In July Democrats Were Praising the FBI Director: Now They Want His Head on a Post (Fired)

james comey fbi director

Likewise, Donald Trump flip flopped on the FBI today. Except now he’s praising it.

No matter what you do, you’re in the hot seat if you have anything to do with the Clintons. Worse, if you have anything to do with them, you just might be dead.

This New Yorker article excerpted here offers some historical background on how the FBI operates. It’s a good piece coming from a liberal publication.

New Yorker

On Friday, James Comey, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, acting independently of Attorney General Loretta Lynch, sent a letter to Congress saying that the F.B.I. had discovered e-mails that were potentially relevant to the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private server. Coming less than two weeks before the Presidential election, Comey’s decision to make public new evidence that may raise additional legal questions about Clinton was contrary to the views of the Attorney General, according to a well-informed Administration official. Lynch expressed her preference that Comey follow the department’s longstanding practice of not commenting on ongoing investigations, and not taking any action that could influence the outcome of an election, but he said that he felt compelled to do otherwise.

Comey’s decision is a striking break with the policies of the Department of Justice, according to current and former federal legal officials. Comey, who is a Republican appointee of President Obama, has a reputation for integrity and independence, but his latest action is stirring an extraordinary level of concern among legal authorities, who see it as potentially affecting the outcome of the Presidential and congressional elections.

“You don’t do this,” one former senior Justice Department official exclaimed. “It’s aberrational. It violates decades of practice.” The reason, according to the former official, who asked not to be identified because of ongoing cases involving the department, “is because it impugns the integrity and reputation of the candidate, even though there’s no finding by a court, or in this instance even an indictment.”

Traditionally, the Justice Department has advised prosecutors and law enforcement to avoid any appearance of meddling in the outcome of elections, even if it means holding off on pressing cases. One former senior official recalled that Janet Reno, the Attorney General under Bill Clinton, “completely shut down” the prosecution of a politically sensitive criminal target prior to an election. “She was adamant—anything that could influence the election had to go dark,” the former official said.

Four years ago, then Attorney General Eric Holder formalized this practice in a memo to all Justice Department employees. The memo warned that, when handling political cases, officials “must be particularly sensitive to safeguarding the Department’s reputation for fairness, neutrality, and nonpartisanship.” To guard against unfair conduct, Holder wrote, employees facing questions about “the timing of charges or overt investigative steps near the time of a primary or general election” should consult with the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division.

The F.B.I. director is an employee of the Justice Department, and is covered by its policies. But when asked whether Comey had followed these guidelines and consulted with the Public Integrity Section, or with any other department officials, Kevin Lewis, a deputy director of public affairs for the Justice Department, said, “We have no comment on the matter.”

Read the rest of the article by clicking on the link to the New Yorker, above.

CNN and other liberals are already calling for FBI Director James Comey to be fired:

Another view:

3 thoughts on “In July Democrats Were Praising the FBI Director: Now They Want His Head on a Post (Fired)

  1. There is something not right with this revelation, at this time. There could be political motive for this as I believe that Comey s still in the tank for clinton. Clintons have a habit of putting out false accusations that can be refuted and then by association the rest, the more damaging accusations can also be shrugged off. I hope that he has come to his senses but I just can’t take him seriously after the server debacle.

    • Some have suggested that Comey put this out to take attention off a big damaging new Wikileaks dump. I personally like to consider all alternative theories about puzzling behavior and then look for evidence to support the strongest theory.

      Others say that Comey was facing a rebellion within the FBI.

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s