Elizabeth Warren to Jake Tapper: 2016 Democrat Nomination Rigged for Crooked Hillary

The rats are deserting the sinking Clinton ship, captained by the chief rat, Crooked Hillary.

It’s every man for himself as two prominent Clinton supporters came out today with the news that Hillary Clinton subverted the will of the people.

Business Insider

Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts thinks the 2016 Democratic-primary process between Hillary Clinton, the eventual nominee, and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont was rigged, she told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Thursday.

Tapper asked Warren about the bombshell claims from former Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile that the DNC was “unethical” and favored Clinton over Sanders for the party’s nomination. Brazile detailed her “proof” in a book excerpt published by Politico on Thursday.

Brazile wrote that she came across an agreement between the DNC and two Clinton campaign funds that suggested unethical practice, she wrote, adding that the DNC was also required to consult with the campaign about staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings long before the primary had wrapped up.

“If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead,” Brazile added. “This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.”

Tapper, in his Thursday interview, asked Warren point-blank if she thought the primary was rigged.

“Yes,” Warren said.

Earlier in the interview, Tapper asked Warren to more broadly address Brazile’s claims.

“This is a real problem, but what we’ve got to do as Democrats now is hold this party accountable,” she said. “When Tom Perez was first elected chair of the DNC, the very first conversation I had with him is to say ‘you have got to put together a Democratic Party in which everybody can have confidence that the party is working for Democrats rather than Democrats are working for the party.’ And he’s being tested now.”

“This is a test for Tom Perez,” she continued. “And either he’s going to succeed by bringing Bernie Sanders and Bernie Sanders’s representatives into the process, and they’re going to say it’s fair, it works, we all believe it, or he’s going to fail. And I very much hope he succeeds. I hope for Democrats everywhere. I hope for Bernie and all of Bernie’s supporters that he’s going to succeed.

Styx covers the history of the DNC’s failures and corruption in light of today’s news. In short Styx argues that dumb Latino Tom Perez, the leader of the DNC today, has no idea how to hold Democrats who will flee to the Republicans.

Liberals Love Trump’s Tax Plan… When Told It’s Bernie Sanders’ Plan (Video)

Not bad, but Mark Dice does these kind of videos better.

Three and a half minutes of college students and liberals embarrassing themselves.

Marilou Danley Sent Away by Alleged Vegas Shooter Stephen Paddock, Who Was Prescribed Valium Four Months Ago

MARILOU DANLEY. DESCRIBED AS SHOOTER’S GIRLFRIEND. WHORE?

Globetrotting Marilou Danley is back in the U.S., accompanied by the FBI. Let’s hope the FBI does a better job with her than it did with the Hillary Clinton email scandal, which should have landed Crooked Hillary in jail.

But I digress.

Danley’s sisters live in Australia. They’ve been talking to the press. Pictures of Stephen Paddock in the Philippines in 2013 have also been unearthed.

There are a couple of things about Paddock I haven’t seen anywhere. First, did he leave a will? Second, did he have any children? Neither of these things has surfaced yet. About all we know for sure is that he had a Flip girlfriend, liked gambling, and had a fair number of firearms.

We also have just learned that he had been prescribed Valium by a Jewish doctor.

Excerpt from CNN

Manila, Philippines (CNN)Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock encouraged his girlfriend Marilou Danley to leave the country before his attack that left 58 people dead, her sisters told CNN affiliate in Australia 7 News.

The sisters, who spoke to 7 News exclusively, did not want to be identified by name and requested their faces be blurred.

“I know that she don’t know anything as well like us. She was sent away. She was away so that she will be not there to interfere with what he’s planning,” one of Danley’s sisters told 7 News from their home in Australia’s Gold Coast region.

“In that sense, I thank him for sparing my sister’s life,” she said, adding her sister was “really in love with Steve.”

Authorities in the US, Philippines and Australia have been involved in the search for Danley, in the hope she might be able to shed some light on the motive behind the deadliest mass shooting in modern US history.

