Alex Jones Loses Child Custody Battle to Jew ex-Wife

Austin, Texas is one of the most liberal cities in America. Austinites hate Alex Jones. After all, he’s a Trump supporter and he’s eccentric in a right-wing sort of way. I’m sure the hippies and hipsters in Austin think he’s an evil Nazi.

Alex’s half Jewish kids (all Jewish by Jewish law since their mother is a Jew) would have had a lot of weird fun growing up in the Jones household. Now, they’ll grow up to be neurotic Jews that Alex will hardly recognize as his own.

Excerpt from Buzzfeed

AUSTIN — After a grueling 10-day trial, a jury has ruled in favor of Infowars founder and CEO Alex Jones’ ex-wife, Kelly, in the custody of their three children.

The jury, which deliberated for roughly nine and a half hours, ruled Thursday night to give Kelly Jones joint custody with the ability to dictate the residence of the children. Previously she had joint custody with limited, supervised visitation rights with residence dictated by Alex Jones.

It was a defeat for Alex Jones, who watched the verdict with a stoic expression and left promptly after the verdict without talking to reporters. Upon hearing the verdict, Kelly Jones dabbed her eyes with a tissue and hugged her lawyer, Robert Hoffman.

Moments later, Kelly Jones spoke briefly to the press, thanking God for the verdict.

“I’m so blessed to have such a wonderful support system, such a wonderful family and friends who stood beside me through all this, and I just pray that from what’s happened to my family that people can really understand what parental alienation syndrome is and get an awareness about it, ’cause we could stop this from happening in future,” she said.

The verdict came on the same day as the lawyers delivered their closing arguments. On Alex Jones’ side, his lawyers portrayed his ex-wife as emotionally unstable and quick to wrongly accuse the Texas family court system of deep corruption against her. Conversely, Kelly Jones’ lawyers made the case that Alex Jones was a “master manipulator” who’d alienated the children against her.

“Mr. Jones is like a cult leader,” attorney Hoffman told the jury. “And we’ve seen the horrific damage cult leaders do to their followers.”

Hoffman argued that the trial focused unjustly on the faults of Kelly Jones, allowing Alex to fly under the radar. “Is it Mr. Jones’ celebrity or his vast wealth that’s allowed him to escape detection? Nobody can stop this man,” he said to the jury, allowing the words to hang in the air for dramatic effect. “Except for you.”

The custody case — a somewhat ordinary family law matter — quickly captured national media attention after news broke that Jones’ attorneys planned to defend his custody on the grounds that his two-plus decades of conspiracy theorizing has been “performance art.”

For onlookers, the trial then offered the allure of answering the burning question: Where does Alex Jones the character end and Alex Jones the man begin?

Questions of Alex Jones’ character were discussed. On the witness stand, Kelly Jones accused him of being a “violent, cruel, and abusive man who engages in hate speech at home and in public.”

She accused him of racist and homophobic comments, as well as frequent comments demeaning to women. “He’s enraged and out of control all the time,” she said, calling Infowars (which Mrs. Jones was involved with many years ago) “a portal of hate.”

Jones and his lawyers meanwhile painted a picture of a kind and gentle family man who never brings his work home with him. “I just want to be with the kids, swim in the pool, and eat hamburgers,” Alex Jones told the court last week.

Well, trying to find a silver lining in the dark cloud for Alex, maybe the unfairness of the court system to men will get as much publicity as Super Male Vitality at Infowars now.

Alt-Right Backstabbed by Trump’s Holocaust Remembrance Day Speech

Should we on the alt-right continue to support President Donald Trump in spite of his flip-flops, shifting positions, and odd behavior?

Consider hugely popular Tweeter Linda Suhler, Ph.D.:

It’s foolish to support any politician no matter what. It’s just as foolish to wish your guy to fail after only 100 days in office.

The middle ground is best. Support your guy, but make it clear to him that you want him to try to fulfill his campaign promises.

Imagine yourself as Donald Trump. Your enemies include John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Paul Ryan, and just about every Democrat. It has to be daunting to wake up every day with those enemies AND the press slashing away at you.

Words are cheap. Watch the Donald’s moves. Praising Jews doesn’t bother me much. Supporting the Jewish agenda does. I admit it’s not looking good, but the game has just started. Keep the faith a little while longer if you can.

So what are prominent alt-right figures saying about Trump these days, after initially supporting him?

Jewish Forward

White nationalists and the “alt-right” were dismayed by President Trump’s remarks at a Holocaust remembrance speech on Tuesday, seeing in the speech further evidence of a betrayal to their cause.

“You can never appease the Jews,” wrote Benjamin Garland at the neo-Nazi website the Daily Stormer. “Give them an inch and they want a mile. The only way to deal with them is to ignore them and/or tell them to shut their filthy mouths.”

Garland bemoaned what he saw as a turnaround for Trump. Months ago he was “a man who knew how the Jews operate and as a man with enough self-respect to not be publicly humiliated by them by bowing to their every whim and demand.”

But Jews “have their ratlike claws deep in him now,” Garland wrote.

