Maryland Judge Considers Forcing President Trump to Double “Refugee” (Dangerous Parasite) Inflow

There is no rule of LAW in America now. There are only political opinions of liberal judges who hate America–white and free America anyway.

As Rush Limbaugh has noted, we are on the verge of a Constitutional crisis. Either the Supreme Court steps in with some real law (not likely) or Trump risks being impeached and thrown out of office for defying these liberal judges.

Civil war, anyone?

Breitbart

A federal District Court judge in Maryland is considering whether he should order President Donald Trump to double the annual inflow of refugees up to 100,000 per year.

Any demand by the judge that the federal government airbus an extra 50,000 migrants — including many adherents of Islam’s sharia legal system — into American neighborhoods would be an unusual intervention into government roles normally left to the elected President and Congress.

If actually implemented, the judge’s plan also would be extremely expensive for Americans, because state and local communities subsidize each new immigrant with roughly $1,600 each per year for decades.

The judge who is at the heart of this case is Theodore Chuang. Learn more about the outrageously partisan Judge Chuang here.

JUDGE THEORDORE CHUANG. PUBLIC SAFETY DOESN’T MATTER TO HIM. HE’S GARBAGE.

The judge revealed his proposal in a footnote in his March 15 decision where he denounced Trump’s reformist Executive Orders, which sharply curbs the inflow of refugees from war-torn Islamic countries. The judge’s footnote declared:

On February 22, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction of S 5(d) of the Executive Order, ECF No. 64, requesting that the Court enjoin a specific provision of the First Executive Order. With the agreement of the parties, the Court set a briefing and hearing schedule extending to March 28, 2017. The Court will resolve that Motion, which the parties have agreed should be construed to apply to the successor provision of the Second Executive Order, in accordance with the previously established schedule.

The language targeted by the judge is in Trump’s first version of the Executive Order, the Jan. 27 E.O. 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States.” The language announced the government’s intention to halve the annual inflow of refugees from the 100,000 level sought by former President Barack Obama, who frequently derided Americans for getting “attached to our particular tribe.”

According to Section 5 of Trump’s January E.O.:

(d) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I determine that additional admissions would be in the national interest.

Similar language appears in Section 6(b) of the upgraded March 6 E.O. 13780, also titled “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States.”

(b) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any entries in excess of that number until such time as I determine that additional entries would be in the national interest.

The plaintiffs’ request for 100,000 refugees each year was made by lawyers for the International Refugee Assistance Protect, HIAS Inc., a so-called “VOLAG” which is paid by federal agencies to import refugees, and by members of the Middle East Studies Association.

“Judge Chuang’s ruling … leaves the door open for further discussion of our challenges to the refugee ban, an opening we intend to pursue,” said a March 15 statement from HIAS. “So stay tuned for more news as our lawsuit continues.” HIAS received at least $19.5 million in government grants in 2014, according to its federal 990 form.

HIAS employees did not answer calls and emailed questions from Breitbart.

Trump’s decision to reduce the annual inflow of refugees was promised and debated during the 2016 campaign. Based on his promise to the voters, Trump won, much to the distress of progressives. Multiple polls show Trump’s immigration reforms are popular.

The law cited by Trump, Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, gives the President near-complete power over who gets into the United States, according to a January 2017 report by Congress’ Congressional Research Service. The critical language declares, at 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (f) that:

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate

Section 214(a)(1) of the same law says that the “admission of any alien to the United States as a nonimmigrant shall be for such time and under such conditions as [the Executive] may by regulations prescribe.”

The President’s authority over immigration is bolstered by Supreme Court decisions. For example, the court declared in its 1950 judgment lawsuit, titled Knauff v. Shaughnessy, that “It is not within the province of any court, unless expressly authorized by [congressional] law, to review the determination of the political branch of Government to exclude a given alien.”

In 2015, the Court reasserted that judgment, saying in Kerry v. Din, that:

Din attempts to bring suit on [her Afghan husband’s] behalf, alleging that the Government’s denial of her husband’s visa application violated her constitutional rights… In particular, she claims that the Government denied her due process of law when, without adequate explanation of the reason for the visa denial, it deprived her of her constitutional right to live in the United States with her spouse. There is no such constitutional right.

Already, the law and the Supreme Court’s rulings prompted a judge in Boston, Mass., to reject another lawsuit the Massachusetts’ government against Trump’s E.O. “Therefore, in light of the“plenary congressional power to make policies and rules for exclusion of aliens,” … which pursuant to8 U.S.C. § 1182(f), has been delegated to the President, the Court concludes that the [federal] government’s reasons, as provided in the EO, are facially legitimate and bona fide,” the judge declared Feb. 3.