The other sister said Danley, who arrived back in the US from the Philippines on Tuesday, “didn’t even know that she was going to the Philippines, until Steve said, ‘Marilou, I found you a cheap ticket to the Philippines.'”

She added Danley was likely “even (more) shocked than us” by his actions.

“No one can put the puzzles together, no one, except Marilou, because Steve is not here to talk anymore. Only Marilou can maybe help,” the sister said.

“If Marilou was there, this maybe as well didn’t happen because she won’t let it happen.”

Danley landed at Los Angeles International Airport on Tuesday evening, a law enforcement source told CNN. She is being accompanied by the FBI in Los Angeles, where Las Vegas police plan to question her, the source said.

Maria Antoinette Mangrobang, the Philippine Bureau of Immigration spokeswoman, said Danley, who travels on an Australian passport, had left Manila for Los Angeles, where her flight landed around 7:30 p.m. Tuesday local time.

Mangrobang added Danley had arrived in the Philippines from Tokyo on September 15. There has been communication between authorities in the Philippines, the FBI and the US Department of Homeland Security, the spokeswoman said.

Las Vegas Sheriff Joe Lombardo said Tuesday his investigators were hoping to speak with the 62-year-old woman.

Speaking at a press conference, he said law enforcement authorities are in communication with Danley and anticipate “some information here from her shortly.”

Adding more intrigue to the case is the news, confirmed to CNN by a US law enforcement source, that Paddock recently wired $100,000 to the Philippines.

Photos from 2013 show Paddock visiting the Philippines. Officials aren’t able to see yet the precise date of the transfer and the FBI is currently working with Philippine authorities over the matter, the source said.

In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, police had described Danley as a “traveling companion” of the shooter, but did not describe her as a suspect.

Paddock traveled to the Philippines in 2013, where these photos were taken.

In one of the more significant developments in the case against Paddock, it’s been revealed that in June he was prescribed Valium.

Daily Mail

Las Vegas killer Stephen Paddock was prescribed an anti-anxiety medication four months before shooting 58 people dead and wounding more than 500.

Paddock was prescribed 50 10 milligram diazepam tablets – also known as Valium – on June 21 by Vegas doctor Steven Winkler, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reports.

Diazepam is a sedative-hypnotic drug that can trigger aggressive behavior in people with underlying behavioral problems, multiple studies have shown.

It is not known why Paddock was prescribed the drug, or whether he had any behavioral issues.

Multiple people who knew him, including his own brother Eric, say he displayed no outward signs of aggression and did not appear as the kind of person who would carry out a mass shooting.

Staff at Dr Winkler’s office would not confirm to the Review-Journal if Paddock had been a patient, and said the doctor would not be answering questions.

One study conducted in Finland, and another in Australia and New Zealand, linked the use of benzodiazepines – the class of drugs to which diazepam belongs – to increased instances of aggressive behavior.

If, and I emphasize if, Paddock is the patsy in a conspiracy, then he was certainly set up nicely. Between the guns and the drugs, there’s the girlfriend who may have been overseas being rehearsed to tell a story that will make it look even more convincing that Paddock was the shooter.

I would be remiss in my obligation to the truth if I didn’t raise the issue of whether Marilou Danley (what a name for a Flip) wasn’t a whore back in her younger days in the Philippines. The country is famous for its women whoring themselves to white American men.

I’m not saying Danley was a whore, but her past is relevant in terms of her credibility as a witness.

If Paddock was set up, then Danley could easily be part of the plot, rewarded with all his assets as her inheritance, including any life insurance he may have had.

Consensus Developing: Vegas Shooter Targeted Conservatives, Deplorables

(((Laura Loomer))) is breaking major news on Tuesday and early Wednesday morning. Kudos to her, if the stories turn out to be true.

Wow! It’s starting to look like Stephen Paddock was a terrorist, a Muslim or Muslim sympathizer who hated Deplorables. It’s also looking like Donald Trump is being set up to be assassinated in Vegas on Wednesday.

