Teen Vogue Sparks Backlash with Tutorial Promoting Anal Sex for Minors

Sodomites are upset with a Christian mum expressing the opinion that a magazine aimed at 11 to 17 year old girls should not be promoting anal sex. Look up anal prolapse and you’ll see she’s right on medical grounds. As to morality, well I don’t recall the Bible endorsing sodomy. Do you?

Patheos

The Activist Mommy, a Christian homeschooling mother of 10, is butthurt about an anal sex advice article appearing in Teen Vogue.

Elizabeth Johnston, aka The Activist Mommy, released a Facebook video earlier this week condemning Teen Vogue for offering a sex education article on anal sex. In her video, an angry Johnston burns an issue of Teen Vogue while encouraging others to boycott the magazine.
In the video, which has been viewed over 2.9 million times, Johnson asks viewers to join her in her campaign to have the publication removed from “your local gas stations, your local libraries and your local grocery stores.”

Clearly Johnston is angry, but is her anger justified?
In the Teen Vogue article in question, “Anal Sex: What You Need To Know,” sex educator and feminist activist Gigi Engle gives readers the facts about anal sex in a non-judgmental and educational context, answering questions that many may have, but are uncomfortable talking about or asking. The article begins:

When it comes to your body, it’s important that you have the facts. Being in the dark is not doing your sexual health or self-understanding any favors.

With that sentiment in mind, we’re here to lay it all out for you when it comes to anal sex.

In short, the article is a straightforward and honest account of the ins and outs of anal intercourse, and good information for the curious.

However, the article makes Johnston furious. In her video the angry activist mommy declares:

Teen Vogue is garbage. The editors minds are in the garbage. The author’s minds are in the garbage. Don’t let your kids read garbage.
There is a particular irony in Johnston’s outrage, given the urban legend confirmed by anecdotal evidence that many “good Christian women” engage in anal sex to protect their vaginal virginity – aka The Loophole:

Bottomline: The Activist Mommy is a magazine burning, attention seeking clown – another ignorant religious extremist willing to deny sex education advice to others in order to promote her demented, conservative Christian, puritanical agenda.

Wow! I don’t think there’s any possibility of finding common ground with sodomites when this type of attitude is expressed. Sexually explicit information that promotes to children what used to be called a “crime against nature” and was illegal shouldn’t have to be debated. It should be something that everyone agrees on.

Watch on Twitter:

Watch on Facebook:

Feminism Is Leaving A Wake Of Unhappy, Unmarried, And Childless Women In Its Path

The premise of a piece about women published at the Daily Wire is wrong. Feminism isn’t about advancing women or making them happy. It’s about leftist identity politics to entice women into experimenting with life as a lesbian. Feminism is correctly seen as a plot intended to make women unhappy in order to advance big, tyrannical government that pretends to “protect” women from the evil white male.

Daily Wire

Feminists claim to promote the advancement of women and gender equality, largely via the promotion of so-called sexual liberation, but their movement is leaving a wake of unhappy, unmarried, and childless women in its path, a real problem feminists seemingly refuse to entirely address.

According to a recent study from Yale University researchers, liberated, college educated women are freezing their eggs because they can’t find a man to marry and have children with before their natural childbearing years expire. In the U.K., for instance, one in five women is childless when their natural reproductive years expires, as opposed to one in ten women a mere generation prior.

So what’s to blame for this onslaught of college-educated yet terribly empty women?

The short answer is feminism.

Colleged education today offers a heavy dose of indoctrination. Instead of teaching Home Economics (sewing, cooking, household management, child rearing, etc.) professors teach a pseudointellectual Cultural Marxist view, which really leaves women with hostility toward men and messed up minds.

The author of the study, Marcia Inhorn, an anthropology professor at Yale University, concludes that the common assumption about women putting off children to advance their careers is mere myth. The 150 women undergoing the egg-freezing process in the U.S. and Israel who were extensively interviewed for the study, claimed they were not putting off having a family in order to advance their career, but because they simply couldn’t find a mate.

Inhorn blames the problem on a shortage of college-educated men. “There is a major gap — they are literally missing men. There are not enough college graduates for them. In simple terms, this is about an oversupply of educated women,” she says.

“Most women who are educated would like to have an educated partner. Traditionally women have also wanted to ‘marry up’ to go for someone more successful, financially well off,” adds the researcher.

