Kim Jong Un: ‘Deranged’ Trump to ‘pay dearly’

KIM GIVING HIS PERSONAL WARNING TO PRESIDENT TRUMP.

If we assume that the threats spoken by President Trump and North Korea’s Kim are not theater scripted in Tel Aviv, then let’s suppose that both parties are rational people, nor madmen.

After eight years of Obama leading the U.S. by hitting a golf ball as often as he could while leaving the tough issues to his successor, the American people decided by a narrow margin they wanted a tough guy president rather than a woman sociopath.

The North Koreans, whose country was destroyed during the Korean War, likewise have a tough guy whose goal is to preserve his regime.

Kim has noted that Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein ended up dead because they had no credible threat to use against the American Empire.

Like all rational people, Kim wants to live, so he’s building missiles and nukes that can hit the U.S. From a rational perspective, these weapons are a deterrent against American aggression. So are his alleged chemical weapons.

So where are we today? In a war of words. Once you have weapons, the threat is enough.

Sky News

Donald Trump is “deranged” and will “pay dearly” for his threats, according to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

In a rare statement reported by the country’s official news agency, Mr Kim said the North would consider the “highest level of hardline countermeasure in history” against the US.

Mr Kim’s words follow the US President’s threat to “totally destroy” North Korea, comments described by the North Korean dictator as “the most ferocious declaration of a war in history”.

He said that Mr Trump’s speech at the United Nations on Tuesday had only convinced him that Pyongyang’s nuclear programme must continue.

“His remarks… have convinced me – rather than frightening or stopping me – that the path I chose is correct and that it is the one I have to follow to the last.

“As a man representing the DPRK and on behalf of the dignity and honour of my state and people and on my own, I will make the man holding the prerogative of the supreme command in the US pay dearly for his speech.”

He added: “After taking office, Trump has rendered the world restless through threats and blackmail against all countries in the world.

“He is unfit to hold the prerogative of supreme command of a country, and he is surely a rogue and a gangster fond of playing with fire, rather than a politician.”

Earlier in the week, Mr Trump had used his first speech in front of the UN General Assembly to describe Mr Kim as being a “rocket man on a suicide mission for himself and his regime”.

Mr Trump had said: “The United States is ready, willing and able (to act), but hopefully this will not be necessary.”

The President also called on member states to work together to isolate Mr Kim until he stops his “hostile” actions, a reference to a series of recent ballistic missile launches and nuclear tests by Pyongyang.

Mr Kim has promised to complete his nuclear programme in the face of strengthening sanctions, saying his state is nearing its goal of “equilibrium” in military force with the US.

Kim knows that he’s dead if he uses his weapons against the U.S. or an ally. He doesn’t seem suicidal to me. He seems more like a crafty gook, playing gook hardball, accustomed to dealing with weaklings like Obama.

Antifa Violence erupts at anti-white nationalist rally in Portland

ANTI-WHITE “STOP THE HATE” MARCH GETS UNDERWAY.

I had to spend 15 minutes looking for info on who was responsible for the violence. The mainstream media just won’t say. I’m surprised that the Portland police were allowed to Tweet out the truth.

MSN

PORTLAND — Violence broke out between opposing groups at an anti-white nationalist rally in Portland that left at least one police officer injured, CBS affiliate KOIN-TV reports.

Police made several arrests in the city’s downtown area as two groups faced off over different views on white nationalism.

The Portland Police Department tweeted that marchers and residents should clear the area for their own safety, adding that officers reported protesters attacking photographers and that projectiles were thrown at officers. They said several arrests were made and at least one officer was injured.

An opposition group held its own protest Sunday which was scheduled for around 2 p.m. local time but instead started around 12:30 p.m.

“We will be there with flags,” Joey Gibson of the Patriot Prayer Group said.

Officials said Friday that Portland Stands United Against Hate has a permit. It is not clear if Patriot Prayer does.

Authorities had previously announced a heightened police presence due to past violence between the opposition groups.

Mayor Ted Wheeler warned protesters that “illegal behavior is unacceptable.”

“We will not tolerate acts of violence. We will not tolerate vandalism. We will not tolerate criminal behavior,” Wheeler said.

Unlike earlier in the year, Portland is taking steps to protect Trump supporters, Christians, and pro-white citizens from violent attacks.

That’s progress.

