Pigging: Shameful New Dating Game Played by Men on Women

SOPHIE STEVENSON. ALLEGED VICTIM OF CRUEL PRANK.

A vile new dating game played by men upon women is in the news today.

We need to start by acknowledging that “pigging” may not really exist. The stories told by alleged victims may be stories told by crazy women. Or, if pigging exists, then it may not be common.

However, if we believe that pigging is real, then let’s get this straight: Men who practice pigging are enemies of our people.

Our people need to have men and women get together to form families and have babies. Anything that causes distrust between the sexes is disgraceful.

So what is pigging? Read on for an explanation.

Excerpt from The Telegraph

It is one thing being rejected or ignored by your holiday romance. It is another thing entirely to fly out to see him in Amsterdam, after weeks of messaging, only to be stood up in the airport with nothing but a text saying the entire affair was a cruel joke and calling you a ‘fat ugly pig.’

But this horrific scenario is exactly what 24-year-old Sophie Stevenson says happened to her after she met Dutchman Jesse Mateman, 21, on holiday in Barcelona. She claims the pair slept together, had a “proper romance” and then spoke regularly when she was back home in Stoke. A month later Mateman convinced her to fly out to visit him in Amsterdam for the weekend.

“We were talking up until I got on the plane,” Stevenson told the Mail. “But when I arrived, he wasn’t there to pick me up. I called him a bunch of times, and he didn’t answer. I waited at the airport for two hours and I hadn’t heard anything, I was really starting to panic about being abandoned.”

Six hours later, she says he messaged her saying ‘you were pigged, it was all a joke.’

‘Pulling a pig’ is a vile game that sees a man try to woo a woman they deem ‘fat and ugly’, solely because he and his deplorable friends think it is ‘funny’.

According to Urban Dictionary, the “winner” is the guy who attracts the “ugliest” one, and the awful phenomenon seems to have been around since 2014, when Big Brother contestant Josie Cunningham tried to launch a dating site called ‘Pull the Pig’, aimed at ‘average-looking women’ (seemingly, it is currently inactive).

It’s part of a wider culture that increasingly relies on trickery, mocking and nastiness in dating. Recent terms like ‘benching’ refer to men keeping a woman they don’t feel passionately about ‘on the sidelines’ – just in case. While ‘kittenfishing’ and ‘catfishing’ mean lying on your social media profile to trick someone into dating you.

A particularly appalling example is ‘chubby chasing’ – where men seek larger women ‘as a laugh’ to impress/shock/win a bet. It is heartless, sickening and, as Stevenson simply said, ‘cruel.’

Mateman has denied the claims, after facing a backlash, insisting he never had a holiday romance with Stevenson and that any texts between them are invented. “That is just fantasist rubbish and it is ruining my life,” he said.

Western civilization is in an existential crisis, and if this report is true, then our young males are foolishly making it worse. You really have to ask if we’ve raised a generation of sociopaths.

Any guys who pull this stuff on women should not only be shunned by women, but also by other men. They make it harder for decent guys to find women to date.

Woman Vendor BANNED from British Market for Selling Mugs That Might Offend Muslims

TINA GAYLE. BUSINESSWOMAN. MOTHER OF FIVE.

You may want to take a mini-crash course in the Knights Templar at Wikipedia before reading this story.

The banning of a woman market trader for selling “offensive” Knights Templar mugs isn’t really about the mugs. It about Muslims exercising their clout. It’a also about terrorizing the indigenous white people of Britain.

You will like the lady. She’s totally unrepentant and totally defiant.

metro.co.uk

A market trader has been banned from having a stall after selling Knights Templar coffee mugs – in case they upset Muslims.

Tina Gayle, 57, who was previously warned for selling books and CDs featuring Nazi swastikas, was ordered to remove the £6 mugs from her stall after Charnwood Borough Council received a complaint they were offensive.

The mugs feature a drawing of a knight and have the Latin motto which translates as: ‘Not to us Lord, not to us, but to Your Name give the glory.’ The Knights Templar was a medieval order of crusading Christian monks who fought against Muslim soldiers. Some modern extremists have claimed to be part of them, for example right-wing terrorist Anders Behring Breivik who wrote a ‘manifesto’ saying they had been re-founded to fight against the ‘ongoing European Jihad.’

