Woman Vendor BANNED from British Market for Selling Mugs That Might Offend Muslims

TINA GAYLE. BUSINESSWOMAN. MOTHER OF FIVE.

You may want to take a mini-crash course in the Knights Templar at Wikipedia before reading this story.

The banning of a woman market trader for selling “offensive” Knights Templar mugs isn’t really about the mugs. It about Muslims exercising their clout. It’a also about terrorizing the indigenous white people of Britain.

You will like the lady. She’s totally unrepentant and totally defiant.

metro.co.uk

A market trader has been banned from having a stall after selling Knights Templar coffee mugs – in case they upset Muslims.

Tina Gayle, 57, who was previously warned for selling books and CDs featuring Nazi swastikas, was ordered to remove the £6 mugs from her stall after Charnwood Borough Council received a complaint they were offensive.

The mugs feature a drawing of a knight and have the Latin motto which translates as: ‘Not to us Lord, not to us, but to Your Name give the glory.’ The Knights Templar was a medieval order of crusading Christian monks who fought against Muslim soldiers. Some modern extremists have claimed to be part of them, for example right-wing terrorist Anders Behring Breivik who wrote a ‘manifesto’ saying they had been re-founded to fight against the ‘ongoing European Jihad.’

When Tina, who pays £16.80 each week for a pitch at Loughborough market, refused to withdraw the mugs she was banned from coming back. The mum-of-five, who also works as a book dealer and artist, said: ‘It’s absolutely, completely bonkers. How on earth are these mugs offensive?

‘I haven’t had a single complaint from a Muslim and I’ve had many browse my stall. ‘The complainant said they were offensive because the Knights Templar killed Muslims in the crusades 710 years ago. ‘The Knights Templar were fighting monks, used to protect businessmen travelling across the Holy Lands. ‘They were not marauding murderers. Whoever made the complaint needs to study the history books more closely.

‘If I only sell books on people who haven’t killed someone, I’d be reduced to Alan Titchmarsh.’ She added: ‘The council gave me a letter at 4pm and said I’m banned. You’re meant to have three written warnings before expulsion and they did not do that.

‘I’m now selling the mugs on eBay. I’d like to get back on my stall but at the moment my hands are tied until the council sees sense.’ A spokesperson for Charnwood Borough Council said: ‘The trader refused to remove the mugs from the stall so we issued a second letter which excludes the trader from all Loughborough markets. ‘This decision is in line with our market regulations which state that if a trader has displayed serious misconduct, they can be immediately excluded from trading, with no further warnings required. ‘Serious misconduct includes bringing the market into disrepute and selling items which could be offensive. ‘The trader can appeal this decision, and we would ask her to write to us to confirm she wishes to do so.’

Diversity isn’t a strength. It’s a prescription of conflict.

As injustices go, Tina’s is minor compared to the injustice suffered by the dead victims of Muslim terrorism.

Britain knows what needs to be done. Summon up the political will and do it, you guys.

Gab Faces Shutdown Over Andrew Anglin Censorship (Videos)

Nothing fancy here, just a clear explanation of how and why free speech platform Gab was facing being shut down because of a Andrew Anglin joke about Charlottesville’s Heather Heyer. Gab infuriated the Free Speech Internet by telling Anglin he had to take down a joke. Twelve minutes.

ANDREW ANGLIN.

Apparently, White Nationalist Emily Youcis has been banned from Twitter because she reposted Anglin’s Heather Heyer joke.

EMILY YOUCIS.

Here’s a second video on the Gab situation. Less than eight minutes by James Allsup.

The Mad Jewess offers measured criticism of Anglin.

Styx weighs in also with negative criticism of Anglin. Slate’s denunciation of Gab, which mentions Styx, does not meet with Styx’s approval. He advises to NEVER APOLOGIZE.

Read the Slate article here. Slate falsely claims that Gab is a Nazi site.

Consensus Villains (Nazis, Pedophiles) Make it Easier for the (((Real Villains))) to Hide

The author of the excerpt that is the focus of this post is The Saker. He’s not a fan of the Daily Stormer and he strongly disapproves of “Nazis.” However, he believes he knows why the powers that be find it necessary to demonize so-called Nazis.

Public disapproval is high for pedophiles as well as “Nazis.” Both provide the public with a punching bag to verbally denounce through virtue signaling.

The thesis of this piece is that (((they))) have demonized Nazis and pedophiles to distract us from their evil doing.

Excerpt from Unz.com

Then ask yourself the following question: how is it that in a society saturated by pornography and in which homosexuals are slowly achieving what can only be called a hero status, how is it that everybody is SO concerned by child pornography? Seriously – do you *really* believe that anybody in our elites actually cares about children? If yes, I have a collection of bridges to sell you at unbeatable prices!

