Are Negroes Compatible With White Society? Can they be Integrated or is the Intelligence Gap Too Wide?

A member of the GLP Forum makes the argument that blacks should be segregated away from whites on the basis of IQ alone.

GLP

The first thing I am going to say so that there is no misunderstanding that as a student of anthropology I AM a “racist”. I believe there are distinct characteristics of the major races that preclude any rational or logical claim that they are “equal”. While I believe in equal opportunity for all, I do not believe in special considerations being made that favor some people over others, and this includes affirmative action or race quotas in hiring or higher education enrollment.

I believe the unrest and the racial conflict are inevitable, simply because no matter how many advantages we give them the average negro will never be able to rise to the social and economic positions of the white.

The fact is (and it is a scientific fact), the average IQ of an “African American” in the United states is a little less than 85.2, while the average IQ of a white is 100. Does this make a significant difference? Well first of all you have o understand what IQ means , and how it is measured. IQ is basically a measure of raw intelligence, the ability to process , understand and use information. It does not account for specific abilities.

Link to thealternativehypothesis.org

Link to todayifoundout.com

That being said a difference of 15 IQ points is extremely significant, especially when it is 85 as opposed to 100.

100 is intentionally set as the average IQ and is meant as a means of identifying people of below and above average IQ. If you’re above 100 you’re above average, and if your 15 points below 100, you’re WAY below average.

Less than 7% of whites have an IQ at or below 85, half of blacks do.

While 50% of whites have an IQ above 100, less than 17% of blacks have an IQ above average in the United States. In Africa or less developed countries where little racial mixing has occurred, the average IQ of blacks can be as low as 70 such as in sub Saharan Africa.

So it is easy to see that there is a huge disparity between the intelligence of Whites and blacks. It is noteworthy to mention Asians have an average IQ slightly higher than whites, at 104.3, which for all intents and purposes is insignificant hen determining social compatibility. It is obvious whites and Asians can integrate successfully based on average intelligence alone.

But 15% IS a significant difference that without a doubt has profound effects on the ability of an individual to function is a social construct “designed” primarily around an average IQ of 100.

So how can we define an average IQ of 85? Well, 85 is 15 points above what is technically referred to as mentally retarded or in politically correct terminology “mentally challenged”.

So the average black is not in fact mentally retarded, and is a full 15 IQ points above what is considered a “moron”.

But what about that >30% of blacks born in America that do fall under the threshold of a 70 IQ?

Greater than 30% of all blacks in America are technically mentally retarded.

What this means in psychological terms is they unable to unlikely to be able to be able to function in normal social situations, like for instance schooling, marriages and jobs.

For the half of Negroes above 85 IQ but below significantly below 100, integrating is challenging but not impossible or even unlikely.

The problem is half of them aren’t smart enough to function in the way our society is set up, and almost a 1/3 are going to find it near to impossible to.

And this is why we have racial inequality in America despite every effort to mitigate it. It doesn’t have anything whatsoever to do with oppression or “white privileged” , it has to do primarily with intelligence. An intelligent black man has MANY advantages over a white with equal intelligence, the problem is they are so few in number that we see few blacks in educated professional jobs with college degrees they actually earned on the sole qualification of merit.

SO naturally being the wide disparity of social success among whites and blacks despite the attempts to establish an impossible equality that has not been successful, blacks are in a continuous state of malevolent envy.

They for the most part are unable to comprehend or accept that their inequality with whites is a product of their own deficiencies, so as Abraham Lincoln said, the black man will never be able to integrate into white society and for their own good as well as for the good of whites should be segregated permanently from whites.

None of this is opinion, it is fact. WHile there are many blacks that can integrate, there are many who cannot, and since we can’t just give them IQ tests and ship the ones that come up below 70 or 85 or whatever arbitrary number we decide to set back to Africa, the only thing we can logically do is segregate them according to intelligence. That is to say we need to do away with quotas and affirmative action and allow the merits system to work.

Affirmative Action F*** Up? Commanding Officer of USS John McCain is a Puerto Rican

CMDR ALFREDO J. SANCHEZ.

The Commanding officer of the USS John McCain at the time of the collusion with an oil tanker on Monday, an accident that has left 10 sailors missing and presumed dead, was Hispanic. The second in command was Hispanic. The third in command was black.

