Now They Want Your DNA: New Mandatory Genetic Testing Law Proposed

All politics is fake. All of it is scripted by (((you know who.)))

In the battle to impose genetic testing on anyone who has a job, the Republicans are being portrayed as the bad guys, the Democrats the good guys.

It’s all Kabuki theater. It’s actors playing roles assigned to them.

The end game is wealth and power.

Here’s a new idea that is sure to enrich that certain group while allowing all manner of mischief to unfold as you either give your genes to them or pay a huge penalty.


A little-noticed bill moving through Congress would allow companies to require employees to undergo genetic testing or risk paying a penalty of thousands of dollars, and would let employers see that genetic and other health information.

Giving employers such power is now prohibited by legislation including the 2008 genetic privacy and nondiscrimination law known as GINA. The new bill gets around that landmark law by stating explicitly that GINA and other protections do not apply when genetic tests are part of a “workplace wellness” program.

The bill was approved by a House committee on Wednesday, with all 22 Republicans supporting it and all 17 Democrats opposed. It has been overshadowed by the debate over the House GOP proposal to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, but the genetic testing bill is expected to folded into a second ACA-related measure containing a grab-bag of provisions that do not affect federal spending, as the main bill does.

“What this bill would do is completely take away the protections of existing laws,” said Jennifer Mathis, director of policy and legal advocacy at the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, a civil rights group. In particular, privacy and other protections for genetic and health information in GINA and the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act “would be pretty much eviscerated,” she said.

Employers say they need the changes because those two landmark laws are “not aligned in a consistent manner” with laws about workplace wellness programs, as an employer group said in congressional testimony last week.

Employers got virtually everything they wanted for their workplace wellness programs during the Obama administration. The ACA allowed them to charge employees 50 percent more for health insurance if they declined to participate in the “voluntary” programs, which typically include cholesterol and other screenings; health questionnaires that ask about personal habits including plans to get pregnant; and sometimes weight loss and smoking cessation classes.

And in rules that Obama’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued last year, a workplace wellness program counts as “voluntary” even if workers have to pay thousands of dollars more in premiums and deductibles if they don’t participate.

Despite those wins, the business community chafed at what it saw as the last obstacles to unfettered implementation of wellness programs: the genetic information and the disabilities laws. Both measures, according to congressional testimony last week by the American Benefits Council, “put at risk the availability and effectiveness of workplace wellness programs,” depriving employees of benefits like “improved health and productivity.” The Council represents Fortune 500 companies and other large employers that provide employee benefits. It did not immediately respond to questions about how lack of access to genetic information hampers wellness programs.

Rigorous studies by researchers not tied to the $8 billion wellness industry have shown that the programs improve employee health little if at all. An industry group recently concluded that they save so little on medical costs that, on average, the programs lose money. But employers continue to embrace them, partly as a way to shift more health care costs to workers, including by penalizing them financially.

The 2008 genetic law prohibits a group health plan — the kind employers have — from asking, let alone requiring, someone to undergo a genetic test. It also prohibits that specifically for “underwriting purposes,” which is where wellness programs come in. “Underwriting purposes” includes basing insurance deductibles, rebates, rewards, or other financial incentives on completing a health risk assessment or health screenings. In addition, any genetic information can be provided to the employer only in a de-identified, aggregated form, rather than in a way that reveals which individual has which genetic profile.

There is a big exception, however: as long as employers make providing genetic information “voluntary,” they can ask employees for it. Under the House bill, none of the protections for health and genetic information provided by GINA or the disabilities law would apply to workplace wellness programs. As a result, employers could demand that employers undergo genetic testing and health screenings.

Too many dark nightmare scenarios can be imagined as genetic testing is required. Jews own the medical and associated industries. Do you trust them with your DNA?

