Ungrateful Illegal Invaders Disrupt Nancy Pelosi’s DACA Press Conference

Five minutes of idiotic, organized shouting. These subhumans are not civilized and can never be civilized. Arrest, then deport. These f*cks need to be reined in by any means necessary. Watch! Five minutes.

The ungrateful wretches are sh*tting in their own milkpail, as Nancy and her Demoncrats would legalize all of them in a second to get their votes.

Breitbart

A group of illegal aliens calling themselves the “Immigration Liberation Movement” crashed a press conference by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Monday, warning the Democratic Party not to “sell [us] out.”

The group shouted down Rep. Pelosi, who struggled to maintain control of the meeting, and unfurled a large banner calling for all illegal aliens to be legalized.

Others held up signs, including: “Fight 4 All 11 Million,” referring to the estimated total of all illegal aliens in the U.S.

In the “mic check” call-and-response style popularized by the Occupy Wall Street protests in 2011, the activists declared:

We remember all too well how for eight years the Democrats laid siege to our communities, raiding and deporting nearly three million people, of our family members and loved ones. Where was your resistance then? Ms. Pelosi, did you think we would forget? We send a clear message to our fellow undocumented youth and community: We are the resistance to Trump! Not the Democrats!

The activists also chanted “Brown power!” In a show of “intersectionality” — solidarity among left-wing groups — they also chanted “Trans lives matter!” and other slogans, while Pelosi stood silently behind the throng.

“You met with Trump, and you call that resistance?” they shouted in unison.

Watch Pelosi praise these ***holes before they shout her down again. One minute.

Earlier, Pelosi had spoken at the podium with community leaders and fellow members of Congress from the Bay Area in support of her legislative push for a bill that would legalize the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

President Donald Trump canceled DACA earlier this month, but left Congress a six-month window in which to find a legislative solution for the roughly 800,000 DACA beneficiaries. Pelosi said that she wanted the “DREAM Act,” a long-dormant Democratic Party bill that goes much further than DACA, “to be the basis of how we go forward.”

“We’re not giving up our fight to protect America’s dreamers,” she said.

However, she could not speak over the protests. “It’s clear you don’t want any answers,” she said.

As if to support her point, activists chanted: “All of us — or none of us,” meaning that they would only accept full amnesty for all illegal aliens, not just DACA beneficiaries.

Watch Tucker Carlson blast illegals as he brings an illegal on his show, at Fox News Insider.

#NaziBucketChallenge: Trump’s Embrace of “Dreamer” Amnesty Wins Him No Friends Among Liberals

YEP, THAT’S A NAZI FOR YOU.

President Donald Trump lost his base when he stopped talking tough about Obama’s so-called Dreamers. Unfortunately for him, he didn’t pick up support from the American liberal, whose hatred of the “Orange cheeto” knows no limits.

I’m not sure of the origins of the Twitter hashtage #NaziBucketChallenge, but it’s #1 trending on Twitter this Friday morning.

It’s actually a pretty simple theme:

One of the things I learned from Microchip (who seems to have disappeared from Twitter after his latest ban) is that Twitter pushes certain hashtags into trending when they don’t deserve it.

Microchip also was aware that not all Tweets are created by real humans.

None of these Tweets make any sense to anyone who’s not mental. It would be great if Donald Trump were a White Supremacist, but he’s not. From his friendships with Oprah, Mike Tyson, Omarosa and other blacks, he’s proven that he’s a race mixer.

All of these Tweets, the real ones anyway, are just self-hating whites and nonwhites expressing their desire to see the white race exterminated in an orgy of white genocide.

If President Trump thought that his outreach to Democrats to amnesty millions of Dreamers and their relatives would win him fans among liberals, he miscalculated.

Trump Treason? Alleged Deal with Democrats Allows “Dreamers ” to Stay

UNPINNED 9/14/2017. PINNED TO THE TOP OF THE HOMEPAGE. SCROLL DOWN FOR NEWEST POSTS.

There’s significant disagreement about the breaking news that President Trump has struck a deal with Democrats to amnesty what would appear to be 800,000 so-called Dreamers. In reality, once they have amnesty, the door opens for millions more via a court ruling.

Here’s the story from the AP, followed by some views that claim that Trump has betrayed his base, with others dissenting.

All I can say is that if Trump has struck a deal with the swamp creatures that goes soft on DACA, I’d be shocked.

Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The top House and Senate Democrats said Wednesday they had reached agreement with President Donald Trump to protect thousands of younger immigrants from deportation and fund some border security enhancements — not including Trump’s long-sought border wall.