Of course our rulers don’t give a damn about our kids: the only use they have for our kids is to use them in the pedophile sex rings, that’s it (oh yes, while pedophilia is a crime for the commoner, it is a universal status symbol for our masters and overlords; Pizzagate anybody?). Ditto for pornography (the US porn industry is far bigger than Hollywood) or morals (we are in the “God is dead” post-Christian society, are we not?).

No, the pedophile has been singled out for the same reason as the Nazi: not because they are bad (which they, of course, are!) but because they are both easy, almost defenseless, targets and ideal ‘consensus villains’. Let me repeat this: for the AngloZionist the function of pedophiles and Nazis is to provide an ideal defenseless villain and their purpose is to make it possible to create the tools used to oppress us all.

There is also another particularly toxic side-effect for creating “consensus villains”: it makes it easy for non-consensus villains to hide. Let’s take a very simple example: the so-called “Holocaust”. It is often said that there is a need for, I kid you not, “Holocaust education” to make absolutely sure that “such an abomination does not happen again”. Not happen again?! It never stopped!!! The decolonization of Africa was a bloodbath, US wars in Korea and Vietnam killed millions of people, as did the US sponsored civil war in Indonesia. The Cambodian genocide, the Bangladesh war of Independence, Mozambican Civil War – all saw millions of people murdered. More recently, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the genocide in Rwanda, the US occupation of Iraq, the 2nd Congo war – they all killed several million of people. It is obscene, grotesque and outrageous to say “never again” it in reality it never stopped. Or let’s take the example of pedophilia: I am absolutely convinced that the Empire publicly persecutes pedophiles only because it refuses to look at the horrors the porn industry generates, not only amongst its “performers”, but in the millions of individuals and families it affects (and if you think that these are the paranoid ravings on a prudish Christian fundamentalist, just read this article and wake up to the real world! I also highly recommend the second chapter “The Illusion of Love” in Chris Hedges wonderful book “Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle” which I consider to be a “must read” to understand the United State’s society).

The horrible truth is that neither Nazis nor pedophiles are in any way exceptional. They are just the typical products of a world gone mad with arrogance, hatred and maniacal perversion. You don’t just do away with any and all forms of spirituality, with any sense of the sacred or absolute, and not pay the consequences of that kind of folly. The condemnation of Nazis and pedophiles is just a particularly hypocritical form of virtue-signaling by forces and individuals which are every bit as evil and perverted as the Nazis and pedophiles which they so vehemently denounce and condemn. We should not let the tree hide the forest, and neither should we allow one SOB to hide a multitude of other SOBs.

What is taking place right now is that the Neocons have found a clever way to circumvent the constitutional guarantees (such as the First Amendment) by privatizing the repression of free speech. This is really nothing new: the Pentagon has been waging illegal wars by using “private contractors” just as the “3 letter” agencies have been illegally spying on us by also using private intelligence companies. Now the Neocons are using the private sector to crack down on our freedoms: ain’t capitalism just wonderful?!

Let’s take the example of the The Daily Stormer again: if the US government had barred The Daily Stormer from having a website or from using email, the ACLU would have been up in arms. But since this is done by the private sector and not by the government, the ACLU has absolutely nothing to say. Why? Because the “terms of service” (which nobody ever reads) give IT companies practically limitless power to do what they want with your data and the power to deny you any and all of their services. To use Google (or any other IT company’s services) is not a right. That’s that simple.

Alt-Right Tech People Working to Create a Free Speech Internet

After going through a discussion of banned “hate” sites, this article describes the efforts by Gab to create an alternative Internet that would allow so-called “hate speech” to be expressed free of worry.

Gab is looking for venture capitalists to fund the new Internet.

Excerpt from Slate

Utsav Sanduja, the chief operating officer of Gab, described the “Free Speech Tech Alliance” to me as “a group of 100 engineers plus from Silicon Valley who are working with us behind the scenes to create an alternative infrastructure.” The movement’s goal is to own its own servers and run its own web hosting, domain registrar, DDoS protection software, cloud storage services, and encryption technology, not to mention social networks like Gab and other “free-speech”–centric alternatives, like a YouTube replacement called PewTube. Sanduja claims Gab has received “hundreds of applications” to join the alliance, which he says is purposefully being kept small in order to protect the identities of its members who fear losing their jobs at Silicon Valley companies. Though it’s unclear where exactly they work, at least a handful are on Google’s campus, Sanduja claims.