Draw your own conclusions. It’s easy.

public.navy.mil

Commander Alfredo J. Sanchez is a native of San Juan, Puerto Rico. He earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico in May 1997. Commander Sanchez was commissioned in May 1998 from Officer Candidate School, Pensacola, Florida. After attending Primary Flight School, his first sea duty assignment was as Third Division Officer, Deck Department onboard USS ENTERPRISE (CVN 65). After attending the Surface Warfare Division Officer’s Course, Commander Sanchez completed his second division officer tour aboard USS BUNKER HILL (CG 52) as the Damage Control Assistant.

Following his division officer tours, Commander Sanchez was assigned to the Surface Officer Warfare School in Newport, Rhode Island where he served as an Instructor in the Division Officer course. After attending Department Head School in Newport, Rhode Island, Commander Sanchez was assigned as Chief Engineer onboard USS RENTZ (FFG 46) where he deployed in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM PHILIPPINES. His second department head tour was as Chief Engineer onboard USS GETTYSBURG (CG 64) and deployed with the DWIGHT D EISENHOWER Strike Group to the Arabian Gulf in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and the Horn of Africa in support of counter-piracy operations.

Following his department head tours, Commander Sanchez attended the Naval War College, and obtained a Master of Arts Degree in National Security and Strategic Studies. He later served as the Aide to the Commander Navy Air and Missile Defense Command, Dahlgren, VA. Commander Sanchez most recently completed a tour on the Joint Staff as the Egypt Desk Officer in the Strategy and Policy (J5) Middle East directorate. He reported as Executive Officer onboard USS JOHN S. McCAIN (DDG 56) on April 2015. His personal awards include the Defense Meritorious Service Medal, Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal (5 awards) and the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal (2 awards) as well as various campaign and unit awards.

There are rumors that the second in command on the USS John McCain was a Negro. I believe these guys are now relieved of duty and awaiting further action.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER JESSIE L. SANCHEZ.

COMMAND MASTER CHIEF DEDRICK L. WALKER.

There are links to Sanchez’s and Walker’s biographies at the link above,

Affirmative action kills.

Negro Coach Suspended After Forcing White High School Cheerleaders to Do Painful Splits

Well, folks, here’s a tale of a new way for a Negro to show either his stupidity or his evil nature, or both.

Ozell Williams got authority over some white cheerleaders who look to be about 14 or 15 years old and then he did his dirty deed.

A total of five people have been suspended by the Denver public school system over the torture and subsequent cover up.

Ozell may bounce back, though, because in Colorado he’s one famous Negro.

Excerpt from 9News

Denver Police are now investigating incidents involving multiple cheerleaders and the cheer coach at East High School, 9Wants to Know has learned. The cheer coach, assistant cheer coach, high school principal, assistant principal and Denver Public Schools deputy general counsel have all been placed on leave.

During the first week of cheer camp for East High School in June, Ally Wakefield, an incoming freshman was surrounded by new teammates, and forced, by the recently hired cheer coach, into an extended split position.

In videos obtained by 9Wants to Know, eight cheerleaders are shown repeatedly being pushed down into the forced splits, while their arms are held up by fellow teammates, making each cheerleader unable to move herself out of the position.

All cry out in pain. Ally Wakefield asked her coach, 9 times in less than 24 seconds to “please, stop.”

All the while, coach Ozell Williams is shown holding down each girl’s shoulders, and pushing them down further.

OZELL WILLIAMS. FAMOUS FOR HIS BACKFLIPS.

9NEWS is identifying those minors who agreed to on-the-record interviews while accompanied by their parents.

You may recognize that coach in the video. He has become a known figure for his backflips down the field during Broncos and CU football games.

This year would have been his first year coaching for the East High School cheer team, but he was placed on leave during the first week of school.

The videos, shot on a cell phone by two of the cheer team members, were sent anonymously to 9Wants to Know in August.

However, school administrators have had access to at least one video since June.

“I have attached a video of the forced splits she and her other team members were forced to do at cheerleading camp and practices; unless they had a doctor’s note. This is how Ally injured her leg,” Wakefield said in the June 15 email addressed to East High School Athletic Director, Lisa Porter.

“My husband and I would like to know what the administration is going to do about my daughter’s injury and how it happened,” the email continued, in part.

That’s a question Kirsten Wakefield and other parents are still asking.

“I don’t understand why that’s allowed,” said Cheri Nickolay, whose daughter, Anna, quit the cheer team.

