South African Nigger Killed by Police While Eating Corpse of Woman He’d Beheaded

APHIWE MAPEKULA. HUNGRY, HE WAS.

What’s a poor old Nigra to do when he’s hungry and there are no fast food joints open?

For one South African nog, the answer was easy. Kill another nog who happened to be nearby and then eat her. Raw. Uncooked.

I don’t know, but I’ve heard that Niggers taste like chicken.

Hell, everything tastes like chicken. Right?

Read on for more evidence that South Africa must return to apartheid or else degenerate into cannibalism.

metro.co.uk

A man has died after police reportedly found him eating the corpse of a woman he had beheaded.

Officers shot Aphiwe Mapekula, 23, in the arm, leg and stomach after bursting into his home in Mount Frere, South Africa, as he was cannibalising his victim on September 9.

Police say the victim was a woman called Thembisa Masumpa, 35, who was known to Mapekula. He allegedly beheaded her after a family argument.

Local media reports that he ignored officers’ warning shots that were fired in order to stop him. When he charged at the police with a knife, they opened fire on him.

Mapekula was rushed to Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital, where he attacked a female medic just minutes after he was admitted. He died three days later on September 12.

The cannibal’s mother was the one who first raised the alarm after seeing her son attack Masumpa as she was leaving the house.

‘I never raised a son like this,’ she told The Daily Dispatch. ‘I never imagined this.’

Neighbours claim that Masumpa worked at the family’s home doing odd jobs, and that she was apparently doing some washing in the back garden when Mapekula attacked her.

They also claim that Mapekula had a history of drug addiction, which had forced him to drop out of university.

Police spokeswoman Captain Edith Mjoko said: ‘He killed her with a knife by cutting her throat. When the mother of the suspect saw what was happening she rushed and called the police to the scene.

‘When they arrived the suspect was busy eating the flesh of the deceased.

‘Police ordered him to stop and hand himself over. He went beserk and stormed at them with the knife. Several warning shots were fired to deter him, but in vain.’

Sizwe Kupelo, a local health department spokesman, told Herald Live last week: ‘He was admitted on Saturday after he was transferred from Madzikane KaZulu Hospital in KwaBhaca with gunshot wounds and needed emergency surgery.

‘He unfortunately died in the early hours of this morning at about 4.35am.’

“Unfortunately died?”

Ungrateful Illegal Invaders Disrupt Nancy Pelosi’s DACA Press Conference

Five minutes of idiotic, organized shouting. These subhumans are not civilized and can never be civilized. Arrest, then deport. These f*cks need to be reined in by any means necessary. Watch! Five minutes.

The ungrateful wretches are sh*tting in their own milkpail, as Nancy and her Demoncrats would legalize all of them in a second to get their votes.

Breitbart

A group of illegal aliens calling themselves the “Immigration Liberation Movement” crashed a press conference by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Monday, warning the Democratic Party not to “sell [us] out.”

The group shouted down Rep. Pelosi, who struggled to maintain control of the meeting, and unfurled a large banner calling for all illegal aliens to be legalized.

Others held up signs, including: “Fight 4 All 11 Million,” referring to the estimated total of all illegal aliens in the U.S.

In the “mic check” call-and-response style popularized by the Occupy Wall Street protests in 2011, the activists declared:

We remember all too well how for eight years the Democrats laid siege to our communities, raiding and deporting nearly three million people, of our family members and loved ones. Where was your resistance then? Ms. Pelosi, did you think we would forget? We send a clear message to our fellow undocumented youth and community: We are the resistance to Trump! Not the Democrats!

The activists also chanted “Brown power!” In a show of “intersectionality” — solidarity among left-wing groups — they also chanted “Trans lives matter!” and other slogans, while Pelosi stood silently behind the throng.

“You met with Trump, and you call that resistance?” they shouted in unison.

Watch Pelosi praise these ***holes before they shout her down again. One minute.

Earlier, Pelosi had spoken at the podium with community leaders and fellow members of Congress from the Bay Area in support of her legislative push for a bill that would legalize the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

President Donald Trump canceled DACA earlier this month, but left Congress a six-month window in which to find a legislative solution for the roughly 800,000 DACA beneficiaries. Pelosi said that she wanted the “DREAM Act,” a long-dormant Democratic Party bill that goes much further than DACA, “to be the basis of how we go forward.”

