Study: Whites Work the Hardest and Longest

Some races are lazy.

Who’d have thought that?

Just our ancestors who observed lazy Indians and blacks first hand.

The lead author on an article studying work effort is highly respected Jewish economist Dan Hammermesh. I recall first reading his work probably 20 years ago or more. His name on a study guarantees it will be taken seriously by economists.

Zerohedge

A trio of labor economists suggest that effort at work is correlated with race…

As The Economist writes, [4] given the long history of making racial slurs about the efforts of some workers, any study casting black and Hispanic men as lazier than whites and Asians is sure to court controversy.

But, a provocative working paper by economists Daniel Hamermesh, Katie Genadek and Michael Burda [5] sticks a tentative toe into these murky waters.

They suggest that America’s well-documented racial wage gap is overstated by 10% because minorities, especially men, spend larger portions of their workdays not actually working.

Uncomfortable though the topic may be, the authors have attempted a rigorous analysis.

The study’s method is straightforward. The data come from nearly 36,000 “daily diaries”, self-reporting on how Americans spent their working hours, collected from 2003 to 2012.

Relying on the assumption that workers are equally honest in admitting sloth, the authors calculate the fraction of time spent not working while on the job – spent relaxing or eating, say – and find that it varies by race to a small but statistically significant degree.

The gap remains, albeit in weaker form, even with the addition of extensive controls for geography, industry and union status, among others. Non-white male workers spend an additional 1.1% of the day not working while on the job, or an extra five minutes per day.

Assuming their controls are adequate, that would still leave 90% of the wage difference between white workers and ethnic minorities, which was recently estimated to be 14%, unexplained.

After rejecting a number of plausible explanations for why this might be, the authors finally attribute the discrepancy to unexplained “cultural differences”.

Acutely aware of the sensitivity of these findings, the professors delayed publication until after the presidential election, releasing their report in January.

“I knew full well that Trump and his minions would use it as a propaganda piece,” says Mr Hamermesh, a colourful and respected labour economist. The paper may yet be seized on by those who are keen to root out “political correctness” and are perennially unhappy with current anti-discrimination laws.

When asked what motivated the study of such a sensitive topic, QZ’s Allison Schrager notes [7] that Hamermesh, typical of economists driven by pure intellectual curiosity, said it hadn’t occurred to him that it might be so controversial.

But, denunciations came quickly, however. Within hours of publication, Mr Hamermesh received vitriolic messages and was labelled a racist in an online forum popular among economists. Mr Hamermesh, an avowed progressive, who refers to Donald Trump only by amusing nicknames and resigned from a post at the University of Texas over a state law permitting the open carrying of firearms, finds this unfair.

He notes that Americans work too much. His preferred solution would not be for some groups to work more, but for others to work less.

If whites are now proven right about the lazy nonwhite worker, then just think how right we are in total about race.

A saboteur would copy the Zerohedge piece at home or at the public library and anonymously leave it on the boss’s desk at work.

It’s not discrimination if the nonwhite really is less productive and is treated that way.

The “racist” comments at Zerohedge are often hilarious. Check them out if you have the time.

Samples:

Its okay to admit coloreds are better athletes than whites, but it is rayciss to point out they are dumber and lazier than whites.

It surveyed blacks WHO HAD A JOB.

The study was self-reporting. Blacks also lie more than Hispanics.

i bet blacks and hispanics did not honestly report their hours so the real numbers would be even worse

Personally I want to know what happened to the asian women in the graph, nail-painting was it, or Facebook? 😀

Black Female Apple Diversity Chief Forced Out After Saying White Men Can Also Be ‘Diverse’

An ominous message has been sent to women of color by Apple. Get with the program or get out.

Zerohedge

Silicon Valley’s disdain for its mostly white, mostly male tech workforce has reached absurd new heights.