For purposes of reading and absorbing this post, set aside the idea for a few moments that Paddock was a patsy and assume he was the shooter. We’re not dismissing the idea that he’s a patsy, just suspending that thought for the moment.

Excerpt from Lew Rockwell

As things always go with these sorts of matters, what we think we know now will inevitably change and, in some respects, undoubtedly change dramatically as more information comes to light. So far, though, this is essentially the extent of the propositions on which the Big Media insiders agree.

Admittedly, I don’t know anything more at the moment. However, I’m shocked (though not particularly surprised) that no one—namely, no “conservative” commentator—has so much as suggested even the possibility that this historically unprecedented massacre just may be the event in which the violent hatred to which suspected Deplorables have been routinely subjected for over a year-and-a-half has reached its bloody climax.

From even before President Trump received his party’s nomination, leftist agitators, mostly fans of Bernie Sanders, began making it a habit to crash Trump’s rallies and assault his supporters. Since this time, literally hundreds of Trump supporters, men, women, and young teenagers—the folks who Hillary Clinton infamously characterized as “deplorables”—have had their person and property abused by leftists of different sorts. Antifa (“Anti-fascists”), BLM (Black Lives Matter), and BAMN (By Any Means Necessary) are some of the more militant leftist organizations that came to be counted upon to attack indiscriminately, and with a range of weaponry, Trump supporters—i.e. veterans, flag-waving patriots, Republicans, Christians, and anyone and everyone else who is deemed “fascist.”

Pepper spray and bear mace; sticks of dynamite and Molotov cocktails; bats, pipes, clubs, and flagpoles; stones, flamethrowers, and bottles; feces and urine—these are among the weapons that have been used against those who have declared their support for “free speech,” Trump, and the American flag.

Some far left members of “The Resistance” have indeed shown up to some events armed with guns, although no one, to my knowledge, has yet used these guns on Trump supporters.

Of course, as recently as June, a Bernie Sanders admirer and avid MSNBC viewer, James Hodgkinson, in an effort to slaughter as many Republican members of Congress as possible, shot several, including and most notably, Steve Scalise (And shortly before this event, another zealous Sanders fan and Trump opponent, Jeremy Christian, who the media tried ((absurdly)) to depict as a “white supremacist terrorist,” stabbed three men on a Portland, Oregon train, killing two of them).

In other words, the last nearly two years have established two things:

(a)Violence against anyone and everyone who is suspected of having contributed to the election of President Trump (and the GOP) has been normalized;

(b)This political violence has been normalized by those on the far left.

It also bears noting that Antifa and the like, in affirming their allegiance to “The Resistance,” affirm their ideological and political affinity with all of those “mainstream” Democrats in Congress and the media who similarly raise the proverbial banner of The Resistance. For that matter, the embarrassment of a former presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, also proclaimed her own allegiance to The Resistance some months back, as did former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

Democrats own the fringes of their party.

Now, given the patterns of the last two years (to say nothing of the left’s long history of violence), is not the theory that the Vegas killer was but another committed Resister, determined to, “by any means necessary,” “bash the fash” not eminently plausible?

After all, the predominantly white country music fans upon whom Paddock set his sights constitute the collective poster child of the Deplorable, a fact of which leftists, in their ever articulate manner, have spared no occasion to remind us from the moment that word broke of this outrage.

Shouldn’t someone in Big Media, specifically, in the so-called “conservative” media, at least raise these points?

Can there be any doubt that had this been a rap concert—an event comprised of tens of thousands of black men, women, and children—that, despite being short on verifiable facts, the very media figures who now refuse to indulge speculation as to the shooter’s motive would have wasted no time in speculating about “racism?”

Can we doubt that had the targeted event been a gathering of tens of thousands of Hispanics or Muslims or gays that we would have been treated to endless speculation concerning the likely “racism,” “Islamophobia,” and “homophobia,” respectively, of the shooter?

