Dindu arrested for racist graffiti that shut down university

EDDIE CURLIN. THE DINDU DID IT.

Eastern Michigan University fell for another one of the now common hoaxes where a Nog or a Jew puts out racist graffiti or threats against nonwhites.

Which shows how stupid or evil university administrators are. Actually, they’re stupid AND evil in my experience.

New York Daily News

A black man has been arrested for spray painting racist graffiti on Eastern Michigan University’s campus over a six-month period.

Eddie Curlin was identified as the suspect in a string of anti-black vandalism acts — a large “KKK” inscribed on one building and the N-word on another, with a message telling black students to leave the school.

The three incidents happened in September and October 2016 along with another this spring, sparking outrage throughout the school, located just southwest of Ann Arbor.

Campus police didn’t have much information until Wednesday, when the 29-year-old Curlin was arraigned in Washtenaw County District Court, according to a news release from the school.

Curlin — who attended Eastern Michigan from 2014 to early 2016 — was already in custody, serving a one-to-five jail sentence on unrelated stolen property charges, the release indicates. He was sentenced in that case in August, according to the Detroit Free Press.

The school noted campus police spent 1,080 hours on the investigation, reviewing 1,200 hours of surveillance video and conducting more than 60 interviews. The FBI and Michigan State Police chipped in to help.

The release didn’t indicate how the probe eventually led them to charge Curlin with malicious destruction of property, identity theft and using computers to commit a crime.

Nor did school officials dive deeply into a motive.

“It was totally self-serving, it was not driven by politics and it was not driven by race,” campus police Chief Robert Heighes told the Eastern Echo school newspaper. “It was an individual item done by one individual for all three major graffiti incidents on our campus.”

Heighes told local media the identity theft charge wasn’t tied to the graffiti, but arose during the investigation.

The police spent as much time and money trying to solve a graffiti case as they would have spent on a serious crime.

That’s pretty insane. It shows the power of blacks to control the agenda on campuses.

I have a new rule for the police to follow in these kinds of cases.

It’s easy to remember: The Dindu did it.

Follow the rule, solve the case, and save time and money.

Here’s how to catch the dindu, Mr. Po-lice man:

Detroit firefighter fired for bringing watermelon to station

A white firefighter in Detroit (aka Detoilet) raised the hackles of the gentlemen of color who manned the firehouse to which he had been assigned by his supervisors.

Those colored gentlemen raised a ruckus when he, as is traditionally done, brought his new brothers a gift–a watermelon.

They looked a gift horse in the mouth and he’s now looking for another job.

Fox2 Detroit

DETROIT (WJBK) – Fired before he officially started.

Last Monday, 41-year-old Robert Pattison went to introduce himself to his fellow firefighters at Engine 55 at Joy and Southfield in Detroit.

Second Battallion Chief Shawn McCarty calls it a tradition for firefighters.

“It’s not mandatory, it’s voluntary,” he said. “You come in bearing gifts. The usual gift is doughnuts but you are allowed to bring whatever you want to bring in.”

And Pattison, a probationary firefighter, decided to bring a watermelon wrapped in a pink ribbon.

We’re told some African-American firefighters were instantly offended since 90 percent of the people who work at Engine 55 are black.

“When you get your first detail at a firehouse you pretty much know what you are getting yourself into,” said Patrick Trout. “So you would have to say it was probably a bad call.”

FOX 2: “Is it racially insensitive to bring a watermelon into a fire house?”

“To some people,” McCarty said.

FOX 2 spoke to Pattison by phone who claims it was not a joke – and he did not mean to offend his fellow firefighters. But he clearly did.

Fire Commissioner Eric Jones says the Fenton native was officially discharged.

In a statement Jones says: “There is zero tolerance for discriminatory behavior inside the Detroit Fire Department. On Saturday, Sept. 30, 2017, at Engine 55, a trial firefighter (probationary employee) engaged in unsatisfactory work behavior which was deemed offensive and racially insensitive to members of the Detroit Fire Department.

“After a thorough investigation, it was determined that the best course of action was to terminate the employment of this probationary employee.”

In a world where racial tensions run high, some tell me the trial firefighter should have known better. Trout doesn’t know if he meant anything by it – but feels it was a bad choice.

