Delta Airlines Tries to Shut Down Ann Coulter

There’s still a lot of talk in the press and social media about the Ann Coulter “Twitter rant” that started a few days ago and continued through yesterday. Who knows, the war of words may continue today.

Lots of opinions, some supporting Ann, others Delta, have been expressed.

The source piece for this post discusses a company’s optimal strategy in dealing with customer issues. It finds that Delta made a mistake in picking a fight with Ann.

USA Today

Airlines are often targets of angry tweets from passengers, but like most major brands they typically tread carefully with their responses to complaints on social media.

By shutting down a polarizing figure like conservative commentator Ann Coulter, Delta Air Lines’ response became a political statement, whether that was the intention or not. The airline pushed back at Coulter after she berated it Saturday on Twitter over getting her seat changed.

Coulter began tweeting about the episode Saturday in which she said the airline gave away an “extra room seat” she reserved before a flight from New York to Florida departed. Coulter had booked an aisle seat, but got a window seat.

“Any back and forth with a customer, particularly a political commentator like this, is going to be viewed through a political lens.” said Tanya Meck, the executive vice president of Global Strategies Group, which specializes in strategic communications.

The company’s original tweet has been liked and shared more than 150,000 times, but people are responding in defense of both Coulter and the airline.

Delta offered Coulter a refund, but also hit back at her criticisms on Twitter saying, “Your insults about our other customers and employees are unacceptable and unnecessary.“

The airline later put out a statement explaining the confusion that lead to Coulter being moved from her reserved seat, and restating their disappointment with Coulter’s comments:

“We are sorry that the customer did not receive the seat she reserved and paid for. More importantly, we are disappointed that the customer has chosen to publicly attack our employees and other customers by posting derogatory and slanderous comments and photos in social media. Her actions are unnecessary and unacceptable.

Just two days earlier, rapper ScHoolboy Q accused United Airlines of putting his dog on the wrong flight, and United’s response was much more conventional:

When customers tweet their complaints at most companies, chances are they will get an apology and a request for more information — unless of course they’re tweeting at Wendy’s, in which case they’ll get roasted.

Chains like Wendy’s and Denny’s have mastered building relationships and responding to customers, even complaints, in a lighthearted way. Smirnoff and Reebok have both taken the opportunity to poke fun at the Trump administration, much to the delight of social media.

Delta’s clapback, however, was met with a mixed response.

“Our response is not that much different than a few days before on another attack,” Delta spokesman Anthony Black said in an email, referencing Delta’s response to comments made by Qatar CEO Akbar Al Baker’s.

Such a strong condemnation could be viewed as “attacking her and her views simultaneously,” according to Daniel Korschun, an associate professor of marketing at Drexel University in Philadelphia. These views are likely shared by many of their customers.

“I think they may have overreacted,” he said. “Generally it is in the company’s best interest to treat all customers the same.”

Korschun said he believes companies can and should be transparent about their political leanings, and that doing so can be great marketing technique. His research shows that customers expect companies that prioritize their core values to take a stand on important issues.

The jury is still out on what Delta’s response will mean for its image. Meck says that while unpopular stances may incite social media backlash, it doesn’t often affect a company’s bottom line.

“Americans expect companies to take a stance or respond to an issue or current event, even if the issue is perceived as political — as long as the company explains it motivation,” Meck said. “In these respects, Delta passed with flying colors.”

I have no doubt that Delta pushed Ann around (or tried to anyway) because she’s white, blonde, and an effective spokesperson for conservative politics.

Take a look at this Delta Tweet and understand that the company is a cesspool of “progressive” thinking:

I’ve said from the beginning that I thought Delta’s dirty tricks were coming out of the faggot agenda. I’ve seen nothing to change my mind.

Ann, always colorful in her word choice really gave me a laugh when she described the female passenger given her seat with extra leg room as being dachshund-legged.

Haha. That woman doesn’t look white to me, so there may be some racial animosity at play, as well as political correctness. Ann claims she was an immigrant.

