Inspirational Quote of the Day: An Irish Proverb

Inspirational Quote of the Day: One About the Meaning of Life

A quote from the much quoted Alan Watts.

Mexicans Know Best: Eating Chili Peppers Makes You Live Longer

In spite of the enchiladas swimming in grease, and their fatness, Mexicans in America live longer than whites do. Could red chili peppers be the secret to their longer lifespans?

Excerpt from the UPI

BURLINGTON, Vt., Jan. 13 (UPI) — Researchers at the Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont have found that consuming hot red chili peppers may reduce total mortality.

The study found a 13 percent reduction in total mortality, especially in heart attacks and strokes, in people who consumed hot red chili peppers on a regular basis.

The research found that people who ate hot red chili peppers were more likely to be “younger, male, white, Mexican-American, married, and to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol, and consume more vegetables and meats … had lower HDL-cholesterol, lower income, and less education.”

Researchers said possible causes of the health benefits of red chili peppers relates to the principal component capsaicin, which is known to prevent obesity, regulate coronary blood flow, and possesses antimicrobial properties.

There’s a link to the full study at the UPI.

Inspirational Quote of the Day: Wisdom from the East by Lao Tzu

I’ve published this one before, but it’s so good it bears repeating.

Learn more about Lao Tzu at Wikipedia.

Bitchy Women Newsreaders Argue Over White Dress on Live TV

The one in the middle, Amber Sherlock, didn’t like that all of them were wearing white. She got very snooty with the one on the left, Julie Snook.

This is what news people are concerned about?

Not truth? Not accuracy? Not completeness?

Turning news reporting over to irresponsible foolish women has been a disaster.

Daily Mail

The extraordinary footage taken in a 9 News studio shows newsreader Amber Sherlock having an epic meltdown after realising she, a fellow journalist and her guest were all wearing white.

She descended into rage after spotting 9 News presenter Julie Snook and psychologist Sandy Rea sporting similar dresses to her moments before going live on Wednesday.

Directing her anger at her colleague, Ms Sherlock demanded Ms Snook put on a different coloured jacket, creating an extremely awkward situation for their guest.

Speaking to her producer, the presenter said: ‘I need Julie to put a jacket on because we’re all in white. I asked her before we came on… Julie you need to put a jacket on.’

Ms Snook defended herself, insisting she had not had time to change out of her outfit.

But Ms Sherlock refused to back down, replying: ‘Come on I told you two hours ago.’

Her fellow 9 News reporter apologised and said she had been ‘flat out’ and had not had time to switch into a different colour.

But a furious Ms Sherlock had no time for her apology and continued to demand she get changed before going live.

Psychologist Ms Rea, who by this point looked very uncomfortable, offered to find a jacket herself, as she was wearing white too.

Speaking to her producer, the presenter said: ‘I need Julie to put a jacket on because we’re all in white. I asked her before we came on… Julie you need to put a jacket on.’

Ms Snook defended herself, insisting she had not had time to change out of her outfit.

But Ms Sherlock refused to back down, replying: ‘Come on I told you two hours ago.’

Her fellow 9 News reporter apologised and said she had been ‘flat out’ and had not had time to switch into a different colour.

But a furious Ms Sherlock had no time for her apology and continued to demand she get changed before going live.

Psychologist Ms Rea, who by this point looked very uncomfortable, offered to find a jacket herself, as she was wearing white too.

But Ms Sherlock told her to calm down and pointedly remarked that she was fine as she had made sure to mention in advance that she would be wearing white.

‘There can’t be three of us,’ the newscaster flatly said.

‘If it’s an issue I can get on out of here,’ Ms Snook said.

‘It is an issue. Go and grab a jacket,’ Ms Sherlock coldly replied, adding: ‘I wasn’t saying it for no reason. The wardrobe girls will be furious.’

Ms Snook tried to claim her dress was actually blue, but she then agreed to put on a black jacket that was lying around in the newsroom.

‘If there’s an issue I can just head on out and get back to work. I’m flat chat. I genuinely forgot,’ the reporter said as she left her chair to find other clothes.

But Ms Sherlock was not finished.

‘Fine, jump on out if that’s what you’d like to do. Come on, wearing a jacket. I asked you two-and-a-half hours ago. It’s not the hardest request.

‘I know it’s not your issue. But we did talk about it two-and-a-half hours ago.’

Despite their incredibly diva-esque row, the pair were all-smiles when they went on air, with Ms Sherlock grinning as she introduced her colleague – who was wearing the black jacket.

HAPPY ENDING.

“America’s Rabbi:” Dylann Roof Deserves to Die Like All Racists

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Muh rabbi, Shumuley Boteach, self-proclaimed as America’s rabbi, preaches death to racists.

He’s also given us permission to hate, although that’s not his intention. But he certainly preaches that it’s right to hate in his statements about Dylann Roof.

So, with Rabbi Boteach’s permission, let’s hate Zionists, ZOG, blacks, wetbacks, dotheads, sand niggers, and every other vile creature that wishes us to die off.

Feel the hate. Revel in it. Muh rabbi says it’s a good thing.

Times of Israel

Dylann Roof was condemned to death by a Federal jury. It is a just sentence befitting a monster who murdered nine African-Americans in the middle of Bible study at a South Carolina church.

