(((Bernie Sanders))) hilariously rails against Americans ‘worshiping wealth’

American Thinker

A man who owns 3 homes – including a recent purchase of a $600,000 vacation home – took to Twitter yesterday to criticize Americans because we’re a nation that “worships wealth rather than caring for the poor.”

In response, the snark was running hot and heavy as the twitterverse destroyed the socialist Senator from Vermont.

Sometimes, you must bow to the absurd. But the absurdity of Sanders claiming we worship wealth while he lives like a king was just too good a target to pass up.

Even more amazing, I would bet that Sanders was unaware of his hypocrisy when he sent out that tweet. It never crossed his mind that people would conclude he worships wealth because he has 3 homes. He considers himself above all that money grubbing. He deserves what he’s got because his more moral, more high minded, and just better than the rest of us.

And liberals complain about Trump’s denial of reality?

American Thinker and the Tweeters all missed an important point while having fun showing the hypocrisy of the greedy Jew Senator.

That point is that government has no business telling us what we should or should not “worship” nor what we should or should not do with money that we earned through the sweat of our brow.

Bernie would take money from the productive and give it to the breeders, the layabouts, and the lazy. That’s just like a Jew so long as it isn’t their money.

My shot at Bernie was probably shadowbanned, but here it is:

Oregon Program Puts a Homeless Person in Your Backyard

BACKYARD HOMELESS SHELTER.

Here’s a liberal band aid that amounts to silly, ineffective virtue signaling. Those homeless people housed in these units (can’t call them homes) are going to be invading suburban neighborhoods because a dumb liberal is willing to have a unit set up in her backyard.

Dumb and DANGEROUS!

Daily Mail

Faced with an intractable homeless problem, officials in Portland are thinking inside the box.

A handful of homeless families will soon move into tiny, government-constructed modular units in the backyards of willing homeowners.
Portland officials are looking for four backyards to place its Accessory Dwelling Units, what some people may call a granny flat, or a tiny home minus wheels.

Under the pilot program taking effect this summer, the homeowners will take over the heated, fully plumbed tiny houses in five years and can use them for rental income.

The project, called A Place for You, is believed to be the first in the nation to recruit stable residents to address a homeless crisis that’s gotten so bad the city last year declared a state of emergency and made it legal to sleep on the street.

Portland has an affordable rental shortage of 24,000 units and nearly 4,000 people sleep on the street, in a shelter or in transitional housing each night.

Residents just passed a $260 million housing bond, but it will be two years before those units are ready, said Mary Li, director of Multnomah County’s new Idea Lab, which developed the concept.

The only ones of this group I’d want in my backyard would be the dogs. The rest of them look like drug addicts because they are drug addicts.

The dogs are often used to draw donations from unwary liberals or just plain stupid people. Some of the local “homeless” in San Antonio reportedly live in homes and are driven to prime locations where their begging earns them $250 a day in tax-free income.

Snopes Debunks Libtard Claim that Trump Will Starve Seniors by Eliminating Meals on Wheels

MEALS ON WHEELS, HOUSTON, TEXAS.

A local woman I know gets a lunch delivered to her mailbox every day by Meals on Wheels at a cost of $3.00 per lunch. The servings are small. One can purchase a frozen dinner at the supermarket that is significantly larger for less than $3.00.

Last night, Twitter erupted with the “Trump is going to starve grandma to death” libtard nonsense.

Snopes debunked the liberal claims. Originally, the Snopes rating was “Mostly false.” I see it’s been changed to “Mixture”.

The text at Snopes appears to be the same as I copied and pasted earlier today before the rating change.

Excerpt from Snopes

On 15 March 2017, the web site Occupy Democrats published an article about a blueprint budget released by the Trump administration under the sensationalized title “Trump Just Announced Plan to End ‘Meals on Wheels’ for Seniors.” Although the text of the article was largely accurate, the clickbait headline misled many readers into believing that President Trump had specifically proposed to eliminate Meals on Wheels, a service that delivers meals to individuals at home (primarily seniors) who are unable to purchase or prepare meals for themselves.

