88 Year Old Black Rep. John Conyers Facing Ethics Investigation Over Sex Accusations

JOHN CONYERS.

John Conyers was the biggest name held up for public scrutiny over sex accusations on Tuesday, although I believe there were other new names. There are now two women who have leveled accusations against him.

The feeding frenzy thus continues.

While listening to the radio on Tuesday I heard Rush Limbaugh poo-poo the theory that women are rushing to accuse men because of their hatred of President Trump. I think the theory goes that if enough women step forward to accuse rich and powerful men of sexual crimes and near crimes, then women who have something on Trump will step forward and destroy his presidency via the impeachment route.

You do have to wonder if the present mania isn’t setting up the public to accept the destruction of Trump, if a credible female accuser appears.

If an ethics investigation forces Rep. Conyers of Michigan out of the House, it would be no great loss. However, his replacement would undoubtedly be another Negro, perhaps one much less intelligent and more militant than Conyers.

ABC News

Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., was accused of sexual misconduct by a second woman earlier this year, as he faces a new ethics investigation after denying a separate report that alleges he sexually harassed a female aide, leading to a reported five-figure payout funded by taxpayers.

“The committee is aware of public allegations that Representative John Conyers, Jr. may have engaged in sexual harassment of members of his staff, discriminated against certain staff on the basis of age, and used official resources for impermissible personal purposes,” Reps. Susan Brooks, R-Ind., and Ted Deutch, D-Fla., the chair and ranking member of the House Ethics Committee, announced today. “The committee … has begun an investigation and will gather additional information regarding these allegations.” Conyers is already under investigation by the ethics committee for a separate matter pertaining to his former chief of staff.

Conyers, the longest-serving current member in the House of Representatives, said in a statement that he “expressly and vehemently” denies the allegations, which were first reported by Buzzfeed.

On Monday, BuzzFeed published a report that said Conyers’ office paid a female aide more than $27,000 as part of a confidentiality agreement to settle a complaint.

In his statement, Conyers, 88, said that his office “resolved the allegations,” though with an “express denial of liability, in order to save all involved from the rigors of protracted litigation.”

“The resolution was not for millions of dollars, but rather for an amount that equated to a reasonable severance payment,” Conyers said.

A second woman accused Conyers of sexual misconduct, outlined in court documents whose details were first published Tuesday by BuzzFeed.

Conyers’ longtime scheduler filed a complaint in federal court earlier this year alleging “sexual advances in the form of inappropriate comments and touches” that were so frequent “that they created a hostile work environment.” She says in the filings, which were obtained by ABC News, that she’s known Conyers since 2006 and began working as a scheduler in 2015. The woman alleges the repeated harassment led her to suffer “insomnia, anxiety, depression and chest pains.” She eventually requested sick leave in 2016, but when she wouldn’t provide medical documents explaining the reason for her sick leave, her position was terminated. The woman says in the filings she didn’t want to provide the documents because of an “atmosphere of mistrust.”

In the filings, the woman asked the court to keep the complaint under seal to protect her privacy. The judge rejected that request, and then the woman dropped the case.

Asked for comment on the scheduler’s complaint, Conyers’ spokesperson told ABC News: “[The former staffer] voluntarily decided to drop her case.”

Prior to the ethics committee’s announcement, several Democrats demanded an investigation, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Reps. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., and Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y. — two of Conyers’ colleagues on the House Judiciary Committee — as well as Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif.

“As members of Congress, we each have a responsibility to uphold the integrity of the House of Representatives and to ensure a climate of dignity and respect, with zero tolerance for harassment, discrimination, bullying or abuse,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said. “As I have said before, any credible allegation of sexual harassment must be investigated by the ethics committee.”

Mulatto Colin Kaepernick Speaks with Imprisoned Rapper Meek Mill, Vows to Fight “harsh sentencing practices”

COLIN KAEPERNICK CAN’T STOP STIRRING THE POT.

If the NFL is colluding to keep Colin Kaepernick from playing football in the NFL, then it’s the best thing the league has done in a long time.

I think, however, that Kaep’s playing skills degraded to the point where no team wanted him.

The white family who adopted him as a niglet really should be ashamed of themselves. He’s ungrateful to them, and loyal to his Nog half. Which was actually true of Obama too.

Like Obama, who knows what the other half is. Jew or not Jew?

CBS Sports

Rapper Meek Mill was sentenced to two to four years in prison earlier this month in Philadelphia for violating a term of his probation from a 2008 arrest. Former 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick tweeted on Monday that he spoke to Mill and and said that he would use the sentencing as motivation to continue to fight “harsh sentencing practices” that plague people of color (POC).

RAPPER MEEK MILL. JUST ANOTHER NOG WITH GOLD CHAINS TO ME.

