz this weekend after learning that Michael Cernovich would appear on 60 Minutes to discuss his website Danger and Play and fake news. The final result, Sunday, was a tense exchange between the liberal bête noire, and interviewer Scott Pelley.

Despite the tension, Cernovich said the interview was “fair” and even declared the segment “good journalism.”

“It was fair. They took their shots at me while giving me a chance to respond,” he said in a statement to Mediaite. “I have no issues with it at all. It was good journalism.”

During the interview, Pelley laced into Cernovich over his coverage of Hillary Clinton’s health, specifically calling out a story he published titled “Hillary Clinton has Parkinson’s Disease, Physician Confirms.”

Pelley: You don’t think that’s misleading?

Cernovich: No.

You believe it’s true today?

Oh, absolutely…She had a seizure and froze up walking into her motorcade that day.

Well, she had pneumonia. I mean…

How do you know? Who told you that?

Well, the campaign told us that.

Why would you trust the campaign?

The point is you didn’t talk to anybody who’d ever examined Hillary Clinton.

I don’t take anything Hillary Clinton is going to say at all as true. I’m not going to take her on her word. The media says we’re not going to take Donald Trump on his word. And that’s why we are in these different universes.

Cernovich is alt-light, not alt-right.

He’s also a self-promoter par excellence.

Although I can’t cite any examples here, I’ve caught him in quite a few falsehoods when I’ve checked his Tweets.

This Tweet is dubious.

Which is not to say that Cernovich never does good work. His fans are ecstatic over this quote.

60 Minutes is theater designed to get our attention off the real issues. David Duke, for example, would be a better interview than Cernovich. But you just know that CBS does not want a discussion of Jewish control of the media and banking. The topic of #fakenews is a lot safer.

Watch! Adorable blind girl blows away the crowd at Donald Trump rally in Louisville Kentucky

Very nice. As one Tweeter wrote, she beats Beyonce any day.

If you prefer to watch on youtube:

Sorry, but I don’t know the little girl’s name, but if someone publishes it, I’ll update this post.

HuffPo Unloads on Tucker Carlson

HuffPo title: Tucker Carlson Thinks Moonlight’s Best Picture Win Was Because Of ‘Affirmative Action’

Tucker Carlson is getting under their skin. They’re triggered!!!

Snark disguised as news from HuffPo. Ugh!

Excerpt from the Huffington Post

Don’t worry everyone Tucker has it covered.

You know Tucker Carlson right? The guy Jon Stewart once obliterated on CNN for the world to see? Yes, the guy with the fifth grader’s haircut who admitted to not watching the Oscar-nominated movie “Moonlight,” and now is here to tell us why “Moonlight” really won best picture at the Academy Awards. Drum roll please: Because it was a “foregone conclusion.” Of course. Why else would an all black cast, with black directors, focusing on the journey of a marginalized member of society win an award? On merit? Merit smerit.

Carlson believes that the “political implications” of the feature, which boasts some of the most promising young actors in the industry, was the only reason it won best picture. Alright, Tuck, for the sake of the debate, I will humor you. What exactly do you think was “political” about “Moonlight?” Did they discuss policy? Government? Congress? The president? Maybe I missed it. Or maybe is it that the only way your brain could fathom a movie about a black, gay man, made by a predominately black creative team, and black directors, taking home the ultimate prize, is to deem it a fix, a foregone conclusion? Or maybe it’s that to Tucker a movie about a black, gay character is inherently political whereas a movie about a white, straight character is not. Merely by pointing a camera at a black, gay man, Tucker believes you are automatically making a political statement. So by his definition, since Hollywood isn’t supposed to make political statements, Hollywood shouldn’t tell the stories of black, gay men. Or other marginalized communities, I guess.

At first glance, Tucker comes across as yet another shallow Fox mouthpiece advocating for celebrities remaining separate from political issues and politics in general remaining separate from Art, whilst spending 30 minutes of his valuable Monday morning, talking about politics and….Art. But look closer and Carlson’s point of view reiterates the still all-too-prominent inherent conservative perception that black and queer experiences exist outside the norm. They only exist in the realm of politics, whenever “others” try to assert themselves and be heard. They aren’t mainstream or deserving of equal attention but instead are granted an award just to appease Hollywood’s need to moralize.

Now if that wasn’t ridiculous enough, Carlson also went on to contradict his already contradictory statement by saying the feature ‘had to win because we knew what the film was about, that’s part of the problem with Hollywood…That’s the law, there is no way around it”.

As regular commenter Robert sometimes reminds us, Alfred Hitchcock, the greatest filmmaker of all time, never won an Oscar. At least since Marlon Brando sent a fake Indian to the stage to accept his award because he was protesting something, the Oscars have been political. To deny that is to deny plain fact.

Last year, blacks made a big fuss about how “white” the Oscars were (really Jewish, but to blacks, Jews are white). So, this year, in an effort to stick it to Trump’s “deplorables,” Hollyweird went all out to protest our existence and our values.

They hate Tuck because he speaks truth.

Wife leaves husband of 22 years because he voted for Donald Trump

Well, I suppose I could make some nasty remarks about the attractiveness level of Gayle McCormick, pictured above, but being a gentleman and a scholar, I won’t.

I will say that it’s not clear to me why any man would desire to be married to the Trump-hating shrew. She’s left him for supporting Donald Trump at one point. No great loss, I would say.

The press has recently picked up on the theme that Donald Trump is a divider. WTF? Is that supposed to be bad? It’s already been apparent for decades that decent white folks can’t get along with feminists, anarchists, Democrats, leftists, Communists, and an assortment of freaks (LGBT, etc.) who’ve been demonizing whites as “pizza chips” (pieces of shit, as the Mexican president of the local university pronounces it).

The Independent

Burning passions over Donald Trump’s presidency are taking a personal toll on both sides of the political divide. For Gayle McCormick, it is particularly wrenching: she has separated from her husband of 22 years.

The retired California prison guard, a self-described “Democrat leaning toward socialist,” was stunned when her husband casually mentioned during a lunch with friends last year that he planned to vote for Trump – a revelation she described as a “deal breaker.”

“It totally undid me that he could vote for Trump,” said McCormick, 73, who had not thought of leaving the conservative Republican before but felt “betrayed” by his support for Trump.

“I felt like I had been fooling myself,” she said. “It opened up areas between us I had not faced before. I realised how far I had gone in my life to accept things I would have never accepted when I was younger.”

Three months after the most divisive election in modern U.S. politics fractured families and upended relationships, a number of Americans say the emotional wounds are as raw as ever and show few signs of healing.

The rancour has not dissipated as it has in the aftermath of other recent contentious U.S. elections. A Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll shows it has worsened, suggesting a widening of the gulf between Republicans and Democrats and a hardening of ideological positions that sociologists and political scientists say increases distrust in government and will make political compromise more difficult.

Continue reading