(((Scientists))) Advocate Drugging White Countries with Oxytocin to “Cure” Nationalism

The Zombification of whites by television, music, movies, the press, the destruction of history, hate speech laws, and so forth isn’t enough.

Now, (((they))) want to dope up the white race with the so-called love drug, Oxytocin. It’s easy to see governments passing laws mandating the drug be put into the water and food supplies for “the greater good.” Some people believe that the drug has already been secretly added. That theory explains the suicidal actions of the Germans, for example, in accepting millions of parasitical refugees.

This is straight out of science fiction and shows that the end game is afoot. The push for the final destruction of the West is on.

Resist! By any means necessary.

Zerohedge

A group of researchers from Germany and the United States have published a study [6] which concludes that doping ‘xenophobic’ populations with massive quantities of the estrogen-linked hormone Oxytocin will cure nationalism – making native citizens more accepting [7] and generous towards migrants who simply want free handouts from Western taxpayers while Islamic extremists peacefully rape [8] and murder infidels.

Accommodating the large influx of migrants not only challenges the humanitarian capacities of European countries but also requires their native populations to adjust to rapid growths in ethnic diversity, religious pluralism, and cultural differentiation. However, the impetus to adapt to changing social ecosystems is susceptible to considerable interindividual heterogeneity. Resistance to this transition often goes along with xenophobic sentiment, and as a consequence, recent elections in Europe have favored populist candidates who have openly expressed xenophobic attitudes toward refugees.

As co-author René Hurlemann said in a related study [9]; “Given the right circumstances, oxytocin may help promote the acceptance and integration of migrants into Western cultures.”

Widely referred to as the ‘love hormone,’ ‘hug hormone,’ and ‘cuddle chemical,’ Oxytocin is secreted from the pituitary gland during sex, childbirth, and lactation – influencing social behavior and emotion [10]. It has been shown to increase romantic attachment and empathy – invoking feelings of relaxation, trust, and psychological stability.

For just €3.11 / day you can destroy your culture!

The study concludes that a combination of oxytocin nasal spray and social pressure from other doped up participants resulted in ‘xenophobic’ test subjects increasing donations to migrants by 74% – jumping from average of €1.79 to €3.11.

[O]ur results imply that an OXT-enforced social norm adherence could be instrumental in motivating a more generalized acceptance toward ethnic diversity, religious plurality, and cultural differentiation resulting from migration by proposing that interventions to increase altruism are most effective when charitable social cues instill the notion that one’s ingroup shows strong affection for an outgroup. Furthermore, UNESCO has emphasized the importance of developing neurobiologically informed strategies for reducing xenophobic, hostile, and discriminatory attitudes (47). Thus, considering OXT-enforced normative incentives in developing future interventions and policy programs intended to reduce outgroup rejection may be an important step toward making the principle of social inclusion a daily reality in our societies.

Perhaps the researchers can also explore how to chemically control refugees so they’re less violent, rapey, and are willing to integrate into other cultures without destroying them? Maybe if they tainted the water supply in Saudi Arabia with Oxytocin they’d start accepting refugees instead of forcing Europe to shoulder the burden?

Meanwhile, the BBC is reporting that Lithium added to tap water [11] may cut dementia by up to 17 percent.

“By this time the soma had begun to work. Eyes shone, cheeks were flushed, the inner light of universal benevolence broke out on every face in happy, friendly smiles.” -Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

There are several live links at Zerohedge. From one of them comes this title and authorship info:

Oxytocin-enforced norm compliance reduces
xenophobic outgroup rejection

Nina Marsha, Dirk Scheelea, Justin S. Feinsteinb,c, Holger Gerhardtd, Sabrina Strange, Wolfgang Maierf,and René Hurlemanna, Division of Medical Psychology, University of Bonn Medical Center, 53105 Bonn, Germany; Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK 74136; Oxley College of Health Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104; Center for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, 53012 Bonn, Germany; Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, University of Bonn Medical Center, 53105 Bonn,Germany; and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Helmholtz Association, 53175 Bonn, Germany

THE SCIENTISTS AND THEIR WEAPON OF CHOICE, A PILL.

Link to PDF of the research paper

I haven’t tried to match up the names with the photos above. It really doesn’t matter who’s who. I see Jews, other nonwhites, and possibly a smattering of white do-gooders among the scientists. These scientists are WAR CRIMINALS.

If they are not laying the foundation for the genocide of the dispersed European peoples, then what else would you call it? Genocidal maniacs should be called out as war criminals.

We’re in a war for our existence whether we like it another. Science is just another weapon in that war.

Cucked: Father of Child Victim of Muslim Terrorists Hugs an Imam

Well, that was disgusting.

Seen at BBC.