In any case, this little guy wouldn’t need the extra leg room:

Politics? Delta Boots Ann Coulter from Reserved Seat

It’s easy to believe that a far-left employee at Delta Airlines decided to punish leggy conservative Ann Coulter for her conservative political and social views. In fact, I’ll bet the scalawag who did the dirty deed is a sodomite male. This is exactly the kind of dirty trick those freaks like to play.

New York Post

Conservative columnist Ann Coulter flew into a fit of fury Saturday after Delta Airlines booted her from her reserved “Comfort+’’ seat — which comes with 3 additional inches of legroom — and gave it to another passenger.

In a two-hour tweeting tantrum,she quoted her exchange with a flight attendant: “Why are you taking me out of the extra room seat I specifically booked?’’ she asked.

Their answer, she said, was “I don’t know.’’

The 6-foot-tall Coulter, who is 55, tweeted a picture of the woman who got her aisle seat on the flight from LaGuardia to Florida, noting, “Delta didn’t give my extra room seat to an air marshal or tall person.’’

A Delta spokesman said it appeared Coulter was in the same extra-room row, just in a different seat. But he promised to look into it.

One Twitter user, clearly not a fan of the columnist, wrote. “Ann Coulter is having a bad day which makes my day better. Thanks Delta.”

Jim Stone Freelance: The Jews are Begging for the Holocaust to Happen for Real

In all honesty, it seems that it would take an entire enclopedia of books, labeled A through Z to lay out all the crimes of the Jews.

As the world wakes up to the magnitude of Jewish mischief, Jim Stone theorizes that there will be an ethnic cleansing of Jews in the future.

Jim Stone Freelance

The more astute will realize that the Jews pulled the six million crap with World War 1 also, but it failed because nothing at all happened. Up until the late 70’s the world war 2 six million crap flopped also because despite Hitler actually doing something, there was no extermination campaign, only an imprisonment campaign and it took them that long to re-write the history. Quite a few people died in the prison camps, they were not nice, but the numbers were no where near what is presently claimed and included all prisoners, not just Jews.

Whatever happened, they made a full recovery and in this day and age, they are:

1. Openly and actively subverting the President of the United States.

2. Ensuring they own the future of food by making everything GMO so they own the patents on the seeds, and deny everyone the god given right to plant seeds that are the product of subsequent agriculture. Additionally, the GMO variants do not even register in tests as being legitimate versions of what is claimed. Worse, the Jews have infiltrated many governments, and at that level have successfully made it illegal to plant heirloom seeds, with their greatest success stories being in Africa. It is obvious what their end game is with this.

3. Rigging ALL elections to the maximum extent possible, so the will of the people is not heard, only their agenda is.

4. Destroying as many children as possible as much as possible with intentionally tainted vaccines that wreck all that receive them, with the most damaged showing the damage as autism.

5. Causing the bankruptcies of nations via rigged central banks, only to receive 10 or more times the amount of the actual bankruptcy values in the form of “bailouts” which are then used to buy up assets and establish Jewish monopolies on everything in business. This will ensure Jewish supremacy over anyone who rises up to compete in business because if the Jews own all the major stores (they now do) they can kill any competition by simply refusing to put the competition’s products in their stores.

6. Destroying the entire backbone of Western civilization via brainwashing in college, destruction of men in family courts in an effort to make sure their influence is greatly diminished, and forced and unwanted immigration no Western nation is actually asking for on a root societal level.

7. They have attained approximately 95 percent ownership of all media and communications, which they are now using to crush legitimate discussion and bury the truth to the maximum extent possible. This extends to the intelligence agencies which have been fully infiltrated and now act only as arms of a great hedgemony that will quickly isolate and/or kill anyone who presents a threat to the Jewish agenda.

8. They have successfully usurped the entire medical industry and system of checks and balances, which is supposed to keep destructive drugs (like antidepressants) out of the hands of the greater public. While doing so, they have increased the cost of medical care by up to a thousand times in some cases, and at least 10X in all cases. Obviously they see the medical system as a weapon that can be exploited to destroy a nation.

