I Just Reported this Netflix Video for Child Pornography

This one’s been heavily down voted on youtube. There’s a movement to report it for child pornography, which I just did.

Sample comments:

Did Netflix just post child pornography?

under the bush admin laws were passed that consider even 2d animated depictions of nude, underage children to be child pornography. so yes, they did.

Um…yeah, What the fuck?! With something like this I may just cancel my Netflix membership.

Report this video to YouTube for Child Pornography because that is what it is.

More netflix original garbage made to brainwash our youth. Sad

Telling kids that it’s ok to kiss a man’s penis is not ok. I canceled my Netflix membership today and I urge anyone with integrity to do the same.

It’s good to see people boycotting Netflix.

Torrid Tale of Interracial Lesbian Love Takes Top Honors at TV’s Emmy Awards

According to queer Twitter, the whole world is jumping in to celebrate two women licking each others bushy areas. And not just any two taco bumpers, but one white and one black.

Yeah, let’s see how I can celebrate. If I had a dog, I’d send him to the refrigerator to get me a beer.

I’m certain that dogs grabbing beers out of fridges are more entertaining than two rug munchers portrayed sympathetically by Hollyweird.

Exactly what sort of reprobate mind thinks this that we should all be celebrating their degeneracy and perversion, I’m not sure. All I can say is that they’re not normal.

Lesbian sexual acts should be made illegal again, as they were until the Supreme Court weighed in.

Huffington Post

The Emmy Awards gloriously embraced queer storytelling this year, and the cherry on top of the sundae was “Black Mirror” picking up prizes for perhaps its most affecting installment to date, “San Junipero.”

The critically acclaimed episode, which revolves around two woman falling in love in an ’80s-set alternate universe, won Outstanding TV Movie, as well as Outstanding Writing for a Limited Series, Movie, or Dramatic Special on Sunday night.

Writer Charlie Brooker took the stage to accept both awards, low-key encouraging an Emmys orgy in his second speech.

“I have heard 2017 described as being trapped, like being trapped in one long unending ‘Black Mirror’ episode,” Brooker said. “But I like to think if I had written it, it wouldn’t be quite so on the nose with all this sort of Nazis and hate.”

“‘San Junipero’ was a story about love and love will defeat hated, love will win. But it might need a bit of help,” he continued. “So maybe if all the beautiful people in this auditorium could start to physically make love with each other, or yourselves, on the count of three, this world would be a far better place. Three, two, one, go.”

After a nervous laugh from a reluctant audience, Brooker concluded, “OK, fine, suit yourself.”

Heartfelt tributes to the episode came pouring in on social media soon after with many noting the importance of the Television Academy recognizing a story about a loving interracial relationship between queer women.

Queer Twitter was indeed out in force Sunday night.

Yes, faggots are elated tonight. But for others, the hatred of the sodomite grows stronger.

Trump Haters in an Uproar Over Retweet of Joke Video Mocking Hillary as Stephen King Says Trump “Fucked-Up”

Yes, he retweeted this fun litle GIF. I just looked. He did it.

Huffington Post

President Donald Trump shared a tweet Sunday morning that included the image of him hitting a golf ball and striking Hillary Clinton.

The tweet came from a user named @Fuctupmind, whose Twitter bio indicates that he wants Clinton to be in prison and believes the conspiracy theory that Democrats had something to do with the death of former Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.

It was not unusual to see violent and misogynistic imagery directed at Clinton at Trump rallies during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Last week, Clinton noted that there was significant criticism directed toward comedian Kathy Griffin when she held up a fake decapitated head of Trump ― and added that she didn’t remember the same outcry over images of her.

“We recently had this big kerfuffle ― this condemnation of Kathy Griffin ― for the picture she had of herself holding a head of Trump like a play on Perseus holding the head of Medusa,” Clinton said. “They were selling T-shirts and mugs at the Republican [National] Convention with Trump holding my head. Nobody said a word. Not a word!”

HuffPost reporters never saw that specific image mentioned by Clinton, but we did see T-shirts of Trump punching out Clinton in a boxing ring and the Democratic presidential candidate falling off a motorcycle.

It’s not unusual for Trump to retweet random accounts, occasionally including users who have anti-Semitic views. As BuzzFeed noted, Fuctupmind has also tweeted anti-Semitic and anti-LGBTQ messages.

