Bombshell FBI Report: Crooked Hillary’s Uranium Deal with Russia Netted Clintons Millions

Lock her up.

The mainstream media pulled out all stops on Tuesday to make this story go away.

New York Post

It turns out the Obama administration knew the Russians were engaged in bribery, kickbacks and extortion in order to gain control of US atomic resources — yet still OK’d that 2010 deal to give Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium. This reeks.

Peter Schweizer got onto part of the scandal in his 2015 book, “Clinton Cash”: the gifts of $145 million to the Clinton Foundation, and the $500,000 fee to Bill for a single speech, by individuals involved in a deal that required Hillary Clinton’s approval.

The New York Times confirmed and followed up on Schweizer’s reporting — all of it denounced by Hillary as a partisan hit job.

But now The Hill reports that the FBI in 2009 had collected substantial evidence — eyewitnesses backed by documents — of money-laundering, blackmail and bribery by Russian nuclear officials, all aimed at growing “Vladimir Putin’s atomic-energy business inside the United States” in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The bureau even flagged the routing of millions from Russian nuclear officials to cutouts and on to Clinton, Inc.

Hillary Clinton, again, sat on a key government body that had to approve the deal — though she now claims she had no role in a deal with profound national-security implications, and during the campaign called the payments a coincidence.

The Obama administration — anxious to “reset” US-Russian relations — kept it all under wraps, refusing to tell even top congressional intelligence figures.

And when the Obamaites in 2014 filed low-level criminal charges against a single individual over what the FBI found, they did so with little public fanfare.

“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national-security concerns,” one veteran of the case told The Hill.

Yet the administration let Moscow move ahead — publicly insisting that there were no national-security worries — and no evidence of Russian interference, despite many lawmakers’ concern at the time.

There’s more: Until September 2013, the FBI director was Robert Mueller — who’s now the special counsel probing Russian meddling in the 2016 election. It’s hard to see how he can be trusted in that job unless he explains what he knew about this Obama-era coverup.

The Hill offers the full, detailed story, explaining why Hillary reeks of corruption.

One more thing. You might have seen the news that Hillary Clinton broke her toe and cancelled her interviews.

Did she really?

There were hints that something big was breaking on Tuesday. Could she be faking a broken toe in order to give herself an excuse for hiding out from the questions that would be forthcoming about her collusion with the (((Russian mafia?)))

Sean Hannity made this story his lead Tuesday night:

“Uranium One will be one of the biggest scandals this country has ever seen,” he said.

“Hillary Clinton and her husband sold out America to the Russians as [money] flowed to the Clinton Foundation,” he added.

He said that, for the “liberal ideologues” who are “screaming Russia” and looking for collusion, “we’ve got it for them.”

Hannity said Congress and special counsel Robert Mueller should “stop wasting time” with Trump and turn their attention to the Uranium One deal.

Married 65 Year Old Anti-Abortion Congressman Who Asked Preggers Girlfriend to Get Abortion is Retiring




There are five issues here that I can identify:

1. Adultery. Americans disapprove of adultery, unlike the French and I suppose some other cultures.

2. Age. Women strongly approve of “cougars,” older women with younger men, but disapprove of older men with younger women. As far as I’m concerned age differences are a nonissue.

3. Abortion. Americans are conflicted about abortion. I’ll restate my position. I’m for legal abortion for nonwhites, but not for whites. The white race is facing an existential crisis that takes legal abortion off the table for whites.

4. Hypocrisy. Americans hate it.

5. Politicians. The word is an insult to a lot of people.

Did I miss anthing?

Excerpt from the Daily Mail

Anti-abortion congressman Tim Murphy, who is in the midst of an affair scandal, has announced that he will retire when his terms ends next year.

The Republican lawmaker from Pennsylvania revealed his decision on Wednesday after it was divulged that not only did he have an affair with a woman half his age, but also asked that she get an abortion when he thought she was pregnant.

Text messages exchanged on January 25 between the 65-year-old congressman and 32-year-old Shannon Edwards, a forensic psychologist in Pittsburgh, show Edwards asking Murphy how he can privately ask her to obtain an abortion while publicly opposing the procedure.