The Jews may be facing a holocaust for real this time around, because despite the fact that they have overtaken a lot, it appears to have been a day too late, and too many people know too much. What is the fitting revenge for destroying countless millions of children via tainted vaccines? What is the legitimate revenge for the pain and suffering they have caused with the family courts? And I did not even mention their wars and extermination programs (like what happened in Ukraine) which are widely known, or their expungement of our historical record via the destruction of the libraries, and subsequent wiping of the internet, indeed, the list of their crimes is so huge that it is impossible for an individual to even scratch the surface.

They did too much while being too vulnerable, and what has happened to CNN proves it. Too many people see right through them at this point, and if they try to spring their trap (they probably will) at this point, it will likely backfire badly, and trigger a real extermination effort. And I won’t cry.

CNN JEWS.

Ann Coulter notices the CNN Jews:

Berkeley: Cowardly Antifa Mostly Stay Away from Tough Guys McInnes, Stickman, et. al.

Although Gavin McIness isn’t much of an alt-right guy, you may remember the happy moment in Washington, D.C. in January when he punched out a leftist who attacked him at Deploraball.

None of the boring speakers at today’s free speech event in Berkeley, California are true alt-right or even race realists. Richard Spencer and David Duke were notably not invited by the self-promoting Twitter people who did speak. The speakers list included Brittany Pettibone, Lauren Southern, Stickman, McIness, and Baked Alaska. All of them seem to be Civic Nationalists, although they at least support the Wall.

Although I personally was hoping that Louise Rosealma (aka hairy fetish model Venus Rosales) would show up and get another whupping, the antifa stood down in the face of the presence of a few tough guys today.

CBS Local San Francisco

BERKELEY (CBS SF) – Hundreds of far-right protesters, some dressed in goggles, gas masks and knee pads, were rallying in support of conservative speaker Ann Coulter in downtown Berkeley.

Some at the rally at Civic Center Park were wearing combat gear, including military grade ballistic helmets and body armor. Dozens of police in riot gear stood by ready to crack down on violence as had been anticipated between provocateurs of both the alt-right and antifa (anti-fascist).

Many of the pro-Coulter protesters have “Build That Wall” or “Trump” stickers across their helmets and several are concealing their identities wearing mirrored ski goggles over their eyes.

As of 3:00 p.m. there was no sign of their antifa opponents, who have violently clashed with the far-right demonstrators previously in Berkeley.

Continue reading

Doom On! Alt-Right Berkeley Rally Live on Twitter and Youtube

As usual with live streams, this one could go down at any moment. For now, it’s up and the rally, which was supposed to begin at 2 P.M. California time, should be underway.

Watch on youtube if it works better for you.

Updated with Tim Pool’s live broadcast on youtube. This guy is good.

New Battle of Berkeley in an Hour: Based Stickman, Baked Alaska, Brittany Pettibone, Gavin McIness et. al. Facing Antifa Thugs

I’ve been seeing Tweets like this one from yesterday on a number of alt-right sites:

Lauren Southern will be there too.

This is the speaking lineup.

Baked Alaska is leading a multi-ethnic group of Trump supporters to the event. It’s not just for whites only and unlike the lies the leffist media is pushing these are not “violent, far right extremists”, as you can see in the video.

Jack Posobiec reports the antifa intends murderous attacks:

Drudge has the link to the CBS Local San Francisco story at the top of his page now. This is the version produced by other local media that is just as biased and inaccurate as the fake news produced by CBS.

SFgate

Police officers were out in force Thursday on the UC Berkeley campus and in a nearby park, gearing up for the possibility of yet another day of violent clashes between fringe groups on the right and left in the wake of the cancellation of a visit by conservative commentator Ann Coulter.

On campus, nearly 100 police officers were positioned outside the student union, at the Telegraph Avenue entrance to the university and in Sproul Plaza, where one person was arrested in the morning after refusing to identify himself or remove a surgical mask.