Top Oz Muzzie: White Women Need Muzzies to Fertilize Them as Whites Go Extinct

MOHAMED ELMOUELHY. HIS NOSE LOOKS LIKE A PENIS.

I can see the Huffington Post headline now: I Gave Birth to a Terrorist’s Baby

For decades now, the (((press))) and other institutions in Western society have encouraged race mixing. White men are encouraged to mash it up with Asian women. White women are encouraged to mix it up with the Negro.

And then along comes Mohamed to throw out a challenge to white women to mate with a terrorist and have his babies. Doesn’t every white woman want to raise a future member of ISIS. I’m sure it would make every mum happy to have a swarthy murdering rapist that reeks of garlic and week old sh*t as a son.

Daily Mail

A leading Muslim businessman predicts Australia’s white race will become extinct within 40 years because Australian men are too busy smoking, drinking beer and taking drugs to procreate.

Halal certification boss Mohamed Elmouelhy told his Facebook followers Australian women needed Muslim men to ‘fertilise them’ and ‘keep them surrounded by Muslim babies’.

Mr Elmouelhy made the comment after Hebrew University in Jerusalem published research which showed sperm counts in men from Australia, New Zealand, North America and Europe had declined by more than 50 per cent in less than 40 years.

‘Your men are a dying breed, Australian women need us to fertilise them and keep them surrounded by Muslim babies while beer swilling, cigarette smoking, drug injecting can only dream of what Muslim men are capable of,’ he said.

‘Muslims have a duty to make your women happy.’

Mr Elmouelhy, who is the president of Halal Certification Authority, said Australia’s white race ‘will be extinct in another 40 years’ if the country is ‘left to bigots’.

The Muslim businessman called on these ‘bigots’ to kill themselves or plan to die.

‘Because you are declining, better go choose a plot for yourself at your local cemetery,’ he said.

‘If you can’t afford it, commit suicide. It is a cheaper alternative for bigots.’

His comments follow research by Hebrew University-Hadassah Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine in Jerusalem found male fertility had sharply declined by more than 50 per cent in less than 40 years in Western nations, including Australia.

Mo isn’t very bright. He’s challenged the white Australian male. Talk is cheap. I’d bet on the Aussie in any confrontation with cowardly goat-f***ing rag heads.

Italy: Large Colony of FLIES Takes up Residence in African Migrant’s ASS CRACK (Twitter Video)

Enjoy your sh*t meal, little fellers!

Belloc’s Prophecy Bodes Ill for the West: The Muslim Challenge

According to the Wikipedia page (link below) on Hilaire Belloc, he was hostile toward the Jews. As far as I’m concerned that makes him a wise and honest man.

Back in the 1930s when the West was at or near its greatest strength, he clearly saw Islam’s rise and challenge to the West.

Lew Rockwell

GRIFFIN INTERNET SYNDICATE, OCTOBER 25, 2001 – Back in the 1930s, when white men were preparing for another round of mutual slaughter, few of them paid any attention to the Muslim world. They assumed it to be a backward region that history had long since passed by.

One man saw it differently. The great Catholic polemicist Hilaire Belloc, an Englishman of French ancestry, remembered Islam’s past and predicted, in his book The Great Heresies, that it would one day challenge the West again. As late as 1683 its armies had threatened to conquer Europe, penetrating all the way to Vienna; Belloc believed that a great Islamic revival, even in the twentieth century, was altogether possible.

Belloc saw Islam not as an alien religion, but in its origins as a Christian heresy, adopting and adapting certain Christian doctrines (monotheism, the immortality of the soul, final judgment) and rejecting others (original sin, the Incarnation and divinity of Christ, the sacraments). Its simple, rational creed had a powerful appeal to Arabs who had known only the arbitrary gods of grim pagan religions. It swept the Arab world, then made converts — and conquests — far beyond Arabia.

Islam was a militant religion from the start. Mohammed himself conquered the entire Arabian Peninsula in just a few years. The new faith was torn by violent internal divisions even as it continued to spread. But spread it did, with incredible rapidity.

Christians had good reason to fear Islam, which soon conquered Spain and held it for centuries. But because Islam has little attraction for Christians, the West has generally failed to grasp its appeal for others, its profound and permanent hold on the minds of believers. Unlike the Christian West, the Muslim world has never had crises of faith like the Reformation and the Enlightenment.

Islam is a simple religion, easily understood by ordinary people. Its commandments are rigorous but few. When it conquered, its subjugated people often felt more liberated than enslaved, because it often replaced burdensome old bureaucratic governments with relatively undemanding regimes — and low taxes. As long as its authority was respected, Islamic rule was comparatively libertarian. It offered millions relief from their traditional oppression; for example, no Muslim could be a slave.