“We’re not giving up our fight to protect America’s dreamers,” she said.

However, she could not speak over the protests. “It’s clear you don’t want any answers,” she said.

As if to support her point, activists chanted: “All of us — or none of us,” meaning that they would only accept full amnesty for all illegal aliens, not just DACA beneficiaries.

Watch Tucker Carlson blast illegals as he brings an illegal on his show, at Fox News Insider.

Poll: Most Americans Oppose White Supremacists, But Many Share Their Views

When a polling firm comes calling, there’s always the question of whether a large number of people will lie to the pollsters and thus provide inaccurate results.

You have to suspect that people are somewhat reluctant to express pro-white views to a stranger.

The good news is that the biases mean that the real number of White Nationalists is higher than the poll results show.

Huffington Post

A new poll in the wake of the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, finds that while Americans widely say they oppose racism and white nationalism, many still appear to hold far-right, white supremacist views.

The Ipsos poll, for Thomson Reuters and the University of Virginia Center for Politics, was conducted online from Aug. 21 to Sept. 5 ― in the weeks following the deadly white supremacist rally in Charlottesville. It sampled around 5,360 American adults, asking questions about race that respondents could agree or disagree with to varying degrees.

“While there is relatively little national endorsement of neo-Nazis and white supremacists,” according to the release describing the poll’s findings, “there are troubling levels of support for certain racially-charged ideas and attitudes frequently expressed by extremist groups.”

While the vast majority of Americans polled expressed support for racial equality when asked in so many words ― 70 percent strongly agreed that “all races are equal,” and 89 percent agreed that all races should be treated equally ― people’s responses got murkier when it came to expressing their viewpoints on particular issues related to race and extremism.

For instance, while only 8 percent of respondents said they supported white nationalism as a group or movement, a far larger percentage said they supported viewpoints widely held by white supremacist groups: 31 percent of Americans polled strongly or somewhat agreed that “America must protect and preserve its White European heritage,” and 39 percent agreed that “white people are currently under attack in this country.”

“The poll results do show both an American public that overwhelmingly rejects racist affiliations and movements but at the same time is more tolerant of racially insensitive positions,” Kyle Kondik, communications director at the University of Virginia Center for Politics, told HuffPost.

“The results may be what you might expect from a country that is arguably defined by racial conflict,” he added. “And one that can vote for an African-American for president who ran on unity less than a decade ago, and then turn around and vote for a vehemently anti-immigrant candidate who exploited white grievances just last year.”

The poll addressed several hot-button issues surrounding racial justice in America ― and in many cases, the majority of respondents seemed to agree with more conservative viewpoints.

When it comes to the debate about removing Confederate monuments, for instance, most Americans polled (57 percent) said they think the statues should remain in public spaces, and less than one-third (26 percent) said they think they should be removed.

Touching on recent heated debates surrounding free speech versus hate speech, the poll found a majority of Americans (59 percent) agreed with the statement that “‘political correctness’ threatens our liberty as Americans to speak our minds,” a view often touted by conservative leaders ― including President Donald Trump.

Even support for interracial marriage ― 50 years after the landmark Supreme Court decision Loving v. Virginia ― isn’t as widespread as one might think: Around 1 in 6 Americans, or 16 percent, strongly or somewhat agreed that “marriage should only be allowed between people of the same race,” while 65 percent of Americans disagreed.

As NAACP Legal Defense Fund staffer Janai Nelson told HuffPost last month: “Calling out extremists, white supremacists, neo-Nazis is an important but very low bar for where we should be as a society at this stage in our democracy.”

“What we should be [having] is a much more nuanced and deepened understanding of how those ‘isms’ manifest in policy, in systems, in a cloak of oppression that still lives with us,” Nelson said.

Check out UVA’s summary of the poll’s findings here, or view the results directly here.

Links are live at HuffPo.

In case you were wondering, the John Wayne quote above is true, as reported by Snopes.

John Wayne had much of interest to say about nonwhites. Click on the “continue reading” button to see more.

Continue reading

Jewish Professor Ordered to Leave Campus Because He’s “White” Settles Lawsuit for $500,000

BLACKS THOUGHT BRET WEINSTEIN WAS WHITE. LOL.

Told ya. Blacks can’t tell the difference between a Jew and a Euro-American. For that mistake, Weinstein is cleaning up.