Anna does not appear in any of the videos obtained by 9Wants to Know, but says that she was also forced into the splits in the same manner, as were additional teammates. She showed her mother a video of her teammate.

“That made me sick to my stomach,” Nickolay said. “I don’t know how you could justify that.”

“If I was to be personally present and witness to an approach to get a young girl to do the splits in that fashion, I would have stopped it,” said Cameron MacDonald, associate professor of physical therapy at Regis University. “I know from myself as a physical therapist that is not the approach I would take.”

Parents have, for months, launched complaints towards the school administrators and the coach himself. On August 22, 9NEWS requested numerous records related to those complaints and the cheer team from East High School. On August 23, Denver police launched their investigation.

Here’s Ozell setting a record for backflips in 2013. Youtube has stripped the sound off the video.

And here’s a second one showing Ozell doing tumbling tricks.

The source site has a video of the girls being tortured by Ozell.

Official U.S. Navy Conspiracy Theory: Navigation Systems of Crash Vessels were HACKED

USS FITZGERALD.

USS JOHN MCCAIN.

My studies of race and my training in heuristic probability and decision making tells me that the U.S. Navy will pull out all stops to avoid having to confront the negative effects of Affirmative Action on Navy effectiveness.

In other words, the most likely explanation for the ship collisions involving the McCain and the Fitzgerald involve cognitively unqualified minorities being assigned duties that led to the accidents. IQ and dutifulness matter.

There’s some chance the navigation systems were hacked, but shouldn’t the Navy be aware of such a possibility. This is the Navy that’s supposed to help America emerge victorious in World War III against Russia and China?

Spare me the unwarranted optimism. Clean out the Affirmative Action deadwood from the services and maybe the U.S. might have a fighting chance.

Daily Mail

A top admiral has said that the US Navy will ‘consider’ whether two fatal collisions this summer could have been the result of a cyber attack.

Admiral John Richardson, the chief of naval operations, said on Monday that there were ‘no indications right now’ that the two ships were hacked, but added investigators ‘will consider all possibilities’.

The shocking possibility emerged as the Navy ordered a broad investigation into the performance and readiness of the Pacific-based 7th Fleet.

Early Monday, the USS John S. McCain collided with an oil tanker in Southeast Asian waters, leaving 10 American sailors missing and several others injured.

It was the second major collision in the last two months involving the Navy’s 7th Fleet, after seven sailors died when the USS Fitzgerald and a container ship collided in waters off Japan on June 17.

Early Tuesday, three navies were hunting desperately for the McCain’s 10 missing sailors as the search and rescue mission dragged into a second day.

As part of an ongoing investigation into the USS Fitzgerald incident the Captain, the Executive Officer and Master Chief Petty Officer were removed from duty last week.

‘The collision was avoidable, and both ships demonstrated poor seamanship,’ the Navy’s 7th Fleet said in a statement, noting that ‘flawed’ teamwork among those assigned to keep watch contributed to the collision.

The Navy said the three had shown ‘inadequate leadership.’ Separately, seven junior officers were relieved of their duties because they had shown ‘poor seamanship’ and bad teamwork, 7th Fleet spokesman Cmdr. Clay Doss said on Friday.

Meanwhile , aircraft from the USS America and ships and aircraft from the navies of Malaysia and Singapore were focusing their search for the missing 10 sailors from the USS John S. McCain on an area east of the city-state where the two vessels collided early the day before at an approach to a busy shipping lane.

The McCain is now docked at Singapore’s naval base. The 7th Fleet said the McCain’s crew is emptying compartments that flooded when the collision ruptured its hull.

Richardson will call for a pause in operations and seek a deeper look at how the Navy trains and certifies its forces that are operating around Japan, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said on Monday.

Placating nonwhites has many costs to American society. Seven dead and ten missing are part of that death toll.

We should have picked our own cotton.

Report: Trump to Take University Affirmative Action Policies to Court

Affirmative Action in university admissions is race replacement. It replaces highly qualified white and Asian students with less qualified blacks, browns, trans, queers, illegals, and whatever other groups are deemed victims of white male oppression.

Once the preferred students are in, then the universities have to lower standards (grade inflation, for example) in order to push them along to graduation.

Just as the mainstream media is rotten to the core, so is American higher education.

New York Times Via NOLA

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.

The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on “investigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.”

The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the division’s front office, where the Trump administration’s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.

