Breaking! The Left Destroyed MILO Today for Advocating Adult-Child Sex, Which the Hypocritical Left Champions as Liberation

THE MAIN PHOTO ON DRUDGE TODAY.

The left scored a major victory today by destroying MILO Yiannopolous.

How they used his own words against him is covered in my earlier post, which you can read here, if you haven’t already seen it.

His CPAC appearance was cancelled. His book deal is done. And Breitbart is likely to drop him. Furthermore, his Dangerous Faggot speaking tour will surely be in tatters. No university group will sponsor him now as far as I can tell.

Although MILO is not one of us, I BECOME EXTREMELY ANGRY ANY TIME THE LEFT WINS.

The destruction of MILO, the top story on Drudge today, is especially galling because the left routinely advocates for adult-child sex via normalizing pedophilia. Indeed, if Hillary Clinton had won the 2016 election, that cause would have been greatly advanced in her first month in office. Democrats love what they call “inclusion,” meaning that every form of pervert and degenerate is welcomed into the party.

Here’s what’s been happening today.

Mediaite

Yiannopoulos received a $250,000 advance for the book, which was to be written for Threshold Editions, an imprint of Simon & Schuster.

Fox Business

Milo Yiannopoulos, the provocative conservative journalist who is often portrayed as a champion of the far right, is facing possible dismissal from his employer, Breitbart News, over comments he once made about underage sex, FOX Business has learned.

His possible dismissal could could come by the end of the day, sources from the conservative website told FOX Business. Earlier Monday, Yiannopoulos was disinvited to speak at a gathering of the Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) scheduled for this weekend.

His official title is Technology Editor for Breitbart, but Yiannopoulos is best known for his political statements on social media and television. Indeed his CPAC invitation drew outrage even from some conservatives given Yiannopoulos’ past remarks about race, sexuality and other issues.

As despicable as MILO is, he’s proof that even faggot Jews can and will be destroyed by the left if they deviate from the inclusive egalitarian Marxist narrative.

As much as I don’t like MILO I wish him luck at making a comeback some time in the future.

I don’t want pedophilia associated with conservatism or the alt right, which is what liberals are pushing on Twitter today. But honestly, what MILO said is far less offensive than what cultural Marxists push in the media every single day.

Watch and see. There’s going to be a major effort to tie Trump to the so-called MILO pedophile scandal. You see hints of it on Twitter already. The press will pick this up and compare MILO to “grab her by the pussy” Trump to smear Trump some more.

This story is just beginning. I suspect it will rage for the next two to three days, with the focus shifting away from MILO to Trump and conservatives in general.

Twitter Explodes as MILO Advocates Sex Between 13 Year Old Boys and Older Men

Listen to MILO in this short video:

MILO exploded on Twitter tonight in response to his advocacy of legalized sex between young teen boys and older men.

MILO appears to be trying to associate ephebephilia (sexual attraction to teens older than children) with the alt-right. He’s a crude little queer, for sure. Since he’s a major supporter of Donald Trump, I’m sure the left is going to focus outrage on Trump as a pedo too–guilt by association.

metro.co.uk headline:

Trump favourite Milo Yiannopoulos is caught on tape ‘defending paedophile abuse’

The story is getting big play across the web, including at Heavy, The New York Daily News, and Daily Caller.

I saw a headline saying MILO was to be the keynote speaker at CPAC. What the Hell? No way should this faggoty pervert be speaking at a meeting of conservatives.

There’s a lot of “dick” talk in this longer video of the conversation.

From the youtube information box:

Published on Apr 6, 2016

Watch Milo Yiannopoulos defend adults having sex with 14 year olds, 30 year olds being attracted to 15 year olds, as well as not giving up the names of Hollywood child abusers he met during parties.

This is still a developing story because we don’t know how CPAc will respond. Nor do we know how MILO’s friend Steve Bannon, now a White House adviser, will react.

Change.org Petition for J. K. Rowling to House Muslim “Refugees” in Her Spare Bedrooms

I signed the petition. You have to register with Change.org to sign. They will send you emails about petitions they think you might be interested in.

