Blacks Demand Sale of COTTON be Halted Because It’s RACIST, Whites GROVEL Before Their Black Masters

The ex-slaves are revolting.

It’s not that they won’t pick cotton any more, but that they don’t want to see cotton being sold.

The butt hurt runs deep. Read on.

NOLA

A woman’s Facebook post questioning the appropriateness of cotton boll decor has gone viral.

Daniell Rider of Killeen, Texas, posted a picture of bouquets of cotton stalks apparently for sale at Hobby Lobby and asked the retailer to remove the items. Her full message to Hobby Lobby:

This decor is WRONG on SO many levels. There is nothing decorative about raw cotton… A commodity which was gained at the expense of African-American slaves.

A little sensitivity goes a long way.
PLEASE REMOVE THIS “decor”.

As of 8 a.m. Tuesday, the post had been shared more than 19,000 times and had more than 207,000 comments.

The conversation comes at the same time a Tennessee university president is apologizing for using cotton stalk decor at a dinner for black students at his home. On Facebook, Lipscomb University President Randy Lowry said “several students” shared their concerns about the centerpieces of cotton.

At least one of the students posted a picture of the centerpieces on social media, saying she “felt very offended.”

So I attend Lipscomb university and as most of you know that is a predominately white school. Tonight AFRICAN AMERICAN students were invited to have dinner with the president of the school. As we arrived to the president's home and proceeded to go in we seen cotton as the center pieces. We also stood and ate dinner, there were no seats to sit in and it felt very uncomfortable. We were very offended, and also the meals that were provided resembled many "black meals" they had mac n cheese, collard greens, corn bread etc. The night before Latinos also had dinner at his house and they had tacos. They also DIDN'T have the center piece that we HAD tonight. A couple of minutes went by, the president was coming around and asking for our names and what our major was. He finally got to our table and my friend @kay_cyann asked why there was cotton on the table as the center piece. His response was that he didn't know, he seen it before we did, he kind of thought it was " fallish", THEN he said " it ISNT INHERENTLY BAD IF WERE ALL WEARING IT " then walked off. Later on all of us that were there were invited into the home, and we had the impression that we were coming to speak about how us as Black people feel about Lipscomb. The whole entire time we were in their home they only talked about themselves( how they met, got married and ended up at lipscomb) & the ONLY question that we were asked was our transformation coming to lipscomb. A couple of women answered the question but they sugar coated it. They said any other questions that we may have can be emailed to the advocate for the Latinos and that a second meeting may be held. Also we don't have an advocate on campus, the only African American advocate we had, no longer works here. The only advocate available to us is the advocate for the Latinos. They claim to have funding for minorities, BUT you have to live up to the expectations of a typical Black family to even get the 1000$.There is NO FUNDING for just us black students. #share

A post shared by Nakayla🦋🌻🥀 (@nakaylayvonne) on

“The content of the centerpieces was offensive, and I could have handled the situation with more sensitivity,” the university president wrote on the school official Facebook page. “I sincerely apologize for the discomfort, anger or disappointment we caused and solicit your forgiveness.”

How DARE Lipscomb University invite ONLY blacks to dinner? Their president, Randy Lowry, is a RETARD. He’s going to be hearing from me when I get the chance to look up his email address.

Report: Trump to Take University Affirmative Action Policies to Court

Affirmative Action in university admissions is race replacement. It replaces highly qualified white and Asian students with less qualified blacks, browns, trans, queers, illegals, and whatever other groups are deemed victims of white male oppression.

Once the preferred students are in, then the universities have to lower standards (grade inflation, for example) in order to push them along to graduation.

Just as the mainstream media is rotten to the core, so is American higher education.

New York Times Via NOLA

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.

The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on “investigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.”

The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the division’s front office, where the Trump administration’s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.

The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies. But the phrasing it uses, “intentional race-based discrimination,” cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minorities to university campuses.

Supporters and critics of the project said it was clearly targeting admissions programs that can give members of generally disadvantaged groups, like black and Latino students, an edge over other applicants with comparable or higher test scores.

The project is another sign that the civil rights division is taking on a conservative tilt under President Donald Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. It follows other changes in Justice Department policy on voting rights, gay rights and police reforms.

Roger Clegg, a former top official in the civil rights division during the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations who is now the president of the conservative Center for Equal Opportunity, called the project a “welcome” and “long overdue” development as the United States becomes increasingly multiracial.

“The civil rights laws were deliberately written to protect everyone from discrimination, and it is frequently the case that not only are whites discriminated against now, but frequently Asian-Americans are as well,” he said.