However, President Trump’s blueprint budget does not mention or target Meals on Wheels, nor would the adoption of that budget spell the end of Meals on Wheels. Rather, the blueprint contained a section proposing the elimination of funding for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program:

Eliminates funding for the Community Development Block Grant program, a savings of $3 billion from the 2017 annualized CR level. The Federal Government has spent over $150 billion on this block grant since its inception in 1974, but the program is not well-targeted to the poorest populations and has not demonstrated results.

The Community Development Block Grand Program is used to fund a variety of community projects by providing grants to state and local governments, who then allocate the funds to city programs (of which Meals on Wheels is one example):

The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is a flexible program that provides communities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs. Beginning in 1974, the CDBG program is one of the longest continuously run programs at HUD. The CDBG program provides annual grants on a formula basis to 1209 general units of local government and States.

The CDBG program works to ensure decent affordable housing, to provide services to the most vulnerable in our communities, and to create jobs through the expansion and retention of businesses. CDBG is an important tool for helping local governments tackle serious challenges facing their communities. The CDBG program has made a difference in the lives of millions of people and their communities across the Nation.

As CNN noted, one example of how the federal CDBG program works is as follows:

The government of San Jose, California, spends federal CDBG funds on homeless outreach, resolving “slum and blight” and other community development needs.

In a statement issued before Trump’s budget blueprint was released, the city said it expected to receive more than $2.5 million in funding for the 2016-2017 fiscal year. It planned to spend $100,650 of that on Meals on Wheels.

Other expenditures included legal aid, senior assistance, literacy programs and home repair for the poor.

The elimination of the federal CDBG program would reduce local funding for a number of programs, including Meals on Wheels. However, according to the Meals on Wheels 2015 annual report, the majority of their funding (about 84%) comes from individual contributions, while only 3% comes from federal grants such as the CDBG program provides. Meals on Wheels might have to make up some revenue shortfalls through alternative sources if the CDBG program were eliminated, but they wouldn’t be shut down.

Twitter is a liberal sewer. The left’s lies are easily exposed. In this case, the exposure came from the dodgy liberal Snopes site.

The more the left lies blatantly, the more disgusting they become in the eyes of people who value truth. Kudos to Snopes this time for exposing the actual situation. Kudos to Trump for trying to kill an ineffective, wasteful bloc grant program that needs to be killed off.

There must be thousands more Tweets like these that reflect the liberal mindset that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.

Inspiring! Putin speaking about the collapse of Western civilization

Paul Craig Roberts

Putin speaking about the collapse of Western civilization at the Valdai International Discussion Club, September 19, 2013
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/19243

“Another serious challenge to Russia’s identity is linked to events taking place in the world. Here there are both foreign policy and moral aspects. We can see how many of the Euro-Atlantic countries are actually rejecting their roots, including the Christian values that constitute the basis of Western civilisation. They are denying moral principles and all traditional identities: national, cultural, religious and even sexual. They are implementing policies that equate large families with same-sex partnerships, belief in God with the belief in Satan.

“The excesses of political correctness have reached the point where people are seriously talking about registering political parties whose aim is to promote paedophilia. People in many European countries are embarrassed or afraid to talk about their religious affiliations. Holidays are abolished or even called something different; their essence is hidden away, as is their moral foundation. And people are aggressively trying to export this model all over the world. I am convinced that this opens a direct path to degradation and primitivism, resulting in a profound demographic and moral crisis.

“What else but the loss of the ability to self-reproduce could act as the greatest testimony of the moral crisis facing a human society? Today almost all developed nations are no longer able to reproduce themselves, even with the help of migration. Without the values embedded in Christianity and other world religions, without the standards of morality that have taken shape over millennia, people will inevitably lose their human dignity. We consider it natural and right to defend these values . One must respect every minority’s right to be different, but the rights of the majority must not be put into question.

“At the same time we see attempts to somehow revive a standardised model of a unipolar world and to blur the institutions of international law and national sovereignty. Such a unipolar, standardised world does not require sovereign states; it requires vassals. In a historical sense this amounts to a rejection of one’s own identity, of the God-given diversity of the world.