‘And you have zero issue posting your pro-life stance all over the place when you had no issue asking me to abort our unborn child just last week when we thought that was one of the options,’ she wrote, as reported by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

‘I get what you say about my March for life messages,’ Murphy responded. ‘I’ve never written them. Staff does them. I read them and winced. I told staff don’t write any more. I will.’

Edwards, it turned out, wasn’t pregnant. Murphy’s spokeswoman had no comment on the report.

Murphy is married to Nanette Missig and has an adult daughter, Bevin.

‘Tis better to retire than campaign next year and lose big.

Did the Russians Do This?

Seen at Jeff Giesea’s Twitter

Jeff Gisea wrote: “Dear @BenSasse,

Russia didn’t create this trendline. Sitting politicians like you did.”

Who controls those politicians? (((You know who.)))

Videos: Bannon’s Man Roy Moore Delivers Two Amazing Speeches


Warning: If the word “God” offends, then do not watch.

Typical youtube comments:

I want to move to Alabama

I think Trump pulled a fast one on the media and the elite republicans. I think he really wants Moore. Do not forget, Trump is always 3 steps ahead!

In my lifetime I never thought I would hear those words. It’s like a dream. Please Lord, as you tarry, put your hand of grace and protection on our nation. Forgive us as a nation for rejecting you and letting all manner of abomination in. No question, we deserve judgement. But if it be possible, please soften the hearts of those who may have forgotten you and make repentance of who and what they’ve become and decide as individuals, families, towns, cities, states and ultimately as a nation; desire you, put you first, seek your counsel and obey your laws and with your help give us wisdom to begin and follow through on the damage and harm we have put ourselves and our children in. In the most holy sweet name of Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour….Amen! Your will be done!

Amen!!! I am Canadian and we need people running our Government like this man . . .

The articulate grace of a true patriotic southerner, speaking on the grace of God.



God Bless you all. It’s so very refreshing to see and here The name of the Lord and our GOD mention over and over again 🙂 I pray our hearts and life’s will be transformed according to the will of God. Remember No GOD, No Peace. Know GOD, know Peace…

This is the Lord’s doing, and it is wonderful in our eyes! Woohoo! Thank you Father, for this victory … more to come! Light is overpowering the darkness, time for the Saints to arise across North America!! Sending love from Canada!

This man espounds values which I haven’t heard from a politician in a very long time.

WTH was Trump supporting the other guy? baffling…From what I hear this guy is the real deal. Anyone Steve Bannon supports I am down with.

That’s it I’m moving from California to Alabama! Any state than can elect a real man of God is the place I want to be.

Most Bizarre Political Commercial You’ve Ever Seen Makes Even Liberal Media Cringe


Watch on Twitter or scroll down to watch on youtube. Democrat Dan Helmer better have another line of work ready because the odds are that he won’t be going to Congress.


Democrat Dan Helmer is running for Congress in Virginia’s 10th Congressional District, but if his first TV ad is any indication he will not be winning any karaoke awards or picking up many new voters. Even liberals are left cringing after a viewing.

The new ad features Dan Helmer, a veteran of the U.S. Army riding up on a motorcycle in sunglasses and a leather bomber jacket before entering a bar where opponent Rep. Barbara Comstock sits.

First-time candidate Helmer seems to hope that voters will see his military service as enough to turn moderate, establishment Republican Comstock out of her seat. He also seems to hope his karaoke commercial will seem “funny” to potential voters.

What happens next in the video is so annoying that even left-wing Slate calls it “the worst ad of 2018”

Slate isn’t alone. The Daily Beast also calls it “The Worst Congressional Campaign Ad Ever.”

“Whoever told House Democratic candidate Dan Helmer this ad was a great idea should reevaluate whether negative attention could be considered good attention,” the Daily Beast wrote.

Even Esquire magazine warns readers that it might be impossible to make it through the ad “without cringing.”

The negative reviews hang on Helmer’s horrible karaoke-styled parody of the tune “You’ve Lost That Loving Feeling,” in which the candidate sings about how Rep. Comstock won’t host a town hall and how she voted against Obamacare.

