Democrats are committing political suicide by refusing to moderate their migrant-first policy agenda, says the liberal intellectual who launched the push for same-sex marriage.
Andrew Sullivan, the immigrant British-born author who championed the same-sex movement, writes in New York Magazine:
Democrats in 2017, in general, tend to criticize the use of immigration enforcement, and tend to side with those accused of violating immigration law, as a broad matter of principle beyond opposing the particular actions of the administration … Democrats are no longer as willing to attack “illegal immigration” as a fundamental problem anymore.
This is, to be blunt, political suicide … In fact, the Democrats increasingly seem to suggest that any kind of distinction between citizens and noncitizens is somehow racist. You could see this at the last [Democratic Party] convention, when an entire evening was dedicated to Latinos, illegal and legal, as if the rule of law were largely irrelevant. Hence the euphemism “undocumented” rather than “illegal.” So the stage was built, lit, and set for Trump …
The entire concept of a nation whose citizens solely determine its future — the core foundation for any viable democracy at all — is now deemed by many left-liberals to be a function of bigotry. This is the kind of madness that could keep them from power indefinitely.
Sullivan is gay but also a liberal with some respect for ordinary people and their preferences. That leaves him out on the edge of the post-2008 Democratic Party, which is controlled by post-graduate elitists who are using divide-and-rule diversity politics to impose their own tastes, status symbols and economic self-interests on all Americans.
For example, Democrats reacted with hostility and contempt towards Trump’s popular immigration principles and also spotlighted their favoritism for illegal migrants, whom they portray as “dreamers.” On October 11, Democratic Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi described Trump principles as “trash” as she appeared alongside three illegal migrants who accused the GOP leaders of supporting racist policies.
So far, business-first groups and their media allies have muted white-collar concern about the economics of immigration by hiding the impact of cheap white-collar immigration from college graduate voters.
Claims that illegals are “living in the shadows are laughable to begin with, but when they come out to hold a press conference demanding this, that, and the next thing, it’s even more laughable.
The evil hand of Mark Zuckerberg is present in this, as noted in the story.
Excerpt from Breitbart
Top Democrats and business allies invited reporters to a Capitol Hill event to watch illegal immigrants demand amnesty and smear Republicans as racist, in Spanish and broken English.
“I’m here representing all the immigrant mothers like myself, will not allow the government to tear down our sons’ and daughters’ dreams while they try to separate our families,” said Lenka Mendoza, an unskilled illegal alien who has been living in the United States for 17 years since the year President Geoge W. Bush was elected. She continued, using a translator, saying:
The president does not care about our children and our families. Trump and his government supposed priorities are nothing else but an anti-immigrant and white-supremacist agenda that don’t solve anything … need clean act now.”
Mendoza was welcomed to the podium by Todd Schulte, a Democratic political activist who is president of FWD.us, a lobbying group formed by Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Venture Capitalists and software CEOs. Nine of the group’s 15 founders are investors who would gain from cheaper white-collar labor and a larger population of customers in the United States.
Schulte hosted the event to showcase Democrats’ opposition to President Trump’s new immigration principles, which balance business’ demands for more workers and customers against Americans’ worries that they and their children will be unfairly outsourced, sidelined and ignored amid mass immigration.
In his October 8 letter to Congress, Trump said:
These findings outline reforms that must be included as part of any legislation addressing the status of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients. Without these reforms, illegal immigration and chain migration, which severely and unfairly burden American workers and taxpayers, will continue without end.
Immigration reform must create more jobs, higher wages, and greater security for Americans — now and for future generations. The reforms outlined in the enclosure are necessary to ensure prosperity, opportunity, and safety for every member of our national family.
Instead of urging compromise, Schulte’s speakers upped their demands, saying they want an amnesty for young ‘dreamer’ illegals plus an amnesty for their parents, to be delivered immediately and without any compromises, such as the improved border defenses sought by a supermajority of Americans.
Haha. Every illegal baby factory has picked up on that phrase “strong woman.” Are there no normal women out there anymore? How about weak women?
“I am a weak woman who must be supported by the taxpayers so that I can stay pregnant all the time.”
That Washington-imposed economic policy of mass-immigration floods the market with foreign labor, spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate prices, widens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions.