Berkeley Students Want to Name Campus Building After Black Cop Killer

The demands by Black Power advocates at UC-Berkeley to rename a campus building after a radical murderer aren’t going to generate much news coverage. But there’s a drip, drip, drip effect that should make the white population even more disgusted with the Negroid race.

PJ Media

Ever since Charlottesville, the tyrannical left has been on the rampage, trying to purge anyone and everyone who had an improper thought. Well, except for Margaret Sanger, apparently. I guess she’s cool.

That’s the mentality at work at the University of California-Berkeley, where students have been battling with administrators to purge the name of a past university president from one campus building. From The College Fix:

Barrows Hall is named after the university’s president from 1919 to 1923, David Barrows, an anthropologist who served as superintendent of schools in Manila when the Philippines became a U.S. colony, according to the University of California Academic Senate’s biography in memoriam.

The Daily said his academic work was informed by “white supremacist ideology.” In 2015 the Black Student Union demanded the name’s removal among other high-priced demands, calling Barrows an “imperialist by way of anthropology [who] participated in perpetuating American colonialism.”

In all fairness, I suspect most academics in the United States during the first quarter of the 20th century were informed by so-called white supremacist ideology.

However, the brave warriors at Berkeley have another name in mind to grace Barrows Hall. Who is this outstanding individual more worthy of recognition?

A cop killer:

The BSU insisted that Barrows Hall be renamed after Black Panther Assata Shakur, a convicted cop killer who escaped from prison in 1979 and fled to Cuba. Shakur is on the FBI’s list of most wanted terrorists.

You just can’t make this crap up, folks. You just can’t.

A man who served as a military officer, an anthropologist, an explorer, and a university president is someone of such poor moral standing that he must be erased from history, whereas a convicted and escaped cop killer is an ethical choice.

Of course, if it brings Shakur back to American soil for the renaming ceremony, then I’m all for it. As long as police arrest her the moment her feet touch American dirt.

Link to David Barrows Wikipedia page.

Link to Assata Shakur’s Wikipedia page.

Leftist Antifa Expert Draws Dartmouth Faculty Support for Allegedly Advocating Violence Against “Nazis”

DR. MARK BRAY. ALLEGEDLY ENDORSES ANTIFA VIOLENCE.

Die Nazi Scum.

We’re seen the signs at so-called counterprotests held by the Antifa. We’ve also seen them attack people they consider to Nazis, which is anyone who disagrees with them.

Since the Anitfa petition went viral and caught everyone’s attention, I wonder if the faculty who supported the Antifa feel any embarrassment. The press moved from support to condemnation of the Communist/anarchists in a flash when it became expedient to do so. Professors haven’t been coming out against the Antifa that I know of.

Mark Bray should be fired for advocating violence, if that accusation is true. It’s one thing to hold political opinions, but entirely another thing to use the bully pulpit of the classroom and the TV interview to push others to go out and violate the law by attacking people with bike locks and baseball bats.

The New American

On August 21, Dartmouth College president Philip J. Hanlon issued a relatively mild public statement disavowing recent comments by one of the college’s lecturers in support of the violent actions of the anarcho-communist group Antifa. Now, more than 100 Dartmouth faculty members have signed a letter in support of the lecturer, Dr. Mark Bray, and are calling upon Dr. Hanlon to retract his statement.

Dr. Bray is the author of Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook, and since the deadly battle in Charlottseville, Virginia, between Antifa cadres and neo-Nazis on August 12, he has shot to stardom, thanks to friendly interviews with NPR, CNN, NBC, Slate, Vox, Vice, and more.

As we noted in our August 29 article, Liberal Media: Cheerleaders for “Antifa” Communist Thugs, the violent Antifa extremists have been generously showered with sympathetic coverage by much of the media. On August 14, for example, Yahoo! News posted a story titled, “As neo-Nazis grow bolder, the ‘antifa’ has emerged to fight them.” Like many similar reports in the “mainstream” media, the article paid an obligatory nod to objectivity by quoting Antifa critics, but the upshot for many readers will be: “Finally, someone is standing up to the Nazi-KKK bullies!”

