Federal Judge Blocks California Law Ban on Magazines Holding More Than 10 Bullets

Nobody would ever need more than 10 bullets, would they? I’m sure the LA rioters would have waited for gun owners to reload had this law been in effect at the time. Rioters are always so nice and cooperative.

Excerpt from the Sacramento Bee

A federal judge has temporarily blocked a voter-approved California law that would have forced gun owners to get rid of high-capacity ammunition magazines by this Saturday.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, who is based in San Diego, issued a preliminary injunction Thursday that found the law was likely unconstitutional because it prevented people from using firearms that employed “whatever common magazine size he or she judges best suits the situation.” The law would have barred people from possessing magazines containing more than 10 bullets.

“The State of California’s desire to criminalize simple possession of a firearm magazine able to hold more than 10 rounds is precisely the type of policy choice that the Constitution takes off the table,” the injunction read.

1992 LOS ANGELES RIOTS.

2 thoughts on “Federal Judge Blocks California Law Ban on Magazines Holding More Than 10 Bullets

  1. The story says a “voter-approved law”. Who did the voting? Illegal spics, niggers, jews, California cuck libtards?

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s