Americans tell pollsters that they strongly oppose amnesties and cheap-labor immigration, even as most Americans also want to favor legal immigrants, and many sympathize with illegals.
Because of the successful cheap-labor strategy, wages for men have remained flat since 1973, and a growing percentage of the nation’s annual income is shifting to investors and away from employees.
A sane country would have raided this press conference, rounded up the illegals, and arrested the citizens who organized it.
Maybe one day we’ll be at that point, but not yet.
Build the wall, get the illegals out of the country–all them, and reform legal immigration.
Pat Buchanan has some simple advice for Donald Trump, laid out at the end of this post in Pat’s words.
Pat saw his idol Richard Nixon kicked around by the establishment the way that Trump is also being kicked around. We know how that ended. Pat sees no hope that Trump can buy the goodwill of his enemies by playing nice.
By Patrick J. Buchanan
“Having cut a deal with Democrats for help with the debt ceiling, will Trump seek a deal with Democrats on amnesty for the ‘Dreamers’ in return for funding for border security?”
The answer to that question, raised in my column a week ago, is in. Last night, President Donald Trump cut a deal with “Chuck and Nancy” for amnesty for 800,000 recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program who came here illegally as youngsters, in return for Democratic votes for more money for border security.
According to preening Minority Leader Pelosi, the agreement contains not a dime for Trump’s Wall, and the “Dreamers” are to be put on a long glide “path to U.S. citizenship.”
Trump denies this is amnesty, and says the Wall comes later.
Fallout? Among the most enthusiastic of Trump backers, disbelief, disillusionment and wonderment at where we go from here.
Superman = Jewperman now.
It’s too bad fucking social justice warrior Superman wasn’t there to protect the fucking thousands of Americans killed by fucking illegal aliens.
Hey, Superman, you fucking piece of shit! Where were you when Jamiel was murdered! And what about Kate Steinle, you moron!
Superman is an illegal alien. Deport him back to Krypton or wherever the hell he came from.
The moment in the book released Wednesday comes a week after President Trump ended DACA.
Perhaps it is just a coincidence, but perhaps not.
In the recent issue of Action Comics #987, “The Oz Effect,” released Wednesday, Superman arrives in the nick of time to protect a group of undocumented immigrants from a white man sporting an American flag bandanna, wielding a machine gun, who is going to shoot them for taking his job.
Superman blocks the bullets before they hit the terrified people.
“Stop this!” Superman orders the gunman.
“Why?!” he responds. “They ruined me! Stole from me!”
Grabbing the gunman by the collar and pulling him in close, Superman says, “The only person responsible for the blackness smothering your soul — is you!”
Police arrive, and Superman hands over the gunman and tells officers to make sure the victims are “safe and cared for.” An officer responds, “Anything you say, Superman!”
The moment comes just one week after President Donald Trump made the controversial announcement that he was ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy put in place by former President Barack Obama. He then gave Congress a window to save the program.
Still, the decision was decried by politicians, civil groups and celebrities alike. Nearly 800,000 individuals, known as Dreamers, have received protection to stay in the country through the program.
In addition to the DACA announcement, Trump was also slammed for comments he made just a few weeks prior when he appeared to be defending a group of white nationalists holding a rally in Charlottesville, Va., at which one protester to the rally was killed and numerous others injured.
Action Comics #987 is by Dan Jurgens, Viktor Bogdanovic, Jonathan Glapion, Jay Leisten and Mike Spicer.
Hollywood and almost the entire entertainment industry needs to be destroyed. We can’t escape their moronic, shallow virtue signaling. Meanwhile, real people die because of Hollywood.
Bankers are in an outrage and Paul Ryan is in a snit.
Something really good must have happended.
What it was was President Trump ended DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). Mean Man Trump has replaced Nice Man Trump, the guy who held and kissed black babies in Houston last week.
Spare Me The Outrage About DACA
Whether it comes from the left, right, CEOs (who love cheap labor damn the law to Hell) or others, just spare me the tears, ok?
I’m not swayed by the claim that the kids involved are blameless. That doesn’t matter; the fact is that they have accessed and consumed services in this nation to which they were not entitled over the previous years, and nobody is demanding that they pay the cost of said services back.