The masked, black-clad Antifa radicals scored a big media boost from NBC shortly after Charlottesville when Meet The Press featured a powderpuff interview by Chuck Todd of Mark Bray on August 16. Todd then brought Bray back for another friendly gabfest on August 20. Bray, a longtime militant activist and a visiting lecturer in Gender Studies at Dartmouth College, publicly let it be known that he is a supporter of Antifa. In other words, he is not coming under criticism merely because he is a scholar who has written a book about a subject he has researched. He has not, as far as we know, publicly admitted to taking part in violent and illegal Antifa activities, but he vocally endorses their actions and is viewed by both supporters and opponents as the chief theoretician and “public intellectual” of the militant movement. Bray previously wrote a sympathetic book promoting the Occupy Wall Street movement, which provided the training ground where the Antifa leaders recruited many of their activists, refined their Marxist-Leninist rhetoric, and honed their violent communist tactics.

Media Research Center (MRC) president Brent Bozell condemned the NBC whitewash of Antifa. “Violent leftists have broken into the mainstream and Chuck Todd is guilty of aiding and abetting,” Bozell charged. “It is abhorrent that NBC and Todd believe it acceptable to normalize extremist groups like Antifa which use terror to silence their opposition.”

Bozell continued: “After the initial interview with Bray, Chuck Todd had the opportunity to correct his mistake but instead chose to again allow a radical to promote domestic terrorism with little push back. Can you imagine Chuck Todd inviting a member of a militant right-wing group on his show to rationalize violence against the left? NBC must cease giving legitimacy to supporters of this violent left-wing movement immediately.”

A letter to President Hanlon defending Bray, reportedly signed by more than 100 Dartmouth faculty members, goes a long way to confirming charges (as if more confirmation were necessary) that much of academia has become totally dominated by the far-left. Bray’s Dartmouth comrades see no problem with his support for Antifa’s violent approach to shutting down speech of opponents. Antifa violence, of course, is not only limited to censoring speech, nor is it directed only at genuine fascists and racists. As we have seen repeatedly (and as we will show presently) the black-clad goons broadly apply the “fascist” label and viciously attack anyone who stands in the way of their radical anarchist-communist agenda.

The Dartmouth supporters cite the cornucopia of media attention Bray has received as evidence of his importance as a scholar, and then note that even more media glory is on the way with his upcoming nationwide book tour. “With the appearance last week of his new book on the subject — which has already sold 10,000 copies and been reviewed in the New Yorker–he is embarking on a 30-city book tour,” the faculty letter breathlessly relates. “He is speaking by invitation at campuses like Duke, NYU, and Colby. In short, his historical expertise is in demand around the country and internationally.”

ADL Suggests Cops Infiltrate, Film Antifa Protests — Then Takes It Back

Our campaign to have the antifa declared a terrorist organization has made the ADL nervous. They made a mistake. For the first time in a decades, their plans are being exposed.

Jewish Forward

The Anti-Defamation League has retracted recommendations that police infiltrate and film antifa protests, saying they had been “posted in error.”

The group deleted the advice from a primer for law enforcement on antifa, the anti-fascist protest movement that has grown in profile since the white supremacist riot in Charlottesville in mid-August.

The ADL has received millions of dollars in donations in the wake of the Charlottesville riots. Many Charlottesville counter-protesters opposing the white supremacist and neo-Nazis there identified as part of the antifa movement.

The deletion appears to have been made shortly after the Forward published a story about the recommendations to film and infiltrate antifa protests.

In a statement Wednesday night, ADL said that it had deleted the recommendations from its website and that it would “defer to law enforcement authorities to make their own decisions on best practices for handling protests that turn violent.”

Asked Thursday morning why the recommendations were removed, ADL reiterated its earlier statement.

In the original version of the primer, ADL suggested that police at antifa protests “capture as much as possible of the event on video, for use in any future arrests or prosecutions.”

ADL also advised that “some departments also place undercover officers in the crowds, to spot suspects and/or to be in a position to assist if a fight breaks out.”

Other deleted recommendations included a suggestion that police search antifa protesters for weapons before allowing them into a designated “assembly zone.”

The ADL appears to have removed only its recommendations from the primer, leaving up its information for law enforcement on the history, background and tactics of the antifa movement.

In a portion of the primer that remains online, ADL writes that “most established civil rights organizations criticize antifa tactics as dangerous and counterproductive.”

The ADL also says in the primer that there is not an equivalency between antifa and white supremacists. “The antifa reject racism but use unacceptable tactics,” he primer reads. “White supremacists use even more extreme violence to spread their ideologies of hate, to intimidate ethnic minorities, and undermine democratic norms.”

