Muslim Argues to Australian Court that Raping 10 Year Old Boys is OK


One of our Muslim friends had a sexual emergency and relieved himself using a little boy as his treatment. Then he argued to the court that it was OK where he came from.

Excerpt from the Daily Mail

A refugee who raped a ten-year-old boy has claimed he did not know sexually assaulting the child was wrong as it was ‘culturally acceptable’ in his homeland.

Mufiz Rahaman told Sydney’s Downing Centre Court raping children was not seen as morally wrong in his native Myanmar when he pleaded guilty to the aggravated sexual assault of a 10-year-old refugee on Wednesday, the Daily Telegraph reported.

The 20-year-old and his young victim are both stateless Rohingya Muslims – a group of people considered illegal immigrants from Bangladesh by the Buddhist-majority in Myanmar – who came to Australia to flee religious persecution.

he court heard Rahaman preyed on the young boy while he was living with a group of refugees, including his father, at a vacant RSL club in Lakemba, a suburb in Sydney’s south west, on January 8, 2015.

According to documents tendered to the court, he crept into the child’s bedroom – which he shared with his father – as he slept and took off the boy’s underpants.

He then raped the boy, who arrived in Australia in 2013, while his father was in another room preparing lunch.

Rahaman tell the boy: ‘I’ll give you money for this.’

‘My father will hit me,’ the boy responded.

The boy’s dad stormed into the room and found Rahaman lying on top of his son who was face down on the bed with his pants around his knees.
He asked: ‘What are you doing to this little boy? You’re an adult.’

The paedophile denied doing anything to his son but the young boy told his father he had been raped.

Rahaman, who came to Australia in 2012, was arrested two days later after another family member reported the incident to police.
He submitted to a DNA test which was matched with semen found on the victim.

According to the Daily Telegraph, Rahaman told the court he had been a victim of sexual abuse as a child before he moved to Australia.

Judge Andrew Scotting said Rahaman failed to understand his actions would ‘physically’ and ‘psychologically damage’ his young victim.

He also said Rahaman, who insisted he thought sexual assault was not seen as morally wrong in his homeland, had not accepted responsibility for his actions and demonstrated a ‘lack of morality’, according to the Daily Telegraph.

‘There is a need for specific deterrence … The offence appears to have been (viewed) as being culturally acceptable conduct in the offender’s childhood,’ Judge Scotting said.

Judge Scotting sentenced Rahaman to five years jail with a non-parole period of three years.

The 20-year-old will be eligible for parole in March 2018 – but the judge noted he had a moderate to high risk of re offending.

Why not send him back after he’s paroled? The judge admitted that he’s probably going to do it again.

13 thoughts on “Muslim Argues to Australian Court that Raping 10 Year Old Boys is OK

  1. Pingback: Muslim Argues to Australian Court that Raping 10 Year Old Boys is OK — saboteur365 | behindertvertriebentessarzblog

    Islam allows a man to have intercourse with his slave woman, whether he has a wife or wives or he is not married…Whoever regards that as haraam is a sinner who is going against the consensus of the scholars.
    “Ruling on having intercourse with a slave woman when one has a wife”
    Islam Q&A, Fatwa No. 10382, November 24, 2005.

    Islam Question and Answer
    General Supervisor: Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid
    Mon 18 Raj 1437 – 25 April 2016

    – Principles of Fiqh » Jurisprudence and Islamic Rulings » Transactions » Slavery.
    20802: Intercourse with a slave woman is not regarded as zina (adultery)
    Hadith 3.718 : I saw Abu Said and asked him about coitus interrupts. Abu Said said, “We went with Allah’s Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Bani Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the ‘Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah’s Apostle (whether it was permissible). He said, “It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come into existence.”
    Does this mean that the Companions of the Prophet (SAW) didn’t commit adultery when they practiced ‘azl with the captive girls?.
    Published Date: 2002-12-27
    Praise be to Allaah.

    This hadeeth was narrated by al-Bukhaari (2542) from Ibn Muhayreez who said: I saw Abu Sa’eed (may Allaah be pleased with him) and I asked him. He said: We went out with the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) on the campaign of Banu al-Mustaliq, and we captured some prisoners from among the Arabs. We desired women and the period of abstention was hard for us, and we wanted to engage in ‘azl (coitus interruptus). We asked the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and he said, “There is no point in doing that, for there is no soul which Allaah has decreed should exist until the Day of Resurrection but it will come into existence.”