The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies. But the phrasing it uses, “intentional race-based discrimination,” cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minorities to university campuses.

Supporters and critics of the project said it was clearly targeting admissions programs that can give members of generally disadvantaged groups, like black and Latino students, an edge over other applicants with comparable or higher test scores.

The project is another sign that the civil rights division is taking on a conservative tilt under President Donald Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. It follows other changes in Justice Department policy on voting rights, gay rights and police reforms.

Roger Clegg, a former top official in the civil rights division during the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations who is now the president of the conservative Center for Equal Opportunity, called the project a “welcome” and “long overdue” development as the United States becomes increasingly multiracial.

“The civil rights laws were deliberately written to protect everyone from discrimination, and it is frequently the case that not only are whites discriminated against now, but frequently Asian-Americans are as well,” he said.

But Kristen Clarke, the president of the liberal Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, criticized the affirmative action project as “misaligned with the division’s long-standing priorities.” She noted that the civil rights division was “created and launched to deal with the unique problem of discrimination faced by our nation’s most oppressed minority groups,” performing work that often no one else has the resources or expertise to do.

“This is deeply disturbing,” she said. “It would be a dog whistle that could invite a lot of chaos and unnecessarily create hysteria among colleges and universities who may fear that the government may come down on them for their efforts to maintain diversity on their campuses.”

The Justice Department declined to provide more details about its plans or to make the acting head of the civil rights division, John Gore, available for an interview.

“The Department of Justice does not discuss personnel matters, so we’ll decline comment,” said Devin O’Malley, a department spokesman.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the educational benefits that flow from having a diverse student body can justify using race as one factor among many in a “holistic” evaluation, while rejecting blunt racial quotas or race-based point systems. But what that permits in actual practice by universities — public ones as well as private ones that receive federal funding — is often murky.

Clegg said he would expect the project to focus on investigating complaints the civil rights division received about any university admissions programs.

He also suggested that the project would look for stark gaps in test scores and dropout rates among different racial cohorts within student bodies, which he said would be evidence suggesting that admissions offices were putting too great an emphasis on applicants’ race and crossing the line the Supreme Court has drawn.

Some of that data, he added, could be available through the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights, which did not respond to a request for comment.

The Supreme Court most recently addressed affirmative action admissions policies in a 2016 case, voting 4-3 to uphold a race-conscious program at the University of Texas at Austin. But there are several pending lawsuits challenging such practices at other high-profile institutions, including Harvard University and the University of North Carolina. The Justice Department has not taken a position in those cases.

The pending start of the affirmative action project — division lawyers who want to work on it must submit their resumes by Aug. 9, the announcement said — joins a series of changes involving civil rights law since Trump’s inauguration.

In a lawsuit challenging Texas’ strict voter identification law, the Justice Department switched its position, dropping the claim that the law was intentionally discriminatory and later declaring that the law has been fixed. Sessions has also made clear he is not interested in using consent decrees to impose reforms on troubled police departments and has initiated a sweeping review of existing agreements.

Minneapolis Mayoral (((Candidate))): Disarm the Police

RAYMOND DEHN. JEW? I BELIEVE SO.

Raymond Denh works with Jewish Community Action to “fight injustice,” which JCA admits is a never ending fight. Since the last name Dehn is Jewish, I conclude that Dehn is a Jew.

Dehn apparently believes that too many blacks are bullied and killed by racist cops with guns, so his solution is to take away police guns.

The anarchist left would like to disarm police because as you are aware “ONLY Black Lives Matter.”

Police with guns are mostly dangerous to the likes of Michael Brown, the “Gentle Giant.” Affirmative Action cops are dangerous to everyone, especially so to Justine Damond. The solution is to end Affirmative Action.

I wonder how long it would take for law abiding citizens to flee Minneapolis if cops were disarmed, which would surely lead to an explosion in crime.

Fox9

MINNEAPOLIS (KMSP) – State Representative and Minneapolis mayoral candidate Raymond Dehn is calling for major policing changes, proposing to take away guns from the majority of officers.

Dehn is one of several candidates running to beat current Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges in the fall.

He recently won the support of voters at the Democratic Farmer Labor convention and now his call to disarm police of their side guns is garnering major attention.

“I’m not saying they don’t have access to that, just like they have access to more lethal weapons in their cars, I would believe they would still have access to their guns in their cars,” said Dehn.