Former Ku Klux Klan head David Duke also railed against Trump in the hours after the speech and decried the fact that the Holocaust is remembered annually.

“Why is the so called Holocaust the only atrocity to receive its very own ‘Remembrance Proclamation’? Jewish privilege,” he wrote on twitter.

“Do you not have any power?” Duke went on, directing his message at Trump. “Why are you surrounding yourself with the enemies of the American people?”

Duke is no longer a member of the KKK but is seen as an elder figure in white supremacist or nationalist circles and has more than 30,000 Twitter followers. Not all white nationalists or members of the “alt-right” are as focused on so-called “Jewish supremacy” as Duke, who dedicates much of his Twitter feed to the theme.

Like the most anti-Semitic elements of the “alt-right,” Duke now sees Trump as a sort of Jewish puppet.

“Alt-right” figurehead Richard Spencer, who calls himself a white nationalist or an Identitarian had much more tempered criticism. Spencer, unlike some on the “alt-right,” is not a Holocaust denier and has even praised Zionism as a form of nationalism he admires.

“Did Trump crib his speech from a History Channel DVD? Sounds like it. Every ’90s Holocaust cliché was sounded,” Spencer wrote on Twitter.

For some, the Holocaust remembrance was seen as part of a broader trend — and tied to Trump’s recent strikes in Afghanistan and Syria, which they see as being spearheaded by Jared Kushner, Trump’s Jewish son-in-law, and his daughter Ivanka Trump. They also criticize Trump for choosing Gary Cohn, former president of Goldman Sachs, as an economic advisor.

On the blog Occidental Dissent, Brad Griffen, who runs the website and goes by the name Hunter Wallace, also wrote that Trump’s Holocaust remembrance was a betrayal.

“We voted for ‘Make America Great Again,’” he wrote. “We wanted an independent country. Instead, we got Jarvanka, Gary Cohn and a bunch of globalist neocons foaming at the mouth to start new wars.”

Trump has publicly disavowed both the “alt-right” and Duke specifically, but many supporters in these circles have held out in the hopes the administration would still bolster their loosely-organized movement.

In the video below, an alleged FBI whistleblower claims that the Trump White House has been compromised. Not by Jews, though, but by the Muslim Brotherhood. Is there any evidence for that? Or is this a Jewish diversionary tactic?

American Rabbi Calls on God to Destroy Trump Administration as He Did with Sodom and Gomorrah

Am I being “antisemitic” for pointing out the hypocrisy of the Jew in this op-ed that condemns on religious grounds a reasonable conservative economic philosophy.

Despite 30 or 40 percent of our incomes going into wasteful government programs, a Rabbi demands more of our blood.

Excerpt from Jewish Forward by Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg

Trump, Pence, Ryan and the whole GOP are Sodomites.

This doesn’t mean that they engage in sodomy, per se. Rather, the Republican leadership today is guilty of sins so grievous that God found necessary to destroy their (im)moral forebears in the Torah.

The actual text of the Sodom story in Genesis 18 and 19 doesn’t give us much information about why that city (along with Gomorrah) is so terrible that God decides to destroy it with fire and brimstone. God describes their sin as great and exceedingly serious. Indeed, the story includes a vignette in which the residents of the town demand that Lot hand over his male guests to the residents “so that they might know them” — presumably in a sexual way. (This, of course, is the origin of the term “sodomy.”) However, a parallel scene in Judges 19 in which a woman is handed over, raped and murdered — and the perpetrators condemned — makes it clear that whatever is going on here, the problem isn’t necessarily loving, consensual sex between men.

Interestingly, the Jewish tradition — including Biblical sources — doesn’t even believe that the sin of Sodom is sexual assault, or poor hospitality. Rather, as the prophet Ezekiel says, “This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: arrogance! She and her daughters had plenty of bread and untroubled tranquility, yet she did not support the poor and needy.” The crime so heinous that God torched the whole city was that of hoarding resources and leaving the economically vulnerable to suffer without assistance.

One doesn’t have to look hard to see how this accusation applies to an administration whose proposed budget cuts meal and nutrition assistance for impoverished children, seniors, and pregnant and nursing mothers and infants. The parallel becomes even starker in light of the over $20 million the government has already spent on Trump’s golf trips and $500,000 per day on Melania’s choice to stay in New York. The White House is not only withholding support for our country’s most vulnerable, but burning through public money for their own “untroubled tranquility” and devising tax cuts to further enhance the tranquility of the very wealthy.

But the parallels don’t end there. The Talmud (Sanhedrin 109a) paints Sodom in even starker terms, suggesting that their selfishness and greed caused them to impose something akin to immigration and travel bans. In one place, the Talmud conjectures that the people of Sodom said to themselves, “Why should we suffer wayfarers, who come to us only to deplete our wealth. Come, let us abolish the practice of traveling in our land….” I’m sure they would have built that “big, beautiful wall” if they could have.

