The latest results of tests on asylum seekers in Sweden subjected to a new method of medically assessing their age show that over 80 percent tested were judged to be older than 18, but not everyone has faith in their accuracy.
Sweden’s national Forensic Medicine Agency (Rättsmedicinalverket) started carrying out the tests earlier year. They are designed to make age assessment during the asylum process more accurate after the Swedish Migration Agency (Migrationsverket) was criticized for failings in assessing the correct age of some refugees claiming to be underage.
To date Migrationsverket has sent 6,880 cases to be tested, and the Forensic Medicine Agency has now released the results of a total of 2,481 tests from the period between mid March until July 31st, 2017.
Eighty percent (2002) were judged to be 18 or over, while in a further 25 cases the Forensic Medicine Agency judged that the subject was “possibly 18 or over”.
In 432 cases the conclusion was that the person is “possibly under 18”. The tests are only carried out in cases where the person’s age is in question.
According to Johan Göransson from the Forensic Medicine Agency, the results are consistent with previous months.
“We see no big difference in the statistics from previous months, the numbers are quite consistent,” he told The Local.
The high proportion of cases judged to be over 18 does not necessarily mean that the asylum seeker lied about their age. In May, the agency released the results of 581 tests and said that there were 442 instances that “suggest the person examined is 18 years or older”.
When newspaper Svenska Dagbladet investigated the 581 results released however it found that in 243 of the cases the person had openly stated that they turn 18 this year.
The method of medical age assessment, which consists of taking X-rays of wisdom teeth and MRI scans of knee joints, then having dentists and radiologists analyse them, has also been criticised in some quarters.
One sceptic is Karolinska Institute endocrinologist Claude Marcus, whose work includes assessing the biological maturity of people to see if they went through puberty earlier or later than usual.
“I’ve had reason to think about this, and I don’t think the type of measurement being used should be. Judging biological age in this way is very uncertain. If we can’t say it for sure we shouldn’t pretend that we can,” he told newspaper Metro.
The Forensic Medicine Agency’s Göransson defended the accuracy of the tests however:
“In general you can say that the risk of inaccurately judging a child to be an adult is small. The biggest risk is if the person is just under 18, in which case it’s around 10 percent”.
I first saw Angry Goy–a not politically correct video game–on Microchip’s Twitter:
If you prefer to watch on youtube:
Watch a cultural Marxist Jew thrown in an oven by the Angry Goy:
How to play the game:
I’m not sure that any of this is healthy, even if it is intended as satire. What do you think?
Published on Aug 21, 2016
Stop White genocide!
Among the first comments:
Curry, just read Ezekiel 4:15 and stop bringing excuses for the disgusting fairy tales that jews themselves wrote.
Europeans have their own ancestral Aryan beliefs and christinsanity was a jewish mind virus for them to be able to infiltrate into our nations by becoming crypto-jews (whenever needed) and pretending to be christians.
Become aware of the whole picture one step at a time but without this knowledge defeating them is not possible.
i support the right of all peoples, including Europeans, Jews, and others, to possess a homeland and to determine their own affairs within their homelands.
Obviously, while Jews desire a homeland for themselves, they also push diversity and multiculturalism upon the West. This makes those Talmudic, multiculturalist Jews enemies of people of European descent.
Israel’s Sephardic Chief Rabbi has sparked controversy after saying non-Jews should not be allowed to live in Israel unless they follow a set of Jewish laws.
Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef said non-Jews who fail to live by the seven Noahide laws should be expelled to Saudi Arabia, The Times of Israel reports.
Speaking in a sermon on Saturday, the Chief Rabbi said: “If our hands were firm, if we had the power to rule, then non-Jews must not live in Israel.”
“If a gentile does not agree to take on the seven Noahide Laws, we should send him to Saudi Arabia.”
The seven Noahide Laws are a basic moral code outlined in the Talmud. They prohibit actions such as blasphemy, murder, illicit sexual relations, theft and eating live animals, according to The Times of Israel.
Rabbi Yosef added that non-Jews who do agree to abide by the laws will be allowed to remain in Israel in order to serve Jews.
How generous. Non-Jews will be allowed to “serve Jews.”
I thought slavery was outlawed.
“Who, otherwise be the servants? Who will be our helpers? This is why we leave them in Israel, ” he said.
Rabbi Yosef’s comments have been heavily criticised by the human rights agency Anti-Defamation League, who have called on him to retract the statements.
Jonathon Greenblatt, ADL’s CEO, and Carole Nuriel, acting Director of ADL’s Israel Office, said in a statement the comments were “shocking and unacceptable.”
“It is unconscionable that the Chief Rabbi, an official representative of the State of Israel, would express such intolerant and ignorant views about Israel’s non-Jewish population – including the millions of non-Jewish citizens.”
