Butt Hurt Psychopath Hillary Clinton May Challenge Legitimacy Of Presidential Election

Butt hurt psychopaths are dangerous.

Hillary Clinton just signaled her desire for a soft coup that would place Donald Trump back in Trump Tower and out of the White House. Probably through some sort of unprecedented recall effort similar to the one that removed the governor of California from office some years ago.

Lock her up!

Zerohedge

The US presidential election took place nearly one year ago, but to Hillary Clinton it may as well never have ended.

In an interview with NPR [4], the former first lady said that “if Russian interference turned out to be deeper than previously thought” she wouldn’t rule out challenging its legitimacy or the outcome.

“No, I wouldn’t rule it out,” she said.

Still, even the defeated Democratic nominee admitted that she does not “believe” there is a means to officially challenge the election’s outcome. “I don’t know if there’s any legal, constitutional way to do that,” Clinton said.

“There are scholars, academics, who have arguments that it would be [possible], but I don’t think they’re on strong ground. But people are making those arguments. I just don’t think we have a mechanism,” Mrs. Clinton said. “I think you can raise questions.”

Your sure can, especially if it means staying in the public eye day after day reminding the world how your loss was everyone else’s fault but your own, to the point where even her fellow Democrats have said enough [5]. Monday’s interview is the latest in a whirlwind of appearances the former first lady has given as she promotes her book, “What Happened.”

In addition to Russia, over the past week, she’s continued to blame James Comey, Bernard Sanders and others for her defeat, and she’s also doubled down on her call to end the Electoral College.

None of this is new: Hillary has repeatedly blamed Russia’s efforts to intervene in last year’s election for her loss to Donald Trump, but her latest comments reflect the depth of her frustration with the Kremlin’s efforts which apparently were channeled by Trump himself. She charged that the president knew the Russians were trying to sabotage her campaign, but that it’s unclear if he can be held accountable at this point.

“[Trump] knew they were trying to do whatever they could to discredit me with emails, so there’s obviously a trail there, but I don’t know that in our system we have any means of doing that, but I just wanted to add to the point you made. There’s no doubt they influenced the election: We now know more about how they did that.”

Clinton also said she would have reacted differently than Trump did and established an “independent commission with subpoena power” to probe it.

“Let me just put it this way, if I had lost the popular vote but won the electoral college and in my first day as president the intelligence community came to me and said, ‘The Russians influenced the election,’ I would’ve never stood for it,” she said. “Even though it might’ve advantaged me, I would’ve said, ‘We’ve got to get to the bottom of this.’” She probably meant disadvantaged.

She then proceeded to psychoanalyze Trump, saying that “I think part of the reason Trump behaves the way he behaves is that he is a walking example of projection. Whatever he’s doing and whatever he thinks is happening he will accuse somebody else of”, she concluded without a trace of irony.

Well, even if Hillary fails to challenge Trump over Putin’s unprecedented hacking of millions of middle-class Americans, she can always find comfort in the stupendous, fantastic, if just a little fabricated rating of her book on Amazon [6], which as of today has 4.8 completely unhacked stars out of 5… with Jeff Bezos’ sincerest compliments [7].

One of the positive things about sites that allow comments is how much more we can learn about a story in the comments section:

Chubber offers this extra info:

Damn, but she has to be the dumbest fucking bitch I’ve ever seen. Here are a couple of salient points she may want to consider. 1). The Russia hacking story has been completely debunked by more than one NSA spook along with Assange, who by the way says he has proof he’s willing to turn over (probably in exchange for a pardon). It’s been shown by IT techs that the download speeds were too high to have been done other than in house.

2). The election committee in NH just announced that over 6,000 out of state voters from Mass, voted in the election and only about 1200 eventually got NH drivers licenses. This means that almost 4800 ILLEGAL votes were cast by Massholes, who voted predominately Hillary. Hillary won the NH election by around 2,000 votes, IIRC.

In other words, if the election were contested it is likely that widespread election fraud would be uncovered. Something that the DNC is desperate to keep hidden as evidenced by them contesting the election boards turning over voter information which consists of names and addresses (something every fucking intel agency already has).