Theft by conversion is still theft. Yes, if you have no ability to reason at the time (because you’re a young child) then you cannot be held criminally liable for said theft, but the fact of the matter is that you still got the benefit and paid nothing for it.
That it was your parents that worked under the table (and thus evaded said taxes) or worse, stole someone’s identity (and thus committed both a criminal act and imposed direct cost on someone else) isn’t material. You were the beneficiary of that conduct — both directly in your home and indirectly in your access to schools, infrastructure, medical care and more that you wouldn’t have had. You’ve benefited greatly over these years.
May I remind you that President Obama, when he announced this program, admitted he had no legal authority to do so. Congress could have changed the law over the intervening time, and indeed prior to that time, but did not and has not.
Speaker Ryan’s mealy-mouthed nonsense is even worse, as the person who could have brought said bill to the floor of the House and hasn’t done so. He is the worst sort of hypocrite and jackass, in that he’s made a nice name for himself by claiming to be for the Rule of Law — right up until it is proposed to be enforced.
Then he turns into someone who condones said theft instead.
DACA is illegal folks. This is not about compassion, it’s about the rule of law. If someone manages to break into a bank every day and steal $20 without being caught for years or even decades that does not change the fundamental nature of their act, nor the fact that’s illegal. Getting away with an illegal act does not make it lawful; it just means, especially when it’s done openly and notoriously, that you managed to sufficiently bribe the cops.
The latter, may I remind you, is a second and more-serious offense, because corruption of the rule of law is usually considered more-serious than simply ignoring or breaking the law.
No, holding cute babies up to the camera won’t change my mind. Nor will appeals to my alleged “better side.” The fact of the matter is that our nation’s immigration laws are what they are and those who intentionally broke said laws and/or profited from same must not be rewarded for doing so by giving them the ability to stay, permanent residency or even worse, citizenship.
Nope, nope and nope. All of the DACA folks have a nation — but it’s not the United States. They’re citizens of some other country, to which they must return. Once they’ve done so if they so choose they may petition to enter the United States for the purpose of residency via the established and lawful basis, and should be expected to repay, with interest, all of their previously ill-gotten gains.
If they have acquired skills and education while here then on a score-based system they’d actually have an advantage in requesting legal status — from their nation of citizenship.
But not while here — while here they are illegal invaders, whether they knowingly broke the law or not, whether carried by their parent(s) or wildcatting on their own.
The law either must be applied evenly or it is meaningless. Congress neither has a right or an obligation to retroactively change these facts — only prospectively. The administration, for its part, has an obligation to enforce the law — not an option to do so or not, as President Obama asserted. That obligation stands as one of the primary pillars of our Constitution and in fact is an explicit component in the oath that the President, and those who serve in the executive or legislature where oaths are required, take before ascending to the office in question.
DACA must end and those who promote otherwise must be driven from public office and the boardrooms in which they sit. Those firms who profit from and advocate for the intentional violation of Federal immigration law must find the firm and all responsible executives charged under said law as accessories before and after the fact and their companies must have their charters revoked and be disbanded.
NO amnesty. By delaying the repeal of DACA for six months, Trump has given Congress an opening to save it. I’m emailing Paul Ryan to tell him NO amnesty. He’s a POS who won’t pay attention unless we beat him over the head with his lies and flip flops. He must be defeated in 2018.
Back in the day when I described myself to students as a “Reagan Republican,” I was too stupid or brainwashed to understand the truth about immigration. The Wall Street Journal was America’s premier voice of conservatism. I was a conservative. The WSJ favored open borders. I should favor open borders so that capitalism would prosper.
The first inkling that I got that I was wrong came in 1992 when Ross Perot ran for president on an anti-NAFTA platform.
Here in San Antonio, the city fathers kept spewing the nonsense that NAFTA was going to turn SA into a world-class trading city, with the streets paved with gold. A business faculty member, Dr. Lynda Y. De La Vina, had been tasked with “selling” NAFTA to the faculty so that we would all be on board with one voice. Her sales pitch essentially boiled down to “F*ck the workers displaced by NAFTA. We’re all going to get rich by doing consulting work related to the legislation.”
Well, she got rich anyway.
I never spoke up for NAFTA but neither did I speak against it.
After all, I was a conservative. How could I be against free trade?