“As a spiritual leader, Rabbi Yosef should be using his influence to preach tolerance and compassion towards others, regardless of their faith, and not seek to exclude and demean a large segment of Israelis.”
Hmmm. I wonder if the denunciation of the Rabbi’s words is sincere or just for the sake of public relations.
This is not the first time Rabbi Yosef’s comments have stirred controversy. Earlier this month, the Rabbi was criticised for suggesting Israelis should kill knife-wielding terrorists without fear of the law, the Jerusalem Post reports.
“If a terrorist is advancing with a knife, it’s a mitzva [commandment] to kill him,” he said in Jerusalem’s Yazadim Synagogue.
“One shouldn’t be afraid that someone will petition the High Court of Justice or some [army] chief of staff will come and say something different,” he added.
For the West, Jews want something different:
Well, it took long enough for rank and file Jews in Germany to wake up to reality–the Germans aren’t going to lampshade them, but the Muslims sure might.
Feel free to disagree, but German nationalists in my opinion ought to use the Jewish opposition to more migrants to form an alliance to make sweeping changes in Germany’s immigration policies. Ousting Angela Merkel from power ought to be the number one priority of anyone with sense enough to understand the danger that open borders in Europe pose.
A Jewish organisation in Germany has called for a limit to be placed on migrants saying they often come from cultures where there is a hatred of Jews.
The Central Council of Jews in Germany warned of growing anti-Semitism explaining many migrants come from Islamic countries where there is an intolerance to the Jewish religion.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government has opened the doors to asylum seekers fleeing conflict in Syria, and arrivals from the war-torn country and other trouble spots are expected to reach one million this year.
And the council’s president Josef Schuster told Die Welt daily: ‘Sooner or later we won’t have a choice but to set an upper limit.
‘Many of the refugees are fleeing the terror of the Islamic State and want to live in peace and freedom, but at the same time they come from cultures were hatred of Jews and intolerance are an integral part.
‘Don’t just think about the Jews, think about the equality between men and women, or dealing with homesexuals.’
Mr Schuster’s remarks were echoed by the Jewish Community organisation IKG in neighbouring Austria, another key country on the migrant trail facing a record number of asylum seekers this year.
With each new Muslim migrant coming to Europe, the risk of a terrorist attack on non-Muslims increases, while the culture of Europe risks being twisted like a pretzel into something not European.
Will Merkel listen to the wisdom of the German Jews? Hell no.
She’s listening to another Jew, Barbara Lerner Spectre, a cultural Marxist who demands that Europe become multicultural.
John Kaminisky tells it like it is. This post excerpts a section from his latest article at Darkmoon, called “Rainbow’s End.”
I recommend that you read the whole article if you find this excerpt valuable. The video shows Jewess Barbara Lerner Spectre advocating the destruction of a white, Christian Europe.
Excerpt from darkmoon.me
Jews aim to flood white nations with African and Asian savages to hasten the arrival of police state martial law, to induce immigrants, bribed with alluring benefits and oblivious to a gentler form of oppression familiar to them, to vote for repressive governments, and to dilute the voting power of intelligent whites, making less likely the chances Caucasians can reverse these diabolical Jewish maneuvers and forestall their own demise.
So far these subversive Jewish tactics have been wildly successful, and wildly devastating to the white Western nations they have thrown into chaos.
The recent black riots in the United States are more of the same. Paid off black demagogues kindle senseless anger among disingenuous black malcontents, who promptly set fire to their own neighborhoods. True, government provocateurs play a large role in this, as they are paid by either the government or political action committees to amplify violence, thereby providing false justification for police crackdowns on innocent people and increasing restrictions on individual freedom.
As with the phony terror tactics stealthily generated by our own government, riots by people of color are all abetted by secret forces aimed at convincing the public more restrictive gun control laws are needed.
All countries would be far stronger if they were homogenous, devoid of interracial strife and on the same page with their chosen religion. Robert Frost’s phrase “good fences make good neighbors” applies here.
So does Adolf Hitler’s philosophy of treating his allies with genuine respect, which is far superior to the current Jewish mindlock on a majority of nations that involves blackmailing financially enslaved clients and then coercing them to commit crimes against the rest of the world, the way the USA is used by Israel as a club to smash opposition to kosher financial hegemony.
Abraham Lincoln’s original suggestion that black slaves should be returned to their African homes or deported to the Caribbean suddenly makes good sense given the chaos in Europe. The fact remains undeniable that black behavior in St. Louis, Baltimore and other cities around the country would be more appropriate in the persistent slums of the African continent than they have been in the society created by whites in the United States. It is simply uncivilized behavior.