HuffPo published a separate story about horror writer Stephen King’s response to the Trump’s retweet.

A psycho like King dare claim Trump is f*cked up???!!! I Tweeted King, calling him “turdface.” The point I made to him was that the Clinton body count is over 100 now and that he should write a book about that psycho.

Trump’s retweet has 63,000 likes already. I agree with Trumpism’s point in the Tweet below.

Poll: Most Americans Oppose White Supremacists, But Many Share Their Views

When a polling firm comes calling, there’s always the question of whether a large number of people will lie to the pollsters and thus provide inaccurate results.

You have to suspect that people are somewhat reluctant to express pro-white views to a stranger.

The good news is that the biases mean that the real number of White Nationalists is higher than the poll results show.

Huffington Post

A new poll in the wake of the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, finds that while Americans widely say they oppose racism and white nationalism, many still appear to hold far-right, white supremacist views.

The Ipsos poll, for Thomson Reuters and the University of Virginia Center for Politics, was conducted online from Aug. 21 to Sept. 5 ― in the weeks following the deadly white supremacist rally in Charlottesville. It sampled around 5,360 American adults, asking questions about race that respondents could agree or disagree with to varying degrees.

“While there is relatively little national endorsement of neo-Nazis and white supremacists,” according to the release describing the poll’s findings, “there are troubling levels of support for certain racially-charged ideas and attitudes frequently expressed by extremist groups.”

While the vast majority of Americans polled expressed support for racial equality when asked in so many words ― 70 percent strongly agreed that “all races are equal,” and 89 percent agreed that all races should be treated equally ― people’s responses got murkier when it came to expressing their viewpoints on particular issues related to race and extremism.

For instance, while only 8 percent of respondents said they supported white nationalism as a group or movement, a far larger percentage said they supported viewpoints widely held by white supremacist groups: 31 percent of Americans polled strongly or somewhat agreed that “America must protect and preserve its White European heritage,” and 39 percent agreed that “white people are currently under attack in this country.”

“The poll results do show both an American public that overwhelmingly rejects racist affiliations and movements but at the same time is more tolerant of racially insensitive positions,” Kyle Kondik, communications director at the University of Virginia Center for Politics, told HuffPost.

“The results may be what you might expect from a country that is arguably defined by racial conflict,” he added. “And one that can vote for an African-American for president who ran on unity less than a decade ago, and then turn around and vote for a vehemently anti-immigrant candidate who exploited white grievances just last year.”

The poll addressed several hot-button issues surrounding racial justice in America ― and in many cases, the majority of respondents seemed to agree with more conservative viewpoints.

When it comes to the debate about removing Confederate monuments, for instance, most Americans polled (57 percent) said they think the statues should remain in public spaces, and less than one-third (26 percent) said they think they should be removed.

Touching on recent heated debates surrounding free speech versus hate speech, the poll found a majority of Americans (59 percent) agreed with the statement that “‘political correctness’ threatens our liberty as Americans to speak our minds,” a view often touted by conservative leaders ― including President Donald Trump.

Even support for interracial marriage ― 50 years after the landmark Supreme Court decision Loving v. Virginia ― isn’t as widespread as one might think: Around 1 in 6 Americans, or 16 percent, strongly or somewhat agreed that “marriage should only be allowed between people of the same race,” while 65 percent of Americans disagreed.

As NAACP Legal Defense Fund staffer Janai Nelson told HuffPost last month: “Calling out extremists, white supremacists, neo-Nazis is an important but very low bar for where we should be as a society at this stage in our democracy.”

“What we should be [having] is a much more nuanced and deepened understanding of how those ‘isms’ manifest in policy, in systems, in a cloak of oppression that still lives with us,” Nelson said.

Check out UVA’s summary of the poll’s findings here, or view the results directly here.

Links are live at HuffPo.

In case you were wondering, the John Wayne quote above is true, as reported by Snopes.

John Wayne had much of interest to say about nonwhites. Click on the “continue reading” button to see more.

Continue reading

Street Sh*tter Tech Bro CEO Called Out for “Nigger” Insults

GURBAKSH CHAHAL. THE TECH BRO IS ONE BAD DUDE.

EVEN HE GETS IT.

The central figure in this story may have called Martin Luther King just another Nigger, which would normally endear him to us, but he’s not a likable guy.