“For sure by far it was,”

The question is did DFD take it too far?

FOX 2: “Should he have lost his job over a watermelon?”

“I don’t think so,” McCarty said. “Between what he did and what was there are a few things that could have been done.”

Getting fired for trying to be nice to the Negroid race is further proof that the mantra remains true: Avoid the groid. Around blacks, never relax.

Blacks Demand Sale of COTTON be Halted Because It’s RACIST, Whites GROVEL Before Their Black Masters

The ex-slaves are revolting.

It’s not that they won’t pick cotton any more, but that they don’t want to see cotton being sold.

The butt hurt runs deep. Read on.

NOLA

A woman’s Facebook post questioning the appropriateness of cotton boll decor has gone viral.

Daniell Rider of Killeen, Texas, posted a picture of bouquets of cotton stalks apparently for sale at Hobby Lobby and asked the retailer to remove the items. Her full message to Hobby Lobby:

This decor is WRONG on SO many levels. There is nothing decorative about raw cotton… A commodity which was gained at the expense of African-American slaves.

A little sensitivity goes a long way.
PLEASE REMOVE THIS “decor”.

As of 8 a.m. Tuesday, the post had been shared more than 19,000 times and had more than 207,000 comments.

The conversation comes at the same time a Tennessee university president is apologizing for using cotton stalk decor at a dinner for black students at his home. On Facebook, Lipscomb University President Randy Lowry said “several students” shared their concerns about the centerpieces of cotton.

At least one of the students posted a picture of the centerpieces on social media, saying she “felt very offended.”

So I attend Lipscomb university and as most of you know that is a predominately white school. Tonight AFRICAN AMERICAN students were invited to have dinner with the president of the school. As we arrived to the president's home and proceeded to go in we seen cotton as the center pieces. We also stood and ate dinner, there were no seats to sit in and it felt very uncomfortable. We were very offended, and also the meals that were provided resembled many "black meals" they had mac n cheese, collard greens, corn bread etc. The night before Latinos also had dinner at his house and they had tacos. They also DIDN'T have the center piece that we HAD tonight. A couple of minutes went by, the president was coming around and asking for our names and what our major was. He finally got to our table and my friend @kay_cyann asked why there was cotton on the table as the center piece. His response was that he didn't know, he seen it before we did, he kind of thought it was " fallish", THEN he said " it ISNT INHERENTLY BAD IF WERE ALL WEARING IT " then walked off. Later on all of us that were there were invited into the home, and we had the impression that we were coming to speak about how us as Black people feel about Lipscomb. The whole entire time we were in their home they only talked about themselves( how they met, got married and ended up at lipscomb) & the ONLY question that we were asked was our transformation coming to lipscomb. A couple of women answered the question but they sugar coated it. They said any other questions that we may have can be emailed to the advocate for the Latinos and that a second meeting may be held. Also we don't have an advocate on campus, the only African American advocate we had, no longer works here. The only advocate available to us is the advocate for the Latinos. They claim to have funding for minorities, BUT you have to live up to the expectations of a typical Black family to even get the 1000$.There is NO FUNDING for just us black students. #share

A post shared by Nakayla Pinkston🦋🌻🥀 (@nakaylayvonne) on

“The content of the centerpieces was offensive, and I could have handled the situation with more sensitivity,” the university president wrote on the school official Facebook page. “I sincerely apologize for the discomfort, anger or disappointment we caused and solicit your forgiveness.”

How DARE Lipscomb University invite ONLY blacks to dinner? Their president, Randy Lowry, is a RETARD. He’s going to be hearing from me when I get the chance to look up his email address.

Berkeley Students Want to Name Campus Building After Black Cop Killer

The demands by Black Power advocates at UC-Berkeley to rename a campus building after a radical murderer aren’t going to generate much news coverage. But there’s a drip, drip, drip effect that should make the white population even more disgusted with the Negroid race.

PJ Media

Ever since Charlottesville, the tyrannical left has been on the rampage, trying to purge anyone and everyone who had an improper thought. Well, except for Margaret Sanger, apparently. I guess she’s cool.