    According to another report, They captured some female prisoners and wanted to be intimate with them without them becoming pregnant. They asked the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) about ‘azl and he said, “There is no point in doing that, for Allaah has decreed who should be created until the Day of Resurrection.”
    This hadeeth was also narrated by Muslim (1438), whose version says: We captured some women of the Arabs and we had been abstinent for a long time; and we wanted to be able to sell them, but we wanted to engage in intimacy with coitus interruptus. We said, “Shall we do that when the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is among us without asking him about it?” So we asked the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and he said, “There is no point in doing that, for Allaah has not decreed that any soul should be created until the Day of Resurrection but it will come into existence.”
    It may be understood from the hadeeth that those who wanted to engage in ‘azl did so for two reasons: they did not want the women to become pregnant, and they wanted to be able to sell them – if a slave woman got pregnant she could not be sold.
    It may also be understood that ‘azl (coitus interruptus) does not change anything. If Allaah decrees that a child should be born, water (semen) will come out before the man realizes it.

    Allaah has permitted intimacy with a slave woman if the man owns her. This is not regarded as adultery as suggested in the question. Allaah says, describing the believers (interpretation of the meaning):
    “those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts)
    Except from their wives or (the slaves) that their right hands possess,__ for then, they are free from blame”
    [al-Mu’minoon 23:5]
    What is meant by “those whom their right hands possess” is slave women or concubines. See also question no. 10382, 12562.
    Once this is understood, it should be noted that what is suggested in the question, that this was zina, never occurred to the Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them). What they were asking about was the ruling on practicing ‘azl with the slave women whom they had acquired in the course of jihad.
    Moreover ‘azl may be done with a concubine or with a wife, if she agrees to that. See question no. 11885.
    And Allaah knows best.
    Islam Q&A

    Muhammad and his followers fought many battles. Some were offensive some were defensive. Following a victory the Muslims would take captives, or prisoners of war. Muhammad would usually distribute the captives, both male and female, as slaves to his soldiers. Islam provides some basic rights to its slaves but these rights are limited. Naturally, the rights or demands of the slave owner were greater than those of the slaves.
    Female slaves were used for primarily for work. But they also provided another service to their male masters ….

    FROM THE QURAN – 70:22-30
    “Not so the worshipers, who are steadfast in prayer, who set aside a due portion of their wealth for the beggar and for the deprived, who truly believe in the Day of Reckoning and dread the punishment of their Lord (for none is secure from the punishment of their Lord); who restrain their carnal desire (save with their wives and their slave girls, for these are lawful to them: he that lusts after other than these is a transgressor…”
    This verse shows that Muslim men were allowed to have sex with their wives (of course) and their slave girls.

    FROM THE QURAN – 23:5,6
    “…who restrain their carnal desires (except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them…”
    Again, Muslim men were allowed to have sexual relations with their wives and slave girls.

    FROM THE QURAN – 4:24
    “And all married women are forbidden unto you save those captives whom your right hand possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. (Muhammad Pickthall’s English translation of the Quran).
    This verse is one verse out of a long passage dealing with who Muslim men can marry or have sexual relations with. The phrase “captives whom your right hand possess”, means the slave girls Muslim men own.
    Note also that this passage deals with more than just marriage. In Sahih Muslim volume 2, #3432, the background context for this Quranic verse is given. It relates to the events at Autus, and it permitted the Muslim men to have sex with their female slaves.

    FROM THE QURAN – 33:50
    “Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty;…”
    This verse is for Muhammad. Supposedly, God allows Muhammad to have sex with his slave girls.
    These verses establish that it was permissible for Muslim men to have sex with female slaves.

    Muhammad had sex with a slave girl named Mariyam. He probably also had sex with another slave girl of his – Rayhana.
    Mariyam was a Christian slave girl and she was given to Muhammad as a gift by the governor of Egypt. Muhammad got her pregnant and she gave birth to a son. Afterwards Muhammad married her. The son died 18 months later.