With white men being demonized in the college classroom, it makes no sense for them to attend a college where they have to confess their white privilege and their guilt for everything that ever went wrong in the world.

With women embracing the hook up culture, why would a man want to pair off with a girl who believes that her liberation lies in her sexual promiscuity?

SLUTS? UHHH, YES.

Inhorn then goes on to blame feminism, sort of. Essentially, because of feminism, liberated women are college-educated but unhappy and alone in exchange, she argues.

“As a feminist I think it’s great that women are doing so well but I think there has been a cost that has been paid,” says Inhorn, adding that women have been left in “sadness and isolation.”

But there’s more going on here. Other experts allude to what Inhorn is unwilling to say: it’s not simply an “oversupply” of liberated women that’s driving this trend, or a liberation-happiness trade-in; it’s men refusing to settle down. And for that, I’d like to thank the feminists’ push for “sexual liberation.”

Let start with the evidence.

First off, some of the women interviewed by Inhorn’s own team even admit that it’s not simply an educational gap; women said they would marry a man who doesn’t have a degree but they can’t find one who wants to marry them.

Then there’s Medical Director of U.K. clinic Create Fertility, Professor Geeta Nargund, who hits the nail on the head (emphasis added): “Women tell us frequently that they are freezing their eggs because the men they meet feel threatened by their success and so unwilling to commit to starting a family together.”

It’s plausible that some men might feel threatened by their woman’s success, but overall that placebo disguises a realistic worry about just how selfish a woman is when she’s fixated on her career and not the family unit.

President of the British Fertility Society, Professor Adam Balen, concurred (emphasis added): “We are seeing some big societal issues, in particular in some social economic groups, with young men not committing.”

(((Balen))) is male-bashing. Blame the male! Yeah, right. He’s a dimwit.

And here’s Executive Director of IVI, Dr. Gillian Lockwood, on Inhorn’s findings: “It exacerbates the problem of men not wanting to ‘settle down’ and start a family until it’s almost too late for the woman to conceive naturally. And if she insists, he’s quite likely to leave for a younger woman whose biological clock isn’t ticking quite so loudly.”

Dr. Lockwood’s “own survey of women doing ‘social’ egg freezing found the overwhelming majority of women having their eggs frozen were doing so because they could not find a partner, or because their own partner would not commit,” notes The Telegraph.

Bingo.

And there’s even more!

Professor Simon Fishel, who founded Care Fertility, explained based on his research (emphasis added): “Almost all of the women in the study who employed egg freezing were heterosexual and wanted to become married mothers. Women lamented the ‘missing men’ in their lives, viewing egg freezing as a way to buy time while on the continuing (online) search for a committed partner.”

Search for a committed partner? I think what he means is you have a group of women who are 5s and 6s looking for a man who’s a 9 or 10. Overvaluing yourself is a real problem in the meat market that is the dating world today.

Over 90% of those surveyed were not freezing their eggs to postpone childbearing to advance a career. Instead, “they were desperately ‘preserving’ their fertility beyond the natural end of their reproductive lives, because they were single without partners to marry,” he said.

So back to the original claim: the so-called sexual liberation of women is indeed screwing women, and not in a good way.

Why would a man rush to settle down and marry someone if he can not only have sex with “liberated” women without a ring, but even cohabitate with them, too? Moreover, the less chaste a woman is, the less preferable she will likely be to a man. Not to mention a woman’s increasing age and creeping near infertility as another massively undesirable trait.

If women demanded more from men, did not sleep around in the name of feminism, men would settle into marriage at an earlier age.

But, nonetheless, these simple truths will be rejected by feminists everywhere, clinging hard to their sad, lonely lives in exchange for empty Feminism, as they accuse any dissenter of being a misogynist.

Our ancestors had it right in those old social guidance films I’ve been publishing here the last few weeks. A number of the women in those old films were good role models–thoughtful, considerate, conservative, chaste, and loyal.

Too many males do hate women today, I believe. The question is whether that hatred (or distaste) is justified.

Sympathy for School Kids When Deadbeat Parents Won’t Pay for Lunch

MUH BABIES EEZ HUNGRY, MI AMIGO.

America’s “gibsmedat” philosophy has the working families of America not only paying their own bills, but also picking up the tab for irresponsible people. The array of “free sh*t” that the American parasite can consume without paying for it is mind boggling.