ADL’s critique of antifa comes amid a wave of liberal Jewish writers taking on the movement. In widely cited columns in the New York Times and The Atlantic, Todd Gitlin and Peter Beinart sepeartely charged that antifa’s use of violence is counterproductive.

ADL leader Jonathan Greenblatt has joined in that criticism on social media. “Whether by #AltRight or #Antifa, no excuses for violence,” Greenblatt tweeted on the day of the Charlottesville riots, hours before a white supremacist murdered a counter-protester in a car ramming attack.

Antifa supporters counter that their organizing has been uniquely effective in countering white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups.

The ADL’s withdrawn recommendation that police surveil and infiltrate antifa protesters ran counter to the traditional position of civil liberties groups, which generally oppose police infiltration and surveillance of protesters. The American Civil Liberties Union regularly denouncespolice infiltration of activists, arguing that it impedes First Amendment rights.

“United States law enforcement agencies, from the FBI to local police, have a long history of spying on American citizens and infiltrating or otherwise obstructing political activist groups,” the ACLU wrote in 2010. “Unfortunately, it appears that these old tendencies have once again come to the fore.”

A portion of the deleted text from the ADL’s primer for law enforcement on antifa.

Liberal Jews created the antifa, but now they’re retreating. It remains to be seen whether the antifa can put boots on the ground any more.

George Soros has experienced a defeat. Now let’s get on having him declared a terrorist via the White House petition.

Partial List of Bans Against Truth: Andrew Anglin Asks Which Side are YOU On?

Microchip has been banned from Twitter over a hundred times but continues to sneak back on. I believe some readers here told me that Ambrose Kane has been shut down. Stormfront has been shut down.

Any others you know about?

List linked in this Daily Stormer article.

What we want is a return to normalcy, a return to sanity.

That is all.

We do not want Jews running our nation, we do not want to be overrun by Third Worlders, and we do not want our race and civilization destroyed – just as no sane person did prior to about the 1950s.

The people who are now censoring us do want those things.

They are part of a system that is hellbent on destroying us.

Charlottesville made it clear for everyone that that is what this current system wants, and will stop at nothing to get.

We are in a war, and the stakes have never been higher.

This is a war for our very genetic survival.

Expecting our enemies – who want America turned into a third world hellhole – to respect our freedom of speech, would be pretty naive.

Of course they want us silenced.

But: are we going to allow them to get away with it?

Are we – the good, decent, law-abiding Americans – going to stand by silently as they ban everyone who doesn’t agree with their insane liberal ideology from the internet, one by one?

That is what is going to happen if we don’t fight this tooth and nail.

Rights are not “inherent.” Arguably, they don’t exist at all. What do exist are privileges, and these flow from power. At best there are privileges that are viewed as sacred enough by enough of a people or a nation that they are respected without having to be demanded – or denied – at the barrel of a gun.

But these privileges/rights are eternally in peril.

The Founders were well aware of this, and that is why they made the Second Amendment the right to bear arms.

That will no doubt be viewed as a radical statement, but it is not a call for violent revolution, it is simply stating a historical fact.

We’re not going to overthrow the government, at least not any time soon (although doing so at this point would indeed be in keeping with the warnings and directives of the Founding Fathers), but what we can do is make a lot of noise.

We need to turn the screws as tight as we can. Pressure works, and we need all hands on deck to apply it in mighty doses.

The only reason, effectively, that any politically active individual would not stand up against this insane wave of censorship, this assault on the most basic of all of our freedoms, would be because they, too, are in the enemy camp, and wish our destruction.

Make your choice.

We aren’t going to get a second chance. The future of civilization rests on our willingness to fight against this tyranny.

Ultimately, people will either die knowing they stood up for what is right in this hour of darkness, or they will die knowing that they stayed silent because they were afraid.

Those who choose the latter are betraying America and her heroic Founders, who themselves risked life and limb to win us these precious freedoms that are now under assault.

Which side are you on?

Street Interviews: Know-Nothing Anti-Trump Protesters Exposed as Morons (FLECCAS Video)

Youtube title: ANTIFA Gets Violent At Trump Protest in Laguna Beach | FLECCAS TALKS

Less than eight minutes. Mass hysteria. Funny and scary at the same time.

Published on Aug 22, 2017

This week I headed down to Laguna Beach where ANTIFA/alt-left protesters had a hard time answering some basic questions about their cause. These people TRULY think they are fighting Nazis.