Illusion of Democracy Shattered: ‘Google has power to control elections, can shift millions of votes to Clinton’

google jews control usa

It’s interesting that a Jewish researcher confirms what we already knew: The System is rigged. By Jews.

Excerpt from

People trust the “unbiased” internet search giant Google so much it can actually influence up to 10 million undecided voters to choose Hillary Clinton for president, prominent US psychologist and author Robert Epstein told RT following years of research.
Despite being a supporter of the Democratic presidential nominee, Dr. Epstein believes Google’s unchecked algorithm of placing one candidate over the other in search results constitutes a “threat to democracy.”

RT:Robert, how did you find that out Google is probably in cahoots with the Clinton campaign?

RE: Well I didn’t find out that they were necessarily supporting Hillary Clinton, that’s not what I found at first. First through several years of research, I found that they had the power to control elections, the power to shift the votes. So, that was more than four years of experimental research with more than 10,000 people in 39 countries.

So, we established through some very careful experiments that by favoring one candidate in search rankings Google can shift a lot of votes. More than 20 percent of undecided voters overall, and in some demographic groups up to 80 percent of undecided voters. People trust search rankings so much that if one candidate is favored in search rankings that shifts peoples’ votes.

Now, more recently, many people have established that Google has a very close relationship with Hillary Clinton. That didn’t come from my research, that came from all kinds of investigative research by many people.

RT:Are you going to take a look at Facebook and Twitter as well? It looks like social media play an even bigger role than televised debates.

RE: Well we know now that Facebook has the power to shift about 600,000 votes to Hillary Clinton on Election Day with no one knowing this is occurring. All they have to do is send out “Go out and vote” reminders to Hillary Clinton’s supporters but not to Trump’s supporters. That would cause a lot of people to vote who would otherwise stay home. So yes, we’ve looked at Facebook, we’ve looked at Twitter. But again, Facebook can shift 600,000 votes, Google can shift somewhere between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes.

RT:Have you been able to find abnormal search results by Google in some other countries intended to influence the outcome of elections?

RE: We haven’t look carefully at too many countries. We’ve looked at the UK election in 2015, we looked at the national election in India, at the Lok Sabha election in 2014. What we do know is that it is the nature of Google’s algorithm to put one candidate ahead of another. That happens automatically. That happens, as Google would say, organically. So, this means that Google’s algorithm has probably been determining the outcomes of close elections around the world for many years, probably actually controlling the winner in as many as 25 percent of the national elections of the world.

RT:What do you think about this threat of big data? Do you think Google and other search engines analyses all search results by an individual for a good purpose?

RE: Well, big data at the moment is a threat. It’s a threat to democracy, at least as we have it in the United States, it’s a threat to human freedom, it’s a threat to civil liberties. This is mainly because the technologies are very new, and new means of control, of surveillance, of manipulation are being developed which at the moment are not regulated – they’re not covered by any laws or regulations. So, the problem is that these technologies have developed quickly, and we have not developed systems for monitoring these technologies, we’ve not developed systems for regulating these technologies. Obviously, we must do so.

As we’ve said before, the U.S. is not a democracy, but an oligarchy. It’s a small club and none of us are members. We just rubber stamp the oligarchy when we vote for one of its two preselected candidates.

Think about it.

thinking ape gorilla

#NeverTrump Forces Ratcheting Up Calls to Fire Comey Over Friday’s Letter to Congress

Daily News Title:

FBI mad bomber James Comey needs to resign

Six foot eight inch tall FBI Director James Comey may need that height to keep his head above the fray that’s brewing in Washington among Democrats.

The push to force Comey to resign or be fired is gathering steam. You know in your heart that Hillary Clinton’s campaign team is behind this move.

Which is ironic because in July when Comey delivered his message that no prosecutor would indict Hillary Clinton in spite of her reckless security lapses, Democrats were eager to praise Comey and move on.

The falsehoods in this opinion piece are easy to expose, which I do after the op-ed.