Liberals can always come up with a heart-tugging anecdote like the one that starts this story off. Anecdotes designed to trigger emotions are not the proper basis for public policy.

AP News

US schools rethink meal-debt policies that humiliate kids

SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — Teaching assistant Kelvin Holt watched as a preschool student fell to the back of a cafeteria line during breakfast in Killeen, Texas, as if trying to hide.

“The cash register woman says to this 4-year-old girl, verbatim, ’You have no money,’” said Holt, describing the incident last year. A milk carton was taken away, and the girl’s food was dumped in the trash. “She did not protest, other than to walk away in tears.”

Holt has joined a chorus of outrage against lunchroom practices that can humiliate children as public school districts across the United States rethink how they cope with unpaid student lunch debts.

The U.S. Agriculture Department is requiring districts to adopt policies this month for addressing meal debts and to inform parents at the start of the academic year.

The agency is not specifically barring most of the embarrassing tactics, such as serving cheap sandwiches in place of hot meals or sending students home with conspicuous debt reminders, such as hand stamps. But it is encouraging schools to work more closely with parents to address delinquent accounts and ensure children don’t go hungry.

“Rather than a hand stamp on a kid to say, ‘I need lunch money,’ send an email or a text message to the parent,” said Tina Namian, who oversees the federal agency’s school meals policy branch.

Meanwhile, some states are taking matters into their own hands, with New Mexico this year becoming the first to outlaw school meal shaming and several others weighing similar laws.

Free and reduced-price meals funded by the Agriculture Department’s National School Lunch Program shield the nation’s poorest children from so-called lunch shaming. Kids can eat for free if a family of four earns less than about $32,000 a year or at a discount if earnings are under $45,000.

It’s households with slightly higher incomes that are more likely to struggle, experts on poverty and nutrition say.

Children often bear the brunt of unpaid meal accounts. A 2014 federal report found 39 percent of districts nationwide hand out cheap alternative meals with no nutritional requirements and up to 6 percent refuse to serve students with no money.

The debate over debts and child nutrition has spilled into state legislatures and reached Capitol Hill, as child advocacy groups question whether schools should be allowed to single out, in any way, a child whose family has not paid for meals.

“There’s no limit to the bad behavior a school can have. They just have to put it in writing,” said Jennifer Ramo, executive director of New Mexico Appleseed, an advocacy group on poverty issues. “We live in a credit society. I think schools should handle debt like everybody else does: You don’t take away food from children. You feed them and you settle the bill later.”

Spurred by Appleseed and others, New Mexico in April passed its anti-meal-shaming law, which directs schools to work directly with parents to address payments and requires that children get a healthy, balanced meal regardless of whether debts are paid on time.

And so once ALL the parasites learn that there are no consequences for not paying their bills, what do you think they’re going to do?

Getting real, we’re talking here mostly about nonwhite women whose wombs pump out the young ‘uns fathered by one mack daddy after another, just so they can get their gibsmedats.

Sterilize ’em as a condition of being on the dole.

AMERICAN NOSTALGIA: The Thrifty Wife (Early 1960s Social Guidance Film)

Everyone who sees these old films wants to go back in time.

The importance of the housewife is shown very clearly in this journey back to a simpler life, in color.

The newest automobile I spotted in this great little movie was a 62 Chevy Impala. Chevrolet must have has something to do with the production since everyone seems to be driving a Chevy.

White “Donut Boy” Traveling Cross Country to Give Cops Free Donuts

DONUT BOY TYLER CARACH WITH SOME OF HIS HEROES.

Well, this should enrage Black Lives Matter.

Donut Boy must watch his back at all times. If he attends a public school that has blacks enrolled, he really is in some danger.

Some causes are better left to adults. While many people may appreciate the youngster’s efforts to thank a cop, police officers are paid reasonably well to “protect and serve.” They can afford to buy their own donuts.

NOLA

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. — When nine-year-old Tyler Carach of Florida saw police officers in his local store, he purchased mini donuts for them to show his appreciation for their hard work.

After he left the store, Tyler asked his mother Sheena if he could thank every cop in the United States by giving out donuts. Tyler would soon be known by police departments across the country as “Donut Boy.”

“They keep us safe,” Tyler said. “They’re my best friends and they need to be reminded that we still care.”

Tyler and his family are embarking on a six-week trip to donate donuts to several police departments, including the New York Police Department.

