Banning assault weapons is based on a fraudulent premise. But that’s not going to stop Hillary Clinton from doing a gun grab.
When Hillary says that no one needs a so-called assault weapon what she’s really saying is that the hard tyranny that she and her (((supporters))) desire would be so much easier to accomplish with a disarmed population.
Although liberals never listen to facts, here they are anyway.
The FBI’s 2015 Uniform Crime Report (UCR) shows nearly three times more people were stabbed or hacked to death than were killed with rifles and shotguns combined.
Breitbart News previously reported this UCR shows nearly twice as many people were beaten to death with “hands, fists, feet, etc.” in 2015 than were killed with rifles of any kind.
According to the FBI, the number of people killed with rifles and shotguns in 2015 totals approximately 548. Nearly three times that many, approximately 1,573, were stabbed or hacked to death.
These facts are especially interesting when you consider that the Democrats emerged from the Sandy Hook Elementary attack with a plan to ban numerous rifles, politically categorized “assault weapons,” and certain shotguns as well. But these efforts are misplaced, at best, if the FBI’s numbers are to be trusted.
While Democrats are pushing an “assault weapons” ban that covers certain shotguns, more than three times as many Americans were killed via stabbing or hacking than from all types of rifles and shotguns combined. And nearly twice as many Americans were simply beaten to death with “hands, fists, feet, etc.” than were shot and killed with rifles of any kind.
They’ve fooled the public into thinking that a military style weapon has no business being in private hands. Once the assault rifle is banned, then more weapons (and ammo) will be taxed, banned, and regulated out of existence. An unarmed population is then at their mercy. That’s why there’s a Second Amendment.