Dehn says there needs to be drastic changes in how officers are trained.

He would be open to officers using other means to protect themselves like a night stick or pepper spray.

“I think as we look at how to change policing and how we get officers to not react to use their gun in situations, but learning skills around de-escalation training I think are important,” he said.

Mayor Hodges disagrees with Dehn’s proposal.

“And if we are going to talk about changes in gun policy, we shouldn’t start with police officer who are going to be operating in a world with people who have guns,” said Hodges.

Dehn says the details of his no gun proposal are still in the early stages and he wants to sit down with police officers and come up with a strategy that keeps both the community and law enforcement safe.

But the head of the police union, Lt. Bob Kroll, says there’s not a chance this idea would fly with any cop.

“I don’t think the people in Minneapolis are logically ready for anything like this,” said Kroll. “Who would ever do the job of policing again? It’s absolutely an absurd thought.”

Fox 9 reached out to several of the other candidates running for mayor. All agreed that there needs to be substantial reform within the police department, but they say stripping officers’ guns is going too far.

Night sticks and pepper spray against bullet? You can see how that would turn out.

It’s the Law: Allegedly Downlow Mohamed Noor Has to Give a Statement on the Justine Damond Shooting, But …!!!

Still employed Officer Mohammed Noor should have been subjected to police questioning the night he killed Justine Damond. As of this writing, he hasn’t been questioned, but he’s had plenty of time to put together his story. In fact, since he was riding with another officer at the time, both should have been questioned already.

Here’s an interesting tidbit: Noor allegedly fired around his partner to kill Justine while they were in the backseat of their patrol car. Were they having queer sex in the backseat, interrupted by Justine who had called police to report that either people were having sex in the alley behind her home or someone was being raped.

Remember, this is Minneapolis, where the Chief was a lesbian woman and the city is committed to “inclusiveness,” meaning hiring degenerates of all kinds.

Minneapolis Star-Tribune

Mohamed Noor has a constitutional right not to talk with anyone pursuing potential criminal charges in the shooting death of Justine Damond on July 15.

But he’ll still likely have to talk with investigators.

If the Minneapolis Police Department opens an internal investigation into the shooting, the law requires him to talk if he wants to keep his job. But even if he does that, what he says to internal affairs can never be used in a criminal case.

“That’s the trade-off the Supreme Court made,” said Twin Cities employment attorney Marshall Tanick.

Tanick is referring to a 1967 ruling, Garrity vs. New Jersey, involving police in the Garden State accused of corruption. When the officers were questioned, they were told they could invoke their constitutional right not to talk, but if they stayed silent, they’d be fired. Prosecutors later used their statements to convict them.

The officers appealed, with the U.S. Supreme Court saying anything that public employees say as part of an internal investigation cannot be used in a criminal case.

“The Supreme Court wanted to encourage people to talk,” Tanick said.

In Minnesota, public employees under internal investigation are now read a Garrity Warning, which says that though they are not legally required to say anything, their employer requires it. If an employee doesn’t cooperate, or fails to tell the truth, they could get fired.

But the statement makes clear that any information gathered during an interview can’t be used in a criminal case.

“Because you are being required to provide information under the threat of disciplinary action, the information you provide, and any evidence resulting from the information you provide, cannot and will not be used against you in any subsequent criminal proceeding,” the warning reads.

Any use of information provided to internal investigators could derail a criminal case. Defense attorneys for two Minneapolis police officers charged with felony crimes unrelated to the Damond shooting are trying to use the Supreme Court’s Garrity decision to help their clients.

For Christopher Reiter, who faces a felony third-degree assault charge for allegedly kicking a man in the face in May 2016, his attorney is arguing that police and prosecutors used information from Reiter’s internal affairs interviews to help the criminal case. Reiter wants a hearing that could see the charges get dismissed.

Efrem Hamilton wants the Hennepin County attorney’s office tossed from his case as he faces felony assault charges for allegedly shooting at a car. In May, his attorney filed a motion arguing that prosecutors used internal information gathered as part of their case.

Judges for both cases have not ruled on the motions.

It’s worth noting that Garrity rights do not apply to private companies and employees. The constitution only protects people from the actions of government, said Don Taylor, a labor professor at the University of Wisconsin.

Garrity rights, Taylor said, are “a manifestation of the [U.S. Constitution’s] Fifth Amendment rights that everybody has that you can’t be compelled to incriminate yourself.”