That’s the mentality at work at the University of California-Berkeley, where students have been battling with administrators to purge the name of a past university president from one campus building. From The College Fix:

Barrows Hall is named after the university’s president from 1919 to 1923, David Barrows, an anthropologist who served as superintendent of schools in Manila when the Philippines became a U.S. colony, according to the University of California Academic Senate’s biography in memoriam.

The Daily said his academic work was informed by “white supremacist ideology.” In 2015 the Black Student Union demanded the name’s removal among other high-priced demands, calling Barrows an “imperialist by way of anthropology [who] participated in perpetuating American colonialism.”

In all fairness, I suspect most academics in the United States during the first quarter of the 20th century were informed by so-called white supremacist ideology.

However, the brave warriors at Berkeley have another name in mind to grace Barrows Hall. Who is this outstanding individual more worthy of recognition?

A cop killer:

The BSU insisted that Barrows Hall be renamed after Black Panther Assata Shakur, a convicted cop killer who escaped from prison in 1979 and fled to Cuba. Shakur is on the FBI’s list of most wanted terrorists.

You just can’t make this crap up, folks. You just can’t.

A man who served as a military officer, an anthropologist, an explorer, and a university president is someone of such poor moral standing that he must be erased from history, whereas a convicted and escaped cop killer is an ethical choice.

Of course, if it brings Shakur back to American soil for the renaming ceremony, then I’m all for it. As long as police arrest her the moment her feet touch American dirt.

Link to David Barrows Wikipedia page.

Link to Assata Shakur’s Wikipedia page.

Art? Graffiti Style Portraits “Beautify” New Orleans Streetscape

My God! Nooooooo!

Growing up in New Orleans, back when St. Claude Ave. was predominantly white, I would have driven past the spot with the “art” hundreds of times.

NOLA

A spray-painted portrait of New Orleans bounce superstar Big Freedia by Sasha Kopfler is a relatively new addition to the Marigny streetscape. The expression on the Queen Diva’s face is perfectly imperial as she surveys the passing traffic.

Kopfler’s eight-foot painting of Big Freedia is part of the ever evolving outdoor art exhibit that wraps the walls of The Art Garage at 2231 St. Claude Avenue. The Art Garage, a former body shop, is the site of an evening art marketplace.

Proprietor Kate Gaar said that from time to time street artists have asked permission to paint the exterior of the former body shop. Her response has been “y’all do whatever y’all want to do,” she said.

Gaar said that the collective street art collaboration has even spread past her property line. Her nextdoor neighbor Beauty Plus, agreed to allow artist Ceaux Young to paint the huge portrait of a young woman on the adjoining wall.

In general, I’m opposed to government regulation, but the uglification of a building that was pretty unattractive to begin with gives a person reason to pause and rethink regulation.

“We Only Shoot Black People:” White Cop with 28 Years on Force FIRED for Sarcastic Remark

Associated Press

MARIETTA, Ga. (AP) — A police lieutenant in Georgia who was recorded on video during a traffic stop saying “we only shoot black people” is being fired, the police chief said Thursday.

Dashcam video from July 2016 shows a car stopped on the side of a road and a woman can be heard telling Cobb County police Lt. Greg Abbott she was scared to move her hands in order to get her cellphone. Abbott, who is white, interrupts her and says, “But you’re not black. Remember, we only shoot black people. Yeah. We only shoot black people, right?”

Announcing his decision to fire Abbott, Police Chief Mike Register remarked that “there’s really no place for these types of comments in law enforcement.” Speaking at a news conference, Register added, “I feel that no matter what context you try to take those comments in, the statements were inexcusable and inappropriate. They’re not indicative of the values that I’m trying to instill within the Cobb County police department and that I believe the county holds.”

Register said he learned of the comments after television station WSB-TV obtained the video and made the department aware of it. Abbott, who had been an officer for 28 years, was placed on administrative duties while the department investigated the video.

Abbott’s attorney, Lance LoRusso, did not immediately respond to an email Thursday seeking comment on the firing. He had earlier said in a statement that Abbott was cooperating with the investigation, and his comments were meant to “de-escalate a situation involving an uncooperative passenger.”

Register said he’s worked hard since becoming chief in June to strengthen the relationship between the department and the community.