The agreement, the latest instance of Trump ditching his own party to make common cause with the opposition, was announced by Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi following a White House dinner that Republican lawmakers weren’t invited to attend. It would enshrine protections for the nearly 800,000 immigrants brought illegally to this country as kids who had benefited from former President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program, which provided temporary work permits and shielded recipients from deportation.

Trump ended the program earlier this month and gave Congress six months to come up with a legislative fix before the statuses of the so-called “Dreamers” begin to expire.

“We agreed to enshrine the protections of DACA into law quickly, and to work out a package of border security, excluding the wall, that’s acceptable to both sides,” Pelosi and Schumer said in a joint statement.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders partially disputed their characterization, saying over Twitter that “excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to.”

Either way, it was the second time in two weeks that Trump cut out Republicans to reach a deal with Pelosi and Schumer. A person briefed on the meeting, who demanded anonymity to discuss it, said the deal specifies bipartisan legislation called the DREAM Act that provides eventual citizenship for the young immigrants.

House Republicans would normally rebel over such an approach, which many view as amnesty for law-breakers. It remains to be seen how conservatives’ loyalty to Trump will affect their response to a policy they would have opposed under other circumstances.

The House’s foremost immigration hardliner, GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa, made clear that he, for one, was not happy.

Addressing Trump over Twitter, King wrote that if the reports were true, “Trump base is blown up, destroyed, irreparable, and disillusioned beyond repair. No promise is credible.”

Earlier Wednesday, during a White House meeting with moderate House members from both parties, Trump had urged lawmakers to come up with a bipartisan solution for the “Dreamers.”

“We don’t want to forget DACA,” Trump told the members at the meeting. “We want to see if we can do something in a bipartisan fashion so that we can solve the DACA problem and other immigration problems.”

Foreshadowing what was to take place later that evening, Trump said he would be open to separating the wall issue from the question of the younger immigrants, as long as the wall got dealt with eventually.

At Thursday night’s dinner, “the president was clear he would press for the wall but separate from this agreement,” said Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill.

The apparent deal is the latest example of Trump’s sudden pivot to bipartisanship after months of railing against Democrats as “obstructionist.” He has also urged them to join him in overhauling the nation’s tax code, among other priorities.

Jew Congressman’s Bridge Act Granting Amnesty to Dreamers Set for IMMEDIATE VOTE

CONGRESSMAN MIKE COFFMAN ON THE LEFT.

They couldn’t fix your health care. They couldn’t lower your taxes.

But Congress appears set to jump on amnestying so-called Dreamers for three years through the Bridge Act.

Don’t worry. It’s kosher.

The Denver Channel

DENVER — U.S. Congressman Mike Coffman, a Republican from Colorado, says he plans to file a rare “discharge petition” in Congress on Tuesday to force the House to vote on the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Coffman introduced the bill known as the Bridge Act in January, but the legislation has flown under the radar until now.

“Force Congress to act on it, I think otherwise, like the President, they kind of wanted to avoid making a decision on it,” said Coffman.

The Bridge Act provides a three-year extension of the Obama-era program that has given temporary legal status to nearly 800,000 undocumented children, including more than 18,000 so called “Dreamers” in Colorado.

“The members of Congress have a choice: They can let the program be phased out and these young people be subject to deportation, or they can sign this petition for the Bridge Act,” said Coffman. “The federal government knows where they are, so if there are deportation proceedings, they could be expedited.”

Coffman plans to file the petition on Tuesday afternoon, the same day President Donald Trump is expected to announce plans to end the DACA program with a six-month delay before the program would officially end.

The Bridge Act gives Congress three years to come up with a more permanent solution, and protects Dreamers from deportation during that time.

If more than half of the House signs on, the Bridge Act would go for an immediate vote without the lengthy committee process.

“People know the issue. I don’t think it’s all that complicated, so I think members of Congress can decide this without significant debate,” said Coffman.

Rep. Coffman also said he believes the Dream Act has constitutional problems — mainly because former President Barack Obama created the program through an executive order in 2012 after attempts to pass a bill via Congress failed.

Coffman pointed to a recent federal court case decision in 2015 that blocked a similar program. He said the court found the executive branch and president of the United States can’t make immigration law without Congress.

“The president’s in a tough position on this. I think he’d rather let it go and not deal with it, but he believes as I do that it’s not constitutional,” explained Coffman.

No Sympathy for “Dreamers”–Tell Congress

Bankers are in an outrage and Paul Ryan is in a snit.