The man, who wasn’t identified, was questioned by university police after briefly holding a sign that officers said was larger than a limit of 30 inches by 30 inches. Despite returning the sign to protestors, police asked the man to remove the mask so they could take a picture, or provide identification. The man refused and was then cuffed in plastic restraints and told he was being arrested on suspicion of obstructing officers.

Even as campus workers set up a perimeter of orange barricades, hundreds of conservative and pro-Coulter protesters were arriving in the morning at the city’s Martin Luther King Jr. Civic Center Park a few blocks to the east.

The protesters have accused Berkeley officials of stifling free speech in their response to plans by a student group, the Berkeley College Republicans, to host controversial speakers like Coulter and former Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos.

The park was the site of previous pro-President Trump rallies that yielded fights, bloody assaults, arrests and second-guessing of the ability of city police to intervene. Some groups descending on Berkeley Thursday vowed to bring makeshift weapons, including sharpened spikes and bike locks, to protect themselves. Others urged participants to be “battle ready.”

In the past, far-right protesters, including white nationalists, have wielded sticks and knives, while counter-protesters with their own weapons have worn all black and covered their faces, employing what are known as black bloc tactics.

That last paragraph is bullshit of the worst kind. Based Stickman had a flag on a flag pole, not weapon. I’ve shown you that the antifa was selling knives to their group, not the White Nationalists, such as Richard Spencer or Jared Taylor.

Here’s an on the ground video posted by Cernovich. I don’t know who made the video. It’s not Cernovich’s voice. Lots of helicopters in the air can be heard over the voice.

The latest I can find. These Tweets are minutes old as I’m posting.

McIness explains what the purpose is.

More later as events warrant.

Determined Ann Coulter to Speak at Berkeley Public Square on Thursday

This story broke about a half hour ago. The situation is fluid and subject to change. The important thing to bear in mind is that the liberal/progressive/Communist police state in Berkeley wants Ann not to speak. If she does speak, some of them would like her dead, which poses problems for law enforcement.

By this point in time, the Berkeley police have had plenty of time to infiltrate the violent criminal thug groups that call themselves the antifa. If a pro-white group were as violent, all its leaders would be under arrest and charged with hate crimes.

The Hill

Conservative pundit Ann Coulter will give a speech at a public plaza at the University of California at Berkeley on Thursday, sparking concerns about massive protests causing safety hazards.

Coulter will speak at Sproul Plaza, the legendary site of the 1960s Free Speech Movements, an area that is open to the public.

UC Berkeley’s chancellor Nicholas Dirks told the Washington Post the school is worried about not being able to screen attendees for weapons.

If the event were inside, the university could use metal detectors and otherwise search for weapons, Dirks said.

“In an open space, you have almost no control over that,” he added, according to the Post report. “The challenges are immense.”

The Post report indicated the school is readying police for the event.

Coulter has repeatedly insisted she will speak on Thursday, despite Berkeley initially canceling the event over safety concerns. Berkeley attempted to move the event date until May 2, but Coulter rejected the proposed change.

“Nice day for an outdoor speech at Berkeley,” Coulter tweeted Monday, sharing a Thursday weather report for the area.

On Monday, the students who initially invited Coulter to speak filed a lawsuit against the school.

The suit accuses “university administrators and campus police” of “repressive actions” to stifle free speech.

Berkeley’s concerns for safety follows massive protests that erupted on campus in February, after the same College Republicans group that invited Coulter brought right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos to speak at the university.

A Berkeley student who is a member of the student groups that invited Coulter told the Post that he shares the school’s concerns for safety, and they are hoping to find an off-campus space for the talk.

He said Coulter has still insisted she will speak at the public plaza.

“We’re worried about it turning into a huge battle between her security and conservative militia and anti-fascists and others,” student Pranav Jandhyala told the Post. “To have that right in middle of Sproul doesn’t bode well for the image of our school or the city. We’re worried about violence and student safety and our own safety as well. It’s a huge safety concern.”

While I was putting together this post, Breitbart broke the news that the Young Americans for Freedom are pulling out of the Ann Coulter event due to the extreme danger. YAF blames a university administration hostile to free speech for their action. I believe we might call their action cowardly.