NY Times: O’Reilly Paid Lis Wiehl $32 Million to Settle Sexual Harassment Claim Prior to Fox Contract Renewal

What happened between former Fox News analyst Lis Wiehl and Bill O’Reilly is known only to them. O’Reilly certainly has shown on a number of occasions that he’s a jerk.

But $32 million given to a woman who suffered no physical or mental impairment because she had to deal with a jerk is obscenely excessive.

New York Times via NOLA

O’Reilly settled new harassment claims, then Fox renewed his contract

By The New York Times
Last January, six months after Fox News ousted its chairman amid a sexual harassment scandal, the network’s top-rated host at the time, Bill O’Reilly, struck a $32 million agreement with a longtime network analyst to settle new sexual harassment allegations, according to two people briefed on the matter — an extraordinarily large amount for such cases.

Although the deal has not been previously made public, the network’s parent company, Twenty-First Century Fox, acknowledges it was aware of the woman’s complaints about O’Reilly. They included allegations of repeated harassment, a nonconsensual sexual relationship and the sending of gay pornography and other sexually explicit material to her, according to the people briefed on the matter.

It was at least the sixth agreement — and by far the largest — made by either O’Reilly or the company to settle harassment allegations against him. Despite that record, Twenty-First Century Fox began contract negotiations with O’Reilly, and in February granted him a four-year extension that paid $25 million a year.

Interviews with people familiar with the settlement and documents obtained by The New York Times show how the company tried and ultimately failed to contain the second wave of a sexual harassment crisis that initially burst into public view the previous summer and cost the Fox News chairman, Roger Ailes, and eventually O’Reilly their jobs.

In January, the reporting shows, Rupert Murdoch and his sons, Lachlan and James, the top executives at Twenty-First Century Fox, made a business calculation to stand by O’Reilly despite his most recent, and potentially most explosive, harassment dispute.

Their decision came as the company was trying to convince its employees, its board and the public that it had cleaned up the network’s workplace culture. At the same time, they were determined to hold on to O’Reilly, whose value to the network increased after the departure of another prominent host, Megyn Kelly.

But by April, the Murdochs decided to jettison O’Reilly as some of the settlements became public and posed a significant threat to their business empire.

Early that month, The Times reported on five settlements involving O’Reilly, leading advertisers to boycott his show and spawning protests calling for his ouster. About the same time, the O’Reilly settlements arose as an issue in Twenty-First Century Fox’s attempt to buy the European satellite company Sky.

In addition, federal prosecutors who had been investigating the network’s handling of sexual harassment complaints against Ailes had asked for material related to allegations involving O’Reilly, according to an internal Fox email obtained by The Times.

“Their legal theory has been that we hid the fact that we had a problem with Roger,” Gerson Zweifach, Fox’s general counsel, wrote in the email, referring to the prosecutors and Ailes, “and now it will be applied to O’Reilly, and they will insist on full knowledge of all complaints about O’Reilly’s behavior in the workplace, regardless of who settled them.”

He warned the Murdochs that they should expect details from the January settlement to become public. Six days later, O’Reilly was fired.

In a statement, Twenty-First Century Fox said it was not privy to the amount of the settlement and regarded O’Reilly’s January settlement, which was reached with a 15-year Fox News analyst named Lis Wiehl, as a personal issue between the two of them.


Regarding O’Reilly’s contract extension, the company said Fox News “surely would have wanted to renew” O’Reilly’s contract, noting that “he was the biggest star in cable TV.”

It emphasized that provisions were added to the new contract that allowed for his dismissal if new allegations or other relevant information arose. “The company subsequently acted based on the terms of this contract,” the statement said.

In an interview Wednesday, O’Reilly, at times combative and defiant, said there was no merit to any of the allegations against him. “I never mistreated anyone,” he said, adding that he had resolved matters privately because he wanted to protect his children from the publicity.

“It’s politically and financially motivated,” he said of the public outcry over the allegations against him, “and we can prove it with shocking information, but I’m not going to sit here in a courtroom for a year and a half and let my kids get beaten up every single day of their lives by a tabloid press that would sit there, and you know it.”

He declined to specifically address questions about the settlement with Wiehl or any others.

O’Reilly’s lawyer, Fredric S. Newman, described his client’s relationship with Wiehl as an 18-year friendship in which she at times gave him legal advice.