Belloc distinguishes sharply between Islam and such barbarous conquerors as the Mongol hordes of Genghis Khan. The Mongols were purely destructive; they were known for slaughtering whole cities and making huge pyramids of severed heads.

Such savagery was alien to the Muslims. Where they conquered, daily life usually went on much as before and culture thrived. In many respects the Muslim world was far more civilized than Christian Europe for centuries. The West hated and dreaded Islam, but nobody would have thought of calling it backward.

That contemptuous image came much later, when modern Europe’s science, technology, and — above all — weaponry had eclipsed those of the Arabs. We are apt to forget how recently this development occurred; and, as Belloc warned, it is not irreversible.

Man, especially irreligious man, is apt to equate power and progress. Many of those who say America is “the greatest country on earth” really mean only that America has fantastic military might, capable of annihilating any other country — and some of them, at the moment, are in the mood to do some annihilating.

To the pious Muslim this attitude seems crass and barbaric. He may conclude from it that the decadent West understands only one thing: force. And would he be far wrong?

Belloc admitted that the idea of a new Muslim challenge to the West seemed “fantastic,” but only because the West was “blinded” by “the immediate past.”

Taking a longer view, he saw Islam, though inferior in material power, as having a great advantage: its religious faith was still strong, while the West was losing its religion and consequently its morale. He thought it entirely possible that Islam would catch up technologically, while he doubted that the West would undergo a spiritual revival.

Are we seeing the beginning of the fulfillment of Belloc’s prophecy? If so, the current uproar over Islamic terrorism may turn out to be a mere superficial symptom of a much larger historical drama. The West is still strong, but it is dying. Islam is still weak, but it is growing. Never mind the terrorists; check the birthrate.

###

“Belloc’s Prophecy” by Joe Sobran was published originally by Griffin Internet Syndicate on October 25, 2001. It is one of the 117 essays in the recently-published collection, Subtracting Christianity: Essay on American Culture and Society.

Learn more about Hilaire Belloc at Wikipedia.

Feminism Is Leaving A Wake Of Unhappy, Unmarried, And Childless Women In Its Path

The premise of a piece about women published at the Daily Wire is wrong. Feminism isn’t about advancing women or making them happy. It’s about leftist identity politics to entice women into experimenting with life as a lesbian. Feminism is correctly seen as a plot intended to make women unhappy in order to advance big, tyrannical government that pretends to “protect” women from the evil white male.

Daily Wire

Feminists claim to promote the advancement of women and gender equality, largely via the promotion of so-called sexual liberation, but their movement is leaving a wake of unhappy, unmarried, and childless women in its path, a real problem feminists seemingly refuse to entirely address.

According to a recent study from Yale University researchers, liberated, college educated women are freezing their eggs because they can’t find a man to marry and have children with before their natural childbearing years expire. In the U.K., for instance, one in five women is childless when their natural reproductive years expires, as opposed to one in ten women a mere generation prior.

So what’s to blame for this onslaught of college-educated yet terribly empty women?

The short answer is feminism.

Colleged education today offers a heavy dose of indoctrination. Instead of teaching Home Economics (sewing, cooking, household management, child rearing, etc.) professors teach a pseudointellectual Cultural Marxist view, which really leaves women with hostility toward men and messed up minds.

The author of the study, Marcia Inhorn, an anthropology professor at Yale University, concludes that the common assumption about women putting off children to advance their careers is mere myth. The 150 women undergoing the egg-freezing process in the U.S. and Israel who were extensively interviewed for the study, claimed they were not putting off having a family in order to advance their career, but because they simply couldn’t find a mate.

Inhorn blames the problem on a shortage of college-educated men. “There is a major gap — they are literally missing men. There are not enough college graduates for them. In simple terms, this is about an oversupply of educated women,” she says.

“Most women who are educated would like to have an educated partner. Traditionally women have also wanted to ‘marry up’ to go for someone more successful, financially well off,” adds the researcher.

With white men being demonized in the college classroom, it makes no sense for them to attend a college where they have to confess their white privilege and their guilt for everything that ever went wrong in the world.

With women embracing the hook up culture, why would a man want to pair off with a girl who believes that her liberation lies in her sexual promiscuity?

SLUTS? UHHH, YES.

Inhorn then goes on to blame feminism, sort of. Essentially, because of feminism, liberated women are college-educated but unhappy and alone in exchange, she argues.

“As a feminist I think it’s great that women are doing so well but I think there has been a cost that has been paid,” says Inhorn, adding that women have been left in “sadness and isolation.”

But there’s more going on here. Other experts allude to what Inhorn is unwilling to say: it’s not simply an “oversupply” of liberated women that’s driving this trend, or a liberation-happiness trade-in; it’s men refusing to settle down. And for that, I’d like to thank the feminists’ push for “sexual liberation.”