Gab is building off the work of a number of existing alternative web services hailing from the far right. Pax Dickinson, the former chief technology officer of Business Insider who left the company after Gawker revealed his racist- and rape joke–filled Twitter account, has started his own alt-right crowdfunding platform called Counter.Fund. There’s also Hatreon, a free speech–centric Patreon alternative, which states in its guidelines that “Hate speech is protected speech.” There’s an alt-right-friendly version of Wikipedia called Metapedia. There’s even a small alt-right dating website, Wasp.love, with the tagline, “Preserve your heritage! Be fruitful and multiply! Join WASP.love today!” Though these services are platforms for people who traffic in hate speech, they’re different from the message boards and forums of Stormfront and Gab, where white supremacist and anti-Semitic ideas are discussed and incubated, and where perpetrators of hate crimes like Dylann Roof and Anders Breivik find encouragement and become indoctrinated.

Dickinson is trying to appeal to investors, though he doesn’t seem hopeful. “Leftist VCs leap at the chance to signal their Leftism, regardless of how stupid the project is,” Dickinson lamented last week on Gab. (He declined to be interviewed for this piece.) Still, alt-tech adherents are convinced that there is a market for their services. “I expect the earliest adopters will be those with the most fringe and radical views who have already been kicked off of YouTube and other platforms,” said Anthony Mayfield, creator of PewTube. “But as the definition of someone who is a bad person who isn’t allowed to say things online begins to grow, I think the users of my platform and others like it will continue to become more and more mainstream.”

In the past two weeks, a handful of far-right video bloggers have jumped onboard to promote the nascent movement, including Styxhexenhammer666, a popular libertarian video blogger, whose two videos about the effort have notched almost 70,000 views. Others have posted “call to action” videos, rallying technologists to join the movement to build “new ‘free speech’ platforms,” which have also attracted thousands of viewers. While these might not read as huge numbers, they suggest a movement with a groundswell of grassroots support.

Here’s one Styx video mentioned by Slate:

Here’s the second Styx video calling for a new Internet:

Here’s a call to action:

Partial List of Bans Against Truth: Andrew Anglin Asks Which Side are YOU On?

Microchip has been banned from Twitter over a hundred times but continues to sneak back on. I believe some readers here told me that Ambrose Kane has been shut down. Stormfront has been shut down.

Any others you know about?

List linked in this Daily Stormer article.

What we want is a return to normalcy, a return to sanity.

That is all.

We do not want Jews running our nation, we do not want to be overrun by Third Worlders, and we do not want our race and civilization destroyed – just as no sane person did prior to about the 1950s.

The people who are now censoring us do want those things.

They are part of a system that is hellbent on destroying us.

Charlottesville made it clear for everyone that that is what this current system wants, and will stop at nothing to get.

We are in a war, and the stakes have never been higher.

This is a war for our very genetic survival.

Expecting our enemies – who want America turned into a third world hellhole – to respect our freedom of speech, would be pretty naive.

Of course they want us silenced.

But: are we going to allow them to get away with it?

Are we – the good, decent, law-abiding Americans – going to stand by silently as they ban everyone who doesn’t agree with their insane liberal ideology from the internet, one by one?

That is what is going to happen if we don’t fight this tooth and nail.

Rights are not “inherent.” Arguably, they don’t exist at all. What do exist are privileges, and these flow from power. At best there are privileges that are viewed as sacred enough by enough of a people or a nation that they are respected without having to be demanded – or denied – at the barrel of a gun.

But these privileges/rights are eternally in peril.

The Founders were well aware of this, and that is why they made the Second Amendment the right to bear arms.

That will no doubt be viewed as a radical statement, but it is not a call for violent revolution, it is simply stating a historical fact.

We’re not going to overthrow the government, at least not any time soon (although doing so at this point would indeed be in keeping with the warnings and directives of the Founding Fathers), but what we can do is make a lot of noise.

We need to turn the screws as tight as we can. Pressure works, and we need all hands on deck to apply it in mighty doses.

The only reason, effectively, that any politically active individual would not stand up against this insane wave of censorship, this assault on the most basic of all of our freedoms, would be because they, too, are in the enemy camp, and wish our destruction.

Make your choice.

We aren’t going to get a second chance. The future of civilization rests on our willingness to fight against this tyranny.

Ultimately, people will either die knowing they stood up for what is right in this hour of darkness, or they will die knowing that they stayed silent because they were afraid.

Those who choose the latter are betraying America and her heroic Founders, who themselves risked life and limb to win us these precious freedoms that are now under assault.

Which side are you on?

Italy: African Athlete Protests Fan’s Racial Taunts

HEY YOU DAGOS, I’M BLACK.

Politically incorrect Italians don’t like seeing blacks on the playing field. Thus, they get rowdy and say mean things. They also sometimes throw bananas at what they perceive to be apes playing their games.

Sulley Montari, pictured at the top, got fed up, argued with the fans, and left the playing field. That’s the crux of the matter in this entertaining story.

Citizen.co.za

Anti-racism group Kick It Out calls for black players to strike over Ghana’s Sulley Muntari’s baffling suspension in Serie A.