The New York Post [4] is reporting that, after just six months on the job, Apple Diversity Chief Denise Young Smith, who was named vice president of diversity and inclusion in May, has resigned her post after making a “controversial” comment last month during a summit in Bogota, Colombia.

What was Young’s crime? She insinuated that “diversity” can still exist among a group of white men because of their different life experiences.

“There can be 12 white, blue-eyed, blond men in a room and they’re going to be diverse too because they’re going to bring a different life experience and life perspective to the conversation,” the inaugural diversity chief said.

DENISE YOUNG SMITH. SHE TOLD AN UNWANTED TRUTH.

“Diversity is the human experience,” she said, according to Quartz. “I get a little bit frustrated when diversity or the term diversity is tagged to the people of color, or the women, or the LGBT.”

That’s right: Young, who is – for the record – a black woman, has been forced out of Apple because her views on diversity were too inclusive.

As the Post pointed out, Young’s comments appeared to defend Apple’s overwhelmingly white and male leadership at a time when the company’s makeup is markedly uneven. This begs the question: What, exactly, was she defending them from?

Young, a 20-year Apple veteran who previously served as the company’s head of worldwide human resources (a senior level position), was later forced to apologize for her remarks, telling Apple staff that her comments “were not representative of how I think about diversity or how Apple sees it.”

“For that, I’m sorry,” she said in an email. “More importantly, I want to assure you Apple’s view and our dedication to diversity has not changed.”

“We deeply believe that diversity drives innovation,” an Apple spokesman told TechCrunch in a statement. “We’re thrilled to welcome an accomplished leader like Christie Smith to help us continue the progress we’ve made toward a more diverse workplace.”

In 2017, only 3 percent of Apple’s leaders were black, and women held just 23 percent of tech jobs, according to Fortune. Female leadership stood at 29 percent, Apple said.

“Meaningful change takes time,” the company said in its diversity report. “We’re proud of our accomplishments, but we have much more work to do.”

Smith will leave the company at the end of the year. Taking over as VP of inclusion and diversity will be Christie Smith, who spent 17 years as a principal at Deloitte.

She is also a white woman.

Like the writer at Zerohedge said, the word “absurd” best explains this insanity. Denise Young Smith simply wasn’t anti-white and that wasn’t good enough for Apple.

Out of curiosity I looked up a photo of Miss Smith’s replacement, “white” Christie Smith. OK, is she Jewish or not? Lesbian or normal?

Caught on Hidden Camera: Nigger Nurses Abuse Elderly White Patient Who Dies, No Punishment (Video)

The abused patient is dead. The video is the result of an investigation by a local TV station. Kudos to them.

Six and a half minutes. Only 11,000 views. Please share and warn people about the danger of Nigger nurses.

11Alive
Published on Nov 13, 2017

The nursing home didn’t want you to see the video.

Click on the video to read the youtube comments. There are only 15 of them, but people get it. If you’re white, you must have white medical personnel looking after you.

Explaining the Spread of White Anger

Regular Unz.com contributor Robert Weissberg offers a thoughtful analysis of why whites are fed up with diversity.

I’ve pulled 500 words out of a 1,600 word essay. Furthermore, there are numerous excellent comments at Unz. Before going to the article excerpt, consider this short, spot on comment #17:

Affirmative action is just a tiny part of the explanation. It’s just one of the tools in the programme of White Genocide. As a European, I will not allow my homeland to be overrun – and ultimately conquered through bloodshed – by low IQ hostiles. This is basic survival and no amount of job opportunities can “fix” my “anger”.

The Unz site is not the Daily Stormer and I don’t believe it allows commenters to name the Jew, so it’s all the more interesting that the the phrase “white genocide” made it to the comments.

Unz.com

The phrase “angry white males” has been around awhile, but Donald Trump’s election has pushed it to the forefront. Indeed, at least for some, it is central to Trump’s election. As Steven M. Gillon put it in The Washington Post, “Donald Trump has tapped into this anger and manipulated it to his political advantage. The bond between President Trump and his white followers is not based on policy but on grievance. They both reject the cultural changes over the past half-century, and Trump’s Make America Great Again slogan signals his intent to unravel them.”