Asked about the allegation of a nonconsensual sexual relationship, a representative for O’Reilly, Mark Fabiani, said that Twenty-First Century Fox was “well aware” Wiehl had signed a sworn affidavit “renouncing all allegations against him,” adding that after receiving the document Fox News offered O’Reilly “a record breaking contract.”

Wiehl’s $32 million deal dwarfs other previously known sexual harassment settlements at Fox News. The largest of those was the $20 million payout former host Gretchen Carlson received after she sued Ailes in July 2016.

The settlement with Wiehl was more than three times the amount of any of O’Reilly’s previously known deals; in 2004, he had settled a lawsuit with a producer, Andrea Mackris, for about $9 million. Publicly known harassment settlements involving O’Reilly have totaled about $45 million.

Read Bill’s response here.

9 thoughts on “NY Times: O’Reilly Paid Lis Wiehl $32 Million to Settle Sexual Harassment Claim Prior to Fox Contract Renewal

  1. Tel(aviv)sion stinks.

    “O’Reilly’s contract, noting that “he was the biggest star in cable TV.”
    How can anybody enjoy watching this bully, other than sadists? This is a sad statement about cable TV to me. I could never stand him for more than 15 seconds like (((Judge Judy))) or (((Ellen Degenerate))). Judge Judy was a TV bully just like O’Reilly, a disgrace to the Bench. Degenerate is just a disgrace.

    These settlements may be a tax scam and fraud. He and /or the network get a tax deduction from his salary or network profits. The winner gets a tax fee payment which they may have split with O’Reilly. All his lawyer expenses woudl be deductible also. These types of fake settlements are made with politicians who have been “slandered” or “libeled” by agreement, in advance. A tax free bribe to the Polly and fully deductible to the network. Win-win for crooks.

    The size of all the payments are highly suspicious. If genuine then they are blackmail, which is a crime more serious than his philandering ways.

  2. Remember this gal. Also remember this lawsuit, but her name was not released. O’Reilly frequently had her and Gretchen Carlson, both lawyers, for spots on his program when he asked them to cover legal matters.

    But, if this is true, what would he have been thinking making advances to a lawyer in her 50’s if this is true. She’s 56 now!

    She’s accusing him of “repeated harassment, a nonconsensual sexual relationship and the sending of gay pornography and other sexually explicit material to her.”

    WOW! All that? Does that mean she couldn’t have told him “NO?” But, it would have meant no more spots on his program. Too bad, honey, speak up!

    Once again, I return to women giving off signals dressing like sluts on Fox as per its requirement. But, Greta never dressed like that.

    What with Hollywood and accusations against all media, O’Reilly might be guilty.

    Who knows! I’m not taking sides.

  3. Lis (((Weill)))?? Anyway, he gave her 32million and he makes 24million a year ..interesting! Non consensual sex? Bill ORielly is the typical moronic dirtbag talking head we are unfortunately exposed to by our Fake media.Never liked this turd when he was loving on GWBUSH and Cheney and all their illegal wars for Israhell and even after they and Israhell did 911…. So he is basically a ((tool)) How he would talk to his stupid listeners ..sooo slow… then for his “pin head” listeners he would have the words printed too! All of the women “news” commentators have their boobs and asses hanging out while their dresses look like sausage skin. So men won’t focus on the idiot messages they deliver. How could anyone like the idiot who penned books such as “Killing Kennedy” where Oswald did it, and “Killing Jesus” we can all guess it wasn’t the JUs. Maybe their shocked ORielly’s charges were heterosexual “shocking” maybe he would be more appreciated at CNN where all the men and many women are queer!

  4. If he was innocent he wouldn’t have given her 32 million. He’s probably one of those people who thinks he can do whatever he wants and nothing will happen to him. May all these losers go down in flames.

    • Whatever the case maybe someone has major dirt on him and is blackmailing O reilly Who coughs up that much? then again maybe the 32 million number is inaccurate

      • If she had sued him in Court she might have won about $1 million or less. Why do the police not charge him now? Rich media tools are not exempt from laws.

        Repeated harassment and sex abuse is ridiculous. She was not a child and not trapped like a sex slave. She could have ended their relationship at any time.

  5. O’Reilly was a dumbski. Most of the hit-on bimbos were lawyers. And, O’Reilly was always fond of reminding his viewers that he attended Harvard and how smart he was. However, for $32 million, I would let him harass me.

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s