Breaking! Google Fires Author Of “Outrageous” Memo Slamming Company’s Anti-Conservative Culture

UNPINNED 8/8. PINNED TO THE TOP OF THE HOMEPAGE 8/7/2017. SCROLL DOWN FOR NEWEST POSTS.

SUNDAR PICHAI, DOTHEAD CEO OF GOOGLE.

Zerohedge

Yesterday we reported that a 10-page document penned by an unnamed Google engineer titled “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber” which criticized the company’s “left-leaning”, “anti-conservative” culture and called for replacing Google’s diversity initiatives with policies that encourage “ideological diversity” instead, led to angry outrage among fellow Google employees and Silicon Valley liberals. The document, published in its entirety by Gizmodo, quickly went “viral” both inside the company and within the broader Silicon Valley community.

The document’s author also wrote that employees with conservative political beliefs are discriminated against at Google and lamented about how “leftist” ideology is harmful. It argued that the company should have a more “open” culture where its viewpoint would be welcomed. The document said that improving racial and gender diversity is less important than making sure conservatives feel comfortable expressing themselves at work.

And, as of moments ago, the author of the memo – whose name has since been revealed as James Damore – has been fired.

I found the following Harvard University photo of a James Damore who is described as a Google software engineer.

It’s a shame that honesty is not appreciated by the scum at Google who make decisions that affect our lives so much.

According to Bloomberg, “Google has fired an employee who wrote an internal memo blasting the web company’s diversity policies, creating a firestorm across Silicon Valley.”

James Damore, the Google engineer who wrote the note, confirmed his dismissal in an email, saying that he had been fired for “perpetuating gender stereotypes.” A Google representative didn’t immediately return a request for comment.

Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai sent a note to employees on Monday, first reported by ReCode, that said portions of the employee’s memo “violate our Code of Conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace.” He did not, however, say at the time if the company was taking action against the employee.

As we explained yesterday, Damore’s 10-page memo accused Google of silencing conservative political opinions and argued that biological differences play a role in the shortage of women in tech and leadership positions.

It circulated widely inside the company and became public over the weekend, causing a furor that amplified the pressure on Google executives to take a more definitive stand.

After the controversy swelled, Danielle Brown, Google’s new vice president for diversity, integrity and governance, sent a statement to staff condemning Damore’s views and reaffirmed the company’s stance on diversity. In internal discussion boards, multiple employees said they supported firing the author, and some said they would not choose to work with him, according to postings viewed by Bloomberg News.

The memo and surrounding debate has come at an awkward time for Google which is currently fending off a lawsuit from the U.S. Department of Labor alleging the company systemically discriminates against women. Google has denied the charges, arguing that it doesn’t have a gender gap in pay, but has declined to share full salary information with the government. According to the company’s most recent demographic report, 69 percent of its workforce and 80 percent of its technical staff are male.

And speaking of hypocrisy, in the same memo from CEO Pichai, we read the the following:

… let me say that we strongly support the right of Googlers to express themselves, and much of what was in that memo is fair to debate, regardless of whether a vast majority of Googlers disagree with it.

… So to be clear again, many points raised in the memo — such as the portions criticizing Google’s trainings, questioning the role of ideology in the workplace, and debating whether programs for women and underserved groups are sufficiently open to all — are important topics. The author had a right to express their views on those topics — we encourage an environment in which people can do this and it remains our policy to not take action against anyone for prompting these discussions.

… there are co-workers who are questioning whether they can safely express their views in the workplace (especially those with a minority viewpoint). They too feel under threat, and that is also not OK. People must feel free to express dissent.
… and to be fired immediately after, especially if the “dissent” puts into question some of Google’s more fundamental ideological tenets, such as those highlighted by Wikileaks which last year revealed “Google’s “Strategic Plan” To Help Democrats Win The Election, Track Voters.”

As for the now former Senior Software Engineer and Harvard PhD, we are confident that a job at Palantir awaits with open arms.

6 thoughts on “Breaking! Google Fires Author Of “Outrageous” Memo Slamming Company’s Anti-Conservative Culture

  1. I thought Google employees were meant to be smart? This man has a PhD but does not know how easily “witches” can be caught and burned by leftists, without trial? He wrote and unleashed this document and got caught and fired within about one day. What a chump. Unless he was being very clever and already has a shyster (((lawyer))) lined up to win millions for unfair dismissal.

    He could have written the document on a computer at home with no Internet connection. Print it at home and give to whoever he trusted – why not WikiLeaks? He could have written the whole thing by hand, or used an old typewriter. Posted it from some city where he does not live, and not carry any smartphone or other computer device with him to that city. Maybe catch a train to post his letter – even his car can be traced e.g. by tolls and Govt monitoring. Google probably shares stuff with the NSA and knows where all their employees are at all times. Big Sister.

    “Google has denied the charges, arguing that it doesn’t have a gender gap in pay, but has declined to share full salary information with the government.”

    What nonsense. The IRS (JRS) would know the name and salary of every Google employee. I am sure they can be forced to share this information to other Govt departments, such as when investigating crimes.

    • I just saw a headline that says he’s exploring legal remedies, but haven’t read it yet. I may not have this right, but I think I saw somewhere that Google encourages employees to post messages with dissenting views on its internal bulletin board. If so, then he may have a legal case related to his firing. But that would depend on California law.

      Styx has a video on this that notes that Damore was actually not against diversity, but rather in favor of diversity of thought. Styx made the video wearing a shirt (LOL) and noted that he thought the writer would be fired. This was before Damore was outed by name and then fired. This was an easy call to make, but the guy looks young in the picture and I guess he thought he had freedom of speech at Google.

  2. Did Google need a SWAT team to fire the kid?

    Last time I was online here, Monday night thru early Tuesday, I posted a copy of a tweet somewhere about this, that the social media site GAB was wanting to hire the Google engineer, even before he was fired, I think.

    • Ahh, I’m slow sometimes, lol. I guess that tweet was a joke, now that I see the tweeter’s name, FluffyDogAttack, I think he tweets sarcastic humor often. But the GAB job offer was real, it was on their site.

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s