Change.org petition

J.K. Rowling has often announced her solidarity with Middle-Eastern refugees on twitter. She is well-known advocate of open borders and often stated, that Europe has the duty to give every single one of these refugees from all over the middle east, rarely warzones, asylum and welfare. Everyone who represented a different opinion was viciously attacked by her, and she is not alone. Many other multi-millionaires and billionaires seem to be fond of virtue-signaling about refugees. Since she is a sheltered member of the rich elite, who is very much disconnected from the ugly reality of rape, murder and destruction which many of these refugees bring with them, we think that it is time for her to show some true solidarity. J.K. Rowling has 18 spare bedrooms in her mansions in Britain and could easily give 18 refugees a long-time housing, not to mention the space available on her giant property to erect refugee shelters.

The refugee crisis will require 250000 homes to be built every year in her homeland Britain. Helping refugees in Europe will cost 10 times as much as helping them in neighbouring countries would.

Donations by the superrich, even in the millions, are a drop in the ocean, as the taxpayer will have to pay billions for the following decades. Elites, that echo the MSM narrative, defending open borders, are hypocrites that will never share the outlook of the working class, which has to encounter refugees every day. So let’s bring one of the loudest virtue-signaling apologists of globalism back to reality and give her some new roommates.

We demand that J.K. Rowling grants no less than 18 refugees shelter in her mansions for at least 8 years. She rejects safe immigration, which is why we also demand, that there will be no additional vetting process for these refugees. Her virtue-signaling stems from ignorance, and the 100% effective cure of it will be this drastic change of perspective. To make this group of refugees representative of the situation Europe, we also demand that the group consists of 14 men and 4 women, since over 75% of the millions of refugees are male.

What Horsesh*t! (((Shia Lebeouf))) Has Reopened “He Will Not Divide Us” Livecam

THE CAMERA AND SIGN ARE SAID TO BE ART.

Jewish actor Shia Lebeouf has moved his camera and sign from New York City to heavily Hispanic Albuquerque, New Mexico. Mexican Trump haters will now have a chance to be live streamed 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for the next four years.

That’s assuming muh barrio dwellers don’t steal the camera to sell for some pesos to buy a low rider. The background in the camera shot shows a typical devastated urban scene in America today–an empty parking lot when a building used to be, concrete everywhere, trashy people with that Zombie look about them. It’s not much of a Trump protest, really. Only a loon like Lebeouf would think so.

Link to hewillnotdivide.us

HEWILLNOTDIVIDE.US is a participatory performance artwork by LaBeouf, Rönkkö & Turner.

Commencing at 9am on January 20, 2017, the day of the inauguration of the 45th President of the United States, the public is invited to deliver the words “HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US” into a camera mounted on a wall outside the Museum of the Moving Image, New York, repeating the phrase as many times, and for as long as they wish.

Open to all, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, the participatory performance will be live-streamed continuously for four years, or the duration of the presidency. In this way, the mantra “HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US” acts as a show of resistance or insistence, opposition or optimism, guided by the spirit of each individual participant and the community.

On February 10, 2017, the Museum of the Moving Image abandoned the project.

On February 18, 2017, the project relocated to a wall outside the El Rey Theater, Albuquerque.

Since the project offers a livestream video, who knows what you will see. I saw a small group of nutty Mexicans jumping around screaming, “He will not divide us.” They looked high on dope.

Lebeouf was arrested for attacking a man at the installation in New York City last month.

People calls this stupidity art. It’s art like graffiti is art. It’s art like taking a dump in the middle of the street is art, if you’re a feminist claiming it’s art.

“On February 10, 2017, The Museum of the Moving Image abandoned HEWILLNOTDIVIDE.US. Their evident lack of commitment to the project is damning,” the artists said in a joint statement on LaBeouf’s website. “From the outset, the museum failed to address our concerns about the misleading framing of our piece as a political rally, rather than as a participatory performance artwork resisting the normalization of division.

“In fact, the museum demonstrated a spectacular lack of judgement—and courtesy to us as artists—by neglecting to consult us when they staged a political rally at the site of our artwork on January 29, 2017.

“On numerous occasions, we voiced serious concerns to the museum about hate speech occurring at the site of our project, and requested that the museum act responsibly in moderating this and providing the public a means of reporting such incidents. Our requests were not even acknowledged, let alone acted upon.

“Nonetheless, there had been no incidents of physical violence at the site of our project that we are aware of, nor that we had been informed of at any stage by the museum.

“It is our understanding that the museum bowed to political pressure in ceasing their involvement with our project. We were only informed of the museum’s capitulation in an email from their attorney, Brendan O’Rourke — a lawyer who we note also represents the current president.