Quora offers a brief explanation of how a president can be impeached, but not recalled.

New Hillary Clinton CBS Interview Exposes Her Seething Hatred of White People

Hillary Clinton gave an interview on Sunday. Her distaste for white working people shines through. It’s all about her.

Fox News

Hillary Clinton said Sunday in her first TV interview since Election Day that she was just “gobsmacked, wiped out” after losing the presidential election to Donald Trump.

Clinton, who is releasing a new memoir Tuesday titled “What Happened” that points fingers and accepts responsibility for her defeat, also told CBS News’ “Sunday Morning” host Jane Pauley that she won’t ever run for office again.

“I am done with being a candidate, but I’m not done with politics because I believe that our country’s future is at stake,” Clinton said during the interview at her home in Chappaqua, New York.

Asked how she was doing, Clinton confessed that the loss still stings.

“I think I am good, but that doesn’t mean I’m complacent or resolved about what happened,” she said. “It’s still painful.”

She said on election night she felt like she let everybody down.

“I had not drafted a concession speech,” Clinton said. “I had been working on a victory speech.”

She said post-election she went off on a “frenzy of closet cleaning,” drinking Chardonnay and walks in the woods. She recommends doing yoga.

“I couldn’t feel, I couldn’t think,” Clinton said. “I was just gobsmacked, wiped out.”

Clinton said she never thought of not going to Trump’s inauguration as a former first lady.

“And so there I was on the platform, you know, feeling like an out of body experience,” she said. “And then this speech [by Trump], a cry from the white nationalist gut.”

She said that during the campaign Trump was quite successful “referencing a nostalgia” that would give hope, comfort and settle grievances for millions of people upset about gains made by others.

“Millions of white people,” Pauley asked.

“Yeah, millions of white people,” Clinton replied.

Clinton also defended her “basket of deplorables” comment about Trump supporters in the interview.

“Well, I thought Trump was behaving in a deplorable manner,” she said. “I thought a lot of his appeals to voters were deplorable. I thought his behavior as we saw on the ‘Access Hollywood’ tape was deplorable. And there were a large number of people who didn’t care. It didn’t matter to them.”

Clinton said she didn’t believer her deplorable comment energized Trump voters.

“They were already energized,” she said.

Clinton said she practiced what she would do if Trump came up behind her during the debates and then she said when he did at the second debate in St. Louis, she became flustered.

“It was so discombobulating,” she told Pauley. “And so — while I’m answering questions, my mind is going, ‘OK, do I keep my composure? Do I act like a president? Am I the person that people can trust in the end to make hard decisions?’ Or do I wheel around and say, ‘Get outta my space. Back up, you creep.’ Well, you know, I didn’t do the latter.”

The interview concluded with Clinton saying the U.S. had a reality show that led to the election of a president. “He ends up in the Oval Office,” she said of Trump .”He says, ‘Boy, it’s so much harder than I thought it would be. This is really tough. I had no idea.’ Well, yeah, because it’s not a show. It’s real. It’s reality, for sure.”

“What Happened” is being published by Simon & Schuster, a division of CBS.

The memoir, which dishes on Bernie Sanders, former FBI Director James Comey and Russian President Vladimir Putin, as well as Trump, has some Democratic Party wags worried.

Coming so soon after the election, it’s poised to re-live the 2016 campaign drama in the media for weeks, if not months, to come – as Democrats try to prepare for the 2018 midterms while also battling the Trump agenda.

Clinton already is taking some criticism — complete with mockery from late-night television hosts — for planning book-tour stops in the Great Lakes and Midwestern states that ultimately cost her the election. But she writes that her campaign had more staff and spent more on advertising in both Michigan and Pennsylvania, two states she lost, than President Barack Obama did when he won them in 2012.

She acknowledges that “if there’s one place where we were caught by surprise, it was Wisconsin,” saying that polls showed her ahead until the end. But while she did not visit the state in the fall, she noted that her surrogates blanketed the state.

In Wisconsin, Democratic pollster Paul Maslin called it a “bitter irony” that Clinton is now trying to reach voters — or consumers — in states he believes her campaign mostly ignored.