Whether this anger is somehow justified is, of course, a question of immense complexity but let me offer three observations that explain its scope regardless of its justification. My point is that affirmative action and other egalitarian social engineering nostrums inescapably spreads antagonisms beyond those immediately affected by the policies. And the anger will only grow as government keeps pushing the egalitarian fantasy.

First, violating the merit principle, whether in college admissions or hiring police officers guarantees disgruntled white males far in excess of its true victims. Consider hiring five firefighters strictly according to civil service exam scores. Let’s assume that a hundred men apply for the position and can be ranked by test scores. The top four are white and are hired. Now, thanks to a Department of Justice consent decree, the fire department must hire at least one African American from the list and if the highest ranking black scores at 20 in the array he will be hired despite his middling score.

How many white males have actually lost their job to a black? The correct answer is exactly one, the fifth ranking applicant. But how many whites will mistakenly believe that they lost out to an affirmative action candidate? The answer is 14 since this is the number of rejected white candidates between 6 and 19 and, to be honest, all can make a legitimate claim of being passed over to satisfy the diversity bean counters. Further fueling this anger is that each of those fourteen “unfairly” rejected applicants may complain to family and friends and thus tales of the alleged injustice multiply though, in fact, only a single white applicant lost out to a less qualified black.

No wonder Trump received such enthusiastic welcomes by white males—the anger has been silently boiling for decades and this was perhaps the first instance where it could be expressed albeit indirectly. Imagine if a speaker at a Trump a rally was more forthcoming: “We are sick and tired of being pushed aside so that some incompetent minority can take our place in the name of diversity whose only purpose is to make some airhead social justice warrior feel good about herself. How many people in this audience personally know anybody who lost their job to a less-qualified ‘diversity candidate’? Give me a show of hands.”

One can only imagine the panic of every corporate CEO, college president and other Thinkgood Americans upon hearing this speech. They would demand that Trump immediately repudiate it. The White Male Martyrs Brigade has awakened and is on the march.

American Navy Crashes Blamed on Lazy, Incompetent Affirmative Action Sailors

USS FITZGERALD.

USS JOHN MCCAIN.

THE MCCAIN IN PORT FOR REPAIRS.

Diversity is our strength. Except when it’s not.

Putting diversity in charge of keeping large warships safe and in operating condition is one of Obama’s legacies.

God help America is the dummies running these ships ever come up against real sailors in wartime.

Excerpt from Zerohedge

Here’s a more likely scenario – its driven and manned by a bunch of incompetent sailors, who very well may have gotten there through some kind of affirmative action nonsense, or social promotion, where pople get qualifications on things they aren’t competent enough to handle because no CO wants to get accused of racism or sexism for failing a black/women/whatever person on the oral board for underway watches. I’ve never been in the Navy, but I’ve seen it, many times. People given way more responsiblity that they are competent to handle, and you just sit back and wait for them to do something stupid, while hoping no one gets hurt. Also, they are probably spending more time doing mandated training on SJW type nonsense than learning how to sail their boat.

Never attribute something to highly complex malice when it can easily be contributed to stupidity and/or incompetence. Thats how Occam would slice it.

A complete breakdown in seafaring culture, from top to bottom. The lookouts either failed or had their reports ignored. The radarmen failed to kep track. The bridge lookouts failed, the officer of the deck failed, and the C/O failed by not ensuring that he had competent people at every position. His C/O failed because he knew that the ship captain was incapable of taut management, and likely knew that many of the junior officers and petty officers were untrained and incompetent.

A complete failure of culture. God help them if they become hard targets in a shooting engagement.

