HuffPo: Time to Deny White Men the Right to Vote

I have the feeling that the Jews will suddenly become nonwhite when white males can no longer vote.

This op-ed is out of the pen of a South African Jew feminist, Shelley Garland: “Shelley Garland is an activist and a feminist and is currently completing an MA degree in philosophy. When she’s not gagging at South Africa’s unique brand of rainbow politics, she’s working on ways to smash the patriarchy.”


If this one is not a Jew, then she’s one of the worst race traitors one can imagine. Just because she looks sane in the picture doesn’t mean that she’s not a lunatic.

Huffington Post

Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa’s biggest cities.

If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened. It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world. The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008. This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.

At the same time, a denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners. After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism. A period of twenty years without white men in the world’s parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared. The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.

This redistribution of the world’s wealth is long overdue, and it is not just South Africa where white males own a disproportionate amount of wealth. While in South Africa 90 percent of the country’s land is in the hands of whites (it is safe to assume these are mainly men), along with 97 percent of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, this is also the norm in the rest of the world. Namibia has similar statistics with regard to land distribution and one can assume this holds for other assets too. As Oxfam notes eight men control as much as wealth as the poorest 50 percent of the world’s population. In the United States ten percent of the population (nearly all white) own 90 percent of all assets – it is likely that these assets are largely in the hands of males. Although statistics by race are difficult to find from other parts of the world, it is very likely that the majority of the world’s assets are in the hands of white males, despite them making up less than 10 percent of the world’s population.

It is obvious that this violent status quo will not change without a struggle, and the only way to do so will be through the expropriation of these various assets and equitably distribute them to those who need them. This will not only make the world a more equitable place, but will also go some way to paying the debt that white males owe the world. Over the past 500 years colonialism, slavery, and various aggressive wars and genocides, have been due to the actions of white men. Redistributing some of their assets will go some way to paying the historical debt that they owe society.

It is no surprise that liberalism – and its ideological offshoots of conservatism and libertarianism – are the most popular ideologies among white males. These ideologies with their focus on individuals and individual responsibility, rather than group affiliation, allow white men to ignore the debt that they owe society, and from acknowledging that most of their assets, wealth, and privilege are the result of theft and violence.

It is time to wrestle control of the world back from white males, and the first step will be a temporary restriction of the franchise to them.

Some may argue that this is unfair. Let’s be clear, it may be unfair, but a moratorium on the franchise for white males for a period of between 20 and 30 years is a small price to pay for the pain inflicted by white males on others, particularly those with black, female-identifying bodies. In addition, white men should not be stripped of their other rights, and this withholding of the franchise should only be a temporary measure, as the world rights the wrongs of the past.

A withholding of the franchise from white males, along with the passing of legislation in this period to redistribute some of their assets, will also, to a degree, act as the reparations for slavery, colonialism, and apartheid, which the world is crying out for to be paid.

As we saw after the recent altercation between a white man and Lebohang Mabuya at a Spur restaurant in Johannesburg, white males still believe that they are in control, and people who aren’t white or male (in particularly black female-identifying people) have to bow to their every whim. There are numerous other examples of white angry male violence in South Africa and abroad, often against black bodies (Dylann Roof’s terrorist actions in the United States is only one of many examples). It is time to wrestle control of the world back from white males, and the first step will be a temporary restriction of the franchise to them.

Although this may seem unfair and unjust, allowing white males to continue to call the shots politically and economically, following their actions over the past 500 years, is the greater injustice.

A warrior for truth would be calling out South Africa’s blacks for their genocide of whites. Shelley is a phony.

20 thoughts on “HuffPo: Time to Deny White Men the Right to Vote

  1. “will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared.”

    This is classic cultural Marxist-feminist ideology. The “world’s wealth” is not a natural commodity that belongs to the “world” and needs to be “shared”. Wealth comes from creative hard WORK, and most of it comes from white men that WORK.

    Garland is not just a stupid feminist, but she is also a Marxist communist and a Jewish stooge, completing her MA degree in nation wrecking at the University of Bolshevism.

    • Pope Francine might rule over a hefty percentage of Roman Katholics, but most non catholic Christians want nothing to do with his dogma and agendas. Many true Christians look upon El Papa’s flock as a pagan idol worshiping cult

      • Precisely they are. and the ‘pope’ is a antiChrist. and dats da fact, jack.

  2. If it were not for white men in S.A. There would be no farms to murder for, no stock market to speak of, no infrastructure, no educational systems. It would still be an underdeveloped back water. Without the work of white men, there would be nothing to redistribute. If white men had been disenfranchised 500 years ago none of this “social injustice” would have happened. The world would be vastly different. I wonder if she thinks of that when she turns on the lights in her home, drives her car, eats food, and writs inane commentaries. Time to check your privilege “ma’am”.

  3. Femimarx spew.
    “This redistribution of the world’s wealth is long overdue”.

    The (((CommieRats))) of the Soviet Union never did it in 74 years. The (((Bolshie gang))) took all the wealth from the welahty, the middle class and the poor. That is right, they took everything and banned al private property. They murdered 40 to 60 million people, rich and poor, destroyed all religion even the Judaic one from which they came, and made every body miserable. Only criminals and the very stupid had a good life in the Soviet Union. Jews ran the NKVD then the KGB.

    That is what this woman wishes on the entire world . She knows what is happening under Mad Bob Mugarbage in Zimbabwe. Yet she wants South Africa to also collapse.

    In the unicorn future, all white men can stay at home, live on welfare, and watch TV. Women will do all the hard jobs, mining, farming, generating electricity, drinking water, gas, delivering all goods, maintain roads and railways, build bridges and dams, deal with sewage, plumbing, labouring you name it. All real jobs, not just Social Work. Rainbows every day. Dark skinned men will eagerly help the white women and Jews run this brave and happy Utopia. Everyone gets the same wage – female surgeons and unemployed white male bums get the same. The boss of Google in the USA gets the same wage as the lowest janitor in Google Africa. Makes you wonder why Jews like Google billionaires push for Marxism does it not?

    • Robert, is it you who lives in South Africa? I believe that one of the commenters here on Sab365 lives in South Africa.

      • I do not live in South Africa. I live in Australia and Eastern Europe. There is a woman called Ozzie Saffe who is from South Africa and lives in Australia. Her link no longer works for me, her blog is worth reading.

  4. No wonder Shelley Garland has issues with White Men, as clearly Shelly is a black dude. But I believe Shelley Garland is FAKE, there is no history of this person on internet – Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook, University data, previous articles, this can’t be the first etc.
    It is Fake News, Racist Propaganda by Huffington Post and everyone should get on Twitter and Facebook and email and contact their US HQ, and Ariana Huffington and other Media Watch outlets to let them know about this FRAUD.

  5. To the left, gender is fuild
    Deny White men the vote?
    Then White men can still vote by claiming we’re White females on election day

    Apparently the left thinks race iand sexual orientation is fuild as well so us evil White dudes could show up as all sorts SJW preferred sub groups

    Any rate, how do they expect to get such legislation passed, with White men and women still having the vote? The article seems more like trolling then anything else

    Also that chick in the article looks like a fat dude in drag.

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s