San Francisco Wants to Remove “Slaveholder” Names from Schools–Washington, Jefferson, and Monroe


All of that famous fog in San Francisco must fog up the brain cells.

It’s ridiculous beyond the pale to equate a military leader who gave you a country to a mediocre nonwhite poet. But race replacement is in the pleasant looking Matt Haney’s mind.

I have no idea how such a load of white guilt was placed upon his young shoulders, but he really needs to understand equivalency. White male who risked his life and his wealth to bring freedom to the colonies is not and never will be equivalent to a black female poet whose wordsmithing skills leave much to be desired.

Unless he’s either trolling us to get a rise out of us or he’s got an agenda that includes white genocide. Because when you obliterate a people’s history, it is genocide.

I would chalk up Matt Haney as another leftist loon, but I predicted this would be happening. And soon Washington, D. C. will be renamed Martin Luther King City. And so forth.


George Washington, the guy on the quarter, could soon be facing the ax in San Francisco as surely as his fabled cherry tree.

The president of the San Francisco school board thinks it’s time to consider renaming schools that bear the names of slave owners — including Washington and his friends and fellow presidents Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe.


Board President Matt Haney said Tuesday he will introduce a resolution before the board this month to clarify the rules for renaming San Francisco schools with an eye to encouraging the communities at Washington High School, along with Jefferson and Monroe elementary schools, to consider whether they want to make a change.

Another school that might want to think about a new name, Haney said, is Francis Scott Key Elementary School — which was named for the slave-owning lyricist of “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

“We need to have a conversation about this,” Haney said. “Especially at George Washington High School. We have school names in San Francisco that are not relevant or meaningful or inspire pride.”

Yes, Haney said, the name Washington — also shared by a state, the U.S. capital and a likeness on a dollar bill — might very well be such a name.

“I would not want to speak for the school community,” Haney said. “It’s a very tricky issue. I’m trying to stay away from condemning anyone. It was a very different time back then. But slavery was America’s original sin.”

Under Haney’s proposal, schools would be encouraged to form committees consisting of students, parents, teachers and administrators to study the issue. If the committee favored a name change, the school board would consider it. The board has the ultimate authority to change a school name.

Were Washington High to shed its name, Haney said, it might be a good idea to replace it with that of poet Maya Angelou, who attended Washington.

maya a

If slavery was the original sin, the second sin was not sending the Negro back to Africa. It’s not too late to fix that.

7 thoughts on “San Francisco Wants to Remove “Slaveholder” Names from Schools–Washington, Jefferson, and Monroe

  1. George Washington has a Jewish looking conk in that picture.

    This Matt Haney looks very young for such a responsible post. I will take odds of 10 to 1 that the man is a butt bandit. Probably almost compulsory in San Francisco to get a senior job in educating children.

    “But slavery was America’s original sin.” This is bullshit. Slavery was obviously in place before the revolution, so how can Americans be blamed for British policy? Maybe the Original Sin was revolting against the British. This massive blunder resulted in new imports of IQ65 black slaves continuing in America for 35 years longer than the British would have allowed. Britain outlawed all slavery worldwide in their Empire during the 1820s. In addition the US revolution resulted in the current massive USA population by dredging all the slums and ghettos of Europe and anywhere else that had surplus white people to get rid of. The USA biggest Sin of all was allowing a huge number of Jews to enter and then to totally dominate and steal the wealth of the entire Nation. British white countries like Canada, Australia and New Zealand avoided this huge Sin of mass immigration until about 1965. The sudden change was due to the Jew power in the USA being so overwhelming by the mid sixties that all foreign white Nations, even right wing ones, dared not oppose Jew policies on non white Immigration. Probably a lot of white politicians were bribed in those days to go along and against the best interests of their own nation, i.e. traitors.

    • Before posting this I tried to find Haney’s email address to include but couldn’t. I was also looking for lgbt activist evidence but found none. Still, I think you’re right. He is surely a queer.

      Haney’s crack about “original sin” is as you suggest, nonsense. He’s pulled a Christian concept out and distorted it, which he should be called on. Anyway, the Indians throughout the New World already practiced slavery before the white man gained any control over America.

      I did look at Haney’s Twitter and left a reply to him there. This idea is not taking off in any big way and so i mocked him.

  2. If slavery was the original sin, the second sin was not sending the Negro back to Africa. It’s not too late to fix that.??? Don’t bloody forget to put on that ship the cuckservative SJW as well ??

    • The SJWs could be the crew chaining the Coons to the deck. They will tell the darkies “This is for your own good. Life is so much better in Africa”.

Leave a Reply. Comments Policy Forbids Insulting Other Commenters.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s