Closing Arguments Begin in Murder Trial of White Cop Who Killed Negro Resisting Arrest After Traffic Stop

slager fighting

Officer Michael Slager is a political prisoner, undergoing a Stalinesque show trial designed to keep blacks quiet and send a message to police officers that #blacklivesmatter.

When he killed black man Michael Scott he was just doing his job. If Scott had not attacked Slager, Scott would be alive today.

As this post is published, a South Carolina jury is deciding Michael Slager’s fate. Will it return a verdict of murder, a lesser charge, or not guilty? Stay tuned.

ABC News

Closing arguments are underway this afternoon in the state trial of former police officer Michael Slager, who is accused of murdering an unarmed black man in South Carolina last year.

Slager, who is white, is accused of killing Walter Scott at a traffic stop on April 4, 2015, in North Charleston while Slager was an officer with the city’s police department.

Witness video that surfaced shortly after the deadly encounter appears to show the moment Slager fatally shot Scott as he ran away. The video garnered national attention, propelling Slager into the spotlight. He was fired from the force after the shooting, according to The Associated Press.

Slager has pleaded not guilty to murder. His attorneys have said the witness video doesn’t show the whole struggle between Slager and Scott, and does not give the perspective of events from Slager’s point of view.

In this state trial, the jury can now also consider a voluntary manslaughter charge, officials told ABC News today. The voluntary manslaughter charge was requested by the prosecution and the judge allowed it based on testimony he heard during the trial.

“The court must let the jury decide if the force used was reasonable,” Judge Clifton Newman said today. “That’s the essence of the case.”

In the prosecution’s closing arguments, Solicitor Scarlett Wilson described murder and voluntarily manslaughter. She said murder involves malice, which “has to be in the mind before the shots are fired.” She said malice is a feeling and an emotion. Voluntarily manslaughter, meanwhile, “is an unlawful killing in the heat of passion,” Wilson said.

Wilson said jurors must decide the difference between heat of passion and malice “because from a distance they can look the same.”

She also discussed reasonable doubt.

“There are a lot of things that ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ does not mean,” Wilson said. “The judge will give you an instruction and you’ll see that it’s the kind of doubt that [makes] you hesitant to act.

“It means that it’s proof beyond a reasonable doubt when we have proven our case, not beyond every doubt, not beyond a shadow of a doubt, but a reasonable doubt,” Wilson said.

She said reason is used because “in life, it’s almost impossible to prove things beyond all doubt 100 percent.”

Wilson told the jurors to look at reasonable doubt as proof that leaves them “firmly convinced of the defendant’s guilt.”

Wilson closed by praising the jury. “Y’all have been remarkably alert. Y’all have been remarkably attentive,” she said. “We know that we made the right decision. … We know that you can do this. You can get it right.”

The defense is addressing the jury now.

Ahead of closing arguments, jurors spent this morning at the scene of the shooting.

On Monday, Slager testified in his own defense, saying that Scott was a threat and that he kept shooting him until the threat was over.

Slager also faces a federal trial, which is scheduled for next year.

Use the search box and you’ll see that this site originally covered the Slager shooting of Scott at the time. Photos clearly show Scott wrestling with Slager, trying to take his pistol from his holster. They also show that Scott was not stopped when Slager fired his taser at Scott. The problem for Slager is that Scott was shot while running away–shot in the back.

ht_michael_slager_float_jc_150407_4x3_992

7 thoughts on “Closing Arguments Begin in Murder Trial of White Cop Who Killed Negro Resisting Arrest After Traffic Stop

    • I had planned to blog a NC story where no charges were filed in the shooting Keith Scott by a cop. Riot police are on standby there. Here, I think Slager will be found guilty of something unless he catches a break with a hung jury due to one “racist” juror.

  1. I do not see why police can not shoot adult males who run away during a traffic stop. Only serious criminals would do this, escaped prisoners, car thieves and others who face a long jail term. The cop was doing his duty. Also anyone who starts a fight with someone legally and openly carrying a gun is entitled to get shot. The gun carrier can not take the risk that the fighter will take the gun and use it on them.

    • He would have gone to jail for back child support. That’s my recollection. Lots of nogs run for trivial reasons. It must be due to nightmares passed down from generations of anguish over slavery. If Scott’s ancestors had run they wouldn’t have been slaves.

  2. “In the prosecution’s closing arguments, Solicitor Scarlett Wilson described murder and voluntarily manslaughter. She said murder involves malice, which “has to be in the mind before the shots are fired.”

    Sounds more like a defense lawyer than a prosecutor. Many murders involve no malice whatsoever. For example, many criminals will kill cops and security guards and “do gooder” citizens to avoid being apprehended. They feel no emotion whatsoever except maybe fear and excitement, certainly no malice towards those they shoot. Same for a con escaping prison, they will kill anyone who tries to stop them without malice. Psychos do not feel malice or any other emotion. They are devoid of real emotions. Some psychos enjoy killing but this is not malice, it is fun for them.

    Using this malice idea, many soldiers in a war who kill an enemy are guilty of murder.

    In Soviet and German concentration camps, most guards are not guilty of murder, because they feel no malice for those they are ordered to kill. According to Scarlett Wilson.

    It is obvious that his cop felt no malice towards the criminal. He was just trying, and succeeding, in stopping a felon escaping.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s