If MILO Yiannopolous was known for anything, it was his love of “big black cock” and his love of “Daddy” Trump. In the video below, there’s no BBC, but there is MILO and some fag fans pretending to start building Trump’s wall at the Mexican border.
WARNING: THIS VIDEO IS GAY!
The video above might be the gayest thing you’ve seen in your whole life.
In fact any appearance by MILO might be one of the gayest things you’ve ever seen.
So how deep down the rabbit hole do you want to go with MILO?
What if he was a (((media))) creation, manufactured according to a plan to take over conservatism and the alt-right and then destroy them?
Certainly, the paid commenters on Twitter and comments sections are pushing hard the notion that conservatives and white nationalists are pedophiles because our leader MILO is a pedophile. That’s bullsh*t, but that’s what I’m seeing everywhere.
An embrace of homosexuality associated with “big black cocks” as exemplified by MILO is not a feature of either the alt-right or traditional conservatism. MILO was not alt-right or conservative, but conservatism fell for his schtick. I think the alt-right showed a little more resistance.
Matt Schlapp, head of the American Conservative Union, which sponsors the big annual CPAC meeting in Washington, is the man who invited MILO Yiannopolous to speak before disinviting him for comments made about underage sex and about Jews. Before disinviting him, Schlapp (is he a Jew?) faced withering criticism from other conservatives for bringing in a degenerate pervert to CPAC.
Let’s try to put the evidence for a Jewish conspiracy to destroy white identity together from several sources.
In the face of the growing outrage, Schlapp at first stood by his decision. Then, over the weekend, the videos of Yiannopoulos began to circulate. In one clip, he cavalierly approves of sex with thirteen-year-olds and suggests that he once attended a party at which minors were sexually assaulted. In another, he talks about the “statistical fact” that “Jews own most of the banks” and “completely dominate the media.”
Yiannopoulos told me that he regretted the statements, and that they were simply his way of dealing with being sexually assaulted when he was younger. “I’m gay, as you know,” he said. “And I’m somebody that this happened to. I’m somebody who has been on the receiving end of child abuse. I kind of thought I could talk about it how I pleased. Does that make sense? I sort of felt like I owned the subject and I was entitled to come to terms with that and express myself about that however I pleased.” He continued, “I don’t believe sex with a thirteen-year-old is O.K. When I mentioned the number thirteen, I was talking about myself. I was talking about the age that I lost my virginity.”
He also addressed his claim about Jewish control of the media. “My mother is Jewish. I was raised Jewish,” he said. “I said we are proportionally overrepresented in some industries, and I don’t think pointing out that fact is anti-Semitic.”
The explanations were too late. Before we got off the phone, Schlapp had already disinvited Yiannopoulos. Later in the day, Simon & Schuster cancelled his book contract, which had reportedly been worth two hundred and fifty thousand dollars.
An opinion piece published at CBS News suggests that conservatism has imploded over the MILO controversy.
Much already has been made of conservatism’s trajectory from sober intellectuals like William F. Buckley to the likes of Milo and Trump. Some would argue that this downward spiral is less severe than it initially looks, if only because Buckley, with his antediluvian notions of race relations, is an overrated figure to begin with.
There’s something to that way of thinking, but it also obscures the fact that conservatism was, until rather recently, a system of ideas that had to be taken seriously. It was mostly coherent, it had arguments with merit, and it animated a political movement that from time to time could form a governing majority. It is now none of those things.
But even as the religion dies, the church services persist. CPAC is an important ritual for conservatives, as silly for the more serious among them as it always is. So the fact that they would choose noted non-conservative Milo as a speaker in the first place is a scandal, and more than that, an admission of conservatism’s increasing irrelevance.
Milo doesn’t really make arguments. He provokes. That’s his job, and he did it rather well until recently when it all blew up in his face. The fact that he upsets the left was apparently enough for the ACU to point to him as the future of right. Conservatives have embraced vacuous thinkers and writers before, of course. But in the past they’ve at least claimed to be conservative.
Instead, Milo brags about his promiscuity, his many lovers, how he “chose to be gay” as an act of rebellion against his parents. One wonders what Buckley would have made of all that, especially when combined with Milo’s oft-stated preference for black men.
Interestingly, Milo brings up that preference with such regularity because he’s so often accused of racism, and there is no doubt a strain of white identity politics that flows through his writings and performances.
As I noted in my earlier post on the destruction of MILO, regardless of his degeneracy he did give white college students a subtle pro-white message: It’s OK to be white, no matter what your professors tell you. Because of his gender identity and his Jewishness, he was the only one able to effectively get that message across.
Richard Spencer will try to bring a pro-white message to universities, but he will fail. MILO will never be allowed to speak at a university again, at least not for a long time.
White youths will now be back in the closet, denying the white pride they should be feeling.
Is that an outcome that was planned in advance?
If you have 20 minutes watch the embedded video below. The gist of it is that MILO was a character in a play, authored by Jewish leftists, out to destroy conservatism. The speaker, who uses a lot of f-words, is no Trump fan. He’s a traditional conservative, angry that other conservatives gave their seal of approval to MILO.
In putting this piece together, I found this piece at Occidental Dissent to be worth a read. The Reagan Battalion, the group that took down MILO is associated with #nevertrump Evan McMullin, according to the Daily Caller. If I recall correctly McMullin is a Mormon puppet of the Jews. His Wikipedia entry shows that he worked in Israel and is “former” CIA (is anyone ever former CIA?).