There is nothing objectionable about speculating, as long as the speculation is reasonable, rendered plausible (if not true) by the known facts. Intellectually curious people speculate. Speculation is actually preferable to the incessant repetition of talking points with which Americans are relentlessly bombarded by the media whenever events like this occur.

That those in the media now refuse to speculate or, to put it more accurately, that they refuse to advance the most plausible of speculative theories—the shooter, like the 66 year-old James Hodgkinson, who was in his age cohort, was an anti-Republican, anti-Trump zealot—is explained by the likely fact that he shared their animosity toward the same objects.

I’ll show my hand now: While I may be proven wrong, I’d bet dollars to donuts that Stephen Paddock was driven by the same homicidal hatred of all things to his right that animated Hodgkinson.

Paddock, I find it more credible than not, saw himself as a member of The Resistance.

Paul Joseph Watson speculates that Paddock targeted conservatives:

Laura Loomer has talked to Mandalay Bay employees. If I understand her correctly, the hotel owner was a far left supporter of the SPLC and Muslim causes. Laura throws out other bombshells in her 14 minutes as well. Alex Jones also announces that he’s going to hire her for Infowars.

One more Tweet from Laura:

(((Bernie Sanders:))) Trump’s Pushback Against Mestizo Mayor of San Juan is Racist, “unspeakable”

You didn’t expect Bernie to praise Trump, did you?

CNN

Washington (CNN)Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday rebuked President Donald Trump’s decision to attack the mayor of San Juan on Twitter as Puerto Rico continues to struggle after being hit by back-to-back hurricanes.

“It is unspeakable,” Sanders told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union.”

Sanders drew a contrast between Trump and San Juan Mayor Carmen Yulín Cruz, saying Trump was “speaking from his fancy golf club, playing golf with his billionaire friends, attacking the mayor of San Juan, who is struggling to bring electricity to the island, food to the island, water to the island, gas to the island.”

Hey Bern, how is Madam Mayor “struggling” to do all the things you list? Is she pedaling away on a bicycle attached to a generator? Did she make a run for a grocery store in Miami to pick up groceries for the islanders? What the hell is her so-called struggle all about? Tell us, Bern. We want to know.

Sanders also said it would be fair for people to wonder if race was a factor in Trump’s response to the devastation in Puerto Rico.

“Given the President’s history on race, given the fact that he, a few months ago told us that there were good people on both sides when neo-Nazis were marching in Charlottesville, yeah, I think we have a right to be suspect that he is treating the people of Puerto Rico in a different way than he has treated the people of Texas or Florida,” Sanders said.

Haha, Bernie. I’m not going to do the research for you that should have done before opening your vile Jewish yap, but Houston and many areas in Florida hit by the recent hurricanes have more black folks than does Puerto Rico.

Furthermore, you dumbass, not everyone who marched in Charlottesville was a “neo-Nazi.” You Jews see Nazis everywhere. Who’s a Nazi, Bernie? Anyone who disagrees with you!

What Happened? The long list of who Hillary Clinton blames

It looks like for a while there’s going to be at least one Hillary Clinton post per day. She’s on a wild and crazy streak, spouting out more and more nonsense.

America dodged a bullet. ABC = Anybody But Clinton.

In this long piece, Hillary admits that people don’t like her, but she also blames many factors for her 2016 loss, including WHITE RESENTMENT.

There’s so much that could be said about this evil creature, but let her speak in her own words.

BBC

The beauty of Hillary Clinton’s new book title, What Happened, is it can be interpreted in so many ways.

Perhaps it’s a definitive account of the 2016 presidential election. “Here’s what happened”.

Maybe it’s an exclamation, like someone reacting to an unexpectedly loud noise (or an electoral earthquake). “Yikes! What happened!?”

Then again, it could be a stern mom, who just walked in on the mess her children (the voters) made in the living room. “Whaaaaat happened …”

Or is she the dazed boxer, picking herself up off the canvas after getting knocked out by a surprise punch from her opponent.

“Wha-, wha-, what happened???”

It’s up to readers to decide for themselves, but in Mrs Clinton’s recent interviews and in her book, which was formally released on Tuesday, she offers plenty of explanations from which to choose.