When Tina, who pays £16.80 each week for a pitch at Loughborough market, refused to withdraw the mugs she was banned from coming back. The mum-of-five, who also works as a book dealer and artist, said: ‘It’s absolutely, completely bonkers. How on earth are these mugs offensive?

‘I haven’t had a single complaint from a Muslim and I’ve had many browse my stall. ‘The complainant said they were offensive because the Knights Templar killed Muslims in the crusades 710 years ago. ‘The Knights Templar were fighting monks, used to protect businessmen travelling across the Holy Lands. ‘They were not marauding murderers. Whoever made the complaint needs to study the history books more closely.

‘If I only sell books on people who haven’t killed someone, I’d be reduced to Alan Titchmarsh.’ She added: ‘The council gave me a letter at 4pm and said I’m banned. You’re meant to have three written warnings before expulsion and they did not do that.

‘I’m now selling the mugs on eBay. I’d like to get back on my stall but at the moment my hands are tied until the council sees sense.’ A spokesperson for Charnwood Borough Council said: ‘The trader refused to remove the mugs from the stall so we issued a second letter which excludes the trader from all Loughborough markets. ‘This decision is in line with our market regulations which state that if a trader has displayed serious misconduct, they can be immediately excluded from trading, with no further warnings required. ‘Serious misconduct includes bringing the market into disrepute and selling items which could be offensive. ‘The trader can appeal this decision, and we would ask her to write to us to confirm she wishes to do so.’

Diversity isn’t a strength. It’s a prescription of conflict.

As injustices go, Tina’s is minor compared to the injustice suffered by the dead victims of Muslim terrorism.

Britain knows what needs to be done. Summon up the political will and do it, you guys.

British Isis member Sally “The White Widow” Jones ‘killed in airstrike along with son, 12’

THE WHITE WIDOW’S MUSLIM HUSBAND RECRUITED HER FOR ISIS.

Volunteers from the West who seek to destroy the West are truly odd. Women who soldier for ISIS usually have a Muslim love interest that motivates them.

If you join an army and go to war, you just might be killed, even if you are female. Sally’s death is justified as the West defends itself from jihadists.

Reportedly, the news of her assassination by an American drone was withheld because her 12 year old son was also killed.

Excerpt from The Guardian

The British member of Islamic State Sally Jones is believed to have been killed, along with her 12-year-old son Jojo, in a US airstrike.

Although there is confidence she is dead, it is impossible to be categorical given the inability to collect evidence on the ground. Other members of Isis have been reported dead only to reappear.

Jones, dubbed “the white widow” by some in the press, was a regular propagandist on social media. She had more than 20 handles on Twitter but there has been no activity from her in recent months.

The Sun reported that the CIA had told its UK counterparts Jones was killed by a Predator drone strike near the Syria-Iraq border in June.

It added she had last been seen fleeing from Raqqa and heading for the Syrian border town of Mayadin. Many Isis members have fled the city as the organisation has gradually been squeezed.

The Pentagon was unable to confirm she had been killed. Maj Adrian Rankine-Galloway, a Pentagon spokesman, said: “I do not have any information that would substantiate that report but that could change and we are looking into this.”

Jones, a former punk musician, was born in Greenwich, south-east London, but then moved to Chatham, Kent.

JONES IN HER PUNK ROCK DAYS ON THE RIGHT.

After converting to Islam she travelled from the UK to Syria in 2013 to join her husband and fellow Briton Junaid Hussain, who was killed in a US drone strike in 2015.

It was after Hussain’s death that the British press began to refer to her as the white widow. She is not the only jihadist to be given this nickname, which has also been used for Samantha Lewthwaite – the widow of 7/7 London attacker Germaine Lindsay.

Both Hussain and Jones were accused of trying to recruit extremists in the UK to carry out attacks. She was placed on a UN sanctions list that included a travel ban and freeze on assets, and a hit list for US bombings.

Jones used her social media accounts to recruit women to Isis and provided practical advice on how to travel to Syria. She also encouraged individuals to carry out attacks in Britain, offering guidance on how to construct home-made bombs, and shared pictures of herself posing with weapons.

The Sun has reported that 12 year old JoJo reportedly executed prisoners for ISIS. Drones don’t discriminate on the basis of age.