Kaepernick, who was recently named GQ’s “Citizen of the Year,” has been involved in social activism for some time now. He began sitting, then kneeling in silent protest during the playing of the national anthem before games in August 2016, which snowballed into a protest saga that is still ongoing. He was using the protest as a vehicle to bring attention to police brutality and injustices against the African-American community.

He has worked with various charities as well, in addition to trying to find ways to make younger generations aware of their rights. Kaepernick has been out of the league since opting out of his contract with the 49ers in March, and in October he filed a grievance against the NFL and the team owners alleging that they have colluded to keep him out of the league due to his political stances.

We’ve known for a good while now that the next item in the (((cultural Marxist))) just society is one in which Negros escape jail or prison for their crimes. Instead, so-called counseling by (((headshrinkers))) would leave black criminals free to roam and terrorize everyone.

Kaepernick is just another “useful idiot” to the left.

NFL Considering Keeping Teams in Locker Room Until AFTER National Anthem

A significant number of white fans are angry with the National Football League for not punishing players who “take the knee” during the playing of the National Anthem before every game.

Trying to thread the needle, the NFL’s possible new policy isn’t likely to calm the roiled waters.

Keeping the players off the field during the playing of the National Anthem denies the players the “right” to protest. But it also represents a subtle form of kowtowing to the protesting players.

The fans want their black gladiators on the field and standing while the Anthem is played. Will they settle for less than that? Yes, some will. Football fanatics who live the game only care about their team winning the Superbowl. If a gang of mass murderers could win the big game, those fans would support them.

Football obsession is a form of mental illness.

Washington Post via NOLA

By The Washington Post

Some NFL owners believe there is a strong possibility they will enact an offseason change to the league’s national anthem policy if the players’ protests during the anthem persist through the end of this season, reverting to a previous approach of keeping players in the locker room while the anthem is played, according to several people familiar with the league’s inner workings.

“I think that if players are still kneeling at the end of the year, then it could very well happen,” said one person familiar with the owners’ deliberations on anthem-related issues.

That person said it was “too early to tell” for certain if the change to the anthem policy will be made by owners and the league. The person was “not sure” if a formal vote of the owners would be required to enact such a change but said, “I think most owners would support it, particularly if players continue to kneel this season.”

Those sentiments were echoed by several others with knowledge of the owners’ thinking on the matter. They said they did not know at this point exactly how many owners would favor such an approach, and they cautioned that there have been no detailed discussions yet about leaving teams and players in the locker room for the anthem because owners did not consider it appropriate to make an in-season change to the policy.

But they agreed that if the protests last all season and remain intensely controversial among fans, the issue will be raised during the offseason and a policy change to having players remain in the locker room until the anthem’s conclusion would have the support of a significant number of owners. They said the matter could be addressed at the annual league meeting in March.

“It would certainly have to be considered very strongly,” said an official with an NFL franchise who is familiar with the thinking of that team’s owner on the matter.

The NFL declined to comment.

The change to having players and coaches on the sideline for the anthem was made in 2009. The current league policy says that players must be on the sideline for the anthem. It suggests but does not require that players stand for the anthem.

At various points this season some players, including full teams, have remained off the field during the playing of the anthem. They have not been fined or otherwise disciplined by the NFL.

The league has been under intense pressure from President Donald Trump and some fans to require players to stand during the anthem. In September, Trump said during a campaign speech in Alabama that owners should fire any player who protested during the anthem. His fiery speech included a reference to such a player being a “son of a bitch” and it fueled an intense national controversy over the issue.

The pressure from the White House has not relented. After Oakland Raiders running back Marshawn Lynch refused to stand for the U.S. anthem before Sunday’s game against the New England Patriots in Mexico City, Trump offered critical comments Monday on Twitter.

“Marshawn Lynch of the NFL’s Oakland Raiders stands for the Mexican Anthem and sits down to boos for our national anthem,” Trump wrote. “Great disrespect! Next time NFL should suspend him for remainder of season. Attendance and ratings way down.”

Owners held a series of meetings last month in New York focused on the anthem and related topics. Owners met with representatives of the players, then held their regularly scheduled fall owners’ meeting. Owners emerged from those meetings without enacting a rule requiring players to stand for the anthem. But even without such a requirement, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and owners said they wanted players to stand.

“We believe everyone should stand for the national anthem,” Goodell said at the conclusion of the October owners’ meeting. “That’s an important part of our policy. It’s also an important part of our game that we all take great pride in. And it’s also important for us to honor our flag and our country, and we think our fans expect us to do that.”

Given the high earnings paid to NFL players and the exorbitant ticket prices, it’s not too much to expect the players to stand for a few minutes.

Young White Woman Employee Shot by Negros During Restaurant Robbery Dies

CHELSEA BELLER SHOT DEAD AFTER OPENING SAFE.