“Russia agrees with those who believe that key decisions should be worked out on a collective basis, rather than at the discretion of and in the interests of certain countries or groups of countries. Russia believes that international law, not the right of the strong, must apply. And we believe that every country, every nation is not exceptional, but unique, original and benefits from equal rights, including the right to independently choose their own development path.”

SJW Starbucks (((CEO))) Hurts Bottom Line

HOWARD SCHULTZ. FOUNDER AND CEO OF STARBUCKS.

There’s always Dunkin Donuts or homebrew, (((Howard Schultz.))) You screwed up, pal.

Yahoo.com

LOS ANGELES, March 9 (Reuters) – Starbucks Corp’s vow to hire thousands of refugees after President Donald Trump’s first executive order that temporarily banned travel from seven mostly-Muslim nations appears to be hurting customer sentiment of the coffee chain.

Trump supporters have used Twitter, Facebook and other social media sites to call for a boycott since Jan. 29, when Starbucks Chief Executive Howard Schultz vowed to hire 10,000 refugees over five years in the countries where it does business.

Schultz in a letter to employees said the promise of the American Dream was “being called into question” and that “the civility and human rights we have all taken for granted for so long are under attack.”

YouGov BrandIndex, which tracks consumers’ sentiment toward companies and their willingness to purchase from those brands, noted that the data around this boycott is different because both measures are declining.

Starbucks’ consumer perception levels took an immediate hit as measured by YouGov BrandIndex’s Buzz score, falling by two-thirds between Jan. 29 and Feb. 13, and have not recovered.

Starbucks Buzz score fell to 4 from 12 during that time.
Such scores can range from 100 to -100 and are compiled by subtracting negative feedback from positive. A zero score means equal positive and negative feedback.

Prior to Schultz’s refugee comments, 30 percent of consumers said they would consider buying from Starbucks the next time they made a coffee purchase, that fell to a low of 24 percent and now stands at 26 percent, according to a YouGov spokesman.

“Consumer perception dropped almost immediately,” said YouGov BrandIndex CEO Ted Marzilli, who added that the statistically significant drop in purchase consideration data showed that consumers became less keen to buy from Starbucks.

“That would indicate the announcement has had a negative impact on Starbucks, and might indicate a negative impact on sales in the near term,” he said.

South African President Jacob Zuma calls for confiscation of white land without compensation

We know that the taking of the property of white people in South Africa without compensation will leave those people totally vulnerable to being murdered. Thus, the white genocide will accelerate.

Here in the United States, the left pushes the message that all that white people have is due to their “white privilege.” It’s one small step away from saying, “Since whites stole all they have, it must be redistributed to nonwhites.” In fact, because of high property and income taxes in the States, our property is being confiscated from us. We’re like frogs slowly boiling in the pot.

frog-in-boiling-water

From what I understand about Australia, the ability of whites to buy property in the first place no longer exists because of government policies favoring nonwhite migrants in housing.

In no formerly white country are we far off from a more open, but still unspoken, white genocide. Obviously, a health care system run by government that sets up rigged “death panels” is another way to white genocide.

While our white brothers and sisters in South Africa are in the greatest danger, all of us face some level of peril.

Telegraph

President Jacob Zumahas called on parliament to change South Africa’s constitution to allow the expropriation of white owned land without compensation.

Mr Zuma, 74, who made the remarks in a speech yesterday/FRI morning, said he wanted to establish a “pre-colonial land audit of land use and occupation patterns” before changing the law.

“We need to accept the reality that those who are in parliament where laws are made, particularly the black parties, should unite because we need a two-thirds majority to effect changes in the constitution,” he said.

Mr Zuma, who has lurched from one scandal to another since being elected to office in 2009, has adopted a more populist tone since his ruling African National Congress (ANC) party suffered its worst election result last August since the end of apartheid in 1994.

The party lost the economic hub of Johannesburg, the capital Pretoria and the coastal city of Port Elizabeth to the moderate Democratic Alliance party, which already held the city of Cape Town.

The ANC is also under pressure from the radical Economic Freedom Fighters, led by Julius Malema.