Something really good must have happended.

What it was was President Trump ended DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). Mean Man Trump has replaced Nice Man Trump, the guy who held and kissed black babies in Houston last week.

Karl Denninger’s Market-Ticker

Spare Me The Outrage About DACA

Whether it comes from the left, right, CEOs (who love cheap labor damn the law to Hell) or others, just spare me the tears, ok?

I’m not swayed by the claim that the kids involved are blameless. That doesn’t matter; the fact is that they have accessed and consumed services in this nation to which they were not entitled over the previous years, and nobody is demanding that they pay the cost of said services back.

Theft by conversion is still theft. Yes, if you have no ability to reason at the time (because you’re a young child) then you cannot be held criminally liable for said theft, but the fact of the matter is that you still got the benefit and paid nothing for it.

That it was your parents that worked under the table (and thus evaded said taxes) or worse, stole someone’s identity (and thus committed both a criminal act and imposed direct cost on someone else) isn’t material. You were the beneficiary of that conduct — both directly in your home and indirectly in your access to schools, infrastructure, medical care and more that you wouldn’t have had. You’ve benefited greatly over these years.

May I remind you that President Obama, when he announced this program, admitted he had no legal authority to do so. Congress could have changed the law over the intervening time, and indeed prior to that time, but did not and has not.

Speaker Ryan’s mealy-mouthed nonsense is even worse, as the person who could have brought said bill to the floor of the House and hasn’t done so. He is the worst sort of hypocrite and jackass, in that he’s made a nice name for himself by claiming to be for the Rule of Law — right up until it is proposed to be enforced.

Then he turns into someone who condones said theft instead.

DACA is illegal folks. This is not about compassion, it’s about the rule of law. If someone manages to break into a bank every day and steal $20 without being caught for years or even decades that does not change the fundamental nature of their act, nor the fact that’s illegal. Getting away with an illegal act does not make it lawful; it just means, especially when it’s done openly and notoriously, that you managed to sufficiently bribe the cops.

The latter, may I remind you, is a second and more-serious offense, because corruption of the rule of law is usually considered more-serious than simply ignoring or breaking the law.

No, holding cute babies up to the camera won’t change my mind. Nor will appeals to my alleged “better side.” The fact of the matter is that our nation’s immigration laws are what they are and those who intentionally broke said laws and/or profited from same must not be rewarded for doing so by giving them the ability to stay, permanent residency or even worse, citizenship.

Nope, nope and nope. All of the DACA folks have a nation — but it’s not the United States. They’re citizens of some other country, to which they must return. Once they’ve done so if they so choose they may petition to enter the United States for the purpose of residency via the established and lawful basis, and should be expected to repay, with interest, all of their previously ill-gotten gains.

If they have acquired skills and education while here then on a score-based system they’d actually have an advantage in requesting legal status — from their nation of citizenship.

But not while here — while here they are illegal invaders, whether they knowingly broke the law or not, whether carried by their parent(s) or wildcatting on their own.

The law either must be applied evenly or it is meaningless. Congress neither has a right or an obligation to retroactively change these facts — only prospectively. The administration, for its part, has an obligation to enforce the law — not an option to do so or not, as President Obama asserted. That obligation stands as one of the primary pillars of our Constitution and in fact is an explicit component in the oath that the President, and those who serve in the executive or legislature where oaths are required, take before ascending to the office in question.

DACA must end and those who promote otherwise must be driven from public office and the boardrooms in which they sit. Those firms who profit from and advocate for the intentional violation of Federal immigration law must find the firm and all responsible executives charged under said law as accessories before and after the fact and their companies must have their charters revoked and be disbanded.

Enough.

NO amnesty. By delaying the repeal of DACA for six months, Trump has given Congress an opening to save it. I’m emailing Paul Ryan to tell him NO amnesty. He’s a POS who won’t pay attention unless we beat him over the head with his lies and flip flops. He must be defeated in 2018.

Politico: Trump has decided to end DACA, with 6-month delay

It looks like the end for dreamers. This is big if true.

By delaying the start of the termination of DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), El Presidente Trump takes a bite out of the firestorm of anger that’s going to take place.

Since Paul Ryan will step in and try to persuade Congress to restore DACA, this gives us a huge opportunity to demonize him: “Mr. Ryan, why are for denying American children their dreams. You’re giving hundreds of thousands of jobs to non-citizens, sir. Why?”