But he said it’s ultimately a sideshow from a has-been.

Here’s hoping that her book (which was surely ghostwritten) is a great big bomb.

Twitter’s “Impeach Donald Trump” Put Up a Poll and Got Screwed Really Bad

Vote if you have a Twitter account. The more we embarrass the left the better.

Currently, the results are as of 6 P.M. Central Time U.S.:

Donald Trump 67%
Barack Obama 22%
George W. Bush 7%
Bill Clinton 4%

Donald Trump is ‘just six Senate votes from impeachment’

Liberals harp on the “Trump is a racist” theme these days. Only problem for them is that being a racist is not a crime. Impeachment and removal from office requires that a president be guilty of “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanours.” The first two are specific. The last two are vague. Pointing out that violence comes from all sides and bemoaning the loss of Confederate monuments would hardly seem a “high crime” or a “misdemeanour.”

Some would call those ideas “truth.” But in an Orwellian nightmare, truth becomes a crime.

The Independent

Donald Trump is just six Senate votes from impeachment, according to an analyst at a prominent independent think-tank.

Support for the President among Republican Senators has waned to the extent that Mr Trump is likely to only hang onto his seat by six votes, according to Elaine Kamarck of the Washington-based research group The Brookings Institution.

Ms Kamarck, who is director of the Centre for Effective Public Management, said 12 Republican Senators had “no fear of the President” and had indicated they could vote against him in a vote.

Among the Senators likely to rebel was John McCain, who delivered the killer blow to Mr Trump’s replacement for Obamacare, Ms Kamarck said in an article on the think-tank’s website.

The US constitution allows Congress to remove a president before they have completed their term if enough members vote to say they committed “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanours”.

An article of impeachment must get a majority vote in the House of Representatives before reaching the Senate. Once there, at least two-thirds of senators must find the President guilty for him to be removed.

Ms Kamarck said that 12 rebellious Republican Senators combined with 48 Democrats “who have shown no inclination to work with this President” meant Mr Trump was six votes away from a Senate conviction.

Three presidents have been subjected to impeachment proceedings in the past. Andrew Johnson in 1898 and Bill Clinton in 1998 and 1999 were impeached but acquitted, while Richard Nixon resigned in 1974 to avoid impeachment.

President Andrew Johnson tried to do right by the south after the War Between the States. He was impeached in 1868, with Republicans failing to remove him from office by one vote.

FOIA Dump Reveals Collusion Between Comey’s FBI, Loretta Lynch, and Media to Cover Up Tarmac Meeting Between Lynch and Bill Clinton

The mainstream media isn’t covering the following story. Only a very few Americans will see it and understand. Bill Clinton met with the Attorney General of the United States, one of his old pals, Loretta Lynch, and surely instructed her to make the investigation of Hillary go away. That meeting was supposed to be a secret, but an alert local news crew stumbled upon it and reported it.

After that, the Obama administration worked tirelessly to stifle reporting about the meeting.

They’re all corrupt and they’re all in it together, up to and including Obama himself.

Zerohedge

Back on June 29, 2016, Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, tried to convince us that the following ‘impromptu’ meeting between herself and Bill Clinton at the Phoenix airport, a private meeting which lasted 30 minutes on Lynch’s private plane, was mostly a “social meeting” in which Bill talked about his grandchildren and golf game. It was not, under any circumstances, related to the statement that former FBI Director James Comey made just 6 days later [4] clearing Hillary Clinton of any alleged crimes related to his agency’s investigation.

The following local news video of the airport runway meeting has been seen by over 350,000 people.

But, according to a new DOJ FOIA dump just released by the American Center for Law and Justice [5] (ACLJ), it looks increasingly as if nothing reported about this “social meeting” between Lynch and Clinton was grounded in fact…shocking, we know.