    In the “Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir”, mention is made of Mariyah. On page 151, it says
    “He [the Lord of Alexandria] presented to the prophet Mariyah, her sister Sirin, a donkey and a mule which was white….The apostle of Allah liked Mariyah who was of white complexion and curly hair and pretty…. Then he cohabited with Mariyah as a handmaid and sent her to his property which he had acquired from Banu al-Nadir.”
    The note for the word “handmaid” says “Handmaids gained the status of wedded wives if they bore children. They were called “umm walad” and became free.
    This story is also supported by Tabari’s History, volume 39, page 194. Here is the quote: (my words are in ( ) parenthesis).
    “He (Muhammad) used to visit her (Mariyam) there and ordered her to veil herself, [but] he had intercourse with her by virtue of her being his property.”
    The note (845) on this says, “That is, Mariyah was ordered to veil herself as did the Prophet’s wives, but he did not marry her.”
    We see that Muhammad had sex with his female slave without marrying her, that it was legal in Islam for Muslim men to have sex with their female slaves. They were after all, the Muslim man’s property. Although the slave girls had some human rights, when it came to satisfying their master’s desires they had to comply.

    When a young Muslim tells his father he wants to get married, his father tells him to “come out back & I will teach you a few tricks”!
    He cuts a branch off a tree & gathers a pile of rocks.
    “Now son, on your wedding night, when she comes on all “lovey dovey”, give her the Mother of All Beatings”. She will begin to cry,
    “But I didn’t do anything wrong”!
    But you tell her, “That’s in case you EVER think of doing anything wrong”!
    The father tells him, “Son, in Islam we marry the VAGINA, THE PUSSY & its to be always ready for us to “play” with:
    Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri
    w45.0 A WIFE’S MARITAL OBLIGATIONS (from m5.I, end)
    w45.1 (Abu Ishaq Shirazi:) A woman is not obliged to serve her husband by baking, grinding flour, cooking, washing, or any other kind of service, because the marriage contract entails, for her part, ONLY THAT SHE LET HIM ENJOY HER SEXUALLY, and she is not obligated to do other thar. that. (A: Rather, it is considered sunna in our school for the wife to do the housework, and the husband (who is obliged to support her) to earn the living, since this is how the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) divided the work between Fatima and ‘Ali (Allah be well pleased with them)) (alMuhadhdhab fi fiqh ai-Imam al-Shafi’i (yI25), 2.68).

    w45.2 (Nahlawi:) The wife’s serving her husband at home-by cooking, cleaning, and baking bread-is religiously obligatory for her, and if she does not, she is committing a sin, though it is not something that she may be forced to do by the court (al-Durar al-mubaha fi ai-hazr wa ai-ibaha

    “Now son, if you tell her you want to “play” with PUSSY, then she has to drop everything, especially her knickers & get up them stairs”.
    “If she doesn’t, then give her a couple of wallops of the stick & that will teach her manners.”
    “And what are the rocks for Dad?”
    “Well son, there might come a time when she feels like running away & you have to defend your HONOR. This is were the rocks come in handy.
    Dig a big hole in the backyard; put her into a sack & hop the rocks of her head. She won’t run away again”!
    “Women have a knack of having a “headache”, when you want your “iron”!
    “Well, just show her the stick & rocks & tell her,
    “I’ll give you all the headaches you want, if you don’t behave yourself!
    Get up them stairs & warm the bed. I’m feeling horny just thinking about it”!


  5. “According to the Daily Telegraph, Rahaman told the court he had been a victim of sexual abuse as a child before he moved to Australia.”

    I expect this to be the case in Europe or other parts as well. They’re just doing the same thing that happened to them. Happens all too often.

  6. Pingback: Muslim Argues to Australian Court that Raping 10 Year Old Boys is OK | zooforyou

  7. “ohingya Muslims – a group of people considered illegal immigrants from Bangladesh by the Buddhist-majority in Myanmar”

    Note word “considered”. To the Holy (((MSM))) anyone can invade another country no questions asked – except Israel, defended by a Holy Wall.

    Muslims are scum and none should be allowed to enter white countries, or any non Muslim county such as Burma.
    Do the Burmese have no rights? Are they now an honorary white country?

    5 years in jail with 3 years non parole is about one quarter the penalty any white man would have got, the victim was only 12 years old. Laws are mostly for whites. Non whites get a “get out of jail early” card.

      • Australian criminal justice is administered by hand wringing leftie judges who are of course white. They are paid by the tax payer, as are the jailers and police, and prosecutors. Tinted people are good for business for such people. The defendants are almost always non white. Victims are most often whites. Strangely, if the victim is non white as in this case, this helps the tinted perpetrator. There is a little bit of racism by the Leftie judge, as though black victims do not matter, as long as the attacker is also dark.Eg this homosexual rape is a “cultural” thing so not too bad as long as the boy is also from the same Tribe.
        White on black is the heinous crime with huge penalties, the only such crime.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s