Congratulate Her! She’s Getting Married

Someone should set up a gofundme page to help pay for her medical expenses and her eventual funeral.

I started to reply to her: “Is he a Nigger?” but decided I didn’t want to lose my Twitter account. Instead, I Tweeted her: “Is your insurance paid up?”

Anyone with multiple accounts, go have some fun.

White Girl’s Gang Rape by 3 Blacks a HOAX, Say Police

BREANA HARMON TALBOT. BEAUTIFUL HOAXER.

Don’t feel bad if you were taken in by pretty Breana Harmon Talbot’s story of being raped by three black males. Lots of people were, including initially the police.

There are enough real black rapists that no one needs to go making up stories about being raped by blacks. It harms the credibility of real victims. It also creates undue fear among women, as it did in the small Texas town of Denison.

BTW, Breana is a race mixer with a Chicano boyfriend.

THE RACE MIXING MUDSHARK.

If pretty Breana looks familiar, you may have read her story at Saboteur365 last week.

First, the story of how the hoax was uncovered, then a discussion of what punishment Breana should face.

KTEN

DENISON, TX- Denison Police released a statement Wednesday stating the alleged abduction and sexual assault case reported on March 8, 2017 was a hoax.

In a statement Denison Police say the “so-called victim in the case allegedly confessed to the hoax yesterday to a member of the investigative team.

BREANA’S MUGSHOT.

Continue reading

London Terrorist Attack: Photo of Indifferent Muzzie Woman on Phone Goes Viral

Chinchilla News

A PHOTOGRAPH of a woman wearing a headscarf showing apparent indifference to a stricken victim of the London terror attacks overnight has provoked a storm of outrage on social media.

Twitter user Texas Lone Star kicked off the controversy by tweeting the picture with the comment “Muslim woman pays no mind to the terror attack, casually walks by a dying man while checking phone” along with the hashtags #PrayforLondon and #BanIslam.

Chinchilla News goes on to try to make some kind of point about racism because the above photo went viral. Multiculturalists came up with this photo and tried to claim some sort of moral equivalence. There is no moral equivalence because the white man’s religion was not responsible for the terrorist attack. Furthermore, he is in his homeland. She is thousands of miles from hers.

Meanwhile, the memes have started:

Degenerate America Finds a New Way to Turn Men into Sissies

When a man wears what appears to be women’s panties, is he still going to act like a man?

The effort to exterminate masculinity marches on. Portraying white men as weak goofuses in TV and the movies isn’t enough. Now they want to change our underwear.

I also observe that women are wearing underwear these days that looks just like men’s underwear.

One race, one gender, one world government with one currency and one religion (Islam). That’s the New World Order for you.

Spend 5 Minutes with Katie Hopkins as She Destroys the Multicultural Narrative in Interview on Tucker (Video)

Youtube title:

Tucker Carlson Interviews Katie Hopkins on London Attacks and Multiculturalism (03/22/17)

Excerpt from Katie’s opinion piece at the Daily Mail

As the last life-blood of a police officer ran out across the cobbles, the attacker was being stretchered away in an attempt to save his life.

London is a city so desperate to be seen as tolerant, no news of the injured was released. No clue about who was safe or not.

Liberals convince themselves multiculturalism works because we all die together, too.

An entire city of monkeys: see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. Blind. Deaf. And dumb.

Immersed in a seething pit of hatred, hidden in pockets of communities plagued by old animosities and ancient strife.

These people may have left their lands. But they have brought every tension, every conflict, every bit of fight here with them.

The Afghans hate the Somalias who loathe the Eritreans. As it was before, it is now. London is a city of ghettos behind a thin veneer of civility kept polished by a Muslim mayor whose greatest validation is his father’s old job.

Son-of-a-bus-driver Sadiq.

I see him now, penning a missive about how London is a beautiful and tolerant city, how we are united by shared values and understanding, and how we will not be cowed by terror.

Sure enough, there he was, saying exactly that, just now. Fool.

LONDON MAYOR SADIQ KHAN. THE FOOL, AS KATIE CALLS HIM.

Gorsuch: Sodomite Marriage “settled law”

“Conservatives” are afraid to stand up for traditional marriage for fear of being called “homophobic.”

Judge Neil Gorsuch did not give opponents of sodomite marriage any support during his Congressional testimony.

That’s disappointing.

Liberal judges completely ignore precedent and settled law. We need saboteurs on the bench to offset the liberal stooges who work in secret for Soros and the New World Order.

Excerpt from Yahoo

WASHINGTON — Judge Neil Gorsuch referred to the Supreme Court’s recent same-sex marriage decision as “settled law,” using a stronger phrase than he has for other legal precedents.

Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., asked Gorsuch to explain how his views on marriage equality have changed since 2004, when the George W. Bush administration was pushing for ballot initiatives that banned the practice in states.

Gorsuch replied that sharing his “personal views” would send a misleading signal to the American people that he might be inclined to rule one way or another on future cases that come up on the subject.
“It’s settled law?” Franken interrupted.

“It’s absolutely settled law,” Gorsuch replied.

But, the judge added: “There’s ongoing litigation about its impact and its application right now.”

Gorsuch used stronger language in describing the Supreme Court’s 2015 same-sex marriage decision than he did when asked about the court’s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade in favor of a woman’s right to have an abortion.

Earlier during the second day of his confirmation hearing, Democratic senators pressed Gorsuch to explain whether he believed Roe v. Wade was a “superprecedent” that should not be struck down. Gorsuch replied that it had been upheld repeatedly and was a precedent of the Supreme Court, but did not go so far as to call it “settled law.”

Asked how he would have voted on the Supreme Court case striking down a city’s handgun ban as violating the Second Amendment, Gorsuch again referred to it as a “precedent” that a good judge should not approach “as if it had never been decided.”

While “settled law” has no specific legal meaning, it has undertones that have come up in previous confirmation hearings. Justice Samuel Alito declined to call Roe settled law, for example, in his confirmation hearing in 2006, saying that he instead viewed Roe as “a precedent that has now been on the books for several decades.”

Gorsuch has thus far not described any other case as settled law. He called Marbury v. Madison, the 1803 decision that established the Supreme Court’s right to judicial review, the “cornerstone” of the legal system. And he described New York Times v. Sullivan, a 1964 decision that raised the standard for public officials for proving libel charges, a “landmark” decision.

If “settled law” has no precise legal meaning, then why even use that term. Its use by Gorsuch is not a good sign. I’m just so sorry that Obama (or somebody) was able to murder Justice Antonin Scalia and get away with it.

David Duke Twitter Video: Jew-Wise Blacks Know the Score

I love smart black people.