But Kristen Clarke, the president of the liberal Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, criticized the affirmative action project as “misaligned with the division’s long-standing priorities.” She noted that the civil rights division was “created and launched to deal with the unique problem of discrimination faced by our nation’s most oppressed minority groups,” performing work that often no one else has the resources or expertise to do.

“This is deeply disturbing,” she said. “It would be a dog whistle that could invite a lot of chaos and unnecessarily create hysteria among colleges and universities who may fear that the government may come down on them for their efforts to maintain diversity on their campuses.”

The Justice Department declined to provide more details about its plans or to make the acting head of the civil rights division, John Gore, available for an interview.

“The Department of Justice does not discuss personnel matters, so we’ll decline comment,” said Devin O’Malley, a department spokesman.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the educational benefits that flow from having a diverse student body can justify using race as one factor among many in a “holistic” evaluation, while rejecting blunt racial quotas or race-based point systems. But what that permits in actual practice by universities — public ones as well as private ones that receive federal funding — is often murky.

Clegg said he would expect the project to focus on investigating complaints the civil rights division received about any university admissions programs.

He also suggested that the project would look for stark gaps in test scores and dropout rates among different racial cohorts within student bodies, which he said would be evidence suggesting that admissions offices were putting too great an emphasis on applicants’ race and crossing the line the Supreme Court has drawn.

Some of that data, he added, could be available through the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights, which did not respond to a request for comment.

The Supreme Court most recently addressed affirmative action admissions policies in a 2016 case, voting 4-3 to uphold a race-conscious program at the University of Texas at Austin. But there are several pending lawsuits challenging such practices at other high-profile institutions, including Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. The Justice Department has not taken a position in those cases.

The pending start of the affirmative action project — division lawyers who want to work on it must submit their resumes by Aug. 9, the announcement said — joins a series of changes involving civil rights law since Trump’s inauguration.

In a lawsuit challenging Texas’ strict voter identification law, the Justice Department switched its position, dropping the claim that the law was intentionally discriminatory and later declaring that the law has been fixed. Sessions has also made clear he is not interested in using consent decrees to impose reforms on troubled police departments and has initiated a sweeping review of existing agreements.

University Launching Anti-Hate “Action Plan” Following White on Black Stabbing Death

WALLACE LOH, VIRTUE SIGNALING PRESIDENT, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.

When white students are victimized by black thugs on campus, I wonder if the University of Maryland will engage in the kind of worthless, disgusting virtue signaling that sh*tstain President Wallace Loh has done this week.

You may have noticed that when a white person commits a crime against a black individual, it’s a hate crime, but the reverse is rarely true. As long as there is so-called diversity on campus and there are fools trying to make it work, there are going to be so-called hate crimes occurring.

Anti-hate = anti-white.

WTOP

University of Maryland President Wallace Loh outlined new anti-hate initiatives Wednesday in the wake of last weekend’s fatal campus stabbing.

The killing of Lt. Richard Collins III, a Bowie State University student who was set to graduate this week, is being investigated as a possible hate crime. Suspect Sean Christopher Urbanski was reportedly a member of a white supremacist Facebook group called “Alt-Reich: Nation.”

FOR ONCE THE WHITE KID ISN’T THE DEAD ONE.

Wednesday evening, Loh urged students to allow authorities the time “to do their work with due diligence.”

But beyond that, he said, “we must do more.”

The action plan, which is effective immediately, is comprised of these initial steps:

Establishing a hate-bias and campus safety task force — composed of faculty, staff, students and alumni — to review relevant policies and procedures. That task force will then submit a report with recommendations and guidelines;

Creating a rapid-response team — composed of faculty, staff and students — to provide support for victims of hate-bias incidents;

Allocating $100,000 in supplemental funds to the Office of Diversity and Inclusion for supporting diversity and inclusion efforts;

Production of an annual report on all campus hate-bias incidents;

Asking the university’s Athletic Council to consider ways to strengthen intercollegiate athletics policy to prohibit hate-bias symbols or actions in any venue.

More actions will be rolled out after the hate-bias and campus safety task force submits its recommendations, Loh said.

“We all want a culture that rejects hate and forges a more perfect union in our nation’s rich multicultural and multiethnic diversity,” he said.

“But these are fraught times, on our campus, across the nation, and the world. It is on all of us to stand up and fight the racism, extremism, and hate that are cancers in our body politic.”

URBANSKI IS A BIRD LOVER? SO WHAT!

