The propagandist who came up with the name “dreamers” for a motley group of illegal aliens deserves a lot of credit. Who could be against dreamers? Certainly not the motley group of so-called legal experts called the Supreme Court.
The illegal aliens get to stay for now. Apparently, there is a traditional legal process that must be followed, with Trump’s people being forced to argue before the highly liberal 9th circuit appeals court that Obama’s DACA order should be ended. We know the 9th circuit will tell Trump to f*ck off and drop dead, but the DOJ is going to have to make their case to that bunch of activists anyway.
What is most disturbing to me is the idea is being enshrined into law that criminals should be allowed to benefit from their crimes. At some point, poor black armed robbers will be allowed to keep their loot so long as they rob from rich people. Make that white people who worked and saved in order to own something.
Excerpt from Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday dealt a setback to President Donald Trump, requiring his administration to maintain protections he has sought to end for hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought illegally into the United States as children.
The justices refused to hear the administration’s appeal of a federal judge’s Jan. 9 injunction that halted Trump’s move to rescind a program that benefits immigrants known as “Dreamers” implemented in 2012 by his Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama. Under the Republican president’s action, the protections were due to start phasing out beginning in March.
In a brief order, the justices did not explain their reasoning, but said the appeal was “denied without prejudice,” indicating they will maintain an open mind on the underlying legal issue still being considered by a lower court, the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The high court also said it expects the lower court to “proceed expeditiously to decide this case.”
Under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, roughly 700,000 young adult, mostly Hispanics, are protected from deportation and given work permits for two-year periods, after which they must re-apply.
The Trump administration had challenged a nationwide injunction by San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who ruled last month that DACA must remain in place while the litigation is resolved.
In an unusual move, the administration appealed directly to the Supreme Court instead of going first to a federal appeals court.
Alsup ruled that the challengers, including the states of California, Maine, Maryland and Minnesota and Obama’s former homeland security secretary Janet Napolitano, were likely to succeed in arguing that the administration’s decision to end DACA was arbitrary.
Justice Department spokesman Devin O‘Malley said in a statement that the administration will continue to defend the Department of Homeland Security’s “lawful authority to wind down DACA in an orderly manner.”
O‘Malley said that “while we were hopeful for a different outcome,” the high court rarely agrees to take up cases before a lower court has ruled, “though in our view it was warranted for the extraordinary injunction requiring the Department of Homeland Security to maintain DACA.”
If Obama could legally write DACA into law through an executive order, then logic dictates that Trump should be able to cancel it. When it comes to the hatred of Trump by liberals and their desire to destroy America and exterminate the white race, there is no logic or law to rely on.
We live to fight another day.