New York Daily News

FBI Director James Comey’s democracy-bending decision to inform America, 11 days before its presidential election, that the bureau is digging into a trove of additional emails demands the highest condemnation. And he must resign.

President Obama must order Attorney General Loretta Lynch to take the case out of Comey’s hands and to fully report the facts as they are known.

Without any base of knowledge, Comey let loose combustible information that could improperly and groundlessly decide the election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

Comey has betrayed both the country and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. In secrecy that is necessary to protect the innocent, the FBI searches for evidence of criminal wrongdoing.

The agency goes public only in court, only in conjunction with Department of Justice prosecutors who judge the bureau’s evidence strong enough to file charges.

Never does the FBI announce the discovery of material that may or may not be evidence. Comey’s breach of standards is all the more egregious because he has already said that “no reasonable prosecutor” could charge Clinton with national security crimes based on her mishandling of email communications.

It defies belief that the newly discovered emails will justify prosecution.

Even worse, Comey still has no idea what they contain. Little wonder senior Justice Department officials strongly objected to the director informing Congress at the time and in the manner he did, pointing to policies that bar the agency from meddling in elections and talking about current criminal investigations.

There are apparently some 650,000 emails in question, and no chance in hell the bureau can bring clarity on them before Nov. 8.

FBI agents found them in early October, on a computer connected to the investigation of former Rep. Anthony Weiner’s sexting. Yet for nearly a month, they kicked around the implications and sucked thumbs on getting a warrant before finally bringing the issue to the top boss, who then, despite massive lingering uncertainty about what it all might mean, madly detonated his bomb Friday.

In fact, at the time of the Comey letter, the Justice Department and the FBI had yet even to obtain permission from a judge to search the emails in question. That warrant is finally now in hand.

The agency still has no clue how many of those are duplicates of emails they’ve already seen. Could be every last one.

Comey, in his Friday letter, communicated none of this. He even admitted that the finding might be insignificant — while going ahead with the earth-shattering move of informing the world of it. The director’s internal letter to his agency, which surfaced later Friday, made matters worse, admitting “we (at the FBI) don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations” and “there is significant risk of being misunderstood.”

You think?

Fully aware of how little he knows and of how much damage he was doing, the FBI director unconscionably personified a weapon of national mass destruction.

The New York Daily News is a propaganda arm of the Clinton campaign. This op-ed could easily have been written by a Clinton operative.

The false premise upon which this editorial is based lies in the fact that the FBI informed CONGRESS of the reopening of an investigation that Congress was a part of. Comey’s duty was/is to Congress (and America), not to Hillary Clinton. He owes her nothing, just as the FBI owes Donald Trump nothing. But Trump has not been under investigation. Hillary has.

A fair editiorial might call for the FBI to expedite it’s investigation while blaming the person at fault for the American public’s lack of trust in Hillary Clinton.

That person would of course be Hillary Clinton. Her own sleazy greed has done her in. Again.

Boo hoo!

smilelaugh tears of joy

And more evidence that the strategy is to get Comey’s head on a post.

The left is also spewing the falsehood that Comey violated the Hatch Act. I have a post further down the homepage explaining the Hatch Act nonsense, which was raised by Senator Harry Reid, a Democrat.

Obese Latina Left with Loose Skin After Massive Weight Loss


You may want to avert your eyes as you scroll through or past this post. What has been seen cannot be unseen.

You have been warned!

Daily Mail

A slimmer is raising money to have her excess skin removed after extreme weight loss left her with a ‘body of a 90-year-old’.

Dionne Gomez, 28, from Chicago was left with loose skin that causes rashes on her body after dropping 130lbs (9st 4lbs) after a vertical sleeve gastrectomy.

‘They did warn that excess skin was a possible but I thought that at my age my skin would just bounce back,’ she said.

‘I have it all around my body, from my neck down – it looks like a 90 year old’s body.

‘There’s a lot of sagging skin on my breast you can pull. I am still learning this new body.’

saggy skin breasts

Pull on her breast, she says? Thanks, but no thanks. I think most fellas would rather not pull on anything that’s a part of this lady’s body, which SHE described as that of a 90 year old.