Buzzfeed and other media outlets are reporting that Urbanski was a member of a Facebook group called Alt-Reich Nation. Before anyone jumps to the conclusion that he plotted a murder, Buzzfeed also reports that Urbanski appeared to be drunk and possibly on drugs. After stabbing Collins, Urbanski was arrest while sitting on a bench 50 feet from the scene of the crime.

Judging from the description of Alt-Reich Nation, it seems to be a race realist site, dedicated to exposing anti-white and anti-male bias. Naturally, the police are pretending to be shocked and appalled by the site.

SAMPLE MEME FROM ALT-REICH NATION.

ANOTHER MEME FROM THE SITE.

Negress Professor Demands that White Men Quit Their Jobs

PIPER HARRON. Y’ALL CRACKAZ BETTA QUIT AN ALL DAT SHEEEEEIT.

Negro logic combined with Marxist logic has invaded the formerly staid world of high-level mathematics, where axioms and proofs used to reign supreme.

Now, Nigga-babble has taken the spotlight, at least for a few moments.

A sour entitled Negress has written a piece called Get Out of the Way for a publication of the American Mathematics Society. Click on the link to read it.

It’s even more nonsensical than the characterization laid out in the source article for this post.

She also has a Liberated Mathematician website that explains why no one would want to hire her. Bizarre!

While calling for a feminist mathematics, a queer math, a people of color math, what happens to 2 + 2 = 4?

One more thing before you read this garbage. I try to do a little more research than the other guys. To go a little more in-depth. Sometimes I find something interesting. Sometimes I don’t.

I saw a clue that suggested that Piper is married. Guess what?

Piper Harron is married to a white male mathematician who also works at the university.

My God! A male oil driller!

PROFESSOR ROBERT HARRON, PIPER’S HUSBAND.

Heat Street

A University of Hawaii math professor has urged every white man to quit their job or take a demotion and deemed those who disagree with her proposition as racist, sexist and transphobic.

Piper Harron, an assistant professor at the University of Hawaii who holds a PhD degree in mathematics from Princeton University, has penned an article for the American Mathematical Society (AMS) blog, calling on white men to “Get Out The Way”.

“Not to alarm you, but I probably want you to quit your job, or at least take a demotion,” Harron wrote, adding that “Statistically speaking, you are probably taking up room that should go to someone else.”

“If you are a white cis man (meaning you identify as male and you were assigned male at birth) you almost certainly should resign from your position of power,” the professor added.

Harron went on to suggest that if quitting is “too difficult”, white men should “at least get off your hiring committee your curriculum committee, and make sure you’re replaced by a woman of color or trans person.”

On the “About the Editors” page, Harron is described as someone who “tried really hard to play by the rules of society and academia, but she failed. Not only did she fail, but she was miserable and found that playing by the rules wouldn’t even keep her safe.

“She officially got her degree from Princeton University in January 2016, and is currently a Temporary Assistant Professor at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. She dedicates her work to everyone who dabbles in misery, trying to find their way in systems that don’t support them, and to anyone trying to tear it all down. ”

The Hawaii University professor continued her bizarre rant on the mathematics blog, claiming that while sexism is prevalent in society, it’s much easier to achieve “equality” at universities:

What can universities do? Well, that’s easier. Stop hiring white cismen (except as needed to get/retain people who are not white cis men) until the problem goes away. If you think this is a bad or un-serious idea, your sexism/racism/transphobia is showing.
Heat Street has approached the AMS, but did not hear back by the publication time.

UH OH, IS THAT A WHITE STUDENT IN HER CLASS?

Dozens of Asswipes Walk Out on Mike Pence Graduation Speech at Notre Dame

Tolerance demands submission.

Mike Pence, America’s VP and former governor of Indiana, is not tolerant enough for the Cultural Marxist. He’s said some things about “gay rights” that aren’t politically correct.

The best idea I’ve seen is to name the stupid shits who walked out and put up their identifying information on a “Do not hire” website. Of course, Hillary, Obama, the DNC, California’s Governor Moonbeam and a host of other lefturds would still hire them. They’d be glad to.

If you work for a company that hires these little Red Shirts, be aware that they’re just looking for somebody to snitch on and destroy their life. Or if you see one fixing you a coffee at Starbucks, be sure to leave your MAGA cap in your pickup, unless you like your coffee seasoned with spit.

NBC News

Dozens of students at the University of Notre Dame walked out of their commencement ceremony Sunday when Vice President Mike Pence took the stage — in protest of the administration and policies he represents.

Some members of the larger crowd cheered the walk-outs on, while others booed the students who marched out of gates 27 and 28 of Notre Dame Stadium during the school’s 172nd commencement. The walk-out came before the students received their degrees, and they were not allowed back in, officials said.

