Kid’s Coloring Book Featuring Just One Drawing of Hitler Recalled by Dutch Seller

The coloring book was made in India. The politically incorrect Hindus love that swastika.

Nltimes.nl

Drugstore Kruidvat recalled a coloring book after realizing that it contained a picture of Adolf Hitler. The drugstore noticed the picture only after customers pointed it out on social media. “The book was in the store for half a day on Monday and several dozen were sold”, a spokesperson for Kruidvat said to NU.nl. “We’re going to figure out how this could happen.”

A number of customers drew Kruidvat’s attention to the paint-by-letters picture showing Hitler doing his infamous salute. The drugstore released a statement on social media calling the picture inappropriate and recalling the entire book. Customers can get their money back if they return the book.

The book was distributed by Belgian publisher Trifora, who called it a “regrettable mistake”. “My suspicion is that the man who created the coloring book got a book of famous people out of the closet and selected a pair, which unfortunately included Adolf Hitler. Maybe he did not recognize him”, a spokesperson said, according to NU.nl.

The book was made in India and it also contains pictures of Nelson Mandela, Abraham Lincoln and Albert Einstein. “It is a nasty combination of circumstances. We check the book on translations, but do not check all the coloring pictures. We probably should’ve, but it did not happen.” the Trifora spokesperson said.

As if Abraham Lincoln and Nelson Mandela are to be admired? Oy vey!

Black Website The Root Cleverly Distorts the Meaning of Richard Spencer and His Message

The article at the center of this post was penned by one Michael Harriot, whose photo shows a Negro. The piece itself reads like Jew Spew.

The title is Richard Spencer’s Racist Little Secret.

What is the secret the writer claims to reveal? That Spencer has no followers.

I think they said pretty much the same about Donald Trump a couple of years ago.

But even if Spencer has no followers, so what? Jesus had 12 and look what happened.

When they can’t fight your logic with logic of their own, they smear you. The writing here is very clever, but it’s not intended to do anything other than fill up space.

White Nationalism is a grievance movement. Whites have honest grievances. It is also a movement with a positive vision–a white homeland. Being cut off from parasiting from us scares the hell out of the black and the left. When whites have their homeland, the left will be exposed as economically, politically, and morally bankrupt. It will be fun to watch blacks turn on them.

The Root

On Tuesday, Richard Spencer—who is the actual throw-up in the back of your mouth—visited Auburn University in Alabama to spew his white nationalist rhetoric. Following the donnybrook that happened in Berkeley, Calif., last week, every media outlet prepared for another showdown between his supposed legion of neofascists and students opposed to his nonsense. I even went to bear witness to the expected tumult.

After his appearance, headlines everywhere documented the thousands of protesters, the brief skirmishes and the First Amendment legal battle that paved the way for his speech. There is one thing they all failed to mention about the brouhaha that ensued:

No one really cared.

That’s right. The whole “celebrity founder of a nationwide ‘alt-right’ movement” narrative is a scam. Richard Spencer is simply an overhyped, racist, Kardashian-like curiosity. He is a media-driven drama queen starring in a reality show that no one cares to watch. He has very few fans and almost no devotees. Richard Spencer is a hoax.

Continue reading

High School Assignment To ‘Defend’ Holocaust Yanked Amid Outcry

The goyim must not be allowed to think for a moment about the Holocaust. Just accept it.

The more (((they))) fight the exploration of what really happened, the more doubt that intelligent people will have about the so-called Holocaust.

Jewish Forward

A homework assignment asking students in an upstate New York school district to argue for or against the Final Solution from the perspective of a Nazi official was withdrawn and will never be assigned again.

High school students in an advanced class in Oswego County were assigned a project to pretend they were members of Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Party in order to argue for or against the Holocaust’s Final Solution.

“This is an exercise on expanding your point of view by going outside your comfort zone,” according to the directions of the assignment.

Two students, Archer Shurtliff and Jordan April, complained and called for the teacher to apologize and for the school district to permanently ban the assignment, Syracuse.com reported. Neither of the students, both 17, is Jewish.

On Monday, New York State Education Department Commissioner MaryEllen Elia said the assignment has been permanently banned.