9 thoughts on “Now They Want Your DNA: New Mandatory Genetic Testing Law Proposed

  1. Pingback: Now They Want Your DNA: New Mandatory Genetic Testing Law Proposed | Afro Futurism

  2. Wow, that’s pretty bad! And yes it looks very bad that so many idiot Repubs in Congress voted for it.

    Thank God I never worked much in “big corporate environments.” And Thank God I’m “over the hill” now & don’t have to even try to fit in to the “work [slave] force.”

    The ADA Law has come in handy, though, so I would not want them to shred that. I used it once over 15-18 years ago vs. a govt. agency whose local nasty peons constantly gave me grief. I finally smarted up & remembered the ADA Law, got a copy of it, read it, picked out the pertinent applicable quotes, & mailed them with my request that they quit badgering an “American with a Disability” to come in person to their office but that they make “reasonable accommodation” by dealing with me via either USMail or email.

    That put the fear of God into them & they had the REGIONAL head honcho (in another city, no less) contact me, & that person forever thereafter was the one they let me deal with AND VIA very-convenient EMAIL at that! 😀

    Work Smart > Use their Own Laws to your advantage whenever possible.

  3. Back to the current subject:

    Big Corporations + Big Govt. = Too Much Power = Too Much Busybody-ness/Control-freakery into Personal Affairs.

    Congress/Senate should be outlawed. Ha. There are Too Many of those guys with Too Much Time On Their Hands Creating Too Many dang Laws that are Not Necessary, Not Wanted, Not Needed.

    To see more POLICE STATE laws they are working on, check this House Bills link regularly:,%22party%22:%22Republican%22,%22bill-status%22:%22passed-one%22,%22congress%22:%22115%22&page=1

    It does not provide a brief summary for each & I did not feel like clicking on every one to get details, but the TITLES ALONE of many of them are enough to send shivers because you can see their WARPED MENTALITY + CONTROL-FREAK-GOALS, & yes, many are created by Repubs!

    That link was provided in a recent tweet by a guy who calls himself & tweets re “TRANSITION TRACKER” > @DaveNYviii . He had said that if there were any specific bills that anyone wanted him to follow & to tweet updates about, to tweet him the Bill # & he would “track” that Bill’s progress in his tweets.

    So I went to have a look at that link/list of Bills but was Overwhelmed by how many spooky Police-State type bills there were!

    They are obviously using Ye Ole “We Must have More Laws to Have Peace & Security” Scam/Lie.

    Anyway, follow @DaveNYvii on twitter & tweet him any Bill #’s you want him to Track.

  4. Like all things, this boils down to the shekels. DNA is our very essence. (((They))) want it so that employers can check for genetic pre-disposition to disorders/diseases and can claim the individual as a potential risk and either deny insurance coverage or charge extortionate premiums, so that you are limited to paying or going without. All insurance is based on risk/hazard. Our jew-infested gov’t/legal system/judiciary/politicos would make this law, and the courts would uphold it, and thus make it precedent. If Chief Justice Roberts could contort the English language to make Obamacare a tax (under absolute purview of Congress) then they could do the same with out DNA for purpose of shekels. Very sneaky of the jews.

  5. Most wealthy people are not Jewish and Jews don’t own all the medical facilities. What is people’s obsession with hating Jews? A lot of your fellow Christians are involved in this. Own it. Otherwise I see your point. Hating other people due to their religion waters your point down.

    • Jews support nationalism for their group, but smear white people as racists and Nazis for defending the idea that Western countries should be populated by their tribes.

      Jews have long been the wealthiest ethnic group in America and the world by virtue of Christians turning over the control of money to them in the Middle Ages.

      Jews call themselves “God’s chosen people.” That’s called Jewish Supremacism. Here’s a well-documented free book on the subject.

      One woman I know won’t read anything by the author because he’s been smeared so often. The truth is truth. The documentation is clear.

      By the way, I can point you to a work by the most prominent academic in Mexico who claims the Mexicans are the superior race. He’s highly respected. It seems any group can claim to be the supreme race except white people, who must be bred out of existence according to the Marxist narrative.

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s