“It is clear, therefore, that the Museum of the Moving Image is not fit to speak of our intent as artists.”

(An intellectual property lawyer named Brendan J. O’Rourke says on his website that he has successfully led ICANN proceedings for a number of celebrities, including Trump, in the past but is is unclear if he still represents the president or if it is the same lawyer who works with the Museum of Moving Image.)

The American Honey actor made headlines in January when LaBeouf, Rönkkö & Turner launched a four-year art project that featured a livestream outside the Museum of the Moving Image in Queens, New York, where people were encouraged to face the camera to state “he will not divide us.”

Shia Lebeouf followers meltdown in the video below. “Reeeeeeeeeeeeeee. SHUT THE FUCK UP.”

This is America today. Mental cases are everywhere, triggered by dope and the Donald.

Jew vs. Jew: MILO Meets Maher on Friday Night (Video)

Since MILO is a Trump supporter, the subtext of almost everything that takes place around him ends up in Trump’s backyard.

I don’t like putting MILO near the top of today’s posts, but I just found this video, so here it is.

MILO started to bore me about two or three months ago and nothing has changed about that. He’s an attention whore who is assuredly NOT alt-right. He’s really not that conservative either. It’s easy to go after low hanging fruit like nut job feminists and liberal college professors, which is his shtick.

The video shows MILO’s appearance on comedian Bill Maher’s HBO show. It lasts about 10 and a half painful minutes. There’s really not anything much of substance discussed regarding any of the issues we are concerned about.

Maher constantly cuts off MILO with gay jokes rather than have the conversation go into serious subjects.

Mashable offers the most insightful take on the whole shabby affair that I’ve seen.

Here’s an excerpt:

Maher, a sporadically liberal free speech advocate, seems to be blissfully ignorant about the past half-decade of cyclical internet outrage.

“If Mr. Yiannopoulos is indeed the monster Scahill claims — and he might be — nothing could serve the liberal cause better than having him exposed on Friday night,” Maher wrote in his statement.

If you’ve spent any time following Milo drama in the past few years, Maher’s approach feels like magical realism. How could he think he’s “exposing” someone who’s already been exposed and roasted time and time again?

That’s because the comedian follows the same logic most media lived by during the primaries. There was little danger in showering Trump with copious amount of free press, the argument went, because of how blatantly unqualified Trump was for president. Audiences would pick up on him immediately. By simply broadcasting Trump’s rallies on television, he would peacefully self-destruct.

As we’ve now learned, the opposite happened. Trump wasn’t exposed when CNN played his rallies without critique — his reputation was sometimes even burnished. Sure, internet progressives tirelessly mocked Kellyanne Conway for making up a massacre. Still, 51% of Trump supporters now believe that the massacre justifies Trump’s extensive Muslim ban.

Audiences who would have never been exposed to these characters now saw them in full light — and some liked what they saw.

By providing these people with a mainstream platform, hosts and journalists do little to expose Milo and Conway for their fringe ideologies. They normalize them and help make their extremist nationalist beliefs more palatable. It’s much more acceptable to defend “black crime” or “killer dykes” when there’s a handsome man on television defending it.

OK, I get it. Ban Trump and everyone who supports him from TV. That’s the gist of the Mashable argument.

When I was a college professor, we embraced the honorable principle that there’s a marketplace of ideas and that the good ideas would triump over the bad ones. Liberals say that conservative and populist ideas are bad, so must be banned.

They’re scared. And rightfully so. It’s time for us to move in for the kill and see to it that liberal (Jewish) control over the media is ended and some sort of fairness is reestablished.

This bullsh*t so called debate is trending #1 on Twitter. Honestly, it’s a comment on how pathetic Americans have become that this junk has so captivated so many millions. Sample opinions:

this-ii-pathetic-gif

Wild Fight at California High School Leaves Parents Perplexed (Video)

During my high school years, spent in a segregated all-white school in the Deep South, there was one brief fight the whole four years. It involved two male students. There were no police at school, either. The teacher’s word was law.

I wonder what’s different now.

D – i – v – e – r – s – i – t – y.

Aka, I Dindu Nuffins. But given that the neighborhood is Chicanos, how do you say Dindu Nuffins in Spanglish? Maybe this?: No hace’ nada.

CBS Los Angeles

RESEDA (CBSLA.com) — Parents of students at Grover Cleveland High School in Reseda spoke out Thursday about the way the school handled a full-out brawl.