Not that the blacks are going to pony up the cash. The taxpayers in the state of Washington will do that.

The Blaze

The professor who made headlines earlier this year after he refused to leave his campus for being white just won a major battle against his employer.

What happened?

Evergreen State College in Washington State announced in a faculty email Friday they recently settled a tort claim brought by professor Bret Weinstein and his wife, professor Heather Heying, for $500,000.

According to the College Fix, as part of the college’s agreement with the pair, they have resigned their positions as biology instructors at the school.

The email states: “They have resigned from their faculty positions at Evergreen, effective today. The college will pay them a total of $450,000 and contribute an additional $50,000 toward their attorney fees. In making this agreement, the college admits no liability, and rejects the allegations made in the tort claim.”

Why did they sue?

Weinstein and his wife sued the school in July seeking $3.85 million in damages, alleging the school “permitted, cultivated and perpetuated a racially hostile and retaliatory work environment” in wake of a campus-wide event dubbed “Day of Absence,” which sought to expel all white people from campus for one day so non-white students could have a safe space to talk about oppression. Weinstein refused to leave and was subjected to ridicule by students and his colleagues, his safety was even put in danger, and on one occasion, he was forced to hold class in a parking lot because students blocked the entrance to his classroom.

Weinstein claimed:

The school “sent the unmistakable message that the school will tolerate (and even endorse) egregious violations (and even crimes) purportedly to advance racial social goals, diminishing the collegiate experience for all, and fostering a racially hostile work and retaliatory environment for faculty and staff.”

“Through a series of decisions made at the highest levels, including to officially support a day of racial segregation, the college has refused to protect its employees from repeated provocative and corrosive verbal and written hostility based on race, as well as threats of physical violence.”

Students literally took over

Video from the school during the height of the protests showed students literally taking the school over, making demands and the college administration cowing to those demands, including agreeing to let protesting students not be penalized for failing to do homework assignments.

Remember this? This time, it’s literally true for the school. I wonder if the guilty administrators will be fired or demoted.

Are Negroes Compatible With White Society? Can they be Integrated or is the Intelligence Gap Too Wide?

A member of the GLP Forum makes the argument that blacks should be segregated away from whites on the basis of IQ alone.

GLP

The first thing I am going to say so that there is no misunderstanding that as a student of anthropology I AM a “racist”. I believe there are distinct characteristics of the major races that preclude any rational or logical claim that they are “equal”. While I believe in equal opportunity for all, I do not believe in special considerations being made that favor some people over others, and this includes affirmative action or race quotas in hiring or higher education enrollment.

I believe the unrest and the racial conflict are inevitable, simply because no matter how many advantages we give them the average negro will never be able to rise to the social and economic positions of the white.

The fact is (and it is a scientific fact), the average IQ of an “African American” in the United states is a little less than 85.2, while the average IQ of a white is 100. Does this make a significant difference? Well first of all you have o understand what IQ means , and how it is measured. IQ is basically a measure of raw intelligence, the ability to process , understand and use information. It does not account for specific abilities.

Link to thealternativehypothesis.org

Link to todayifoundout.com

That being said a difference of 15 IQ points is extremely significant, especially when it is 85 as opposed to 100.

100 is intentionally set as the average IQ and is meant as a means of identifying people of below and above average IQ. If you’re above 100 you’re above average, and if your 15 points below 100, you’re WAY below average.

Less than 7% of whites have an IQ at or below 85, half of blacks do.

While 50% of whites have an IQ above 100, less than 17% of blacks have an IQ above average in the United States. In Africa or less developed countries where little racial mixing has occurred, the average IQ of blacks can be as low as 70 such as in sub Saharan Africa.

So it is easy to see that there is a huge disparity between the intelligence of Whites and blacks. It is noteworthy to mention Asians have an average IQ slightly higher than whites, at 104.3, which for all intents and purposes is insignificant hen determining social compatibility. It is obvious whites and Asians can integrate successfully based on average intelligence alone.

But 15% IS a significant difference that without a doubt has profound effects on the ability of an individual to function is a social construct “designed” primarily around an average IQ of 100.

So how can we define an average IQ of 85? Well, 85 is 15 points above what is technically referred to as mentally retarded or in politically correct terminology “mentally challenged”.

So the average black is not in fact mentally retarded, and is a full 15 IQ points above what is considered a “moron”.

