Breaking: Trump Immigration Order Blocked by Federal Judge


The word “chaos” is the word of choice that liberals have used to smear the presidency of Donald J. Trump. That word appears in this story and most others. With all the chaos that Trump is allegedly creating, how come the country is still running?

Regarding Trump’s travel ban, which the press often calls a “Muslim ban,” whatever chaos there was, was created by anti-Trump agitators and striking cab drivers.


President Donald Trump’s travel ban executive order suffered its most severe legal blow to date Friday, as a federal judge in Seattle blocked the impact of the directive nationwide.

U.S. District Court Judge James Robart ruled in favor of the attorneys general of Washington state and Minnesota on a lawsuit they brought seeking to overturn the order limiting travel to the U.S. by citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries.

“The state has met its burden in demonstrating immediate and irreparable injury,” Robart said, according to local press reports.

The temporary ruling from Robart, an appointee of President George W. Bush, appeared to be the most sweeping legal rebuke to the order since Trump issued it a week ago.

“Judge Robart’s decision, effective immediately, effective now, puts a halt to President Trump’s unconstitutional and unlawful executive order. It puts a stop to it immediately, nationwide,” Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson told reporters. “What the judge announced today was nationwide; the president’s executive order does not apply.”

Ferguson said the also nullifies the impact of the order on people seeking to travel to the U.S.

“That relief is significant, to put it mildly,” Ferguson said.

The judge ruled from the bench and said he’ll follow up with a written opinion. Asked for comment, a Justice Department spokeswoman said, “The department looks forward to reviewing the court’s written order and will determine next steps.”

Apparently, foreigners now have Constitutional rights. Luckily for us, Judge Robart wasn’t around in 1942 to order the country to open its borders to the same Japs who bombed Pearl Harbor.

Next stop for Trump: The Supreme Court.

We’ll see if the Trump travel ban, which mirrored travel bans by previous presidents, including Obama and Clinton, will be declared illegal.

I wonder how effectively the liberal lawyers in the Justice Department who argued this case presented Trump’s case. It wouldn’t surprise me to find that he was stabbed in the back. Jeff Sessions, once he takes over, needs to drain that swamp. You may remember that Trump fired the acting Attorney General earlier this week.

The courtroom defeat for the Trump White House came just hours after Justice Department lawyers scored their first notable victory in the legal war over the executive order, persuading a judge in Boston to allow the expiration of a restraining order against the travel ban.

The 21-page decision from U.S. District Court Judge Nathaniel Gorton was a preliminary one, but the White House is sure to tout the ruling as a counterpoint to the series of hostile decisions from Robart and other judges.

One of those early court orders was issued early Sunday by two of Gorton’s colleagues on the federal court in Boston, who imposed a nationwide ban on deportation and detention of travelers based on Trump’s order. Immigrant rights advocates wanted the seven-day temporary restraining order extended, but Gorton said such an extension was not warranted.

Gorton, an appointee of President George W. Bush, said Trump’s order was entitled to deferential review from the courts.

“The President has exercised his broad authority under [the law] to suspend entry of certain aliens purportedly in order to ensure that resources are available to review screening procedures and that adequate standards are in place to protect against terrorist attacks,” the judge wrote. “Such a justification is ‘facially legitimate and bona fide.'”

Asked for reaction to the Boston ruling, a Justice Department spokeswoman said the order speaks for itself.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment on Friday’s legal developments.

Gorton ruled that Trump’s “order provides a reasonably conceivable state of facts [which concerns national security and] that could provide a rational basis for the classification,” the judge wrote. “Accordingly, this Court declines to encroach upon the ‘delicate policy judgment’ inherent in immigration decisions.”

The judge also appeared dismissive of arguments that the order—focused on citizens of seven majority-Muslim countries—amounts to invidious religious discrimination. Refugee-related provisions in the order “could be invoked to give preferred refugee status to a Muslim individual in a country that is predominantly Christian,” wrote the judge, who is the brother of former Sen. Slade Gorton (R-Wash.). “Nothing in [that section] compels a finding that Christians are preferred to any other group.”

The Trump White House may have scored the singular legal win because one of the most controversial aspects of the executive order—its impact on green-card holders—has now been effectively set to the side. The White House now says the order does not apply to such permanent residents at all. And a federal judge in Detroit issued a nationwide, permanent injunction Thursday barring any impact from the order on green card holders.

Gorton says in his ruling that, in his view, Trump’s order never applied to green-card holders, despite the fact that more than 100 of them were detained for a time in the first day after the order was signed and that the Trump administration initially set up a waiver system to allow green card holders into the country under the order.

At least one other federal court also held a hearing Friday on Trump’s travel ban. Complaining that the directive was not well vetted and had unleashed “chaos,” a federal judge in Alexandria, Va. extended an order barring certain deportations from Dulles Airport and guaranteeing green-card holders there access to lawyers.

An unusual provision in the Boston order requiring U.S. officials to notify airlines that individuals with valid visas would be admitted to the U.S. led to Boston’s Logan Airport becoming an entry point of choice for some travelers affected by Trump’s order. A dozen or so Iranian citizens arrived in Boston on a Lufthansa flight Friday afternoon after that airline said it would allow the boarding of passengers with U.S. visas that appeared to be valid. The U.S. government contends those visas were canceled last week, but the Iranians were allowed into the country by Customs and Border Protection officers.

As a result of Gorton’s ruling, the unusual access through Boston’s airport will likely go away, although if Robart’s decision sticks, travelers with what appear to be valid visas may find the welcome mat rolled out for them at every international airport in the country.

You had to expect that with all the Trump hating liberal judges out there that this was going to happen. But Trump has put together a team of smart people who will fight back.

The battle is lost, but the war rages on.

11 thoughts on “Breaking: Trump Immigration Order Blocked by Federal Judge

  1. Pingback: Breaking: Trump Immigration Order Blocked by Federal Judge | Afro Futurism

  2. Elected politicians make laws.
    Unelected judges break these laws depending on their own political bias, how much cash they get in plain manila envelopes, and their mood and emotions on the day.
    Jews run the USSA and they own these judges and above all the Jewsupreme Court is stacked with 4 lefty Jews out of 8 judges.
    Trump better stack all these courts with right wing white men and nil Jews.

  3. Fox is reporting this is a temporary restraining order until further hearings.

    “The White House called Robart’s ruling “outrageous” and said it would file for an emergency stay of the Robart decision.”

    “Robart Declared ‘Black Lives Matter’ in a Previous Hearing in Which He Ruled Against a Police Union.

  4. Communist Party USA’s seething response to Gingrich’s call for a new House Un-American Activities Committee.

    “HUAC was never in reality directed at Nazi sympathizers. From the start, it was used to target left-wing activists, especially our Party, the Communist Party USA. Throughout the 1940s, 1950s and into the 1960s, HUAC hearings were used to target, punish, demonize, and ostracize labor, civil rights fighters, artists, and actors, such as Pete Seeger, W. E. B. Du Bois, Paul Robeson, and many, many leaders of the CPUSA.”

    • The HUAC found that most Commies and traitors in the USA are and were Jews.
      Eventually the Jews got Joe McCarthy and still tarnish his reputation today. He told the truth, that is not encouraged where Jew rule.

      • I picked up a book called Blacklisted By History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy by M. Stanton Evans. Haven’t read it yet but will soon. Got it from Amazon.

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s