French President Emmanuel Macron spoke in resigned tones in mid April about the invasion of Europe by African negros.
On May 10 he received the Charlemagne Prize for contributions to “European unity.”
If you look more closely at the Charlemagne Prize, you’ll discover that it’s really the Codenhave-Kalergi Prize to encourage the genocide of the European.
Macron is widely viewed as a globalist shill, but is he playing a game with the Jews who would destroy the European race?
I don’t know for sure the answer to the question, but Macron is replacing Angela Merkel as the leader of a unified Europe. But unified in a good or bad way?
The French president claimed that due to immense population growth in Africa, Europe needs to prepare for an “unprecedented” wave of mass migration, “that is there and will last”, implying that the destiny of the two continents is intertwined.
“We have a migratory phenomenon that is there and will last, because there are geopolitical conflicts, climatic change and African demography that is there and that is a real bomb.” Proclaimed the French president during an interview on Sunday. Somehow, because all these things are occurring in Africa, it is up to Europeans to welcome these people and fix their situation, never mind the fact that the USA, China, India, Europe and Japan could combined, fit into Africa and that that continent is brimming with resources.
Macron referenced the work of French-American journalist and professor Stephen Smith in a recent book.
“[Africans] are mostly turning to Europe because the continent [of Europe] is not an island, because of our location, and because Europe has its destiny bound with Africa,” said the staunchly pro-EU French figure during a two-hour long interview.
Smith estimates that the number of Africans living in Europe will grow from nine million to between 150 million and 200 million within the next 30 years.
The Rush to Europe describes a massive, unprecedented population transfer still in its infancy, which Smith explains will — “paradoxically” — be triggered mostly as a result of Western foreign aid money financing wannabe migrants’ journeys from Africa.
Smith in his book outlined a number of different scenarios he believes could emerge from the situation.
“The most optimistic” of these — according to Le Figaro — is “Eurafrica”, which would see mass migration create a ‘welcoming’, multicultural Europe, which “would fully embrace being a ‘mixed-race land of immigration and interbreeding’”. – Sweden is the prime example of this, a large welfare state combined with open borders. The country is committing demographic suicide, and that is exactly what Smith wants for the whole Continent.
This scenario would see the end of welfare states in Europe however, Smith said, pointing to the incompatibility of large-scale immigration and generous social programmes. – Even the ‘humanitarian superpower’, Sweden has had to cut down on the number of immigrants coming in and raping the countries resources as well as its women.
Another possible scenario, ‘Fortress Europe’, is one which involves “a battle generally considered unwinnable, or even shameful” but which Smith points to as the case which strongly “has its reasons and its chances to succeed”, noting the effectiveness of EU deals with Libya and Turkey in stopping the influx. – Typical postmodernist propaganda ‘fighting to keep your way of life is ‘shameful”
Africans have the second largest continent on the planet, full of resources, all to themselves, we only have one home, Europe. What needs to happen is clear. Our borders must be enforced, and the Africans need to build up their countries and prosper in their territory, Europeans can and have been helping with that. But what we cannot have, is that continent’s people flooding into our territories, because if they do, we will disappear. Demography is destiny.
The board of directors for the Charlemagne Prize said they were honoring Macron “in recognition of his vision of a new Europe” and his “decisive stance” against nationalism and isolationism.
The bishop of Aachen, Helmut Dieser, opened the ceremony in Aachen Cathedral, congratulating Macron for winning last year’s French presidential election on a pro-European platform. “We therefore offer you all our respect and gratitude,” the bishop said.
The annual Charlemagne Prize commends public figures who promote European unity. It is named after the Charlemagne, who in 800 AD took up the role that would later come to be known as the “Holy Roman Emperor,” launching a series of wars and political reforms to build a continental European empire.
Macron has made a series of prospective EU reforms one of the focal points of his presidency. Notable goals include the creation of a common eurozone budget and a European finance minister post, a joint military “rapid reaction force,” and a new EU tax regime targeting internet technology giants.
This, Kalergi stated, should be a plan run for and by the racial and spiritual supremacy of ‘blood aristocracy and Jewry’. These are all his crude racialist words, not mine. People should be free to mix and settle with a partner from whatever race or ethnicity they choose. But what Kalergi and the Pan European plan specifically calls out for is the deliberate use of enforced and disproportionate mass immigration, especially from non-European countries, in order to bring in a Pan European single state dictatorship and destroy the indigenous pink/white nationalities, and therefore resistance, of Europe.
All I can say at this point is that Macron bears watching. His star may flame out quickly, but given his youth he may be around for decades. It would be great if he were willing to fight for a white Europe, but don’t hold your breath.