We honestly don’t need street sh*tters as CEOs of American tech companies. In fact, why wasn’t this maggot deported for beating up his girlfriend?

The high school dropout is worth $100 million.

Raw Story

A new lawsuit alleges that Silicon Valley CEO Gurbaksh Chahal routinely used racial slurs when speaking to subordinates, physically attacked two women and fired a male employee who tried to prevent him from striking a third woman.

The Daily Beast reported Sunday that Chahal is the subject of a lawsuit which alleges that he called workers his “n**gers” and took out his violent rages on employees. Two other pending lawsuits against Chahal accuse him of misleading investors, hiring women based on their looks and making death threats against one employee of his multiple tech companies.

In 2013, Chahal briefly stepped down as CEO of his ad tech company RadiumOne after a vicious attack on his then girlfriend in a San Francisco penthouse.

Police examined surveillance video and determined that during the attack, Chahal punched and kicked the woman he was dating 117 times. He then tried to smother her with a pillow for 20 seconds. Court records show that microphones caught Chahal telling the woman “I’m going to kill you” four times as he beat her.

Nonetheless, he resumed his position at RadiumOne after he was able to get the 47 felony counts against him dropped by a judge who ruled that the video was inadmissible as evidence. Chahal crowed online that he was innocent and accused his former partner of having sex with other men for money.

The RadiumOne board ousted Chahal, but he formed a new company called Gravity4 and has continued to helm new ventures including trying to raise $100 billion to start a new Bitcoin-like crypto-currency, the Daily Beast’s Kelly Weill wrote. Former reality TV star and hotel heiress Paris Hilton has given her imprimatur to the project.

“He’s the biggest liar I’ve ever met in my life,” said one former employee to the Daily Beast.

Gravity4 chief of staff Ali Al-Ansari filed a new suit alleging that Chahal is shockingly sexist, detailing a series of remarks he made against women’s rights and equal pay for men and women.

Other pending lawsuits accuse Chahal of forcing alcohol on women, attacking another girlfriend and then pressuring an employee to help him evade charges, as well as asking male coworkers if women job applicants’ breasts were attractive enough to hire.

Al-Ansari alleges that Chahal described to him in lurid detail how he wanted to further harm the two women he’d attacked, who he saw as trying to “ruin his life.”

The final straw for Al-Ansari came in a Miami apartment when Chahal attempted to attack a woman and Al-Ansari physically prevented the assault.

According to the lawsuit, “Al-Ansari was forced to interpose himself between the woman and Chahal and physically intervened to defend this woman to block Chahal from hitting her. Chahal nonetheless managed to hit this woman. Al-Ansari repeatedly told Chahal ‘don’t touch her!’”

When Al-Ansari took out his phone and began to record the altercation, Chahal reportedly fired him on the spot. The lawsuit further alleges that after the firing, Chahal tried to illegally access Al-Ansari’s personal laptop and destroy incriminating data.

Chahal was freely racist and open about his contempt for black people, the lawsuit says. He used the “N-word” frequently and was resentful and defiant when called out about it.

“I’m not going to stop the n-word,” Chahal said in a discussion transcribed in the suit. “Dude, do you want me to go ahead and say n**ger, n**ger, n**ger? I don’t give a fuck. Martin Luther King might not like that, but he’s a n**ger, too.”

LINK TO HIS WIKIPEDIA PAGE.

Here’s his interview with “Nigger” Oprah:

Jewish Professor Ordered to Leave Campus Because He’s “White” Settles Lawsuit for $500,000

BLACKS THOUGHT BRET WEINSTEIN WAS WHITE. LOL.

Told ya. Blacks can’t tell the difference between a Jew and a Euro-American. For that mistake, Weinstein is cleaning up.

Not that the blacks are going to pony up the cash. The taxpayers in the state of Washington will do that.

The Blaze

The professor who made headlines earlier this year after he refused to leave his campus for being white just won a major battle against his employer.

What happened?

Evergreen State College in Washington State announced in a faculty email Friday they recently settled a tort claim brought by professor Bret Weinstein and his wife, professor Heather Heying, for $500,000.

According to the College Fix, as part of the college’s agreement with the pair, they have resigned their positions as biology instructors at the school.