Evan Bernstein, the Anti-Defamation League’s New York regional director, praised the district and Elia after saying in a statement that “There is no assignment that could ever be given to students that even hints at a balanced perspective to the horrors of Nazi actions during the Holocaust …”

Voltaire supposedly never said the following, but whoever said it spoke the truth:

Paul Joseph Watson: My Last Ever Video?

PJW explains how youtube will carry out its new effort to make the bastion of conservative thought into a bland, boring regular TV channel that draws advertising shekels.

From the youtube information box:

Published on Mar 24, 2017

Your favorite YouTube channels could be about to disappear.

One upvoted woman responded this way:

Well that’s just about disgusting. I’ve already all but abandoned Twitter and completely deleted my facebook over this kind of garbage. If YouTube turns into nothing but a leftist echo chamber, I’ll have no problem leaving it as well. We’ll see how much the ad companies crybaby when there’s no one left to even watch their ads…

Although PJW never mentions (((them))) some of the commenters do.

An in-depth discussion of youtube’s advertising controversy can be read at Australian Financial Review.

Google Apologizes After Major Brands Yank YouTube Ads Over Racist Content

CHEERIOS CEREAL FAMILY FROM 2014 AD.

One man’s hate is another man’s truth.

As you will see in this news report, advertisers want nothing to do with “hate.” So why so many mixed race couples in ads? Why so much denigration of the white male, always portraying him as a goofus?

Advertisers feel like they can insult my race and my sex with impunity. Well, we’re awake now and we hate your hypocrisy and the insults you peddle.

Google may kowtow to you, but we’re learning to live without your products. Your boycott of the truth expressed on youtube isn’t going to win you any friends.

NBC News

Google’s EMEA president of business and operations has apologized for the misplacement of advertising next to extremist content on its video site YouTube.

“There have been stories over the past few days about brands appearing against content that they wouldn’t like to appear against and particularly on YouTube, and so for me it is a good opportunity for me to say, first and foremost, to say sorry this should not happen and we need to do better,” Matt Brittin said at a press briefing Monday at the start of industry conference Advertising Week Europe in London.

Brands including HSBC, U.K. retailer Marks and Spencer and L’Oreal have pulled advertising from YouTube over the past few days, while agency group Havas has paused ads from U.K. clients including Domino’s Pizza and Hyundai Kia pending discussions with Google.

Speeding up the Review Process
Brittin said Google, which has the world’s biggest digital advertising platform, has invested “millions” and has thousands of people working to make sure “advertising practices are good.”

“I’ve spoken personally to a number of advertisers. Those that I have spoken to, we have been talking about a handful of impressions, and pennies not pounds of spend, but however small or big the issue, it is an important issue that we address,” he said.

“We’ve got a comprehensive review under way — we have for some time — looking at how can we improve here and we are accelerating that review.”

Unilever Chief Marketing Officer Keith Weed, who was with Brittin at the briefing, declined to comment on whether it had pulled advertising for any of its brands — which range from deodorant Axe (Lynx in the U.K.) to detergent Surf — from YouTube.

“We won’t make any public statement. I’m a great believer in talking about where the industry needs to get to, and what are the things we need to [do] collectively, the first accountability does go to the media companies because at the end of the day we are spending our money on their platform,” he said.

“I think the best way to do negotiations with any supplier is one on one and in private, and so you won’t find us coming out and making big public statements about particular customers. And we are working hand in hand,” Weed added.

How to Monitor Content Without Censoring Content
About 400 hours of content is uploaded to YouTube every minute, Brittin said, claiming that 98 percent of “removals” happen within 24 hours and adding that it will be looking at its policies, controls and how those are enforced. But it has a job to do in making sure it doesn’t remove content that is controversial, but not illegal, for example.

“It is not as simple as it might seem, so you might say: Why don’t you just exclude content that relates to war or that relates to politics? Well actually if you were to do that you would exclude important news content or documentary content.”

“Firstly on policies, this is about what content within YouTube do we deem to be safe for advertisers, and we’re going to raise the bar on that,” Brittin said. “That would include things like looking at our definition of hate speech, or our definition of inflammatory content, so that we raise the bar on what is deemed acceptable for advertising.”

Google expects to make further announcements on how it is tackling the problem of ads appearing next to extreme content “in the coming days,” he added.

Pivotal Research Group on Monday downgraded Alphabet stock from buy to hold after media buying agency Havas pulled spending from YouTube and Google Display Network in the U.K.