The Wall Street Journal was advocating for NAFTA then as a step toward a completely open North American borderless country. The globalists at that paper are still at it, all these years later.
Excerpt from Breitbart
President Donald Trump should abandon his merit immigration reform and simply let employers import cheap workers to ensure profitability, the Wall Street Journal recommends.
The newspaper’s Editorial Board declared August 4:
Senators Tom Cotton of Arkansas and David Perdue of Georgia have introduced legislation that would eliminate the green-card preferences for parents, adult children and siblings of U.S. citizens, which in effect would reduce legal immigration by 40%. Foreigners could also apply for up to 140,000 green cards via a government admissions process that awards points based on education, language ability, age, educational attainment and job skills …
[But] any point system is also arbitrary and reflects the biases of politicians—namely, Messrs. Cotton and Perdue—rather than the needs of employers … Employers have a better idea of the skills they need than does the Labor Department bureaucracy …
Every economist knows that employers can only raise wages as fast as productivity and profitability allow. If the cost of labor rises too much for a specific job, employers will simply cease providing the service or move production overseas. That means fewer jobs for Americans too …
The solution, as ever, is a legal immigration system that is generous with visas and flexible enough to meet the demands of a growing U.S. economy. If the White House is serious about passing something in Congress, it needs to recognize that reality.
Read it all here.
You need a subscription to read the full WSJ editorial.
The Breitbart piece goes on to discuss the economic damage that immigration does to Americans. All of us on the alt-right also note the cultural damage.
The Wall Street Journal is owned by globalist Rupert Murdoch.
There are too many good comments at Breitbart to summarize or post, but her’s a sample:
fwcaller spcnrs • 2 hours ago
It is not about jobs or economic growth. It is about voting. The steady, massive importation of big-govt-loving third worlders, who multiply like flies, then providing them amnesty, then watching them vote the first world countries into the ditch, just like they did to the third-world hell holes they escaped from because they voted those countries into the ditch. The jobs/economy matter is a red herring; a diversion. If these companies wanted to make big profits, they would cut workers. They do it all the time to increase their bottom line and push up their stock price. Or they would robotize peasant jobs. So their reasons are phony. They need more ignorant, big-govt.-loving voters.
I’m sure muh Kike wants nothing in return from Hillary. After all, she’s got the cleanest, most ethnical hands in politics.
A billionaire Facebook founder has agreed to donate $20million to defeat Donald Trump just weeks before the election.
Dustin Moskovitz, 32, announced his latest donation in a post he wrote for Medium earlier this month, stating: ‘The events of the past few weeks have only deepened my conviction that Hillary is the best choice for America. I hope that these contributions will help make that outcome a reality.’
Just one month prior, Moskovitz revealed in another Medium post that he has donated $15million to help elect Clinton and other Democrats.
But despite these staggering donations, many in the Democratic party know very little about Moskovitz, who is worth $10.7billion according to Forbes.
Moskovitz explained his reasons for supporting Clinton and his disdain for Trump in his September Medium post.
‘We cannot ignore the remarkable alignment between these two visions for society and the choices in this year’s election. The Republican Party, and Donald Trump in particular, is running on a zero-sum vision, stressing a false contest between their constituency and the rest of the world,’ wrote Moskovitz.
‘We believe their positions, especially on immigration, which purport to improve the lives of Americans, would in practice hurt citizens and noncitizens alike.
‘In contrast, the Democratic Party, and Hillary Clinton in particular, is running on a vision of optimism, pragmatism, inclusiveness and mutual benefit.’
Spoken like a true Marxist and a Jew. Moskovitz denies that open borders and the importation of dark-skinned colonizers is going to hurt whites. Never trust a back stabbking Jew billionaire.
His fellow Jew, the late economist Paul Samuelson developed the Factor price equalization theorem back in the 40s.
After the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed, for instance, unskilled labor wages gradually fell in the United States, at the same time as they gradually rose in Mexico. The same force has applied more recently to the various countries of the European Union.
Since Jews don’t work for wages, they love low wages, which results in them claiming a bigger piece of the pie.
The rest of muh Jew’s babble is Jew spew. Inclusion is good, blah, blah, blah. All the while Mr. Jew surreptiously sucks a little more blood from the host.