The move was not totally unexpected, since the student organization WeStaNDFor had shared their plans ahead of time. They believe that the politics Pence, the former Indiana governor who was raised Catholic, represented contradicted the Catholic social virtues Notre Dame extols.

“He has supported policies that have targeted the weakest and most vulnerable among us,” said graduate student Luis Miranda, a member of the group, told NBC affiliate WNDU before the protest. “These are my classmates; these are my friends; these are our family members as well. We’re standing up for them. We’re standing up for their dignity.”

South Bend Equality, a group participating in the event, expanded further on the specific issues that they were protesting.

“Our members lived in South Bend when Mike Pence was governor,” the group said in a statement. “We know all too well how his policies endangered or caused direct harm to public education, health care, women’s rights, the environment, LGBTQ individuals, immigrants and refugees, reproductive rights, local infrastructure, the economy of our state, and more.”

“Racist” Video Draws Condemnation and Investigation from University

The president of Washington State University speaks out of both sides of his mouth. On the one hand he says he’s for inclusivity. On the other hand, he says that people with certain beliefs are not welcome on his campus.

He, quite frankly, is a piece of shit liberal of the worst kind. I despise these people from having to be around them during my academic career.

Watch the video embedded at the bottom of this post. It’s at the center of the police investigation ongoing at WSU.

spokesman.com

A racist video, much of which was filmed last year at a Trump rally at Washington State University, surfaced on social media this week, prompting outrage by students and another call for inclusivity by the university’s president.

“The attitudes, the behavior, and the language expressed in the video are not acceptable. Individuals with those beliefs are not welcome in our community,” President Kirk Schulz said in a statement to the university on Thursday. He added that the video “was intended to cause pain to our community of color at WSU. It directly impacted our students of color studying for final exams.”

POS KIRK SCHULZ.

The opening frame shows a white man clad in a Donald Trump hat and T-shirt, with another man’s voice asking, “You ready to make America great again?” They are standing in a crowd of students on WSU’s Glenn Terrell Mall during a rally last October in which the College Republicans erected a plywood wall to show support for Trump’s immigration proposals.

The video then shows a heated argument between the men and several black women. At one point the words “Maybe you should go back to Africa” appear over a still frame of the women.

The video ends with an unrelated clip of a young boy using a slur that refers to black people.

It was originally posted to Facebook by a user called “Ultra Meme Lord.” The account has since been deactivated, but not before the video spread to other platforms.

Schulz wrote on Twitter late Wednesday, “We are investigating to determine who authored the video and will hold them accountable.”

James Allsup, the College Republicans president who organized the Trump wall demonstration, said he shot much of the footage on his cellphone and uploaded it to YouTube. In some portions of the footage, he too can be seen arguing with other students.

Allsup said the footage was used without his permission and that he played no role in creating the edited version. He also responded to the situation in a series of tweets.

“In perhaps the most hilariously embarrassing moment for WSU’s admin this year, they’ve launched a full investigation – into a meme,” Allsup wrote. “Essentially, the FB page ‘Ultra Meme Lord’ used content from my YouTube channel to create a pretty overtly racist meme video. Here’s the thing though: this video can’t even be traced back to WSU. An anonymous Facebook meme page created it. Just further evidence that universities are nothing more than bubble-wrapped safe space havens that need a good popping.”

Asked about his own views on race, Allsup, who is white, pointed to the works of Richard Lynn, a British professor who for 50 years has employed eugenics to explain racial and gender inequality. Lynn asserts that men, whites and Asians are genetically superior groups, and that the wealth and power of nations depends on their racial “homogeneity.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center describes Lynn as a white nationalist. His research, much of which relies on IQ scores, has been panned by the mainstream scientific community.

Other students responded to the video with outrage on Twitter.

One woman wrote that she’s “fed up” with “passiveness toward hate speech on our campus under the guise of ‘freedom of speech.’ ”

Another wrote that at WSU, people of color “are constantly getting targeted and belittled, makes me sick to my stomach.”

WSU’s Black Student Union tweeted, “Unity is everything and ignorance is fought with proactive determination, intelligence and action with numbers. Make your voices be heard.”

The video is the latest display of intolerance to rock the university in recent months.

Last September, a student said she found racist graffiti on a desk in a WSU library – the N-word penciled above “TRUMP 2016.”

And in February, fliers urging people to report “illegal aliens” to immigration authorities were found on the WSU campus. They appeared to be the work of a white supremacist group called American Vanguard.