Model Receives Rape and Death Threats for Showing Hairy Legs

ARVIDA BYSTROM. HAIR EVERYWHERE.

Attention whore. But only sickos would respond to her with threats of violence.

I assume that because Arvida likes to be natural that she doesn’t use toilet paper and never takes a bath.

The Muzzies in Sweden would like that!

Excerpt from the Daily Mail UK

Model receives rape and death threats for showing off her hairy legs in an Adidas ad – and is told she looks like a ‘disgusting monkey’

A Swedish model has revealed how she’s been subjected to death and rape threats after posing for an Adidas ad campaign with unshaven legs.

Arvida Bystrom, 26, a model and photographer, took to Instagram to reveal how she’d received a torrent of abuse after the campaign was released in which she reveals her hairy calves underneath a pair of pink ankle socks.

‘Me being such an abled, white, cis body with its only nonconforming feature being a little leg hair,’ she said. ‘Literally I’ve been getting rape threats in my DM inbox.

Unfortunately Arvida is no stranger to online abuse, and regularly receives negative comments on Instagram where she often posts photos that reveal her armpit hair and is told she should shave.

‘That’s the most disgusting lady I’ve ever seen in my whole life,’ one commenter wrote.

However, Arvida is not short of support from followers who have praised her for challenging the impossible standards women are supposed to uphold and showing that body hair is natural

‘I can’t even begin to imagine what it’s like to not posses all these privileges and try to exist in the world. Sending love and try to remember that not everybody has the same experiences being a person.

I doubt that Arvida has been getting rape threats in her DM. She’s exaggerating for the publicity. If you look for attention among strangers, you have to accept the good with the bad. Disgust is merited here, but not threats.

As for Adidas, whose shoes Arvida is promoting, those pukes are right up there with pornographers in trying to change men’s erotic template. It’s a good thing that men noticed and reacted negatively.

Someone send Arvida a razor.

Panic on London Train As Black Man Reads BIBLE VERSES Aloud

Was the Negro who read apocalyptic Bible passages aloud on a train a devoted Christian seeking to share the gospel or was he a black bastard troublemaker enjoying scaring white passengers?

You make the call on this one.

metro.co.uk

Panicked passengers forced their way out of their rush hour train after a man read out Bible passages in the carriage. The train was just outside Wimbledon at around 8.30am, when the man started reading out phrases such as ‘death is not the end’.

Commuters became scared, and started trying to get out of the carriage as quickly as possible. As the passengers forced open the doors and climbed frantically onto the tracks, the rail power lines were cut. The train was travelling from Shepperton to Waterloo, one of London’s busiest commuter lines.

Ian, who was on the train, tweeted that the man’s Bible-reading caused a ‘crush’ and a ‘commotion’. He said that someone asked the man to stop speaking ‘as he was scaring people’, after which ‘the guy stopped and stood there with his head down’.

Other passengers praised a guard, who apparently dealt with the situation with ‘compassion, restraint and bravery’. A Network Rail spokesman said: ‘Passengers self-evacuated off a train and on to the tracks at Wimbledon this morning after a passenger incident. ‘British Transport Police are investigating and there were no injuries to passengers or staff.

‘This has caused significant delays to services in and out of Waterloo that will continue for the rest of the morning.

Inspirational Quote of the Day: One About Money by a 50s Glamour Girl

It’s a stretch to call Glynis a glamour girl, but she’s glamorous to me.

Wikipedia

Glynis Johns (born 5 October 1923) is a retired Welsh stage, television and film actress, dancer, pianist, and singer. Born in Pretoria, South Africa of Welsh origin, she is best known for creating the role of Desiree Armfeldt in A Little Night Music on Broadway, for which she won a Tony Award, and for playing Winifred Banks in Walt Disney’s musical motion picture box office smash Mary Poppins. In both roles, she originated songs written specifically for her, including “Send in the Clowns”, composed by Stephen Sondheim, and “Sister Suffragette”, written by the Sherman Brothers. She was nominated for an Oscar for her work in the 1960 film The Sundowners.

Johns had a huge hit in Mary Poppins (1964) and played James Stewart’s wife in Dear Brigitte (1965). She was in The King’s Mare at the Garrick Theatre in 1966.