I’ve worked on vessels in the oil field my whole life and have seen the decline in discipline and accountability. With so many wireless devices it’s almost impossible to keep people focused on their task. If they would disconnect the internet from these vessels and keel hull a few of the captains most of the problem would go away.
Hacking, GPS spoofing, etc are all things that should be investigated. However IMO they are unlikely. What seems more likely to me is there is a breakdown of operational discipline.

However this was brought on is open for much debate. A large factor that I think contributes, is the shift away from the military from being an instrument of death to our enemies to a global force for good and social engineering experiments.

And in the case of the USS Fitzgerald and USS John S. McCain, the Navy has ruled [9] that incompetence was indeed the cause of [10] the incidents:

The collision between Fitzgerald and Crystal was avoidable and resulted from an accumulation of smaller errors over time, ultimately resulting in a lack of adherence to sound navigational practices. Specifically, Fitzgerald’s watch teams disregarded established norms of basic contact management and, more importantly, leadership failed to adhere to well-established protocols put in place to prevent collisions. In addition, the ship’s triad was absent during an evolution where their experience, guidance and example would have greatly benefited the ship.

The collision between John S. McCain and Alnic MC was also avoidable and resulted primarily from complacency, over-confidence and lack of procedural compliance. A major contributing factor to the collision was sub-standard level of knowledge regarding the operation of the ship control console. In particular, McCain’s commanding officer disregarded recommendations from his executive officer, navigator and senior watch officer to set sea and anchor watch teams in a timely fashion to ensure the safe and effective operation of the ship. With regard to procedures, no one on the Bridge watch team, to include the commanding officer and executive officer, were properly trained on how to correctly operate the ship control console during a steering casualty.

Relevant comment at Zerohedge:

This affirmative active action shit is blowing up in people’s faces. Good. Took long enough.

That is what they get for promoting niggers not because of what they could do but because they were a nigger.

Everyone knows the game. I say let the niggers run the military. See how many other ships are torn up and destroyed. Heck I am betting at least one more incident with 10-or-more dead SMs by the end of the year.

Super Dykey Professor: Replace ‘Traditional Science’ With ‘Anti-Science, Antiracist, Feminist Approach’

SARA GIORDANO. SCIENCE IS RACIST AND MUST GO.

Man, oh man.

When that one turned dyke she decided to go all the way.

What a f*cking freak!

It’s almost too much to have to look at her in order to put together this post.

But I soldier on.

Daily Caller

A women’s studies professor at the University of California, Davis has declared that the time has come to replace “traditional science” with “a much needed anti-science, antiracist, feminist approach to knowledge production.”

The professor is Sara Giordano, according to Campus Reform.

Giordano, who has a Ph.D. in neuroscience but has chosen to pursue a career in the field of gender, sexuality and women’s studies, expounds on her thesis in a lengthy essay in Catalyst, a feminist theory journal.

In her 6,611-word treatise (with only three footnotes), Giordano calls on women to “challenge the authority of Science” by “rewriting knowledge” in a way that “explicitly unsticks Science from Truth and therefore opens up possibilities to unstick Being/Power/Truth/Freedom from Coloniality.”

Science is a root cause — perhaps the root cause — of “racial hierarchy,” “genocide,” “slavery” and “exploitation,” the sexuality and women’s studies professor claims.

“Traditional science” depends on “a colonial and racialized form of power,” Giordano says. “These genealogies demonstrate the co-construction of Science with the globalization of racial hierarchy, both of which together naturalize and justify domination through acts of genocide, slavery, and other forms of exploitation. At the root of the justification for social inequality then is Western science (together with philosophy and other modern disciplines).”

Science is also the cause of the evils of capitalism.

“By producing the categories of human/nonhuman as forms of natural (yet flexible) racial difference, capitalism becomes justified as a natural (yet flexible) economic system,” Giordano writes.

What’s more, science is a privileged field because “taking pleasure in observing our ‘natural world’ is class- and race-based, as many people grow up without ‘nature’ around them.”

Science is also “always political,” Giordano asserts. The “goal of science is not the innocent goal of ‘understanding nature’ but rather a political project of producing ‘nature.’”