Let start with the evidence.

First off, some of the women interviewed by Inhorn’s own team even admit that it’s not simply an educational gap; women said they would marry a man who doesn’t have a degree but they can’t find one who wants to marry them.

Then there’s Medical Director of U.K. clinic Create Fertility, Professor Geeta Nargund, who hits the nail on the head (emphasis added): “Women tell us frequently that they are freezing their eggs because the men they meet feel threatened by their success and so unwilling to commit to starting a family together.”

It’s plausible that some men might feel threatened by their woman’s success, but overall that placebo disguises a realistic worry about just how selfish a woman is when she’s fixated on her career and not the family unit.

President of the British Fertility Society, Professor Adam Balen, concurred (emphasis added): “We are seeing some big societal issues, in particular in some social economic groups, with young men not committing.”

(((Balen))) is male-bashing. Blame the male! Yeah, right. He’s a dimwit.

And here’s Executive Director of IVI, Dr. Gillian Lockwood, on Inhorn’s findings: “It exacerbates the problem of men not wanting to ‘settle down’ and start a family until it’s almost too late for the woman to conceive naturally. And if she insists, he’s quite likely to leave for a younger woman whose biological clock isn’t ticking quite so loudly.”

Dr. Lockwood’s “own survey of women doing ‘social’ egg freezing found the overwhelming majority of women having their eggs frozen were doing so because they could not find a partner, or because their own partner would not commit,” notes The Telegraph.

Bingo.

And there’s even more!

Professor Simon Fishel, who founded Care Fertility, explained based on his research (emphasis added): “Almost all of the women in the study who employed egg freezing were heterosexual and wanted to become married mothers. Women lamented the ‘missing men’ in their lives, viewing egg freezing as a way to buy time while on the continuing (online) search for a committed partner.”

Search for a committed partner? I think what he means is you have a group of women who are 5s and 6s looking for a man who’s a 9 or 10. Overvaluing yourself is a real problem in the meat market that is the dating world today.

Over 90% of those surveyed were not freezing their eggs to postpone childbearing to advance a career. Instead, “they were desperately ‘preserving’ their fertility beyond the natural end of their reproductive lives, because they were single without partners to marry,” he said.

So back to the original claim: the so-called sexual liberation of women is indeed screwing women, and not in a good way.

Why would a man rush to settle down and marry someone if he can not only have sex with “liberated” women without a ring, but even cohabitate with them, too? Moreover, the less chaste a woman is, the less preferable she will likely be to a man. Not to mention a woman’s increasing age and creeping near infertility as another massively undesirable trait.

If women demanded more from men, did not sleep around in the name of feminism, men would settle into marriage at an earlier age.

But, nonetheless, these simple truths will be rejected by feminists everywhere, clinging hard to their sad, lonely lives in exchange for empty Feminism, as they accuse any dissenter of being a misogynist.

Our ancestors had it right in those old social guidance films I’ve been publishing here the last few weeks. A number of the women in those old films were good role models–thoughtful, considerate, conservative, chaste, and loyal.

Too many males do hate women today, I believe. The question is whether that hatred (or distaste) is justified.

Trump: “The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive”

TRUMP AND SPEECHWRITER (((STEPHEN MILLER.)))

President Donald Trump broke with the Cultural Marxist interpretation of Western civilization during his speech in Poland.

That speech was written by speechwriter (((Stephen Miller))). It reflects the views of Miller and Stephen Bannon, Trump’s strongly nationalist adviser.

The word “will,” commonly used on “Nazi” websites, was spoken by Trump some 40 times. That’s sure to draw the ire of the media pundits. Furthermore, the speech broke with the wimpy philosophy articulated by President’s Bush and Obama.

All in all, a great day for the West, as it has now found someone, however imperfect, who is willing to defend the West via argumentation.

Ironically, as Trump spoke, battles raged on the streets of Hamburg, Germany, site of the G-20 meeting of world leaders, between police and antifa demonstrators who seek the death of the West.

This speech would be viewed as a major historic speech except that the press and academia hate it so much.

Excerpt from Los Angeles Times

President Trump’s speech in Warsaw cast the fight against terrorism as a clash of civilizations, adopting a framework that his two predecessors had determinedly avoided and linking it to his controversial policies on immigration.

The speech on Thursday offered extended praise for what Trump described as the unique virtues of Western civilization, which he said faced “dire threats.”

Those, he said, emanate from the “south or the east” — apparently a thinly veiled reference to the Islamic world — and could “erase the bonds of culture, faith and tradition that make us who we are.”

“The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive,” he said, one of nearly a dozen times that he invoked the idea of “will” during the course of the approximately 40-minute speech.

Continue reading