President Trump May Actually Name a NonJew to the Supreme Court, and a Protestant at That

The current makeup of the United States Supreme Court is all Jews and Catholics. There’s not a Protestant among them.

That may be about to change once President Trump names his pick for the High Court. Expect a bitter confirmation battle, complete with horrific smears by the leftist Democrats in Congress.

Brother Nathanael reports that there’s only a single Jew on Trump’s long list, while his alleged short list, which has recently emerged, has none.

The Brother writes:

Jews love Hillary’s abortion stance. Why not? Like their father the devil, Jews are murderers from the beginning. I mean, Jews pushed through Roe vs Wade.

Let’s take a look at those the rumor mill has on Trump’s short list.

Excerpt from Politico

President Donald Trump has narrowed his first Supreme Court nomination to three finalists, with 10th Circuit judge Neil Gorsuch and 3rd Circuit judge Thomas Hardiman emerging as front-runners while 11th Circuit Judge Bill Pryor remains in the running but is fading, according to people familiar with the search process.

Trump interviewed at least those three finalists in New York during the transition, according to a person familiar with the search. Trump himself said Tuesday he would make a selection for the court’s empty seat next week and summoned top Senate leaders to the White House to discuss his impending choice to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, who died nearly a year ago.

“The president wants to move as quickly as he can,” said Leonard Leo, one of Trump’s advisers on the court pick and a top official at the Federalist Society.

Leo declined to discuss Trump’s short list, but he praised both Gorsuch and Hardiman effusively.

“Under our Constitution, the power rests with the people, and that was at the core of Justice Scalia’s legacy, and you heard from President Trump’s inauguration that is the core of Trump’s agenda, and that’s very much the core of what Neil Gorsuch’s record is as a jurist,” Leo said. “He’s an excellent writer. He’s got sharp analytical ability, strong intellect and he’s got a lot of strength and courage. Those are things that the president very much wants in a nominee.”

“Hardiman,” Leo added, “shares many of the same qualities.”

Leo went on to say that Hardiman is “an extraordinarily talented and smart jurist” who has “a very direct and understandable writing style.”

As Gorsuch’s fortunes have risen, Pryor’s have dimmed. A 2006 George W. Bush appointee, Pryor is currently the subject of raging debate on an off-the-record group email list that includes many in the conservative legal and political communities, including many Republican Senate staffers, thanks to his decision to join the majority in Glenn v. Brumby, a 2011 opinion that protected transgender people from workplace discrimination.

“I think everybody on this list probably has something I’m not going to agree with. I think that decision with Pryor probably would be the one that would fall into that category,” said Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network, a conservative legal organization.

John Malcolm, who oversees a legal center inside the Heritage Foundation, acknowledged that “Bill Pryor has been getting attacked from the right. Which is strange to me.”

Politically, Pryor’s nomination would spark outrage on the left — liberal activists are likely to mobilize around his statement that Roe v. Wade is “the worst abomination of constitutional law” — without fully unifying conservatives.

Firmly in Pryor’s corner, however, is a longtime friend and fellow Alabama native likely to join the Trump administration soon: attorney general nominee Jeff Sessions, who is pushing hard for his nomination, according to two sources familiar with the conversations.

Profiles of the potential nominees at NPR state that Pryor is a Catholic, snf Hardiman probably a Catholic since he attended Notre Dame.

Phyllis Schafly’s Eagles reports that Goresuch is an Episcopalian.

In doing my research for this post I discovered that all of these judges, while demonized as conservative ideologues by the left, actually have made decisions either favorable to abortionists, faggots, trannies, or other liberal special interest groups.

Life is complicated. It would be great if a judge came along and said leave abortion, sodomite marriage, and other legal issues to the states. Having nine black robed lawyers decide what our culture will be is an abomination.

8 thoughts on “President Trump May Actually Name a NonJew to the Supreme Court, and a Protestant at That

  1. Potentially promising, but lets not get too excited yet ; doubtful [[[they]]] will allow anyone that, even if not one of [[[them]], doesnt act like it.

  2. “protected transgender people from workplace discrimination.”
    That was a blunder which will weaken US industry and Govt. I have never heard of a man changing in to a woman who did not cause havoc at their work place or study pace. They are lazy, crazy, emotional, turn up late, many “sick” days, and are entitled. The female hormone injections seem to make them go nasty and batshit at the same time. They make trouble. They are highly likley to sue the employer for big bucks. Why would any sane company or Govt agency hire such a person?

  3. Pingback: President Trump May Actually Name a NonJew to the Supreme Court, and a Protestant at That | Afro Futurism

  4. Pingback: President Trump May Actually Name a NonJew to the Supreme Court, and a Protestant at That | zooforyou

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s