Helmer accuses Comstock of “losing that centrist feeling” and for “right-wing appealing” until the actress playing Comstock leaves the bar in a huff.

The candidate’s wife did offer one small bit of good advice in the ad. Just as the candidate prepares to break out into song, Mrs. Helmer, who plays a bartender in the ad, tells her husband not to do it.

“Listen to your wife, Dan!” the Daily Beast pleaded.

Styx Defends Trump’s DACA Deal (Video)

Here’s a different perspective on Trump’s deal making. Styx argues that Trump will succeed bigly in getting the Wall and cracking down on so-called sanctuary cities by working with Democrats. According to Styx, there will be NO blanket large scale amnesty.

Styx’s fans on youtube aren’t with him on this one.

Here are some sample comments from youtube:

I know he didn’t cuck on the wall Styx. The amnesty will destroy the United States, your libertarian dream WILL die. If we don’t end chain migration and get E-Verify AT LEAST, this country is over. Full stop.

Trump aint a genius playing 4 D chess, you monkey. He´s all Jewed up in the Jew World Order, and does what they tell him, meaning more wars, more immigration while pretending to be tough on it,, and unlimited money printing with no debt ceiling. Open your fukkin eyes.

Styx your crazy. he doesn’t get to lie to his base without consequences.

Every time Trump negotiates with the Dems, he weakens their narrative that he’s Orange Hitler. If they deal with him, they can’t argue that he’s an unreasonable tyrant. He’s normalizing his Presidency, in the public mind.

Trump’s New “No Chain Migration” Tweet Could Queer the DACA Deal with Pelosi and Schumer

Is President Donald Trump playing 32nd level deep chess or is he scrambling to undo the damage he suffered from working with Chuckie Schumer and Nancy Pelosi to amnesty Obama’s so-called Dreamers?

For the first time that I’m aware of the term “chain migration” has come to the fore in the news.

It’s a simple idea: If I were an amnestied illegal, my mother and other close relatives could come to the States. Then her mother and her close relatives could come too. And so on to infinity. We could be one big happy family again!!!

Trump Tweeted his opposition to chain migration on Friday.

Let’s hope that queers the deal he allegedly struck with Schumer and Pelosi.

What should happen?

Deport all illegals. Encourage legals to return to their homelands. Drop all new legal immigration to zero for at least 10 years, excepting white refugees from Africa.


President Donald Trump on Friday tweeted a new requirement of any immigration deal — and it could throw a wrench in negotiations on how to protect young undocumented immigrants in limbo.

“CHAIN MIGRATION cannot be allowed to be part of any legislation on Immigration!” Trump tweeted Friday morning.

The term “chain migration” refers to immigrants coming to a country based on a connection to family. In the US, a small fraction of green cards are given out each year based on employment, with family connections being a much larger share. That includes spouses, children and some extended family.

It was not immediately clear what specific item the President was referring to. Trump has announced an end to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program started by President Barack Obama, which protected young undocumented immigrants brought to the US as children. This week, however, he jumpstarted talks with congressional Democrats on ways to save the program and potentially keep “Dreamers” in the US.

The demand from Trump could complicate negotiations on the Hill. While there is widespread support for the concept of a DACA deal, most likely paired with border security measures, the details reveal deep divisions between and among the parties that remain steep hurdles to overcome.

Republicans almost universally would want any deal to prevent any naturalized DACA recipients from being able to sponsor their parents or family for citizenship as well.

Trump has separately endorsed a bill from Republican Sens. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and David Perdue of Georgia that would eliminate some categories of family sponsorship and limit green cards to immediate family and minor children. It would also cut a diversity lottery and overhaul employment-based green cards to put a heavy emphasis on highly skilled, educated and English-speaking applicants.

But that bill faces opposition on both sides of the aisle, including from some Republicans, who don’t like that it slashes green cards annually in half and doesn’t allow for low-skilled applicants.

Still, transforming the US system from a familial approach to a more merit-based system has widespread support, though past proposals that have gotten both sides on board did not cut overall legal immigration.