Schulz said in his statement that administrators would launch a formal effort to improve the social climate at WSU. He said administrators would prepare a report by June 1 and create a website where students can track progress and provide input.

“We will recommit, in our actions as well as our words, to building a truly welcoming and inclusive environment at WSU,” Schulz said in the statement. “We are not progressing quickly enough.”

Ghetto College Students Demand an End to Free Speech

You can take the Nigga out of the ghetto, but you can’t take the ghetto out of the Nigga.

Here, gorilla college students demand that all opinions contrary to theirs be shut down. What the urban pavement types will do if their demands are not met is not clear. Maybe they’ll go burn down a ghetto someplace. Who knows.

Their demands read as if scripted by (((God’s chosen people.))) The young scholars of color use words (like hegemonic) that they have no idea the meaning of.

Claremont Independent

In an open letter to outgoing Pomona College President David Oxtoby, a group of students from the Claremont Colleges assail the president for affirming Pomona’s commitment to free speech and demand that all five colleges “take action” against the conservative journalists on the staff of the Claremont Independent.

The letter, written by three self-identified Black students at Pomona College, is a response to an April 7 email from President Oxtoby in which he reiterated the college’s commitment to “the exercise of free speech and academic freedom” in the aftermath of protests that shut down a scheduled appearance by an invited speaker, scholar and Black Lives Matter critic Heather Mac Donald, on April 6.

“Protest has a legitimate and celebrated place on college campuses,” Oxtoby wrote. “What we cannot support is the act of preventing others from engaging with an invited speaker. Our mission is founded upon the discovery of truth, the collaborative development of knowledge and the betterment of society.”

In their open letter, the students sharply disagree.

“Free speech, a right many freedom movements have fought for, has recently become a tool appropriated by hegemonic institutions. It has not just empowered students from marginalized backgrounds to voice their qualms and criticize aspects of the institution, but it has given those who seek to perpetuate systems of domination a platform to project their bigotry,” they write.

“Thus, if ‘our mission is founded upon the discovery of truth,’” the students continue, citing Oxtoby’s letter, “how does free speech uphold that value?”

The students also characterize truth as a “myth” and a white supremacist concept.

“Historically, white supremacy has venerated the idea of objectivity, and wielded a dichotomy of ‘subjectivity vs. objectivity’ as a means of silencing oppressed peoples,” they explain. “The idea that there is a single truth–‘the Truth’–is a construct of the Euro-West that is deeply rooted in the Enlightenment, which was a movement that also described Black and Brown people as both subhuman and impervious to pain. This construction is a myth and white supremacy, imperialism, colonization, capitalism, and the United States of America are all of its progeny. The idea that the truth is an entity for which we must search, in matters that endanger our abilities to exist in open spaces, is an attempt to silence oppressed peoples.”

In reference to the protests of Mac Donald, the open letter explains that engaging with Mac Donald’s speech would have amounted to a debate not “on mere difference of opinion, but [on] the right of Black people to exist.”

“Heather Mac Donald is a fascist, a white supremacist, a warhawk, a transphobe, a queerphobe, a classist, and ignorant of interlocking systems of domination that produce the lethal conditions under which oppressed peoples are forced to live,” the letter claims. “Why are you [President Oxtoby], and other persons in positions of power at these institutions, protecting a fascist and her hate speech and not students that are directly affected by her presence?”

The open letter concludes by insisting that Oxtoby apologize for his April 7 email and issue a new message that the college “does not tolerate hate speech and speech that projects violence onto the bodies of its marginalized students and oppressed peoples.”

The students also demand that the Claremont Colleges “take action” against the staff of the Claremont Independent for their “continual perpetuation of hate speech, anti-Blackness, and intimidation toward students of marginalized backgrounds.” Taking a step further, they call for “disciplinary action” against conservative journalists from the Claremont Colleges.

“We also demand that Pomona College and the Claremont University Consortium entities take action against the Claremont Independent editorial staff for its continual perpetuation of hate speech, anti-Blackness, and intimidation toward students of marginalized backgrounds,” they write. “Provided that the Claremont Independent releases the identity of students involved with this letter and such students begin to receive threats and hate mail, we demand that this institution and its constituents take legal action against members of the Claremont Independent involved with the editing and publication process as well as disciplinary action, such as expulsion on the grounds of endangering the wellbeing of others.”

The letter’s signatories, of whom there are more than 20 at the time of publication, request a response by the afternoon of April 18.

The authors of the letter did not immediately respond to the Independent’s requests for comment.

WE SHOULD HAVE PICKED OUR OWN COTTON.