Leaked Twitter Shadowban List Shows Bias Against Truth, Conservatives

Richard Spencer, Mark Dice, Alex Jones, Brittany Pettibone, Lew Rockwell, and a host of other “racists,” truth tellers, and conservatives are on the list.

Jack Dorsey, the CEO of Twitter, is destroying his own creation with his insane leftist nonsense. Be aware that this is only a partial list. More shadowbanned users are yet to be revealed by the leak.

Breitbart explains how a Twitter shadowban works.

Just in case Twitter suspends Tennessee GOP, here’s another Tweet that has the list.

Google condemned by British MP after refusing to ban YouTube video about JEWS by David Duke

MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT YVETTE COOPER. DOESN’T WANT ANYONE TO HEAR THE TRUTH ABOUT JEWS.

The Independent

Google has been condemned by an MP for refusing to ban a video by a former Ku Klux Klan leader called “Jewish People Admit Organising White Genocide”.

Yvette Cooper, the chairwoman of the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, expressed disbelief when the internet giant’s vice president said the recording – posted by Holocaust denier David Duke – did not “breach our guidelines”.

The 15-minute YouTube clip accuses “Zionists” of having “ethnically cleansed the Palestinians” and planning to do “the same thing to Europeans and Americans”.

Ms Cooper told Google’s Peter Barron: “You allow David Duke to upload an entire video which is all about malicious and hateful comments about Jewish people.

“How on earth is that not a breach of your own guidelines? I think most people would be appalled by that video and think it goes against all standards of public decency in this country.”

Watch the 15 minute video which features Jewish leaders themselves speaking about ethnic cleansing of white countries.

Opening the parliamentary inquiry into hate crime on social media, Ms Cooper revealed that two other videos had been taken down by Google – but only after her committee protested.

One had been posted by National Action, a neo-Nazi group that celebrated the murder of the Labour MP Jo Cox, which was banned as a terrorist organisation in December.

“This is an organisation proscribed for terrorist links by the Government,” Ms Cooper pointed out.

“There aren’t that many proscribed organisations. Don’t you feel any responsibility, as multi-billion pound organisation, to check you are not distributing material from a proscribed organisation?”

But Mr Barron, Google’s vice-president for communications, said it relied on “notification and self-policing” to detect and investigate offensive content.

He defended Google’s record, which saw 200,000 videos flagged by viewers everyday of which 98 per cent were reviewed within 24 hours.

“We arrive on our community of more than one billion people around the world to flag videos,” Mr Barron said.

He admitted the Duke video was “anti-Semitic, deeply offensive and shocking”, but insisted: “It doesn’t meet the test for removing under our guidelines. We are in favour of free speech and access to information.”

The Home Affairs Committee also grilled Facebook and Twitter, as part of its inquiry into “hate crime and its consequences”.

Facebook came under fire after the BBC said it used the site’s ‘report button’ to flag up 100 photos on the website, but 82 were not removed – with an automated response saying they did not breach “community standards”.

The images included under-16s in sexualised poses, pages aimed at paedophiles and an image apparently taken from a child abuse video.

And Ms Cooper demanded to know why Twitter had not suspended an account which wanted to “deport all Muslims” – and displayed a “very disturbing graphic cartoon”.

But Nick Pickles, Twitter’s senior public policy manager, said the “context” of tweets was crucial – whether an image had been “targeted” at a particular person, or simply posted

“In this context, we reviewed that particular tweet and that particular image and we found it wasn’t in breach of our hateful content policy,” he said.

And he added: “We will never get to the point where there is nothing on the internet that offends anyone – and nor would we seek to get to that point.”

But Ms Cooper said her committee found it “baffling” that, in most circumstances, social media sites waited for people to complain before acting.

The internet giants were called in after Labour MP Diane Abbott revealed she had been been advised not to go out alone after suffering a torrent of racist abuse – and rape threats – online.

Setting aside everything except the specifics of the David Duke video, it’s almost unbelievable that anyone could find the facts presented by Dr. Duke as offensive and worthy of censorship. Facts are facts. Western civilization was built on the idea that man has certain inalienable natural rights. There is no freedom without freedom to access information. Except when Jews and their stooges like Cooper say no.

Shame on Yvette Cooper. Shame on Britain for electing a Jew stooge to Parliament.