If we get lucky, Mexicans will be joined by the Antifa and riots will break out. If you’re white and older or sickly, don’t wear your MAGA caps out in public for a while. There’s no sense in making yourself a target.

Politico

President Donald Trump has decided to end the Obama-era program that grants work permits to undocumented immigrants who arrived in the country as children, according to two sources familiar with his thinking. Senior White House aides huddled Sunday afternoon to discuss the rollout of a decision likely to ignite a political firestorm — and fulfill one of the president’s core campaign promises.

Trump has wrestled for months with whether to do away with the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, known as DACA. He has faced strong warnings from members of his own party not to scrap the program and struggled with his own misgivings about targeting minors for deportation.

Conversations with Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who argued that Congress — rather than the executive branch — is responsible for writing immigration law, helped persuade the president to terminate the program, the two sources said, though White House aides caution that — as with everything in the Trump White House — nothing is set in stone until an official announcement has been made.

In a nod to reservations held by many lawmakers, the White House plans to delay the enforcement of the president’s decision for six months, giving Congress a window to act, according to one White House official. But a senior White House aide said that chief of staff John Kelly, who has been running the West Wing policy process on the issue, “thinks Congress should’ve gotten its act together a lot longer ago.”

Trump is expected to announce his decision on Tuesday, and the White House informed House Speaker Paul Ryan of the president’s decision on Sunday morning, according to a source close to the administration. Ryan had said during a radio interview on Friday that he didn’t think the president should terminate DACA, and that Congress should act on the issue.

Neither the White House nor a spokesman for Ryan immediately responded to requests for comment.

The president’s expected announcement is likely to shore up his base, which rallied behind his broader campaign message about the importance of enforcing the country’s immigration laws and securing the border. At the same time, the president’s decision is likely to be one of the most contentious of his early administration, opposed by leaders of both parties and by the political establishment more broadly.

The White House and Congress have tried to pass the issue off on each other – with each arguing that the other is responsible for determining the fate of the approximately 800,000 undocumented immigrants who are benefiting from DACA. Though most Republicans believe that rolling back DACA is a solid legal decision, they are conscious of the difficult emotional terrain. Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch joined Ryan in cautioning Trump against rolling back the program.

The president is likely to couch his decision in legalese. Many on the right, even those who support protections for children brought into the country illegally through no fault of their own, argue that DACA is unconstitutional because former President Barack Obama carried it out unilaterally instead of working through Congress.

Some Republican lawmakers, including Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, have said that Congress needs to pass a law to protect the so-called Dreamers.

“My hope is that as part of this process we can work on a way to deal with this issue and solve it through legislation, which is the right way to do it and the constitutional way to do it,” Rubio told CNN in June.

Trump’s expected decision to scrap DACA represents another challenge for Ryan and fellow congressional Republicans, who are facing an end-of-September deadline to avert a government shutdown and government debt default, while also tackling a Hurricane Harvey relief package and a major tax reform push.

Haha. Score one for Jeff Sessions. Thanks Jeff for persuading Trump to MAGA.

It looks like Ivanka lost the argument this time.

Trump Might Allow Current “Dreamers” to Stay

We’re not interested in splitting hairs or explanations. We want them out on general principle.

End DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), Mr. President.

You promised.

Excerpt from the New York Post

President Trump is mulling a split decision on the “Dreamers.”

White House sources say the president is moving toward ending new work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, without changing the status of the roughly 800,000 already enrolled in the program.

A decision on the future of the “Dreamers” is expected Tuesday.
Trump has spent the last week trying to decide what to do with the program started by former President Barack Obama in 2012, which allows young immigrants brought to the country as children to work in the US legally, while shielding them from deportation.

Despite Trump’s strident campaign speeches calling DACA an illegal “amnesty,” the fate of the young people already in the program is a key concern, according to several people familiar with his deliberations.

Ending new permits without scrapping the program altogether could be a compromise to buy time for Congress to provide alternative protection for the Dreamers, who registered after being told they would not be deported.

House Speaker Paul Ryan and other legislators are urging the president to hold off scrapping DACA, to give them time to come up with a legislative solution for those now covered by the program.

“These are kids who know no other country, who are brought here by their parents and don’t know another home. And so I really do believe that there needs to be a legislative solution,” Ryan told a Wisconsin radio station.

Trump’s decision comes as a deadline set by 10 Republican state officials critical of DACA approaches. The group told US Attorney General Jeff Sessions in a June letter they would challenge DACA in court by Sept. 5 if the president didn’t end the program.

We’ll know for sure on Tuesday.