Kick It Out, an anti-discrimination group in Britain, has slammed Italy’s football administrators for being “gutless” after they banned Sulley Muntari for taking a stand against racism.

The Ghanaian midfielder, who plays for Pescara, left the field in stoppage time during last weekend’s Serie A meeting with Cagliari.

Muntari had been subjected to racist abuse from Cagliari fans throughout the game.

The 32-year-old was so fed up eventually that Pescara had to play without him for the last two minutes.

He was shown a second yellow card for “leaving the field without permission”.

Bafflingly, a Serie A disciplinary committee handed him a one-match ban but didn’t even give a warning to Cagliari over its fans.

The committee said the racist remarks were “deplorable” yet they couldn’t fine the club because “only 10 fans were involved”.

That number is apparently too small to punish a club.

“We have made a representation to FIFPro, the World Players’ Union, to share its frustrations about the treatment of Sulley Muntari by the FIGC (the Italian Football Federation),” Kick It Out said in a statement.

“The gutless failure to not take action by the Italian authorities should not be allowed to pass. It’s unbelievable that Cagliari escaped punishment as ‘only 10’ fans were involved. This situation should never be allowed to happen again.”

Former Tottenham legend Garth Crooks, who is an independent trustee of the organisation, called for radical action from black players in Serie A.

“Every self-respecting black player in the Italian League should not play this weekend unless the Italian authorities withdraw the ban on Sulley Muntari,” he was quoted as saying.

Muntari was a key player for Ghana in 2010’s World Cup in South Africa, where he scored a wonder goal in the quarterfinal against Uruguay.

Wikipedia has a page on racism in association football, chronicling a long list of incidents in Europe and elsewhere.

Hail Trump! Work on the Wall to Start NOW, Adding 5000 Border Agents, and MUCH MORE

Libtards around the world are sitting stunned tonight to learn that President Donald Trump is a man of his word.

The world is used to conniving, bullsh*tting politicians, not honest men holding public office.

The left started the #nobannowall hastag to Tweet out their hatred of Trump and the “racist” polices he promised to implement.

express.co.uk

DONALD Trump said building work on the Mexican border wall will begin “immediately” and gone are the days when Hispanics can “stay in our country and wreak havoc”.

The new President confirmed he had signed an executive order stating the “great wall” will line the border with Mexico in a bid to stop criminals and drug traffickers entering America.

President Trump announced he will employ 5,000 new border security agents and begin a concerted effort to deport illegal immigrants and criminals back to their home country.

He blasted: “We want other countries to take back their criminals.”

The 70-year-old also said “sanctuary cities” – those which are complicit in harbouring illegal immigrants – will see their federal funding drastically reduced.

Several watchtowers and aerial border patrols will be installed to slash the number of Mexicans flowing over the almost 2,000 mile border.

He said he would be “bringing back law and order to America”.

In a briefing earlier this evening, the President’s White House spokesman Sean Spicer outlined Trump’s desire to catch, detain and deport illegal immigrants and foreign nationals who commit crimes upon entering the US.

Mr Spicer bullishly declared that their countries of origin will take the “criminals” back “no ifs no buts” and Trump’s administration will give them “a one way ticket to their homeland”.

He said: “They are going to get a one way ticket to their home countries and their governments will take them back.

“Federal agencies are going to unapologetically enforce the law, no ifs, no buts.

“We will target illegal immigrants for removal and return them.

“We will stop federal grant money for cities and states who harbour illegal immigrants.

“This is at the top of President Trump’s priority and we will restore law and order.

“Building this barrier is more than just a campaign promise. It’s a common sense first step to really securing our porous border

“This will stem the flow of drugs, crime, illegal immigration into the United States.”

President Trump also signed an executive order restricting access into the US from the predominantly Muslim countries of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen as he seeks to reduce the number of Islamist inspired terrorists circumventing America’s homeland security network.

The 70-year-old is making good on his campaign promise to tighten America’s national security after saying some “bad hombres” were entering the US with ease due to the miles upon miles of largely unguarded Mexican border.

The construction of the “great wall” coincides with President Trump’s promise to round up and eject “criminal aliens” and Mexican’s “taking Americans’ jobs”.

President Trump, 70, repeatedly told his campaign rally attendees that he would recoup the cost of the wall from the Mexican government, which has in turn denied that it will pay for the property mogul’s latest constriction project.

Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto said: “It is evident that we have some differences with the new government of the United States, like the topic of the wall, that Mexico of course will not pay.”

President Trump has promised watchtowers, increased border controls and aerial surveillance to keep tabs on undocumented immigrants entering the United States.

He also reportedly wants to block visas being issued to individuals from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen.

Throughout his campaign, President Trump proposed a temporary ban on Muslims entering the US “until we find out what the hell is going on” when it comes to Islamist terror attacks.