The fight was caught on tape.

A security guard was reportedly beaten during the Wednesday fight that occurred around 11 a.m. on the campus at Tampa and Saticoy.

KCAL9’s Erica Mandy said while some parents were decidedly upset, others were not concerned.

“I got pushed around, and I got kicked,” said one student.

Dozens of students watched the brawl. Some took videos and shared them on Instagram.

“You just see like cops walking down the hallway fast,” said one student.

“I felt like a lot of people were getting hurt,” another student added.

One video of the incident — 45 seconds in length — shows no adults trying to step in to intercede.

School police and the LAPD ultimately intervened. The school police reported that no one was seriously hurt.

After the brawl, the school was placed on lockdown and parents received a recorded phone call from the principal. “Our campus was briefly in lockdown,” the call said.

A day later, parents have differing opinions.

“If it wasn’t for our children telling us what went on, we wouldn’t have known how serious it was,” said parent Niki Wysong.

“I’m just trusting the administration, I honestly think they took the right measures, and I feel okay about it,” said Soo Ahn.

“It was a small group of students,” said one parent, “it happens at every single school no matter where you’re at.”

“Overall we are pleased they did alert us, it would have been good to get a little more information quicker,” said another parent.

An LAUSD spokesperson sent Mandy an email.

“All student matters are confidential, but we can assure you that school personnel were present and acted quickly to restore order,” the email stated.

School police said the incident may have been an ongoing dispute between rival gangs.

But the district said gangs were not involved.

There is also no consensus on what caused the fight in the first place. And, perhaps more importantly, can it happen again?

Notice how the media prefers to omit any consideration of race in this incident. It would spoil the “Diversity is our strength” narrative.

One more thing, the video shows clearly the school to prison pipeline at work. Now, you understand.

SOME OF THE “KIDS” LOOK 40!

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg Promotes New World Order Globalism in New “Manifesto”

He’s going to be running for president. I’m telling you. You heard it here first. The Jews want one of their own as POTUS.

Reuters

Facebook Inc Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg laid out a vision on Thursday of his company serving as a bulwark against rising isolationism, writing in a letter to users that the company’s platform could be the “social infrastructure” for the globe.

In a 5,700-word manifesto, Zuckerberg, founder of the world’s largest social network, quoted Abraham Lincoln, the U.S. president during the country’s 19th century Civil War known for his eloquence, and offered a philosophical sweep that was unusual for a business magnate.

Zuckerberg’s comments come at a time when many people and nations around the world are taking an increasingly inward view. U.S. President Donald Trump pledged to put “America first” in his inaugural address in January. That followed Britain’s decision last June to exit the European Union.

“Across the world there are people left behind by globalization, and movements for withdrawing from global connection,” Zuckerberg wrote, without naming specific movements.

The question, the 32-year-old executive said, was whether “the path ahead is to connect more or reverse course,” adding that he stands for bringing people together.

Quoting from a letter Lincoln wrote to Congress in the depths of the Civil War, he wrote to Facebook’s 1.9 billion users: “The dogmas of the quiet past, are inadequate to the stormy present.”

Zuckerberg said that Facebook could move far beyond its roots as a network for friends and families to communicate, suggesting that it can play a role in five areas, all of which he referred to as “communities,” ranging from strengthening traditional institutions, to providing help during and after crises, to boosting civic engagement.

In comments on Facebook, some users praised Zuckerberg’s note for staying positive, while others declared “globalism” dead.

Facebook has been under pressure to more closely police hoaxes, fake news and other controversial content, although the concerns have had little impact on its finances. The company reported 2016 revenue of $27.6 billion, up 54 percent from a year earlier.

One area where Zuckerberg wrote that Facebook would do better would be suggesting “meaningful communities.” Some 100 million users are members of groups that are “very meaningful” to them, he wrote, representing only about 5 percent of users.

Facebook is also using artificial intelligence more to flag photos and videos that need human review, Zuckerberg wrote. One-third of all reports to Facebook’s review team are generated by artificial intelligence, he wrote.

Zuckerberg’s letter was “a bit more ambitious and a bit more of the 30,000-foot view than I see from most tech company CEOs,” Peter Micek, global policy and legal counsel at Access Now, an international digital rights group, said in a phone interview.

But Zuckerberg stayed away from certain subjects on which Facebook could be vulnerable to criticism, mentioning the word “privacy” only once, Micek said.