First, the new FOIA documents seemingly confirm that the FBI and DOJ simply lied in response to the ACLJ’s initial FOIA request filed back in July 2016. Here is what the ACLJ was told at the time after sending requests to both the Comey FBI and the Lynch DOJ asking for any documents related to the Clinton-Lynch plane meeting:

That said, documents released today by the ACLJ reveal several emails between FBI and DOJ officials concerning the Lynch/Clinton meeting primarily related to how they should go about explaining the train wreck that had just been unwittingly played out on live television courtesy of a local Phoenix affiliate station. Here is a recap from ACLJ:

The documents we received today from the Department of Justice include several emails from the FBI to DOJ officials concerning the meeting. One with the subject line “FLAG” [7] was correspondence between FBI officials (Richard Quinn, FBI Media/Investigative Publicity, and Michael Kortan) and DOJ officials concerning “flag[ing] a story . . . about a casual, unscheduled meeting between former president Bill Clinton and the AG.” The DOJ official instructs the FBI to “let me know if you get any questions about this” and provides “[o]ur talkers [DOJ talking points] on this”. The talking points, however are redacted.

Another email [8] to the FBI contains the subject line “security details coordinate between Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton?”

On July 1, 2016 – just days before our FOIA request – a DOJ email chain under the subject line, “FBI just called,” [9] indicates that the “FBI . . . is looking for guidance” in responding to media inquiries about news reports that the FBI had prevented the press from taking pictures of the Clinton Lynch meeting. The discussion then went off email to several phone calls (of which we are not able to obtain records). An hour later, Carolyn Pokomy of the Office of the Attorney General stated, “I will let Rybicki know.” Jim Rybicki was the Chief of Staff and Senior Counselor to FBI Director Jim Comey. The information that was to be provided to Rybicki is redacted.

Also of note several of the documents contain redactions that are requested “per FBI.”

It is clear that there were multiple records within the FBI responsive to our request and that discussions regarding the surreptitious meeting between then AG Lynch and the husband of the subject of an ongoing FBI criminal investigation reached the highest levels of the FBI.

Then comes a series of emails between DOJ officials and several mainstream media outlets that appear to reveal collusion to effectively ‘kill the story.”

The first such email involves a Washington Post writer who tells the DOJ’s Director of Public Affairs that he’s hoping to “put it [the story] to rest.”

The next email came from Mark Landler of the New York Times who almost apologizes for even inquiring about the Lynch/Clinton meeting saying that he had been “pressed into service” to write about the topic.

Finally, here is an email where ABC apparently told the DOJ they “aren’t interested” in the Lynch/Clinton story, “even if FOX runs with it.”

Can you imagine all of the stuff we would have learned over the past 8 years if the press pursued the Obama administration and/or the Clinton investigation with even 1/10th of the vigor with which it is currently pursuing Trump?

Wasserman Schultz IT Aide Arrested Trying to Leave Country

IMRAN AWAN HAS BEEN ARRESTED.

A Paki crook was hired by the Jewess Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to be her IT person. He (and other members of his family) allegedly had access to all Congressional emails and other confidential documents.

He was arrested yesterday for bank fraud, but there’s much more to what is likely to prove a case that the Democrat party is a threat to the American system of government.

Watch the short video to gain perspective on the story.

Don’t be surprised that if in the near future Awan’s name is added to the Clinton body count. I hope someone is keeping a close eye on him before he shoots himself in the back of the head a few times in a successful suicide.

Fox News

A House IT staffer at the center of a congressional computer equipment scandal has been arrested by federal officials and charged with bank fraud, Fox News has learned.

Fox News is told officers and agents from the U.S. Capitol Police, the FBI and Customs and Border Protection were involved in the arrest of Imran Awan at Dulles International Airport.

Awan, 37, of Virginia, pleaded not guilty Tuesday to one count of bank fraud during his arraignment in federal court in Washington, D.C. He was released but will have to wear a GPS monitor and abide by a curfew.

Awan also was ordered to turn over all his passports. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Aug. 21.

Law enforcement authorities for months have been looking into how Awan may have double-billed the House for equipment like computers, iPads, monitors, keyboards and routers. Several relatives of Awan worked for House Democrats and were fired months ago. Awan, however, was kept on staff by Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., even though he was no longer allowed access to the House server network.