She appeared in various character roles in Don’t Just Stand There! (1968) and Lock Up Your Daughters (1969), but worked increasingly on stage: A Talent to Amuse (1969), Come As You Are (1969-70) and Marquise (1971-72).

Johns had a huge success appearing in A Little Night Music (1973). The song “Send in the Clowns” was reportedly written with her in mind.[citation needed] In 1973, she won a Tony award for her role in the musical.

UK Public Schools Forcing Girls As Young As Four To Wear Muslim Veil

TAYYIBAH GIRLS SCHOOL, LONDON.

At this point in the Islamification of the West, it should surprise no one that Muslims will try to impose their will on weak Western governments. Traditional Britain has disappeared in London for the most part.

In this article, based on a Sunday Times investigation, we learn that public funds are being used to impose Islamic customs on children.

When the British decided that God was optional, God reciprocated. Soon, all British people will be forced to worship a false God.

Zerohedge

Research published in The Sunday Times this week revealed that eight state-funded British schools are forcing children to wear the Islamic hijab along with other Muslim female dress code requirements, which includes girls as young as four. The findings are based on open source investigations into published dress code directives of 176 Muslim schools across Britain, most of which are private.

However, the new discovery of public schools among them has sparked outrage across the UK, especially as three of the schools are elementary level schools (including kindergarten). According to The Sunday Times:

Girls as young as four are being “forced to wear the hijab” as part of approved school uniform in state-funded Islamic schools, campaigners have told ministers.

According to research by the National Secular Society, the hijab appears to be compulsory in eight state-funded Islamic schools in England, including three primary schools.

A further 51 private Islamic schools of the 176 surveyed by the society also require the headscarf to be worn by female pupils. Eighteen schools said wearing the head covering was optional.

Shockingly, one particular school called the Independent Olive Secondary requires that, “Hair should be covered by a black scarf; outside the School the face must be covered,” while another UK school is explicit in stipulating that, “It is very important that the uniform is loose fitting and modest and that the hijaab is fitted closely to the head. The College uniform is COMPULSORY” (sic). The Tayyibah Girls School in London warns: “The school is not willing to compromise on any issues regarding uniform.”

Meanwhile, some schools go so far as to recommend the niqab. For example girls at Al-Ihsaan school in Leicester are told they must wear either a “jilbaab or niqab”. The jilbaab is a long and loose-fitting gown which covers the entire body expect for hands, face, and feet. But the niqab recommendation is much more significant in that it is practiced by only a small minority within the Muslim world – it covers the entire face except for the eyes, and is typically worn with black garments with cover head to toe.

In addition to the eight publicly funded schools which require head coverings of veils, thirteen others cite an optional hijab as part of their uniform policy. Islamic academies in Britain came under scrutiny early this month when a previous Times story first reported that “Thousands of state primary schools are allowing girls as young as five to wear the Muslim religious headscarf as part of approved school uniform, a Sunday Times survey has revealed.”

The earlier investigation found that even Church of England associated schools were increasingly adopting various forms of Islamic dress as acceptable among students:

Last month a survey by The Sunday Times revealed that nearly a fifth (18%) of 800 state primary schools, including Church of England primaries, in 11 regions of England now list the hijab as part of their uniform policy, mostly as an optional item.

Feversham College is a high school level academy specializing in Science for Muslim girls aged 11-18 years. It’s website spells out that a “close-fitting” hijab is “COMPULSORY” (sic).

Activists associated with the investigation cited by The Sunday Times called the uniform requirements “illiberal and repressive” and stated, “no child should be obliged to wear the hijab or any other article of religious clothing while at school.” Included among those appealing to the UK education secretary to root out such practices, especially when they appear at state funded schools, are Muslim women activists.

Of course, it’s mostly a good thing when the state leaves private religious schools alone to do or require whatever they want in terms of dress code, but that state funded UK schools would enforce Muslim veils is the deepest hypocrisy in a country which has recently been known to target and punish families wanting to opt out of LGBT related curriculum. The British authorities have even threatened Orthodox Jewish schools with closure with the ultimatum: “teach your children about homosexuality and gender reassignment, or we will close you down.”

In a trend that began years ago, the British education secretary began warning even Christian private schools that their teaching curriculum must reflect the “UK values” and laws concerning transgender recognition. The government now routinely cites “combating extremist” as a motive for getting private schools to conform.