We should feel no guilt for his sentence and have no reservations about carrying out. He deserves to die.

What Roof deserves is our contempt, our vitriol, our hatred.

I declare unreservedly that I hate him and everything he stands for. Why are we so reluctant to declare our hatred for odious, racist murderers? Where is the visceral abhorrence and detestation for monsters?

It wasn’t always thus.

Abraham Lincoln had no hesitation declaring his hatred for the abomination of slavery. In 1854, in Peoria he said, “I cannot but hate slavery. I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself.” Churchill said openly that “I hate no man but Hitler.” And because he hated the beast, he inspired a nation to fight him. The French, who did not hate Hitler, collaborated with him and sent Jews to the gas chambers instead.

It seems that hatred has gone out of vogue.

Let my Christian brothers speak of loving one’s enemies. I will confess my admiration for my loving African-American brothers and sisters — many of them family members of Roof’s victims — who came together in South Carolina to forgive the killer after his murderous rampage.

But for all their moral greatness, they are still wrong. We have an obligation to hate evil and never forgive it lest it be permitted to spread. We must fight it instead.

Let my Catholic friends tell me to turn the other cheek. When it comes to racist mass murderers like Roof, I cannot but reject both New Testament teachings and instead embrace Solomon’s proclamation in Proverbs: “The fear of the Lord is to hate evil.” I will welcome what King David said regarding the wicked: “I have hated them with a deep loathing. They are as enemies to me.”

The kind of man who could storm into a church and pump worshippers with bullets is not a man at all. He is a beast, pure and simple. He may once have been created in the image of God. But he has since erased every last vestige of God’s image from his countenance. He is no longer our human brother. He is a bloodthirsty animal.

Loving the victim of a crime generates compassion for suffering. But hating the perpetrators generates action to stop the orgy of murder. While innocence should evoke compassion, evil should evoke only contempt and the determination that it be eradicated.

OY VEY! THE RABBI SAYS HATING THIS BOY AND WISHING HIM DEAD IS A GOOD THING.

If you’re a regular reader you know that I preach righteous hate here. It’s good to see the Rabbi agree with me.

Paleomasculinist Responds to Bitchy Feminist Mocking Masturbation

The Tweet above reminds me that sex robots have been in the news lately, along with all other manner of sexual behaviors. The cultural Marxist assault on morality roars along at warp speed now.

I’m not recommending that men form relationships with sex robots or sex dolls, but the constant taunting of men by feminists is going to backfire on them.

Certainly, Muslim males don’t put up with women’s sh*t, although as we’ve seen in a few stories posted here, white feminist SJWs believe it’s a good thing to be raped by Muzzies. It takes away their white guilt through some mysterious, insane process of redemption.

As the Tweet suggests, sex robots are an alternative to both masturbation and putting up with bitchy, unloving, unkind feminist whores. There’s still a problem for men, however.

Sex robots as marriage partners or lovers offer a cowardly way of life. There are significant MORAL ISSUES akin to the issues associated with having sex with animals or dead people. In short, I think we need to think twice about taking an amoral perspective on sexual relationships with robots.

The only real answer to the woes imposed on our culture by Jewish feminism is to destroy feminism. Taking away women’s rights to a degree and imposing on women a moral perspective on life is the only thing that can remake our culture into something decent.

That naked feminist and her stupid sign above is rightly mocked and ridiculed. Disempower her.

Quartz

In the face of AI exerts repeatedly predicting the rise of sex robots, it’s increasingly difficult to insist that such machines strictly belong to a far-off, dystopian future. But some robotics experts predict we’ll soon be doing far more than having sexual intercourse with machines. Instead, we’ll be making love to them—with all the accompanying romantic feelings.

At this week’s “Love and Sex with Robots” conference at Goldsmith University in London, David Levy, author of a book on human-robot love, predicted that human-robot marriages would be legal by 2050. Adrian Cheok, computing professor at City University London and director of the Mixed Reality Lab in Singapore, says the prediction is not so farfetched.

Uh-oh, my Jewdar just went off.

jewdar-gif

“That might seem outrageous because it’s only 35 years away. But 35 years ago people thought homosexual marriage was outrageous,” says Cheok, who also spoke at the conference. “Until the 1970s, some states didn’t allow white and black people to marry each other. Society does progress and change very rapidly.”

And though human-robot marriage might not be legal until 2050, Cheok believes humans will be living with robot partners long before then.

Though Cheok acknowledges that sex robots could fulfill sexist male sexual fantasies, he believes robot-human marriages will have an overwhelmingly positive effect on society. “People assume that everyone can get married, have sex, fall in love. But actually many don’t,” he says. And even those who do might be in search of a different option. “A lot of human marriages are very unhappy,” Cheok says. “Compared to a bad marriage, a robot will be better than a human.”

Notice that the author promoting sex with robots is a (((Jew))). Typical. Jews are leading whites down another dead end road that will lead to our extinction.

Although white men are demonized by feminists at the Huffington Post, on college campuses, on TV and the movies, we need to hang together and get our balls out of asses (sorry for the crude way of putting it) and confront these nasty women, as well as the Jews who seek our death as a race.

Just as importantly, we need to appreciate the good women in our lives.

LIVING NATURAL.