Dionne used to embrace her curves until last year she realised her 300lbs (21st 6lbs) frame was affecting her health.

When she was diagnosed with pre-diabetes and sleep apnoea in 2015, Dionne decided to get a vertical sleeve gastrectomy after other weight loss attempts failed.

Mexican men like those “curves” and every one of those 300 pounds. Maybe this lady had started looking for a white boyfriend? It’s just a speculation.

The lady looks quite fetching in a dress. I do have to note that many nonwhite women seem to want to be blondes, however. Her hair color does match her bronze skin tone though.

Now, brace yourself for a couple of “after” pictures showing that loose skin that milady is complaining about.


There are several other pictures of Gomez at the linked story. She looks quite shapely and attractive in clothing. However, her saggy skin pictures reveal what clothing conceals.

So, at the risk of sounding like a vulgarian, I’ll simply say that you don’t really know a lady until you’ve seen her without makeup and without clothing.

Maybe a first date to a nude beach would help both parties decide whether the relationship was going anywhere.

One more thing. She’s got the money for fancy clothes, manicures, makeup, hair styling, and tattoos. But the story goes on to tell us that she wants someone to pay for her skin surgeries.

Maybe she could cut back on the luxuries and save her money to pay for it herself. It’s certainly not our obligation as taxpayers to pretty her up.

Britain’s Prince Harry Rumored to be Dating Mulatto American Actress

Price Harry of Britain is a race traitor. In that sense, he’s also a traitor to his heritage and to the indigenous peoples of Britain.


The Sunday Express said the actress has already been introduced to the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and “fitted in straight away”.

Kensington Palace said they did not comment on private matters, and Ms Markle’s representatives did not return a request for comment.

A source told the newspaper the pair were “taking it a step at a time”, adding: “He’s happier than he’s been for many years.”

Bookmakers on Sunday said they were suspending betting on a royal wedding for Prince Harry, having previously offered odds of 12-1 that he would announce his engagement this year, and 5-1 that he would tie the knot in 2017.

Prince Harry has a royal duty to marry a royal woman. If he fails to exercise that duty, then the least he could do would be to marry a British woman who can pass on his genes for red hair.

Gingers are going extinct. Every ginger should think about that and act accordingly.

Prince Harry can thank me later, but doing a quick Internet image search turned up this unidentified beauty, who would be a far better match for him than an American half-breed. Go for her, Harry!

red hair beauty

Senator Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is Threatening FBI Director with Termination for Reopening Hillary Email Investigation

The letter as you see it is genuine. You can read it at Harry Reid’s Senate website if you like.

You can read the story at the Huffington Post, which unlike the New York Times and Washington Post has no paywall.

U.S. Legal explains that removal from the job is the maximum penalty for violating the Hatch Act.

The big news here–the bombshell if you will–is Reid’s claim that Trump is tied in with Russia. Haven’t we heard that before?

Uh, yes, we have!

So, Harry, tell us what that explosive information is about Trump’s ties to Russia since you seem to know so much.

CBS News plays this story straight, noting that Comey had promised Congress to keep it informed of any new information that might pertain to the Clinton email scandal.

No one in the mainstream media is bringing up Democrats praise for Comey when he recommended in July that Hillary Clinton not be prosecuted. But we can remember it and note the hypocrisy in Reid’s letter.

Not Pretty! Leaked Footage Shows Huma and Weiner Together When Sexting Scandal Broke

This video offers a fascinating look at the interaction between the woman who was going to be your Secretary of State and her so-called husband.

There’s no way that this marriage is real, but Huma’s pouting and barely concealed anger is. Watch the short video and see for yourself.

Published on Aug 23, 2016

[LEAKED] Footage from campaign office of Huma Abedin and her husband Anthony Weiner when news of his sexting scandal first broke. How does she react after finding out her significant other had been sexting behind her back with 22 yr. olds? She asks “what’s your press statement going to be?” with zero emotion.

Original footage found in Weiner the documentary.

Giant “Hillary for Prison” Sign at World Series