25 thoughts on “Maryland Judge Considers Forcing President Trump to Double “Refugee” (Dangerous Parasite) Inflow

  1. You have done well on your continent to have only had a couple of wars and for a relatively new country that’s unusual, one might even say exceptional. However, all that will undoubtedly change in the near future as the same people that started all the European wars are stepping up their game in an attempt to stem the tide of nationalism. This number of immigrants is sure to upset the balance of any country no matter how stable and I feel it’s deliberate, more and more people are beginning to notice. When enough people come to the obvious conclusion and find that they can do nothing to stop it through the normal channels then they will look for a more direct approach. This has happened throughout history and there is no evidence to suggest that it will not continue to happen today. The globalists see their diabolical plan threatened by nationalism and they know that a civil war will play into their hands. Get ready because war will come to your continent before it returns to Europe, mark my words.

  2. I think I want Hillary to be President now. I prefer for my violent Communist masters to be ELECTED officials, not deep state bureaucrats and spymasters. Apparently it’s a binary choice.

    In all seriousness, it’s time for these judges to have their wings clipped. We need a constitutional amendment to force them to run for election. And the cockroaches should have to stand for reelection every single year. This issue is crying out for a national campaign by Trump. He could call it an ‘Accountability Revolution.’

  3. Pingback: Maryland Judge Considers Forcing President Trump to Double “Refugee” (Dangerous Parasite) Inflow | Afro Futurism

  4. “The plaintiffs’ request for 100,000 refugees each year was made by (((lawyers))) for the International Refugee Assistance Protect, HIAS Inc., a so-called “VOLAG” which is paid by federal agencies to import refugees, and by members of the (((Middle East Studies Association))).

    One paragraph that tells it all.

  5. Requests for refugees? Shouldn’t that be requests by refugees? Why should we take the dregs of the world, anyway? Well, with the democrats having alienated intelligent white people they need a new voter base. Juan and Ahmed fit the bill right up there with J’Tavius.

  6. Time for The Trumpenfeuhrer to go full fuhrer and exercise the power he, as President, is authorized exclusively via the Constitution and legal precedent, and as CEO of the Executive Branch, and tell the courts to go pound sand. It is legal, lawful, ethical, and moral. If he continues trying to be a nice guy, he will be bogged down and rendered ineffectual.

  7. Judges need to reject unsanitary Muslim left handed shit diggers no matter how good of a face they try to portray. Muslim law is: deceive non Muslims being dishonest acting like you are honest.

  8. Pingback: Maryland Judge Considers Forcing President Trump to Double “Refugee” (Dangerous Parasite) Inflow | zooforyou

  9. Those prior Supreme Court rulings look good, so how do these nation-hating lower court judges think they can ignore all that?

    While building the Wall, the Trump Admin should also begin building GALLOWS with citizen courts. Hang the traitors!

    As a side note, someone at CTH wrote that both rulings, by this Maryland-judge-traitor & the Hawaiian-judge-traitor, were both exactly 43-pages long. They provided links to each (sorry, I didn’t grab those links), suggesting someone should compare the wording to see if they were written by the same person (V.Jarrett at Obama house).

  10. ~~~

    (“Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is an American immigration policy started by the Obama administration in June 2012 that allows certain undocumented immigrants to the United States who entered the country as minors to receive a renewable two-year period of deferred action from deportation and eligibility …”)

  11. “A federal District Court judge in Maryland is considering whether he should order President Donald Trump to double the annual inflow of refugees up to 100,000 per year.”

    Can this guy also order Trump to bake a wedding cake for anal banging perverted men? Can he order Trump to only use the female toilets?

    Why can’t Trump just fire this guy. “You’re fired”. Better yet charge the judge with treason. Then execute him after conviction, unless he can he bit by a dronwe strike instead. Why not a drone strike on the (((Supremacist))) Court and get all 8 of the buggers at once?

    The USA takes in about 6 million tired, poor, huddled new people every year as immigrants and millions of them are dark skinned such as African, Indians, Pakis, Mexicans, Muzzies and god knows who else. The black and Muslim refugees are the shit icing on a pretty horrible cake.

    Are these two Jap judges giving the USA some payback fro Hiroshima and Nagasaki? These two Nips should be deported back to Japan. They are enemy alien infiltrators masquerading as US citizens and judges of all things.

  12. Judge usurping the position of the President of the United States making the government only two bodies, Judicial and Congressional.

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s