The prominence of science is bad for feminism because “science and feminism” are “an unequal pairing, with science occupying a privileged place.” It’s time, Giordano says, to “go back to feminist antiracist politics instead.”

Giordano calls on feminists who are “trained in the sciences” to avoid science. Instead, she says, they should teach something called “critical science literacy skills based on our first-hand knowledge of the sciences.”

The “delegitimizing of science” can “create new definitions of science — ones that are politically grounded in social justice and the politics of location.”

Giordano suggests that feminist professors should engage in “‘pedagogy through politics’ rather than a pedagogy centered solely on the classroom.’”

“In my own teaching and research I have developed a kind of critical science literacy practice,” she writes.

“For example, in one semester students used the skills developed in the course to produce a strategic collective response to anti-immigrant population control environmentalism propaganda that was circulating on campus and in the larger community around Earth Day.”

The University of California, Davis, Giordano’s employer, is infamous in part because the campus newspaper issued a steely edict last year warning students that drinking too much to celebrate Cinco de Mayo is a form of racist cultural appropriation. Also, the student newspaper said, anyone celebrating must spend time learning about the intricacies of “Chicanx/Latinx culture.”

Back in 2011, a campus cop at UC Davis pepper-sprayed a group of protesters who were huddled together on a sidewalk. That incident ultimately resulted in a $1 million settlement divided among several protesters. The officer who pepper-sprayed the protesters, John Pike, also received his own $38,056 settlement for mental anguish for “psychiatric injury.”

This is the second woman professor this week who has attacked traditional scholarship. The first was the Latina who alleged that math was racist. Now this one broadens out the accusation to all rational scientific thought.

I never met a lesbian at the university who wasn’t batsh*t crazy. Even by normal lesbian standards this one is beyond crazy.

It’s nothing that five years in a work camp wouldn’t fix, though.

America is so fuxated, though, that removing the garbage from our universities is out of the question, much less putting it in work camps.

One last thing. Her classes will be populated with crazy lesbians like her. They will give her high teaching marks. She will win teaching awards and be promoted.

But if she taught a class to the general student body, none of those good things would happen for her. That’s the way universities work today.

Majority Of White Americans Say They Believe Whites Face Discrimination

A full 45 percent of white Americans are still asleep or in denial.

Only 55 percent of white Americans believe there is discrimination against white people.

Let’s see:

1. Affirmative Action in jobs and college admissions: What is AA other than discrimination against white people.

2. Race Replacement: What is an immigration policy that allows the country to become minority white? Obviously, it’s discrimination against the white race.

3. White Lives Matter: When the culture says you’re a bad person if you claim that white lives matter, isn’t that discrimination against white people?

4. When universities preach that “whiteness” must be exterminated, do they also preach that “blackness” must be exterminated too? No? Then what are universities doing but discriminating against whites?

4. When Hollywood portrays white men as bumbling fools in TV commericials, but not men of other races, no one with common sense would say that’s not discrimination.

5. As white mortality rates rise and white lifespans decline, as recent evidence documented in this post has shown, there’s more evidence that whites are discriminated against.

I could go on, but instead will reiterate to the sleeping 45 percent: Wake up!

NPR

A majority of whites say discrimination against them exists in America today, according to a poll released Tuesday from NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

“If you apply for a job, they seem to give the blacks the first crack at it,” said 68-year-old Tim Hershman of Akron, Ohio, “and, basically, you know, if you want any help from the government, if you’re white, you don’t get it. If you’re black, you get it.”

Instead of worrying about petty examples of blacks picking up a benefit here and there, consider the root cause of discrimination against whites:

The real issue isn’t whether whites face discrimination and unfair treatment by government and a diversity-driven private sector.

No, the real issue is what or who is behind that unfair treatment.

I’ve given you the answer, but let’s see how disengaged from the truth whites really are by reading more from the article.

Continue reading