The email states: “They have resigned from their faculty positions at Evergreen, effective today. The college will pay them a total of $450,000 and contribute an additional $50,000 toward their attorney fees. In making this agreement, the college admits no liability, and rejects the allegations made in the tort claim.”

Why did they sue?

Weinstein and his wife sued the school in July seeking $3.85 million in damages, alleging the school “permitted, cultivated and perpetuated a racially hostile and retaliatory work environment” in wake of a campus-wide event dubbed “Day of Absence,” which sought to expel all white people from campus for one day so non-white students could have a safe space to talk about oppression. Weinstein refused to leave and was subjected to ridicule by students and his colleagues, his safety was even put in danger, and on one occasion, he was forced to hold class in a parking lot because students blocked the entrance to his classroom.

Weinstein claimed:

The school “sent the unmistakable message that the school will tolerate (and even endorse) egregious violations (and even crimes) purportedly to advance racial social goals, diminishing the collegiate experience for all, and fostering a racially hostile work and retaliatory environment for faculty and staff.”

“Through a series of decisions made at the highest levels, including to officially support a day of racial segregation, the college has refused to protect its employees from repeated provocative and corrosive verbal and written hostility based on race, as well as threats of physical violence.”

Students literally took over

Video from the school during the height of the protests showed students literally taking the school over, making demands and the college administration cowing to those demands, including agreeing to let protesting students not be penalized for failing to do homework assignments.

Remember this? This time, it’s literally true for the school. I wonder if the guilty administrators will be fired or demoted.

Give Ben Shapiro Credit for His Response to a Question About Abortion

To start, let me emphasize that I am not a Ben Shapiro fan. However, he apparently has his moments.

When confronted by a leftist student during the question and answer session after his Berkeley speech, conservative Jew Ben Shapiro had the opportunity to do some clever verbal jiu-jitsu on the student.

Shapiro makes a concise case for the pro-life position.

What I would like to see is a moral case made for denying white women abortions, while encouraging abortion among nonwhite women.

If Shapiro would grant that pregnancies resulting from rape are morally OK, then we have a place to start the discussion. Likewise, if he would grant that it’s morally acceptable to abort severely retarded babies, we have another starting point.

I fear, however, that to Shapiro, abortion is NEVER acceptable. Maybe not even if the pregnant woman’s life is threatened.

The Blaze

Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro masterfully handled a student’s claim that a first-trimester fetus isn’t human life during a Q&A session at his highly anticipated speaking event Thursday at the University of California, Berkeley.

What did the student ask?

“I just wanted to know why exactly do you think a first-trimester fetus has moral value?” the unidentified student asked.

What Shapiro said

“A first trimester fetus has moral value because whether you consider it a potential human life or a full-on human life, it has more value than just a cluster of cells. If left to its natural processes, it will grow into a baby.”

“So the real question is where are you gonna draw the line? Are you gonna draw the line at the heartbeat? Because it’s very hard to draw the line at the heartbeat. There are people who are adults who are alive because of a pacemaker and they need some sort of outside force generating their heartbeat.”

“Are you going to do it based on brain function? OK, well what about people who are in a coma? Should we just kill them?”

“The problem is that whenever you draw any line other than the inception of the child, you end up drawing a false line that can be applied to people who are adults. So either human life has intrinsic value or it doesn’t.”

The tense exchange

“We both agree that adult human life has intrinsic value — can we start from that premise?” Shapiro asked.

“I believe that sentience is what gives something moral value, not necessarily being a human alone,” the student replied. Sentience is the capacity to feel and perceive, or to reason morally.

“OK, so when you’re asleep, can I stab you?” Shapiro asked.

“I’m still considered sentient when I’m asleep,” the student said back.

“OK, if you are in a coma from which you may awake, can I stab you?” Shapiro asked again.

“Well, then, uhh, no,” the student answered. “That’s still potential sentience.”

“I agree it is potential sentience. You know what else is potential sentience? Being a fetus,” Shapiro declared to loud cheers.

How did the student respond?

In response, the student explained he believes the “burden” that “unwanted” children have on potential parents should be weighed when considering abortion policy.

“Now you’re shifting the argument,” Shapiro told him. “I don’t believe that you being a burden on somebody is justification for them killing you.”

BEN SHAPIRO WANTS TO SEE BABIES BORN, NOT ABORTED.