On that same folio in Sanhedrin (109b), the Talmud posits that the Sodomites developed an elaborate ruse to exploit the poor under false pretenses. “If a poor man happened to come there,” it reads, “every resident gave him a denar [coin], upon which he wrote his name, but no bread was given [that is, the store owners recognized such coins and refused to accept them]. When he died, each came and took back his [denar].” Hmmm, an elaborate ruse constructed to give people the sense that they’re being cared for, but in the end, reflects a staggering lack of empathy for their health and well-being? A system designed to enable the wealthy to get rich off the suffering and death of the poor? I can only imagine that the Speaker of the Sodomite House would have been impressed with Paul Ryan’s tenacity and determination to pass a Trumpcare bill that is, against all odds, even worse for Americans than its previous iteration.

The situation in our country right now is exceedingly dire. We are in a state of moral emergency, as some of the worst crimes Judaism could imagine are becoming public policy — and becoming normalized. Many people will likely die as a result of the policies of this administration, and many more will be plunged into a deep, irreversible level of poverty. Hungry people will not be fed. The bread of massive corporations will be hoarded, and only the most symbolic of tokens — ultimately useless, ultimately irredeemable — will be offered to those desperate for sustenance and care. It’s bad, and it’s going to get worse as the months go on.

“Hungry people will not be fed,” wrote muh Jew. He lies. This whole piece is intended to lay a guilt trip on white people.

Don’t fall for the Jew’s lies. Resist. You’ve already “shared” your wealth with ungrateful parasites. The Jew wants you the host dead.

Jewish socialism is an alien presence in America. It ignores the Constitution. It ignores the rule of law.

Austria’s President Says All Women Must Wear the Veil in Solidarity with Muslims

Leftist politicians everywhere have embraced Islam in the name of inclusion. Are they naive about the religion of peace. Or is their promotion of Islam part of a nefarious plan to destroy the West on behalf of the New World Order? It’s just not credible to think that naivete is driving Alexander van der Bellen’s effort to Islamify Austria.

RT

The president of Austria has raised quite a few eyebrows after stating that there may come a day when all women are asked to wear headscarves out of solidarity, citing discrimination faced by Muslims in the country.

Alexander Van der Bellen, who made the statements while speaking to students on Monday, began by stating that he believes it is “every woman’s right to wear whatever she likes.”

However, referring to discrimination against Muslims in Austria, the leader went on to state that “if this continues… with the widely spreading Islamophobia, the day will come when we have to ask all women to wear a headscarf – all – out of solidarity to those who do it for religious reasons.”

Foolish women, voting left rather than right, have helped seal their fate as sex slaves of the forthcoming rebirth of the Ottoman Empire.

Well done, ladies.

Sweden: Muslim Facebook Rapists Given Ridiculously Light Prison Terms

Fria Tider via Google Translate

There are two problems with Sweden’t lenient justice system.

1. Moral hazard. The light sentences given these and other rapists send a message to other parasites who infest the country. That message is that rape is OK.

2. Public safety. In a few months to a year these savage degenerates will be out of prison. They will continue to commit crimes.

One more thing: They should be deported after serving 20 or more years in prison. Sweden doesn’t even have the guts to kick them back to Middle East.

The three men who were charged with the attention-raped rape broadcast on Facebook in January were sentenced to the prison of the Uppsala District Court today.

The sentenced men are 18, 21 and 24 years old, respectively.

The 18-year-old and 21-year-old, who is a Afghan citizen, are convicted of rape. The 18-year-old man is also convicted of minor drug offenses.

The 24-year-old man, a Swedish national with Iranian immigrant background, is convicted of gross misconduct, minor drug offenses and failure to reveal rape.

For the 18-year-old, released a few days ago, the sentence will be a year’s imprisonment, while the 21-year-old will be sentenced to two years and four months in prison. The reason that the 18-year-old gets a lower penalty is stated to be his age.

The third man is sentenced to six months in prison.

If the 24-year-old is convicted of failure to report rape, the District Court writes:

“This has been aware that a rape was about to happen, but not responded or contacted by a police officer. This man is also convicted of gross assault by the plaintiff by putting on the film on Facebook. The crime is gross because the film got a big Attention both in Sweden and internationally, which caused the plaintiff a major damage. ”

The prosecuted men claimed that the woman had consented to having sex, but because of the drunk state she was in, that objection does not matter, the district court believes.

– Even though, as the accused said, she agreed to have intercourse, it is not possible for a person who is in such an exposed situation to consent. They should therefore be held responsible for rape, “says Nils Pålbrant, chairman of the court, according to Aftonbladet.

The men also pay damages of a total of 320,000 SEK to the rapist woman.

It was at the end of January this year that the rape was broadcast on Facebook from an apartment in Uppsala. The film showed how two men raped a seemingly lifeless woman. Many witnesses saw the rape, which was streamed in a big Facebook group. The police were alerted about the incident and managed to locate the apartment where the abuse was going on. A scene from the movie shows how the police enter the apartment and interrupts the broadcast.

Antifa Flyer Promises Extermination of White Children

I’m not sure what to make of the alleged antifa flyer that calls for the mass murder of both whites and “heebs.” Is this a George Soros trick or a rogue group of antifa? Or the work of a troll?

Reddit The Donald offers 28 comments on the poster, asking the same question as me: Is it real?