There’s nothing to be said that hasn’t already been said before about black criminality.

Our forefathers implemented segregation because segregation made everyone safer. If Chelsea Beller’s upscale Atlanta restaurant had the right to bar Negros from entering, she would still be alive today.

AJC

Video surveillance shows three masked people responsible for the particularly heinous shooting of an Atlanta restaurant manager Sunday, police said.

Chelsea Beller of Atlanta was forced upstairs to open a safe during a robbery by three masked suspects at Barcelona Wine Bar on Howell Mill Road, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution previously reported. The rest of the employees were tied up with electrical tape, police said.

After opening the safe, Beller was shot in the shoulder and later died at Grady Memorial Hospital.

While police know three people are responsible, they are asking for the public’s help in identifying them and have issued a higher-than-usual reward, Atlanta police spokesman Carlos Campos said Monday in a statement.

The usual $2,000 Crime Stoppers reward for information leading to an arrest and indictment is more than tripled at $7,000.

“No crime against our citizens, anywhere in the city, is acceptable,” Campos said. “But the robbery and murder of an innocent restaurant manager doing her job is a terrible crime that has shocked even the most jaded among us here at APD.”

Police are continuing to investigate the shooting and robbery and ask anyone with information to provide an anonymous tip through Crime Stoppers Atlanta by calling 404-577-TIPS (8477).

If the Negro worked as hard at education and real work as he does at crime, he might be an asset to society.

As it is, he’s a liability. Even the Great Emancipator Abraham Lincoln wanted him out of the United States.

The best thing we could do short-term to protect the public is to implement judicially administered corporal punishment. Blacks would be whipped when stepping out of line (as would everyone). Pain is the only language they understand. Prison is like a vacation to them.

The death penalty (public hanging) should be imposed on the three killers very shortly after their trial.

WSB

“She was just a positive person, fun loving. She didn’t have an enemy to speak of,” said her cousin, Brandi Borgwat. “Everybody that knew her, loved her.”

Friends left flowers and candles outside the restaurant Sunday afternoon.

While the investigation continues, Beller’s family hopes that her killers are not on the streets for much longer.

“She deserves justice for this,” said Borgwat.

Zimbabwe’s Mugabe to Face Impeachment

As of this writing Robert Mugabe has shown no inclination to leave office.

It looks like he will have to be pushed out.

Will Zimbabwe peacefully transition to a different leader. You’ll have to take it day by day to see.

Sky News

Zimbabwe’s ousted vice president has called on Robert Mugabe to quit immediately – paving the way for him to take over.

Emmerson Mnangagwa – known as “the crocodile” – said in a statement on Tuesday that he is not in Zimbabwe and will not return until he is “satisfied of my personal security”.

He added that Mr Mugabe must “heed the call of the people to resign” or face “humiliation”.

Impeachment proceedings to remove the 93-year-old from power are expected to begin later – with the ruling Zanu-PF party backing Mr Mnangagwa to replace him.

Zimbabwe’s leader stunned his country on Sunday when he failed to announce that he was stepping down.

An ultimatum from Zanu-PF to resign by midday on Monday or face impeachment also came and went with no word from Mr Mugabe.

The party will now press ahead with impeachment by tabling a motion, and it believes it can all be done and dusted in a couple of days – contrary to the view of some experts.

“We want to get rid of this animal called Mugabe. We have the numbers, the opposition is also going to support us,” said Zanu-PF MP Vongai Mupereri.

“We are going to impeach – the man has to go,” MP MacKenzie Ncube told the AFP news agency.

Zimbabwe’s military chief said on Monday evening that a road map to hand over power had been agreed with Mr Mugabe.

Constantino Chiwenga said Mr Mnangagwa, whose firing led to the unrest in the country, would return to Zimbabwe “shortly” to meet the President.

Rubbing the noses of his opponents and most of his citizens, Mr Mugabe is also set to host a cabinet meeting on Tuesday at his official residence – although Zanu-PF has told ministers not to attend.

The 93-year-old has ruled Zimbabwe with an iron fist since 1980 and the end of British colonialism, but events last week have brought him to the brink.

The vice president’s sacking put Mugabe’s unpopular wife, Grace, in prime position to succeed him.

The army promptly seized power and put the President under house arrest – but insisted it had not staged a coup.

Despite the impeachment machinery getting moving on Tuesday, lawyers have told Sky News it could take months to prise him from power.

Tarisai Mutangi, a constitutional lawyer, said: “He knows the law is on his side, that the constitution is on his side and that the kingpins of this process want to do it constitutionally, and that means it’s going to take quite some time.”