Mr Malema has been travelling the country urging black South Africans to take back land from white invaders and “Dutch thugs”.

He told parliament this week that his party wanted to “unite black people in South Africa” to expropriate land without compensation.

“People of South Africa, where you see a beautiful land, take it, it belongs to you,” he said. Although progress has been made in transferring property to black South Africans, land ownership is believed to be skewed in favour of whites more than 20 years after the end of apartheid.

The Institute of Race Relations, an independent research body, said that providing a racial breakdown of South Africa’s rural landowners was “almost impossible”.

I haven’t watched all of the video below, but for those interested in the Boers, the part I watched seemed informative.

Nappy Haired White Race Faker, Rachel Dolezal, in Dire Economic Straits

RACHEL DOLEZAL. CLAIMS TO BE REVILED BY BOTH BLACKS AND WHITES.
Rachel Dolezal

When Rachel Dolezal was exposed as a white woman in blackface and a African do two years ago, she briefly became America’s most famous loon. In a crazy, mixed-up world in which some “women” have penises and some “men” have vaginas, why wouldn’t a person with white skin and DNA be able to get away with claiming she was black.

Sadly for her, Dolezal found it didn’t work that way. If Caitlyn Jenner was hailed by liberals as a hero, Dolezal was the liberal zero.

Whites enjoyed watching the liberal hypocrisy exposed.

Now, she’s back with a sob story and a book.

Daily Mail

Two years after race-faker Rachel Dolezal was exposed for living secretly as a black woman, she insists in her new memoir that she did nothing wrong.

The 39-year-old made international headlines after her parents, Larry and Ruthanne, revealed she was a white woman pretending to be black.

She resigned from her post as the Spokane, Washington, NAACP leader and also lost her job as an adjunct instructor at Eastern Washington University.

Dolezal later conceded that she ‘was biologically born white to white parents’, and compared herself to Caitlyn Jenner, claiming race is ‘not coded in your DNA’ and should be viewed like gender or religion.

Last year, she announced the release of her memoir, In Full Color, on Instagram. The book is set to be published next month.

Dolezal told the newspaper that she is currently jobless and feeding her family with food stamps.

Her friend reportedly helped her pay two months worth of rent and she said she expects to be homeless.

Dolezal said she has applied for more than 100 jobs, including a position at the university where she used to teach, but no one will hire her.

The only work she has been offered is reality TV, and porn.

‘Right now the only place that I feel understood and completely accepted is with my kids and my sister,’ Dolezal told the Guardian.

She says she has very few friends and despite changing her name on her legal documents, she is still recognized wherever she goes.

BEFORE SHE BECAME BLACK.
dolezal white girl

The Guardian

African American commentators called her a “blackface”, guilty of the worst extremes of cultural appropriation. She was “mentally ill”, and had cheated black people out of positions that were rightfully theirs. When Dolezal quoted the activist Dick Gregory to black talkshow host Loni Love – “White isn’t a race, it’s a state of mind” – the host exploded: “No, let me tell you something. I’m black. I can’t be you, I can’t reverse myself. That’s the difference.” Twitter span with comic memes, and still burns with comments along the lines of: “Why hasn’t anybody beaten her up already?”

“This is obviously an issue a lot of people want to say things about,” reflects Dolezal now. “And it needs to be talked about, so it’s kind of helpful to create a punching bag. There’s nobody saying, ‘Well, that’s racist if you say that about Rachel’, or ‘That’s sexist if you say that about Rachel.’ There’s no protected class for me. I’m this generic, ambiguous scapegoat for white people to call me a race traitor and take out their hostility on. And I’m a target for anger and pain about white people from the black community. It’s like I am the worst of all these worlds.”

DOLEZAL AND SONS. THEY’RE REALLY BLACK, LIKE HER EX-HUSBANDS.
dolezal and sons

If anyone expected disgusting Dolezal to give up the pretense that she’s black, she’s not cooperating. I’ll bet there are plenty of black males out there who’d marry her, although they might want her to go back to her natural blonde locks. She’s a one of a kind, for sure.

As to white men? She’s gone black. We don’t want her back.