“It’s sad to think that several seconds of video has the potential of tearing that apart, and I hope that is not the case,” he said, later adding, “This badge and this uniform should mean that there’s justice and fairness for all.”

The department plans to rework its policies for reviewing videos to better catch problems, Register said.

Register said he’s known Abbott for many years and has known him to be an honorable man. The report from the internal review indicates that Abbott was trying to be sarcastic and to address the situation as he perceived it, Register said.

“He made a mistake,” Register said. “I don’t know what’s in his heart but I certainly know what came out of his mouth. It’s inexcusable.”

Black community leaders applauded Register’s quick action.

“Although we applaud them for their transparency in this regard, the officer’s interjection of race into the stop was particularly troubling and may be systematic, a deeper issue in the department,” said Deane Bonner of the Cobb County chapter of the NAACP.

“Police misconduct is not news,” said Ben Williams, chairman of the Cobb County chapter of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. “The real story here, in my opinion, is the behavior of this police chief in Cobb County, Georgia.”

“To be here today and to stand with Chief Register as he pulls the shades up and exposes the sunrise here in Cobb County as that pertains to the conduct of the Cobb County Police Department, that’s the news,” he added.

Notice that there was no interaction with blacks and that no blacks were harmed. Yet a veteran cop is out of a job and facing destitution because a TV station, pandering to the Nog population in Atlanta, raised a stink.

WSB-TV are real sh*ts.

Poll Reveals Americans’ Opinions on Confederate Monuments, White Supremacists

A nice 60 percent of Americans oppose the removal of Confederate monuments. Before getting too excited, remember that America today is only 62 percent white, according to official numbers. As America grows more nonwhite because of demographic changes related to birth rates, the percent favoring the removal of our history will rise.

sentinelksmo.org

Despite repeated calls from media, official action, and protests to remove monuments across the country, the American people aren’t so certain Confederate monuments –or other historical monuments–should be taken down. A pair of polls conducted since a white nationalist march in Charlottesville revealed Americans are somewhat united on leaving the statues alone.

More than 60 percent of respondents to a poll conducted by NPR, PBS, and Marist University said Confederate statutes should remain standing as historical symbols. In another poll, conducted by Economist/YouGov, 48 percent of respondents opposed removing removing a Robert E. Lee statue in Charlottesville. The percent marked a plurality of respondents. Another 30 percent said the statue should be removed. The remainder had no opinion.

Almost universally, respondents in the Marist poll said the disagreed with the views of the Ku Klux Klan. More than 85 percent of respondents said they disagreed with the white supremacy movement.

In Missouri, people are talking more about next Monday’s solar eclipse than the 30-plus Confederate monuments and statues in the Show-Me State, according to an article in the Kansas City Star. A photo of a statue of Confederate Gen. Joseph O. Shelby accompanies the story. Shelby once lived in Waverly, Mo., and the statue sits in a park named for him.

As Waverly Mayor Barbara Schreiman told the paper, “Actually, a lot of people here probably don’t know who he is. Just some guy on a horse.”

In the next post down on the homepage, I’ve published a report that Mayor Schreiman quickly gave in to Negro demands that the Confederate flag be removed from Shelby Park. If she thinks that the people are for removing Confederate history, someone should show her the poll cited here.

That poll says that the overwhelming majority of Americans disagree with the Ku Klux Klan. A whopping 85 percent disagree with the idea of white supremacy.

The poll result may be born out of ignorance or out of virtue signaling.

By the numbers, whites score high in IQ, high in creativity, high in ability to create civilizations, and low in crime. Blacks score lowest. Ignoring facts, and trying to build a society on the lie of egalitarianism is not an effective way to organize the way we live.

I wonder how many of those who reject white supremacy would enthusiastically endorse Jewish supremacy, phrased as the question, “Do you agree with the Jewish claim that they are God’s chosen people?” Probably lots of people think it’s socially acceptable to endorse Jewish supremacy.

There are lots of other questions that could be asked that relate to white supremacy, which seems to be a trigger term carefully crafted by (((them))) to offer whites a chance to express an irrational self loathing that provides a slippery slope to hard white genocide, rather than the soft genocide of monument removal. Questions about freedom of association, affirmative action, and such would likely elicit responses that support race realism, white nationalism, and white identity.