Under the Zimbabwean constitution, the president can be impeached for four things:

:: Serious misconduct
:: Failure to obey, uphold or defend this constitution
:: Willful violation of this Constitution
:: Inability to perform the functions of the office because of physical or mental incapacity

Here’s some grandfatherly advice from Papa Mugabe:

Trump Kicking 50,000+ HAITIANS Out of U.S.

LITTLE HAITI, MIAMI, FLORIDA.

Little Haiti in Miami is going to experience some depopulation over the next 18 months if Donald J. Trump has his way.

Miami Herald

After years of being shielded from deportation from the United States while their disaster-prone country continues to recover from its devastating 2010 earthquake, tens of thousands of Haitians will now lose that safeguard.

The special deportation protection known as Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, will be revoked for as many as 59,000 Haitians living and working in Miami and across the U.S., Department of Homeland Security Acting Secretary Elaine Duke announced Monday.

The protection will permanently terminate July 22, 2019, allowing Haitians living in the U.S. under TPS an 18-month window to return to their struggling homeland. At the end of the 18 months, Haitians who had TPS but remain in the U.S. will return to whatever immigration status they previously held, leaving them facing possible detention and deportation.

“With this decision, the law is relatively explicit that if the conditions on the ground do not support a TPS designation, then the secretary must terminate the TPS designation,” a senior administration official said on a call with reporters Monday night to announce the decision. “The conversations she had were constructive. They were informative. They were helpful. And we fully expect that in the 18 months coming up, the acting secretary will continue those conversations with the members on the Hill and the Haitian government to prepare for the return of Haitian [TPS] recipients.”

The decision comes 14 days after DHS announced it was terminating TPS for 2,500 Nicaraguans and delaying a decision for 57,000 Hondurans, which automatically gave them a six-month extension after their current status expires in January.

The announcement, while pleasing to immigration hardliners who argue that the provision was never meant to be permanent, deals a hard blow to longtime Haitian and immigration advocates. For months they have lobbied the Trump administration to extend the status for at least 18 months. It had been set to expire Jan. 22.

“Haiti is not ready to absorb 58,000,” said Marleine Bastien, a South Florida Haitian activist who has pushed for at least an 18-month extension of TPS. “It’s going to be a disaster for the 58,000 families in the U.S. and a disaster for Haiti. Clearly they are not making decisions based on facts on the ground, but rather politics. This is purely unacceptable.”

BYE, BYE, DEAR HAITIANS.

Rap Mogul Russell Simmons Denies Sexual Assault Accusation

THE ACCUSER.

THE ACCUSED. RUSSELL SIMMONS AND BRETT RATNER.

A rich and powerful Negro and a rich and powerful Jew team up to have some sexual fun at the expense of a young model back in 1991.

Believable? It is to me.

Wikipedia gives Russell Simmons net worth as $340 million.

It’s the measure of corrupt American culture that anyone can be that rich from producing hip hop.

NBC News

Hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons denied allegations on Sunday that he sexually assaulted a 17-year-old model in 1991 while Hollywood director Brett Ratner watched.

The allegations were reported in the Los Angeles Times.

In a statement, Simmons said he recalled a weekend 26 years ago that he spent with Keri Claussen Khalighi, but he said that what she described as assault was “completely consensual and with Keri’s full participation.”

Khalighi, now 43, declined to speak with NBC News, but she told the Times that Simmons, now 60, a co-founder Def Jam Records, was showing her a music video at his apartment with Ratner, who went on to direct “The Rush Hour” franchise and other films.

Khalighi told the Times that Simmons began pulling her clothes off, so she “looked over at Brett and said ‘help me’ and I’ll never forget the look on his face,” she said. “In that moment, the realization fell on me that they were in it together.”

Khalighi said Simmons tried to force her to have intercourse, but she said she “fought it wildly.” Simmons, she told the Times, then coerced her to perform oral sex.

“I guess I just acquiesced,” she told the newspaper, adding that Ratner “just sat there and watched.”

Later, she alleged that Simmons penetrated her without her consent while she was taking a shower. The Times’ report doesn’t say whether Khalighi contacted police after the alleged assault, although it says she told three friends about it. Contacted by the newspaper, they corroborated her account.

The Times has reported that 10 other women have accused Ratner of sexual misconduct. His lawyer, Martin Singer, didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment, although he told the Times that Ratner has “no recollection” of Khalighi’s apparent plea for help. Singer added that Ratner disputed the accounts of the other women, as well.

Simmons acknowledged spending two days and a night with Khalighi in 1991 in his apartment and other “public places,” including a nightclub.

“Much of the time we were in the presence of other acquaintances,” Simmons said. “I’m deeply saddened and truly shocked to learn of Keri’s assertions as to what happened over the course of that weekend.”

Everipedia offers more information on the accuser. Unfortunately, she’s married to a sand Nog. She would get more sympathy here except for the fact of her being a race traitor.

Here’s another shot of her.