Here’s a list of just some of the factors to blame for the fact that she’s hitting book stores across the country, while Donald Trump is redecorating the Oval Office.

James Comey
“If not for the dramatic intervention of the FBI director in the final days we would have won the White House.”

This isn’t the first time Mrs Clinton has said the former FBI director – who wrote a letter informing Congress that he had reopened the investigation into the handling of classified material on Mrs Clinton’s personal email server as secretary of state – is the main culprit behind her defeat.

In her book, Mrs Clinton calls the use of that server a “dumb mistake”, but the resulting scandal was “even dumber”. And in Mrs Clinton’s eyes, Mr Comey’s blame for the matter extends to his public announcement that he would not bring charges against Mrs Clinton, despite the fact that she had been “extremely careless” in her handling of classified material.

“I don’t know quite what audience he was playing to, other than maybe some right-wing commentators, right-wing members of Congress, whatever,” Mrs Clinton said of Mr Comey’s press conference in July 2016.

Continue reading

Trump Accuses Hillary Of “Colluding” With Democrats “To Beat Crazy Bernie Sanders”

Haha. Great new stuff from the Donald. He’s coined a new nickname to go with Little Marco, Low Energy Jeb, and Crooked Hillary: CRAZY BERNIE.

Zerohedge

It is Sunday morning, and Trump celebrated the start of the new week with a tweet at exactly 8 am EDT in which the president lashed out against both Hillary Clinton and the Democratic party, accusing them of colluding to “beat Crazy Bernie Sanders.”

“Hillary Clinton colluded with the Democratic Party in order to beat Crazy Bernie Sanders. Is she allowed to so collude? Unfair to Bernie!” Trump said.

Trump is referring to the disclosures that emerged last summer when it was revealed by email leaks from hacker Guccifer 2.0 that the DNC had colluded with the Clinton campaign to prevent Bernie from winning the Democratic primary.

It’s not the first time Trump has accused the Democrats of cheating Sanders out of the nomination, although today’s tweet comes amid probes ongoing probes into Russian meddling into the presidential election and possible collusion between Trump’s campaign and Moscow.

In an interview airing Sunday on Fox and Friends Weekend, Trump blasted Barack Obama over Russia’s interference, accusing Obama of doing “nothing” before the election.

“Well I just heard today for the first time that Obama knew about Russia a long time before the election, and he did nothing about it. But nobody wants to talk about that,” Trump said in an interview airing in full Sunday on “Fox and Friends Weekend.”

“The CIA gave him information on Russia a long time before they even — before the election. And I hardly see it. It’s an amazing thing,” Trump continued. “In other words, the question is, if he had the information, why didn’t he do something about it? He should have done something about it. But you don’t read that. It’s quite sad,” Trump said.

On Saturday evening, Trump mused some more on this topic when he tweeted that “Obama Administration official said they “choked” when it came to acting on Russian meddling of election. They didn’t want to hurt Hillary?”

Sensing a shift in sentiment – as reported yesterday, angry grassroots Democrats are increasingly turning on leaders such as Obama, Pelosi, Schumer with demands that they “talk less about Russia” and focus on core economic issues instead. Needless to say, nothing could make Trump happier than to put the Russian scandal in the past, especially if he can do it while redirecting attention to his arch-nemesis, Hillary Clinton.

As for Bernie Sanders, we doubt he will care much about what Trump has to say. As reported yesterday, the Vermont senator and his wife, who are now under investigation for bank fraud, have far bigger problems on their heads than a Trump tweet.

There are always lots of good comments at Zerohedge. This one caught my eye, from alt-right girl:

Trump has his hands tied while his departments are still filled with Obama leftovers.

And the Dems are blocking all nominations to keep controlling those departments.

But is good that he slowly calls out Sanders for what he is: a crazy old j00.

If it were up to him would be neck deep in gibsmedats right now.

Instead, Trump Wants Immigrants Off Welfare During Their First 5 Years