But what about that >30% of blacks born in America that do fall under the threshold of a 70 IQ?

Greater than 30% of all blacks in America are technically mentally retarded.

What this means in psychological terms is they unable to unlikely to be able to be able to function in normal social situations, like for instance schooling, marriages and jobs.

For the half of Negroes above 85 IQ but below significantly below 100, integrating is challenging but not impossible or even unlikely.

The problem is half of them aren’t smart enough to function in the way our society is set up, and almost a 1/3 are going to find it near to impossible to.

And this is why we have racial inequality in America despite every effort to mitigate it. It doesn’t have anything whatsoever to do with oppression or “white privileged” , it has to do primarily with intelligence. An intelligent black man has MANY advantages over a white with equal intelligence, the problem is they are so few in number that we see few blacks in educated professional jobs with college degrees they actually earned on the sole qualification of merit.

SO naturally being the wide disparity of social success among whites and blacks despite the attempts to establish an impossible equality that has not been successful, blacks are in a continuous state of malevolent envy.

They for the most part are unable to comprehend or accept that their inequality with whites is a product of their own deficiencies, so as Abraham Lincoln said, the black man will never be able to integrate into white society and for their own good as well as for the good of whites should be segregated permanently from whites.

None of this is opinion, it is fact. WHile there are many blacks that can integrate, there are many who cannot, and since we can’t just give them IQ tests and ship the ones that come up below 70 or 85 or whatever arbitrary number we decide to set back to Africa, the only thing we can logically do is segregate them according to intelligence. That is to say we need to do away with quotas and affirmative action and allow the merits system to work.

Britain: Subhuman Black Filth Rapes 14 Year Old School Girl in Broad Daylight in London Park

CCTV IMAGE OF SUSPECT.

The police think this blurry image is going to lead to the apprehension of the dirty N*gger rapist?
Let’s get to work on security cameras that can take clear photos.

As to the rapist, he should be subjected to judicially administered corporal punishment, followed by death by hanging. These creatures are subhuman Satanic monsters. Kill them. Legally.

Sky News

A 14-year-old girl was raped in broad daylight during a “horrendous” attack in a public park.

Investigators said the teenager was assaulted in a secluded area of Avery Hill Park in Greenwich, southeast London, between 9am and 1pm on Monday 4 September.

Officers have released CCTV images of the man they want to speak to in connection with the incident.

A police spokesman said: “The attacker is described as a black male believed to be in his 20s, of slim build, with short black hair and a moustache.

“He was wearing sand-coloured combat trousers, dark shoes which might have been blue, and a grey drawstring bag.

“He was also wearing sunglasses with black, round lenses.”

The victim is being supported by specialist officers and no arrests have been made, according to the police.

DC Mark Azariah, from the Child Abuse and Sexual Offences Command, said: “This was a horrendous attack on a vulnerable girl in the middle of the day.

“If you were in and around the area and saw anyone matching the description of the suspect or saw anything suspicious I would urge you to get in touch with my team.

“Likewise, if you have information about the man wanted for questioning as a result of the images released today, my team are waiting for your call.”

Witnesses or anyone with information should call police on 07789 926065 or email mark.azariah@met.pnn.police.uk.

“No justice, no profits:” St. Louis Mob Storms, Shuts Down Mall (Video)

It looks like half the mob are dumb-ass white youths. F*ck them. May diversity ram a protest sign up each one of their sorry asses.

Here’s a highly informative comment that shows just how dumb blacks are to always go out and defend thugs by tearing up their neighborhoods.

Gateway Pundit Comments

Huffam Tracksuit Al • 2 hours ago

An interesting fact that I’ve never seen mentioned in the mainstream media reports was mentioned in the judge’s ruling. He pointed out the entry wound on the deceased’s lower left abdomen. Had he been sitting quietly in the driver’s seat, as the judge pointed out, there’s no way anyone standing outside the door could have shot him in the lower left flank. A doctor testified that a bullet wound in that location was consistent with what Stockley said: That Smith was reaching over for something–like the gun that both officers had seen earlier, before the chase, and which was found in the car. The judge also pointed out that Stockley had nothing in his hand when he exited his own car and that it would have been impossible for him to secrete on his person a gun that large. Also that it made no logical sense for someone who planned to plant a gun to first take off his gloves so he’d leave DNA or fingerprints on it!.