The Carach family will be staying with friends on Staten Island and will be handing out donuts to officers at an event on each borough. Their first event will be held on Staten Island on July 17.

“We know for sure we already have 5000 for NYPD donated by Dunkin’ Donuts and 25 dozen donated by The Donut Pub,” Sheena Carach said.

Tyler first started thanking cops with donuts last August and has already donated more than 6,000 donuts. He hopes to donate more than 10,000 donuts by the end of his six-week trip.

Tyler also hopes his trip will add more police department patches and challenge coins — carried by police officers to keep the oath to uphold the law — to his growing collection.

SAMPLE POLICE DEPARTMENT CHALLENGE COINS.

Read more about challenge coins at Wikipedia.

How the Government Conditions Citizens to Obey

Teachers and police (and the IRS) expect blind obedience to authority.

The consequences can be severe when one disobeys. Are we living in a police state? Many awake Americans and Europeans believe so.

Excerpt from Lew Rockwell

Governments and corporations alike know that the best way to mold a person is to start in childhood.

That is why children younger than 6 are being prescribed anti-depressants by the government health care system in Great Britain. Almost 200,000 prescriptions for antidepressants are handed out to children under 18 in Great Britain, almost 13,000 of which go to kids from 7-12 and over 600 go to children under 6 years old!

Yet as disconcerting as these figures are, the UK isn’t the first country to have them. In 2009, five deaths have already been linked to antidepressants in Australian children aged 10 to 19; moreover, 89 recorded adverse reactions in children under nine were associated with antidepressants. Dr. Joe Tucci, Chief Executive of the Australian Childhood Foundation, said: “I cannot think of a good reason why any six-year-old, or younger, should be treated with antidepressants. I think it’s gone up because medication is being used to treat the symptoms and not the cause.”

The actual cause is where the story starts. Why are children so young depressed?

Coercion is arguably the leading cause of all mental health issues. In modern society, children start to feel this coercion as soon as they are born into a society shaped like a cattle pen.

Increasing suicide attempts by children are concentrated around the times when school is in session. The unnatural environment in which they are placed causes extreme stress for many children. The “well-adjusted” ones take to the authority like good sheep, and everyone else gets loaded up with drugs to make them a better citizen.

Later in life, a good citizen will take this lesson to heart. Don’t feel like you fit in? Not happy with your job, spouse, environment? Anxiety, depression, helplessness, anger over things that you cannot control because you feel forced into a life you don’t want?

Drugs. Do illegal drugs and enrich the CIA (and give the government an option to lock you up if they want), or do legal drugs and enrich the government connected pharmaceutical corporations.

It is, however, encouraging to see an increase in home-schooling in the USA, (which could actually be inadvertently fueled by forced vaccination for any children attending public school). About 40 years ago, 40 million children attended public school and under 100,000 were homeschooled. By 2005 48 million children attended public school, and a whopping 2 million were being homeschooled.

Parents who raise their kids to not blindly follow authority are doing a great service. It is tempting for parents to snap, “Because I said so!” to children, but it is better to explain why the rules are what they are whenever possible.

The kids rewarded in school are the ones best at following directions, and the teacher always hates the kid that asks why they have to do what they are told when it doesn’t make any sense. I once had to write a letter home because I didn’t wear my coat at recess. My parents responded by letting the teacher know that at the age of 12, my nerve endings had developed enough so that I could choose if a coat was necessary while running around in 50-degree temperatures for 15 minutes.

But police do the same thing to adults conditioned by the public school system.

If you get pulled over or are otherwise unfortunate enough to come into contact with the police, your life is literally in serious danger if you do not immediately and obediently follow all their orders, even when they have no legal standing to make those demands. Moving your hands out of site, asking why you are being arrested, or simply not hearing or understanding an officer are all offenses worthy of execution in the United States.

The teachers and police who expect blind obedience simply because they are an authority figure are programming the same thing into citizens: that the state must be obeyed, or there will be consequences.

And this same philosophy of shaping the citizen is seen everywhere to varying degrees and molded for different types of people. The newest trend is to police thought crimes by claiming that hate speech is not protected free speech. If you offend anyone, you have committed a crime, if you have a contrary opinion, it is fake news, if you desire any internet privacy, you are probably a terrorist.

The image below is art produced by David Dees, the man who resists authoritarianism. The is real alt-right art.