Wasserman Schultz, though, has now fired Awan. Spokesman David Damron said Tuesday in a statement:

“Mr. Awan previously served as a part-time employee but his services have been terminated. No charges, evidence or findings from the investigation have been formally shared with our office, so we cannot comment on them.”

Authorities also have looked into IT workers putting sensitive House information on the “cloud” and potentially exposing it to outside sources.

Fox News is told that federal officials arrested Awan at Dulles airport in suburban Virginia as he was “trying to leave the country.”

The criminal complaint and affidavit said he had bought a ticket to fly Monday to Doha, Qatar, and then Lahore, Pakistan, with a return flight booked for early January. The affidavit specifically alleged he engaged in a scheme to defraud a Congressional Federal Credit Union. It did not appear to go in depth into the other matters investigators have been looking into.

Meanwhile, the counsel for Wasserman Schultz, the former Democratic National Committee chairwoman, recently began negotiating with Capitol Police for access to her laptop in the case. Until this point, she had resisted USCP efforts to look at her computer – even suggesting “consequences” for the agency if the computer was not promptly returned.

Fox News first reported last week that arrests were coming in the case.

Awan and his relatives worked for House Democrats for more than a decade, earning hundreds of thousands of dollars. But Awan declared bankruptcy in 2012.

Awan is of Pakistani descent, and Democratic sources have argued the family’s ethnicity is a factor in the attention they’re receiving.

Awan is just one more example of the cultural enrichment that immigrants bring to America.

WSJ Reporter’s Death Points to Another Clinton Hit

JOSEPH RAGO, AGE 34. FOUND DEAD IN HIS APARTMENT.

I believe this is the third Clinton-related death story I’ve posted in the last two weeks.

Jeff Sessions needs to step up to the plate and take the heat for appointing a special prosecutor to investigate all aspects of the Clinton machine, including the deaths. This set of deaths goes way beyond coincidence or chance.

Free Republic

Vanity: Another Clinton Foundation Related Death?
Vanity
Posted on 7/22/2017, 9:54:47 PM by TigerClaws

Wall Street Journal writer Joseph Rago found dead in his apartment .

He was reportedly investigating Hillary’s involvement in the purchase of Russian drug company Veropharm by Abbot Labs at a time in 2014 when sanctions against Russia would have prevented the sale. The purchase was accomplished by a US shell company named Kew Garden Hills, LLC (registered in Delaware –and- Hillary Clinton’s home State of New York) acquiring approximately 98% of Veropharm shares—and then their being bought by Abbott Laboratories. Hillary has ties to both Abbot Labs and Kew Garden Hills LLC.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation_world/wall-street-journal-writer-joseph-rago-found-dead-in-his-apartment-20170722.html

Critical to note about Abbott Laboratories acquiring Veropharm, this report explains, is that it was accomplished on 12 December 2014—which was 9 months from the March 2014 Obama regimes sanctions against Russia prohibiting such company takeovers—and that only someone with Hillary Clinton’s power and lust for money could make happen.

To how this takeover was completed in order to evade the Obama regime sanctions against Russia, this report details, was accomplished by a US shell company named Kew Garden Hills, LLC (registered in Delaware –and- Hillary Clinton’s home State of New York) acquiring approximately 98% of Veropharm shares—and then their being bought by Abbott Laboratories.

Handling this takeover transaction, this report continues, was the Russian investment bank Renaissance Capital—who are most to be noted for their having paid former President Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech he gave before their top executives in Moscow.

More from the Daily Mail

A Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist with The Wall Street Journal was found dead at his Manhattan home on Thursday evening, the newspaper reported on Friday.

New York police discovered the body of Joseph Rago, 34, at his East Village apartment at 7:40pm, according to the Journal.

His colleagues at the newspaper grew concerned earlier in the day when Rago did not show up for work.

Rago’s boss, Paul Gigot, the editor of the Journal’s editorial page, notified the newspaper’s security officials, who promptly called police.

First responders arrived at his home and found Rago with no obvious signs of trauma.

They declared him dead at the scene.

Authorities are awaiting the results of an autopsy before definitively determining the cause of death.

At the Mail comments section, the Clinton name comes up. We’re not as ignorant as we used to be.