Supreme Court Watchers Look for Travel Ban Ruling Today, Possible Retirement of 81 Year Old Justice Kenneday

A TWO-FER TODAY WOULD BE NICE.

Oh, the joy that would spread across the real America if both Justice Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Bader-Ginzberg were to announce their retirements today. All the buzz is that Kennedy is going to do it. Bader-Ginzberg is a different story. Her hatred of Trump may keep her going until she dies in office.

The second great matter on the Court’s agenda that has prompted great speculation is what happens next with the President’s travel ban. Each passing day that the ban is delayed creates more opportunities for Muslim mayhem in America. What the Court will do and what it ought to do may not coincide, but what it ought to do is lift any injunctions against the travel ban until the Court reaches a final ruling, probably next fall.

Yahoo

Washington (AFP) – The White House declined to comment Sunday on speculation that a pivotal US Supreme Court justice might announce his retirement on Monday, the last day of the high court’s current session.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, who has cast the decisive vote in some of the court’s most far-reaching decisions, turns 81 next month and is widely believed to be thinking of retiring.

When asked about that, White House adviser Kellyanne Conway told ABC: “I will never reveal a conversation between a sitting justice and the president or the White House, but we’re paying very close attention to these last bit of decisions.”

One of those decisions could come Monday, if the nine justices are prepared to rule on a White House challenge to lower-court findings blocking Trump’s attempt to limit travel from six predominantly Muslim countries.

The court could also delay its recess to allow more time to consider the case, or even put it off to the fall session.

Two federal appeals courts have so far ruled against the travel ban, with one saying it violated laws against religious discrimination and another finding that Trump had exceeded his authority on immigration matters.

The original ban and a later revised order, both blocked by courts, represented one of Trump’s most controversial actions. They sparked global condemnation and threw travel from the targeted countries — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — into turmoil. Iraq was removed in the second version of the ban.

Kennedy, who was appointed to the high court by President Ronald Reagan in 1988, has often cast a “swing” vote from the bench.

He typically sides with conservatives on economic matters, gun control and voting rights, but with liberal justices on social issues like gay rights, the death penalty and abortion.

It was Kennedy who wrote the decision establishing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage nationwide.

Speculation about a Kennedy retirement was sparked partly because he was slow to hire clerks for the court’s next term.

If he does step down, Trump would have a chance to deepen his mark on the nation’s judiciary with the opportunity to pick another nominee for a lifetime appointment to the bench.

His first nominee, Neil Gorsuch — once a clerk to Kennedy — joined the court in April.

Republicans hold a 52-48 majority in the Senate, and under rules they passed to expedite Gorsuch’s confirmation they would need only a simple majority to fill the next court vacancy.

But a strongly conservative successor to Kennedy could push the court firmly to the right, and Democrats say they would fight such a pick fiercely.

“I expect Armageddon on the next one,” Republican Senator Orrin Hatch said after the Gorsuch confirmation, “because that’s going to change… the direction of the court” far into the future.

Read more at CNN.

3 thoughts on “Supreme Court Watchers Look for Travel Ban Ruling Today, Possible Retirement of 81 Year Old Justice Kenneday

  1. If Muzzies hate homos and femiNazis, why have they never attacked this (((Supremacist Court))) or any of the judges? So called “Muslim terrorists” never attack anything which is run or owned on controlled by Jews. Unless a huge terrorism insurance policy has been taken out such as Lucky Larry did.

    • One answer to your question would be that they pick the low hanging fruit. Another would be that they are too stupid to pick high value targets. Yours is still a valid question, however. If I were a Muzzie terrorist I’d pick Jew scientists and Hollywood to target. They should be easy to mow down and the attention would be huge. To be clear, I am not promoting violence by Muslims or anyone else. I’m just raising a question analogous to your question.

      Don’t forget that Sirhan Sirhan allegedly killed Robert Kennedy. He may have been a patsy though.

      • Sirhan was able to shoot Kennedy point blank from behind while standing 10 feet in front of him. Must’ve bought some magic bullets from ol’ Lee Harvey.

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s